As Predicted, iPod nano Gets Multitouch

5

Comments

+ Add a Comment
avatar

IMFSHN

Bummer about the loss of video recording. It may have been an underused for the cost benefit.

I'm sure there is a simple answer to this- how does this have a built in FM radio and there isn't one included in the iPhone? Cellular radio interference you think? Then at least give it to the iPod Touch crew.

I was a bit hesitant about the new nano, but "got it" when I saw the ad.

avatar

Nano-fan

Despite my username, I HATE this new nano. The old one weighed nothing, it didn't need to be lighter! It didn't need touch! It might have needed a new interface, but this isn't the answer! What do I do with my movies?! What do I do with my TV shows!? What do I do with my iPod games?! I have a 4GB 3rd gen nano, but I have 1 GB of music, 4 GB of videos, and 1 GB of games! What do I do with all of that stuff?! Buy a Classic. Okay, it wasn't difficult to solve.

Anyone who wants this nano doesn't know what an iPod is, have fun with your overpriced watch.

avatar

malber

It's a nerfed nano. The nano used to be a nice crossover between having a shuffle and a Classic, especially if you don't want to pay the price of the Touch. Hell, given the form factor and price it was a worthy replacement for a Classic. Without a capacity increase, less features, and a smaller screen, this is not worth the price.

avatar

dmanforce4

this is crap its a shuffle with a screen bogus

avatar

braatenmw

I am gonna buy this nano ASAP. I wish the 8 GB was $99 and the 16 GB was $129. It doesn't play video. And there aren't even games. Maybe in the future. I want one jailbroken!

Log in to Mac|Life directly or log in using Facebook

Forgot your username or password?
Click here for help.

Login with Facebook
Log in using Facebook to share comments and articles easily with your Facebook feed.