Quantcast
The video player requires Flash 8 Player or later. Please download the latest Flash Player.


Maclife Hottest Articles
Thumbnail
FEATURE
100 Snow Leopard Tips, Tricks, and Features
Browser
FEATURE
OS X Browser Speed Wars: May the Fastest App Win
iTunes History
FEATURE
The Complete iTunes History -- SoundJam MP to iTunes 9
iTunes Tips
FEATURE
iTunes 9 Tips and Tricks - Solve the Mysteries of the New iTunes
2 More Patents: Haptic Feedback and RFID Antenna
Posted 07/02/2009 at 12:43:50pm | by Arvind Srinivasan

And we thought Apple scoffed at the Blackberry Storm’s haptic feedback. Guess not, because Apple has filed a patent that not only recognizes the limitations of a purely smooth touchscreen (can’t see what you are pressing), but shows haptic display technology as the solution.

The patent describes a grid of *big word alert* piezoelectronic actuators that would be activated on command. Now, if you are like us and don’t spend excessive amounts of time on Wikipedia, you probably don’t know what this means. Essentially, the touchscreen would have different surfaces such that the user would be able to feel buttons, while maintaining the no-button approach that Steve Jobs adores.

This could take the form of playback buttons (next song, previous song, pause), and even a haptic keyboard, which could enable touch typing. The good thing about the haptic feedback is that it would be completely programmable, so it could take different forms in different applications.

In another patent described in the same MacRumors article, Apple details an RFID reader integrated in the touchscreen, with the RFID antenna placed in the touchscreen panel itself. RFID tags, if you aren’t familiar with them, are becoming increasingly prevalent as tracking devices for products, key entry for security systems, and several other mainstream products.

Would you be excited about haptic feedback on your phone, and would you ever use RFID scanning to keep track of your robot army? Let us know in the comments.

COMMENTS
avatarNew Content Needed

Why does MacLife keeps reposting articles from high-traffic sites such MacRumors and AppleInsider instead creating more original content? I have all 3 on RSS feeds and invariably, MacRumors or AppleInsider will break a story and hours later MacLife reposts the same content.  I can understand if there is an article on a small website somewhere that MacLife brings attention too, but it seems like the majority of articles are just reposts of whatever MacRumors and AppleInsider write. If MacLife added some original analysis or added facts it would be forgivable,  but I am getting tired of the duplicate content. If I need economize my RSS feeds, MacLife will be the first to go.

Login or register to post comments
avatarThat's why I come here

I don't read those sites, and appreciate the most interesting and important news being summarized here.

Login or register to post comments