Quantcast

INSIDER RESOURCES
Special Sponsored Section


The video player requires Flash 8 Player or later. Please download the latest Flash Player.


Maclife Hottest Articles
Thumbnail
FEATURE
100 Snow Leopard Tips, Tricks, and Features
Browser
FEATURE
OS X Browser Speed Wars: May the Fastest App Win
iTunes History
FEATURE
The Complete iTunes History -- SoundJam MP to iTunes 9
iTunes Tips
FEATURE
iTunes 9 Tips and Tricks - Solve the Mysteries of the New iTunes
RELATED CATEGORIES
iPhone
News
HOLIDAY BUYING GUIDE
SEE MORE ARTICLES

Apple: We Did Not Reject Google Voice For iPhone -- Oh SNAP!
Posted 09/18/2009 at 1:43:03pm | by Cory Bohon

In another turn of events regarding the Google Voice rejection story, Apple is sticking to its story about not rejecting Google Voice for iPhone. According to The Business Insider, an Apple representative stated, "We do not agree with all of the statements made by Google in their FCC letter. Apple has not rejected the Google Voice application and we continue to discuss it with Google.”

Earlier today Google dropped the confidentiality of their statement to the FCC about the rejection of their application from Apple's App Store.

 

COMMENTS: 6
TAGS:  iphone, Google, App Store, Apple Inc, Google voice, Rejection
COMMENTS
avatarWhat is it?

Submitted by LordChax on Fri, 2009-09-18 14:00

What is this Google Voice???

Login or register to post comments
avatarsearch google voice... so

Submitted by broadwaybobby on Fri, 2009-09-18 14:19

search google voice... so many results will pop up... he described it well in a podcast

Login or register to post comments
avatar@broadwaybobby

Submitted by maccytech on Fri, 2009-09-18 16:49

yeah but who has a spare half hour trying to find a good podcast for a definition?

Login or register to post comments
avatarVOIP for iPhone

Submitted by Tinkerintenor on Sat, 2009-09-19 00:00

Correct me if I'm wrong here, but Google Voice is basically a VOIP service right? So a Gooogle voice app for the iPhone would allow u to use the app for calling people over the Internet instead of AT&T's actual phone service? I'm not convinced this would be such a big deal to be honest.If it worked well over 3G then I guess it could cut AT&T out of some money on charging people for minutes, but they would still have to be paying for a voice and data plan to use that 3G connection anyway. I suppose it would be sort of useful on an iPod Touch too, but not as a "mobile" phone insofar that one would have to be in range of a Wi-Fi network to use the service and make calls.

Login or register to post comments
avataromega watches

Submitted by benet (not verified) on Tue, 2009-11-10 22:43

Were not smart, but also learn from others bald.omega watchesChing had no water to fish, one to the cheap is invincible.replica watchI left Dragon, White Tiger right shoulder tattooed Mickey Mouse.replica watchesEfforts should be made! ! For your Audi Dior me.dai

Login or register to post comments
avatarthank you ar..is

Submitted by ammarvvip (not verified) on Wed, 2009-11-11 07:23

thank you ar..is niceee!@#
شات صوتي, دردشه صوتيه, شات مصريه, شات دردشة دردشه دردشة موبايل شات دردشه

Login or register to post comments