It's All Black & White
The fastest way to convert color images to black-and-white in Photoshop has long been a simple matter of choosing the Grayscale mode from the Image > Mode submenu and allowing Photoshop to blend most of the green components of the image with a healthy dollop of red and almost no blue. Of course, that rarely results in a rich-looking image. Power users have tried a variety of other methods, including selecting a single channel from the Channels palette before invoking the Grayscale conversion, which forces Photoshop to utilize just that channel in the conversion process. Other techniques call up the mystical Calculations dialog in order to mix custom ratios of the main color components. The Channel Mixer delivered an expanded set of options.
CS3 offers a new Black and White mode that streamlines the process without leaving you with a flat-looking black-and-white image and allows you to choose exact percentages of any and all of the primary color components. There’s even an integrated tinting command, which essentially provides the Colorize portion of the Hue/Saturation color controls, for creating tinted versions of your grayscale images.
Custom-mix any color component to create rich-looking black-and-white images.
Next: A Better Way to Be Selective
suaili
December 21, 2009 at 8:52pm
And we also provide fast delivery service, guarantee our listing price is lower than other competitors.replicas watches and professional customer service. We are more than ready to show our unique prowess and fortes to gain our footing.
ammarvvip
November 11, 2009 at 8:07am
thank you ar..is nice88
شات صوتي, دردشه صوتيه, شات مصريه, شات دردشة دردشه دردشة موبايل شات دردشه
benet
November 10, 2009 at 7:14pm
Every little chat Salon 1000 ah!replica watchYou are my best's buddy
dsfsd
xiaodanhu
September 11, 2009 at 11:38pm
Read this article, ILouis Vuitton see a lot of things
By seeing this article, I Louis Vuittonunderstand a lot, learned a lot of knowledge
Motorcycle Guy
April 22, 2007 at 6:36am
Good thing it isn't made by apple or you would already be taking these pictures down.
Wi-Fi
March 27, 2007 at 7:57pm
In my opinion, Apple TV should support for more video formats (for which we do not need any helps from video converter) and include personal video recording functions also.
http://www.apple-tv-converter.com
bilogic
March 27, 2007 at 12:17am
I agree with both camp on the subject of breaking pages. May be a extra option to chose between long or short pages would please both sides..
rmyslewski
March 26, 2007 at 6:52pm
The main reason that we run multi-page articles when the pages are image-heavy is to ease the page-load times for those poor folks who are not yet on broadband. We purposely use fairly large images to make sure that our articles are well-illustrated, but we don't want to strangle slow dial-up connections. Hey, if you're on broadband, what's a few extra insta-clicks between friends..?
climbonrock
March 27, 2007 at 11:59am
If I am on a slow connection I would rather wait for 2-3 long page loads than 15 medium-long page loads. It is much less frustrating to wait 2 minutes 2-3 times than to wait 30 seconds, read, click, wait 30, read, click, wait 30, click.....you get my point.
just my opinion. great preview!
climbonrock
Anonymous
March 27, 2007 at 12:41pm
it's not about giving you the best reading/user experience. This is about ads paying the bills. It's not about quick loading times either. There's a business side to all this creativity as well. Revenue. You wankers, stop wining about the ads between the free review or go somewhere else where you can pay to get the same information without the advertisement interruptions. To all others - keep up the creative work in this hard business world ;-) Cheers. M.
Anonymous
March 26, 2007 at 8:24pm
Seriously? If you really cared about dial-up users as your excuse for short annoying pages, then would you really have all those ads.. those ads are probably 3 - 4 times as large as your article pages..
Realist
March 26, 2007 at 9:10pm
Hey, anonymous, get real. If there are no ads, there would be no web site -- and then where would you complain?
In any case, back to the main reason for these comments: The really good Photoshop story. Does anyone know when we'll be able to get our hands on the final version? What it'll cost? If we can just buy Photoshop without having to buy everything else?
Jack B Nimble
March 26, 2007 at 5:30pm
Brekaing up an article over 15 pages was really annoying, especially since they were short pages. It would have been nice to have 2 or 3 pages.
Good review though. It will be nice to see what else CS3 has in store.
Jim Stone
March 26, 2007 at 11:09am
David, your peek under the hood is well-timed and VERY appreciated! Test-driving the CS3 beta didn't really get me going, but now I am actually excited about upgrading. Can you do a follow-up on Illustrator, please?
Carl Hudson
March 25, 2007 at 6:37pm
Wow. Thank you for a well written article with a lot of coverage of what's new in Photoshop CS3. Adobe (& the old macromedia ppl) have been very busy making this a significant upgrade. I personally am looking forward to seeing how much of this translates into the new Adobe Dreamweaver CS3. C'mon Adobe, make your announcements! :)
MediaRoots
March 30, 2007 at 5:54pm
Looks like you covered pretty much everything! Good job, not covered the stuff about photoshop extended though, go video!
eri
March 27, 2007 at 6:17pm
re "C'mon Adobe, make your announcements!"
well they have, sorta. CS3 announcements were made on the 22nd March but it was in a whisper room at webDU. Sorry, can't share they made everyone in a jam packed room sign NDAs. Think the official announcements are due tomorrow.
