News Roundup: Wi-Fi and GPS in an iPod, DRM, and More

Anonymous's picture

News Roundup: Wi-Fi and GPS in an iPod, DRM, and More

Those analysts. Always talkin'. And now an analyst for Prudential Equity Group is predicting that the next generation of iPods will ditch HDD storage, instead using all solid-state NAND flash memory. The analyst, Jesse Tortora, says that 32GB drives would be cost feasible. That seems like a paltry amount for storing movies and TV shows, but Tortora reasons that the improved battery life would trump the need for larger amounts of storage. (We're...skeptical.) Less hyped—and even missing altogether from many news reports—are the other features Tortora predicted for the next line of iPods: a touchscreen like the iPhone's, Wi-Fi connectivity to send content to an Apple TV, and built-in GPS functionality. According to the analyst's report, these new iPods could be out by the end of the year.

 

The waves set off by Steve Jobs's "Thoughts on Music" are still reverberating around the world. The response from the Norwegian Consumer Ombudsman seems to miss the point entirely, agreeing that Apple should "kick the lock in technology from the iTMS iPod combintation." The problem with that position is that iPod owners aren't actually locked into buying music from the iTunes Store at all; they can rip songs from CDs, and DRM-free music can even be purchased online (cough, cough, eMusic). The RIAA agrees with Norway, calling on Apple to license its FairPlay DRM technology. BusinessWeek makes suggestions for ditching DRM, but recognizes that the decision to do that really belongs to the record companies. And a former EMI executive calls Jobs's desire for a move to DRM-free music "disingenuous," pointing out that Jobs wouldn't be so eager to sell Apple software, or Disney or Pixar movies, without restrictions. With overall music sales down (even while online music sales thrive), it's in both sides' interest to come to some type of agreement.

 

Are you sick of all the recent bickering between fans of Microsoft and Apple, and even between the companies themselves? Well, the blogosphere sure isn't. One blog suggests that Apple should be copying Vista features for Leopard. Another complains that Microsoft's decision not to license the $199 Home Basic version of Vista for virtualization, meaning that users have to buy the $299 Enterprise version if they want to run it on a virtual machine (such as on a Mac through Parallels), amounts to a $100 "Vista tax" on Mac users. A third blogger calls that "Vista tax" notion absurd, asking why Microsoft should allow virtualization of its OS when Apple only licenses Mac OS X for "one Apple-labeled computer at a time." Shots are firing back and forth across the Internet, and we doubt it'll stop anytime soon. Perhaps throwing fuel on the fire, on Saturday Apple plans to launch a campaign "mocking" Vista inside Apple Stores.

 

Finally, some cool stuff. DasBoot is a free utility that lets you use an iPod or flash drive as a bootable diagnostic disk for your Mac. Here are directions for upgrading the CPU in a Mac mini. And could the iPhone be released June 15? It is, after all, the day King John signed the Magna Carta.

 

Tags:
3

Comments

+ Add a Comment
avatar

PGM

Here's a little tip for the previous poster: start by investing some money in a keyboard that can also type lowercase characters...

avatar

Anonymous

You said: "And a former EMI executive calls Jobs's desire for a move to DRM-free music "disingenuous," pointing out that Jobs wouldn't be so eager to sell Apple software, or Disney or Pixar movies, without restrictions."

I love when people try to call someone out without have the facts. The simple fact is that I have been buying Apple software for many, many years, and with the exception of iWork that software has never had any physical restrictions. Yes, the license only allows me to install it on one machine (just like I'm not supposed to share a CD when I buy it) but if I wanted to I could install it on 1000 machines. Now, I don't do that but Apple software does not have a key (aside from iWork) and so they are already trusting their customers and have been for years.

Talk about open mouth, insert foot. These record company execs don't have a clue about the digital world. Heck, they should look at themselves since the most popular songs are available at file sharing sites before they are available in stores or via iTunes.

I think the best line in Steve's open letter was the one pointing out that while the majority of music is still sold on CD, that same music has no DRM and is just as easy to add to your computer.

avatar

Elias

----I WISH THE MAC OS WOULD WORK ON A COMPUTER I WANT TO BUILD... IF COULD BUILD THE FASTEST COMPUTER FOR A REALLY GOOD PRICE AND RUN MAC OS I WOULD BE IN HEAVEN!!----

Log in to Mac|Life directly or log in using Facebook

Forgot your username or password?
Click here for help.

Login with Facebook
Log in using Facebook to share comments and articles easily with your Facebook feed.