The iPad 2 Review

When change comes, it can be torrentially fast. In under a year, the iPad went from question mark to astonishing success, selling 15 million units in its first nine months on sale. No wonder the iPad 2’s debut touched off even more bedlam than Apple’s often-frenzied product launches.
That reception is probably partially behind the undercurrent of disappointment we feel after testing the iPad 2. We feel a little bad about it, too--because without question, the iPad 2 is an outstanding tablet, the kind of beautifully designed and cleverly engineered triumph that’ll keep other tablet manufacturers glumly clutching at straws for another year. But because the iPad’s debut last year was so transformative, we expected at least a small dollop of that kind of innovation in this model. It just isn’t there--in fact, if Apple had followed the iPhone naming convention, this tablet would be called the iPad S.
Unfair? Maybe a little--but we all expect Apple to innovate. The iPhone 4’s Retina display and 5MP camera made that smartphone more magical than previous models, and those two standout features had starring roles in our expectations for the iPad 2. Nothing so difference-making appears in the iPad 2 (yes, it has dual cameras, but several issues severely limit their utility), making this new hardware an iterative, evolutionary refresh, rather than a dramatic leap forward.
Slimmed Down
Once that bubble’s popped, it’s easy to ooh and ahh over the iPad 2. When you pick one up, it instantly feels lighter and thinner, and its beautifully curved edges make its redesigned unibody a pleasure to hold. Those curves mean plugging in the Dock connector the first few times takes a little fumbling around because it’s too easy to try to mesh them at the wrong angle, but that’s a tiny thing that you’ll quickly get a feel for. Even the slick new speaker grill looks cooler than the iPad 1’s trio of speaker openings, and to our ears, delivered identical sound.
Apple also created a white model this time around, but we ended up not liking it. Obviously, it shows dirt more, but the white trim also doesn’t disappear the way the black border does when gaming or watching video. Of course, that’s entirely a personal preference.
More importantly, at 1.3 pounds, the iPad 2 dropped a little more than 3 ounces off the weight of the iPad 1. You can feel the difference in heft, but holding it for long periods--Netflix or iBooks sessions--will still strain your arms in ways that a small e-reader like the 8.5-ounce Kindle doesn’t.
Sped Up
But an iPad 2 can do so much more than an e-reader, and its new 1GHz dual-core A5 system-on-chip powers it to a noticeably more nimble performance. In our benchmarks, which measure memory and processor performance, it scored 1.65 times better than the iPad 1. On average, the iPad 2 powers up 8.2 seconds faster, and many apps launch 1–1.5 seconds faster too, though often the iPad 2 was only a beat or two quicker at launching apps. Like its predecessor, battery life is seriously impressive, lasting 13.42 hours in our rundown (which looped an iTunes-bought movie), though the iPad 1’s battery took 14 hours flat to run down last year. Perhaps the A5 eats a bit more power?

While FaceTime and Photo Booth join the ranks of Apple-supplied apps, the iPad 2--like its predecessor--still doesn’t include the Clock, Compass, Weather, Stocks, or Calculator apps that iPhones do. Weird!
In practice, those numbers make everything you do feel a touch more speedy and responsive--particularly games. It’s certainly not an earth-shattering difference, but heavy iPad 1 users will mumble an appreciative “oh, cool!” Likewise, the new three-axis gyroscope smoothes out tilt-control games a bit, but not hugely so.
We expect the big improvements to come when developers have a chance to fashion apps that are tuned to take advantage of the A5’s dual cores. Likewise, the fact that the iPad 2 has only 512MB of RAM (as measured via software; Apple declined to confirm the spec) made no difference in the apps we tested. It’ll be a much-discussed detail because competitors like the Xoom and TouchPad sport 1GB, but only time will tell whether the iPad’s 2 RAM is a limitation or wise cost-cutting measure.
Same Screen
Easily the biggest letdown of the iPad 2 is that the screen hasn’t been improved. The 9.7-inch 1024x768 LED-backlit IPS display is the same as the iPad 1’s, and it holds up well, delivering lovely visuals and highly responsive Multi-Touch control. Even with that oleophobic coating, it still smudges up with fingerprints almost as soon as you pick it up, so keep a microfiber handy.
The iPad 2 does deliver one dazzling video upgrade, and that’s mirroring in 1080p. If you buy the optional Digital AV Adapter ($39), you can connect it to a TV or monitor, and everything you see and do is mirrored on the external display. It’s instantly useful for everything from presentations to gaming to teaching, and while it’s a simple addition technologically speaking, it’s a massively cool one that loads of people will use. (The adapter also works with the iPad 1, but in 720p only.)
But since the display hasn’t changed, the iPad 2’s screen still gets annihilated in bright sunlight--images are so drowned out by the glare that the device becomes virtually unusable. Old news, but it really becomes a problem when you’re trying to use the cameras outside because you literally can’t see what you’re shooting.
Why So Grainy?
Yes, the iPad 2 adds dual cameras, a terrific improvement. The front-facing camera delivers VGA-quality video and stills (like the iPhone 4), while Apple’s official specs carefully describe the rear camera only as an HD video camera that films in 720p. That’s probably because the rear camera takes grainy, low-res photos—examining their metadata told us that it’s a 0.7MP camera, though Apple also declined to confirm that spec. You’ll instantly notice that shortage of megapixels in your photography; pictures look noisy and low-res, like the janky snaps from old cell phones.

