Wi-Fi Edition: Can An iPad Replace Your iPhone?

A recent survey of new iPad owners sounding off on Twitter revealed that a whopping 26 percent were unhappy about the fact that the device couldn’t replace their iPhone. That got us thinking: What would it be like to spend a day with only the iPad?
With that challenge in mind, we (mostly) stuck our trusty iPhone 3GS away for a full day and “made do” with only the Wi-Fi model of iPad. As it turns out, it’s not as difficult as you might expect. We have yet to find any iPhone apps that don’t also run on the iPad -- even seemingly more complex ones such as SlingPlayer Mobile or Skype work just fine -- so most of the iPhone functionality can already be duplicated just by installing the same apps you already use.
It’s Not a Phone, Silly
The biggest trick was replicating the cell phone part of the equation -- you know, the thing that makes the iPhone a phone to begin with. This would be a particular challenge for an iPad that only offers Wi-Fi wireless connectivity. (For comparison, we’ll be returning to this project later in the month when our 3G-equipped model arrives, to compare experiences on both.)
For the phone part of the experiment, we installed four apps: Skype, Fring, Truphone for iPad and VoiceCentral Black Swan, the Google Voice “weblication” that we first examined back in January, while it was still in beta. (It’s since available to all in both free and paid versions.) Since our testing place has ditched the landline, we had to do a little bit of cheating, using Black Swan to initiate outgoing calls and then pick up the iPhone to actually carry out the conversation.Of course, outgoing calls are not really the problem -- any one of the above apps can rise to that challenge, and in the case of Skype, fring and Truphone, you can actually hold a conversation on the iPad itself, both using the built-in mic & speakers as well as through a set of earbuds plugged into the device. Incoming calls are only possible on Skype while the app is open, so that’s no good unless you’re expecting a call at a certain time, although Fring at least adds push notifications of incoming calls via Skype (but truthfully, they don’t work all that well). Truphone is the only app of the bunch to be iPad native at this writing, and it worked as well as the iPhone version does.
We didn’t have a Skype In number to test with, otherwise we could have routed incoming calls to the iPhone to that number and made things work a little more efficiently. However, the fact that the current iPad only works under Wi-Fi means that the minute you leave home (or a coffee shop, McDonald’s, et al), it won’t matter anyway. So as far as the iPad replacing your iPhone for actual calls, it’s a mixed bag: Just fine for outgoing in the right conditions, mostly stinks for incoming.
Message in an iPad
Next we turned our focus to instant messaging. Thankfully, AOL was front & center at launch with AIM for iPad, and since that’s our primary IM service to begin with, we signed off from our iPhone’s standard IM client, BeejiveIM, rather than cheat and install it on both devices. The day we tested was not a particularly busy one for IM’ing to begin with, but AIM for iPad did the job just fine -- again, while we were within a Wi-Fi signal. We were able to access and use other IM services through Fring and Truphone, including Yahoo! and Google Talk, so those experiences were mostly unchanged from the iPhone, other than having always-on connectivity.
Text messaging is another area where the iPhone is quite capable, and not only because of AT&T’s own SMS and MMS services -- there are literally tons of apps that provide cheap (or even free) SMS capabilities. Thankfully, the iPad can replicate some of that, thanks to the free, universal textPlus app. textPlus even allows you to receive push notifications while the app is closed, and you have the option of having those messages routed to your iPhone.VoiceCentral Black Swan can also be commissioned for both incoming & outgoing SMS messages using Google Voice, but there’s no way to know if you’ve received a new SMS without actually opening the app or setting up Google Voice to forward an e-mail notification. Because Black Swan isn’t a true app created in the iPhone OS SDK, it sadly can’t access push notifications. You’re limited to only receiving such text messages while the device is within range of Wi-Fi anyway, so the iPhone keeps the advantage in this department unless you go with the e-mail notification option.
E-Mail Me Happy
Outside of phone calls and messaging, the iPad quite successfully replaced our iPhone 3GS over the course of a full day. Thanks to Apple’s MobileMe service, our e-mail was pushed to the iPad in the same way -- and for whatever reason, it was actually faster at doing so! (The iPad push would chime first, followed by the iPhone a few seconds later.) Ditto for calendars, contacts and bookmarks.
