atalay22

June 28, 2009 at 11:30am

hastır lan amk. porno seyret izle porno izle porno seks video izle porno izle sikis video sikis video sikis video izle sikiş izle film sinema izle film izle

shahseta

April 06, 2009 at 3:21pm

No, i won't.

asterell

March 29, 2009 at 3:21pm

The prices quoted are obviously American dollars.I live in Australia what are the converted prices for Australians?

gtrmacman

March 27, 2009 at 1:01pm

If anyone's gonna buy a song by an artist they'll pay 99 cents. I can't believe Apple is going to allow music to be purchased (which is more shared today than purchased) for as little as 30 cents. Who's there to support the artists of today that have to contend with so much file sharing they can't make any income. Then, iTunes is gonna take some of that 30 cents - leaving the artist like 20 cents or something. Doesn't anyone care about the indie artist anymore?

lukeforester1

March 26, 2009 at 5:25pm

just-thats all i can say iTunes, not looking good.

jerryla

March 26, 2009 at 3:26pm

An extra 30 cents for no DRM and 256 I consider a bargain. The fact that I can purchase single songs, with good quality is a plus for me. Very few times do I find any discs worth owning the entire thing. I buy from the artists source, such as their website when possible. Bottom line, I love iTunes and support it 150%.

maclua

March 26, 2009 at 2:28pm

i prefer to buy music for .99 with DRM that way if i wanted to get DRM free i would only pay .30 more for the ones pick instead of all my music

Jamie

March 26, 2009 at 11:47am

buying a from iTunes as much. $11.99 for a 256 kpbs download? Please. $1.29 for one song? Forget it. If this really was a ploy on the part of the labels to displace Apple as a major outlet, in my case, they've succeeded. It's a shame. All I really care about is compensating people for their music, and more and more I buy it directly from them, if possible. It's a way to legally cut the labels out altogether.