Even in good lighting, the iPad’s cameras produce grainy, low-res photos.
When recording video, though, the rear camera produces good-quality footage--if you can figure out how to hold on the darn thing. Yes, gripping a big, flat “camera” is as awkward as you’d expect, and while tap-to-focus is as cool as always, the Camera app exacerbates the problem by forcing the shutter button to appear at the bottom of the screen. Since most people will want to hold the iPad 2 by its sides, you’ll inevitably wobble the screen when you reach for that button. The iPad 2’s also difficult to keep steady once you do start filming, and with the rear camera positioned on its edge, we’ve literally never stuck our finger into the frame so many times before.

If you just want to make video calls, the iPad 2’s dual cameras do a fine job of it.
Honestly, we recommend that you don’t buy an iPad 2 intending to use its cameras for anything other than FaceTime and Photo Booth. For those purposes, the iPad 2 shines. The FaceTime calls we made during testing were smooth and lag-free, though we found it far more comfortable to use a stand for these calls. If both callers are using the front cameras, hand-holding the iPad 2 tends to put a pretty big image of someone else’s face right up in your grill in an uncomfortable way. Flipping it around to use the rear camera to film kids or cats works great, and the backside-illumination sensor in the rear camera makes it fairly adept in low light.

Photo Booth is genuinely good fun.
Photo Booth and its nine live feeds of special effects was an unexpected delight, great for goofing around. We entertained a couple kids for a solid hour, getting hard belly laughs the whole time as they experimented with the distortions and snapped wacky photos of one another. It’s a terrific toy.
Magnetic Matters
Last but not least, we were surprised at how cool the magnetic Smart Cover is. Something about how it uses 31 freakin’ magnets according to iFixIt.com’s excellent tear-down to seamlessly snap the case onto the iPad 2 and wake it from sleep adds to the whole futuristic feel of the device. It’s another one of those “touching is believing” moments that helped make the iPad such a success in the first place.
The bottom line: With properly calibrated expectations--think minor refresh, rather than next generation--the iPad 2 continues Apple’s reign as the king of tablets. If you haven’t bought one yet, the iPad 2 is a stellar device that still feels like a little slice of science fiction come true. But if you already own an iPad 1, there’s no real need to upgrade unless you’re a hardcore gamer who wants premium performance.
iPad 2
1GHz dual-core Apple A5 system-on-chip with 512MB DDR2 RAM; 16GB, 32GB, or 64GB flash drive; 9.7-inch 1024x768 LED-backlit glossy Multi-Touch IPS display with oleophobic coating; front camera (VGA video & stills); rear camera (720p video & 0.7MP stills); 802.11n Wi-Fi; Bluetooth 2.1 + EDR; three-axis gyroscope; digital compass; accelerometer; ambient light sensor; 30-pin dock connector; built-in speaker, mic, and stereo headphone jack; 25 watt-hour lithium-polymer battery. Wi-Fi + 3G for AT&T model: UMTS/HSDPA/HSUPA (850, 900, 1900, 2100 MHz); GSM/EDGE (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz). Wi-Fi + 3G for Verizon model: CDMA EV-DO Rev. A (800, 1900 MHz).
New A5 chip and RAM significantly improve overall performance, and gaming in particular. Dual cameras work fine for video calls. Thinner, lighter unibody looks slick and makes the iPad more comfortable to use. Video mirroring adds “teaching and presentation tool” to the iPad’s list of many useful functions. Magnet-based Smart Cover is an ingenious, valuable accessory. Same pricing as first iPad.
No transformative new features. Display is unchanged, so it still isn’t usable in bright sunlight and attracts lots of smudgy fingerprints. Cameras yield poor, low-res photos. Using cameras is often difficult and requires awkward grip. No support for 4G cellular data. Still no expansion ports.
Paul Curthoys
March 15, 2011 at 11:31am