Non-push e-mail accounts such as a few IMAP accounts set up on both devices were a different story. Those were fetched whenever the Mail app was actually opened, which was a little bit nerve-wracking after being used to having the PushMail app installed on our iPhone. As the name implies, PushMail uses push notifications to notify you the moment that new e-mail arrives in your inbox (it actually forwards messages from your IMAP account, which then triggers the push notification).
We cheated a bit and left the iPhone powered on in our pocket for part of the day so we could hear when PushMail was doing its job; of course, we could just as easily have installed the app on the iPad as well. But truthfully, when the iPhone was completely off, it was a refreshing change of pace not to hear the PushMail notifications going off so frequently from several different e-mail accounts.
Everybody’s Goin’ Surfin’
When it came to web browsing, there was simply no comparison: The iPad is a more pleasant experience in almost every way. It’s not just about the bigger screen, either: Having the ability to turn on the bookmarks bar so the Mobile Safari emulates its desktop counterpart is a dream come true. You also get the full website rather than switching to a mobile version by default, since the iPad’s Mobile Safari identifies itself to a website differently than the iPhone’s does -- although it might be nice to have the option of accessing the mobile version by default in some cases.
Our only real quibble with the iPad’s version of Safari: It takes some getting used to going to the top of the screen in order to go forward or back a page, open a new window or add a bookmark after almost three years of having those functions at the bottom of the screen on the iPhone. Note to Apple, it might be nice to make that a little more uniform now that so many of us have both devices, don’tcha think?One big downer is the lack of a camera on the iPad. Come on, Apple, it’s a total bummer. Once or twice during the day, we wanted to snap a quick picture or video of something, but had to remember that oops, we couldn’t -- we were supposed to be living a whole day iPhone-free. While we’re sure that a camera will be implemented in the next iteration of the device, for now the iPad is an epic fail on this front. (Yeah, we know there’s even an app for that now, but it still requires an iPhone to be the eyes for it.)
Yes, Virginia, the iPad Might Replace an iPhone
In almost every other way, the iPad more than replaced the iPhone for a day. The bigger screen made watching videos, listening to music and almost every other task a complete joy, plus we had the extra incentive of watching free streaming video from the likes of ABC TV and Netflix, neither of which the iPhone does just yet. Browsing news using the iPad USA Today or New York Times Editor’s Choice apps was also a dream, as well as websites we saved later to read with the universal Instapaper Pro app. Even checking the weather was an enhanced experience, thanks to both The Weather Channel Max and Weatherbug Elite apps, both of which take advantage of the expanded real estate of the iPad to provide more impressive results.
For all of the iPad’s groovy goodness, we found ourselves missing a few of the iPhone niceties we’ve enjoyed for so long: Yes, Apple, we miss our Stocks, Clock and Calculator apps (not so much the Weather app, for the reasons noted above). Sure, there’s already several calculator apps for the iPad (most of them charging for the privilege), and even a few alarm clock or stock apps (Reuters News Pro for iPad is a free app which provides both stock quotes as well as news), but it’s just not the same experience. For instance, Apple’s Clock app can truly run in the background for alarms or the timer, where third-party apps cannot.
Aside from incoming phone calls, we only cheated once -- during a trip to The UPS Store to drop off an overnight package. Since we didn’t have the excellent Trip Cubby installed on the iPad, we had to actually pull out the iPhone and log that mileage using the handset. Yeah, we could have just logged the mileage on a piece of paper to enter later, or even installed Trip Cubby on the iPad (especially since you can sync the data between devices quite easily) -- but it was just easier to pull out the iPhone and get that job done on the spot. So sue us.
