5 Things We’d Like to See In An Apple Television

The little black box known as the second-generation Apple TV must be feeling mighty neglected of late, with speculation running rampant that Cupertino is in the throes of creating an honest-to-God, full-fledged television set -- or at least a baby step by introducing television functionality to the iMac. But what would a true “Apple TV” (“iTV”) need to succeed? Journey with us now as we join the speculation.

It’s not a huge leap of faith to imagine that Apple might be working on an HD television set -- after all, former CEO Steve Jobs told official biographer Walter Isaacson that he had finally “nailed it” in a rare moment of honesty when discussing future products from the company. Of course, many of us are perfectly happy with the HDTVs already in our living rooms, so what could Apple bring to the table that consumer electronics companies have missed for decades?
We won’t pretend to know all the answers, but here are a handful of things we’d certainly love to see from Apple’s next invasion into the living room.

“Play Last Night’s Episode of ‘Community’”
Siri is already rumored to play a key part of any Apple-branded television set, and there’s no denying the currently iPhone 4S-only technology would be a perfect match. Instead of a traditional remote control littered with way too many buttons, you’d simply speak commands to the TV set and it would know what you want. Does that mean there will be no remote at all? We’re guessing Apple will bundle at least a basic remote control like the one included with the second-generation Apple TV, as well as updating the Remote iOS app for more advanced features.
As cool as a Siri-based television sounds, we can definitely see a few disadvantages. For example, you’ll never be able to control the TV set while holding a large party with a bunch of loud, boisterous guests talking over each other. And those epic battles married people and roommates endure fighting for control over the remote? You ain’t seen nothing yet, with couples screaming commands back and forth at Siri until her virtual head explodes.

Go Big or Stay Home
Despite what analysts tell their male patients, size does matter when it comes to a television set. Bigger is better, and these days even a 50-inch set seems too small in many homes. There’s no way of knowing exactly in which sizes Apple might offer their rumored HDTV, but at least one recent report claims three sizes starting at 32 inches and topping out at 55 inches.
A trio of sizes makes sense, although limiting it to two would be more Apple-like: For example, the company already offers the iMac in both 21.5-inch and 27-inch sizes. But here’s hoping that the maximum size is more like 60 inches -- maybe we’re spoiled, but we already have a rather nice 50-inch Samsung, so it will take the next step up to entice us into buying out of the gate.

Don’t Just Upgrade the iMac
Speaking of the iMac, another recent rumor claims that Apple may try to shoehorn television technology into the existing iMac next year, with a true HDTV set coming later down the road. While this may excite the geeks among us who already use a Mac mini or an old Mac in their living room, it’s not quite pushing the right buttons with us.
Anyone remember the 1993 debacle known as Macintosh TV? (We get chills down our spine just thinking about it -- and not in a good way.) That was Cupertino’s first attempt at integrating a television set with a Mac, and it flamed out four months later with only 10,000 units having been manufactured. There are plenty of great options for getting TV on our Macs and even recording it (Elgato’s EyeTV certainly comes to mind) -- let’s focus on a true living room experience and save the Mac for our laps and desks.

Total Control
As we add more devices to our home theatre setups, complications arise when it comes time to turn them all on and make sure everything’s set to the right input. Companies like Logitech have been working on this dilemma with their line of Harmony remotes (and more recently the $99.99 Harmony Link, which turns an iOS device into the remote), but if Apple hopes to dominate the living room, they’ll have to step outside of their own little world and address this particular elephant.
How could they do it? By including a sophisticated IR blaster with the HDTV, which can then be controlled with the existing Remote iOS app or better yet, through any third-party offering in the App Store, thanks to a new API. That’s a tall order considering all of the boxes, game systems and other devices out there, especially when you factor in adding Siri control over at least the most basic features of each.