For all intents and purposes, it is indeed possible to replace an iPhone with an iPad, particularly if you don’t receive many phone calls (or have another way to receive calls, such as a landline or an old cell phone). The biggest dilemma for now is that the Wi-Fi dampens how much you can roam about with the iPad, a limitation we expect to see lifted when our 3G-equipped model arrives later this month and we revisit this subject again. Be sure to check back with MacLife.com when the 3G iPad ships to see how this saga plays out!
tymaxbeta
August 01, 2010 at 12:25pm
the Ipad is completely capable for calls via a blue tooth microphone, as well as the microphone attached to the headphones you can get these days, I know this because thats exactly what I do. To pay only 25 dollars a month for everything and more that the Iphone does is just a no brainier, and in my experience I don't regularly get phone calls, everyone texts these days...
momokani
July 07, 2010 at 11:16am
Same here. I am thinking to get iPad (WI-FI) and a cheap prepaid phone with music capability to replace my iPhone. iPad seems great and does 85% of things I needed, but it is too big to fit in my pocket. For taking incoming phone calls and playing music, I want a handy device, something like an iPod Nano with a phone capability. The Nano phone provides only essential functions including phones and iPod functions, but it will be great if it works as a 3G router (provide WI-FI connections to other devices).
kylerwalker
May 11, 2010 at 2:14pm
some people think ipad can replace your iphone well THERE WRONG just imagine holding a 9.4 screen up to your ear just to take a PHONECALL NO and even imagine AT 1.5LB man you would not make it through the day with out a hurting wrist. NOW IT CAN replace your bolky labtop or note book but NOT YOUR IPHONE
dougstrickland
April 25, 2010 at 7:45am
These comments are exactly the route that I'm considering. Drop the iPhone as a platform, downgrade to a 'less than smartphone', and move the data plan to the iPad 3g/wifi. This covers most situations, except traveling. Thats where I'm willing to sacrifice the screen size for portability. If I'm visiting Manhattan and looking for a great Cuban restaurant, I can't see myself whipping out the ol' iPad and hitting Urban Spoon. Will this lead to AT&T (or more optimistically another carrier) offering a combined data plan (the thinking being that you won't likely be using both simultaneously)? Doubtful.
unlockedcellphones
April 10, 2010 at 8:13am
Don't think so, otherwise Apple would have named it 'iPhone' instead of 'iPad'. I think it's different animal altogether though we see duplication of functionalities in these 2 devices. The key point to whether iPad can replace iPhone lies on the point mentioned: "if you don't receive many phone calls". Points to ponder...Unlocked Cell Phones
jiubreyn
April 12, 2010 at 4:25am
You're right, the iPad is designed and marketed to be in a category by itself, not as a comparison to the iPod touch nor iPhone. It's somewhere between an iPhone and a MacBook, while still not quite being a netbook.
MacGurl
April 09, 2010 at 8:44am
I honestly think that the iPad (wi-fi) could be better compared to the iPod Touch not the iPhone.
dspeers58
April 08, 2010 at 3:27pm
This idea is not that far-fetched. I just dropped my iphone for a phone that does not require $720 in data charges for the term of the contract. This will help pay for the ipad. I got a cheap phone, and it makes calls just fine. Yes, I have to carry two devices, but I usually carry books, folder etc, whenever I work, and even after work. The ipad will be much more functional than the iphone for a number of business related functions, given the space etc of the screen. So it can and will work for a time. The only problem is getting a somewhat retarded phone to work as nicely as the iphone. It wont. In any case, I am trying just that. Thanks for the article.
mob1278
April 08, 2010 at 3:12pm
I mean if you get a 3G iPad and a dumbed down phone it could happen however, most people may not have both. Plus I just couldn't see getting rid of my iPhone! I would lose my status lolllllllll!
airguardim
April 08, 2010 at 2:31pm
I'm considering the purchase of the Wifi/3G iPad and discontinuing my iPhone service in November when my contract expires. At that point I might purchase a prepaid phone and save about 60 dollars a month after purchasing the monthly 3G data plan for iPad.
I don't think it's a completely crazy idea, but we'll see how awesome the new iPhone will be first.
jeffsome
April 08, 2010 at 2:23pm
Who would really want to carry around a device that you can't even fit in your pocket to make phone calls. The iPad is a great tool but wasn't made to replace a mobile phone.
