It’s The Content, Stupid
Last but not least, we come to the content. There’s no denying that the iTunes Store has a lot to offer, but there’s a whole other world out there, including Hulu Plus and Amazon Instant Video, neither of which are yet available from the existing Apple TV box but are freely available from competitors like Roku. Other services should include favorites such as Plex, Boxee and XBMC, which have been available on hacked Apple TVs for years and really deserve to find a home there permanently. Sure, Apple might have to take one for the team by letting these rivals on their branded HDTV, but if they don’t, they’ll have less to offer than companies who have been making TVs for far longer.
It’s a logical conclusion that an Apple television will include everything we have today with the second-generation Apple TV: AirPlay, internet services like YouTube, Vimeo and Netflix, access to existing iTunes Store content and iCloud services such as Photo Stream. But Apple will have to go even further to compete with what’s already out there -- we think they should be shooting for eliminating as many boxes from an existing home theatre setup as humanly possible, including their own!
Follow this article’s author, J.R. Bookwalter on Twitter
(Images courtesy HitechBytes.com, RadioMobileTech.com, Guilherme Marins Schasiepen, VectronicsAppleWorld.com)
knurd
December 13, 2011 at 2:01am
After owning a WDTV the last year (streaming from my Mac), I don't see the point of Apple trying to enter in this game. More than likely you would not be able to play any files that were not m4v/a. There are so many great solutions out there right now that work seamlessly. If they could take a chapter out of Microsofts book for once and work with companies to develop software for a certain brand of products (Ford & Sync) then that would be less likely to spread the company too thin. God knows they need to focus on making the iPhone stronger. Android is taking too much of a lead.
clasqm
December 12, 2011 at 2:07am
If Apple's TV looks anything like this wish list it will be a big yawn. Just more of the same, folks.
I hope to see something radical. It might still use the term "TV" but it will change the way we passively consume entertainment. Anything less than that just won't be worth the money.
If you want to watch a show and you first have to remember if that particular show is available on the Netflix, Hulu or Boxee app, then the battle is lost already. If you have to send monthly payments to a dozen different providers, forget it. If there is more than one data cable going into the thing, been there, done that. And if the whole thing doesn't work seamlessly across national borders, what else is new? If I want to watch something and I am prepared to pay for it, don't tell me I live in the wrong country.
Go radical or go home.
feinberj
December 11, 2011 at 3:38pm
If the Apple TV ran iOS apps, it would be a HUGE selling point. The remote would simply be a wireless magic trackpad, with acceleration sensors inside. The TV is the app screen, but the remote is the app touchscreen. You could even put a forward facing camera in the TV, so that people could run facetime and skype.
Apple should sell this for $100. Even if they took a hit on the hardware, they would gain more iOS market share, and they'd make the money back on their 30% cut on apps.
John F
New York, NY
mortond
December 09, 2011 at 2:56pm
I have a Mac Mini Server, with SLS installed. This connects to my TV using HDMI cable.
My TV is connected to an A/V box for 5.1 sound.Front Row plays all my 'saved to hard disk' DVDs (TS folders) as entire DVDs , it can handle most any video file I can throw at it.
It also plays my iTunes library and displays my iPhoto library, why I would play them on my TV as opposed to on my 27" iMac is a question I cannot really answer...because it's there!!!!
My TV is network attached and plays Netflix streaming. I tried installing understudy on Front Row but it doesn't work (or rather I cannot get it to work)
I can control my MM using a wireless keyboard, or an Apple mouse or an Apple remote.
For some inexplicable reason Apple dropped Front Row from Lion. However, there are a couple of scripts out there that will install Front Row on/in Lion. I did install it on my 2011 iMac so I know it does work.Plex and XBMC are nice front ends but, IMO, are a pain to navigate (one can activate the mouse but it works when it wants to and is definitely a PITA. Also they are rather picky as to what they play only DVD main features for instance.
Front row is free, gender bender cords are available for connecting most Apples to a TV's HDMI, if one has a late model TV it's probably network ready so why bother with a whole load of extra boxes and extra expense.
mortond
December 09, 2011 at 3:10pm
I have also, just recently, found out how to connect my Comcast cable box to my iMac via Firewire.
I can now watch TV on my computer with just the added expense of a 10' FW cable (400 CB to 800 computer external hard drive. I use these hard drives for media storage and backup.
Controlling the channels is a little stone age but whatever.If one has unlimited amounts of cash yes, it's nice to buy all the toys but one can achieve the same thing with a little work, imagination and good 'ol Google.
Log in to Mac|Life directly or log in using Facebook
Forgot your username or password?
Click here for help.


