Sorry Steve P., but Raketemensch nailed it--this is an Apple device. I expect top quality in all elements, whether I plan to use them or not. As a guess, Apple probably saved $5 by not using the 5MP rear camera from iPhone 4. That's money not well-saved, and if there's a camera in something, I want it to work well when I use it, regardless of how rare or awkward using it might be.
Also, Bbray, I had compared Infinity Blade launch times vs iPad 1 and it is much faster on iPad 2, but that was more exception that the general rule of thumb that I was stating in that part of the review. Still, it's a good point to loop back to--Infinity Blade is probably the most demanding app out there at the moment (can anyone think of another?), so as devs design apps to take advantage of the A5's dual cores, I expect this gap to widen such that we see bigger performance differences between the two iPads.
@Roosch, agreed--AirPlay mirroring would be great. But it wouldn't cost $39, and hardware manufacturers make a mint on accessories. :)
Steve Paris
March 15, 2011 at 12:03pm
Hi Paul, except that you yourself mentioned in your article how awkward using the iPad to shoot anything is (be it stills or video). I think people will try it a couple of times and then give up on it. This device is just not designed for this.
I'm much much more annoyed that the iPod touch's got the same crappy 0.7MP camera. That was uncalled for since, just like the iPhone, it's so much better suited to taking stills than an unwieldy 1.3-pound contraption (it's fantastic for videos though).
I think taking shots with an iPad is a moot point: hardly anyone will do it, whether it has a 5MP or 0.7MP camera. It's quite possible that Apple gambled on this fact and potentially saved themselves hundreds of millions of dollars (considering how many are being sold right now, I think they made the right choice).
Oh, and if you want to be cynical about this, they'll need to give iPad 2 owners a reason to upgrade when they release iPad 3 next year :)
Paul Curthoys
March 15, 2011 at 4:37pm
Can't agree with you there--just because it's awkward to use doesn't mean it's okay for it to suck. But I totally agree with your points on the iPod and on cynicism. The iPad 3 will be touted in its keynote for its magical 10MP camera. Or something :)
Steve Paris
March 15, 2011 at 6:57pm
Hi guess my point is that if you've got a sucky camera, expect it to take sucky shots. Imagine how horrible it would be to have a super MP camera that was extremely hard to use? You'd keep trying to use it because of the amazing lens but get incredibly frustrated because of the crappy nature of the device's design.
But it's my point, and it looks like I'm in the minority here. Maybe that's why they hired you to write the article and not me ;)
Raketemensch
March 15, 2011 at 9:34am
The whole point of having the camera isn't that you're going to carry it with you instead of a DSLR or something... That argument's pretty much moot. The point of these "magic" devices is that you have them with you all the time.
I still take pictures with my 3GS, not because they're great photos, but because I have it with me when something cool happens. When one of the kids does something crazy, I don't have to run to find the Lumix, I just launch the camera app and start snapping. That's the theory, but generally I try to snag my wife's iPhone 4, because those candid shots come out great.
The disappointment comes in because these candid ipad shots are going to suck, mostly unnecessarily. In the volume Apple's cranking these things out, how much more would it have cost to include a better camera? $1? $5?
I'm still buying one, but every time I see a cool shot to take with it, there's going to be a twinge of "I wish I had my wife's phone," or "I hope this doesn't come out looking like it was taken with a RAZR." That's a crappy experience to have with an Apple product, and it would've been fairly cheaply avoidable.
mx5_94
March 15, 2011 at 7:35am
But wasn't there another article in the last day or so that said 70% of iPad 2 buyers were first time iPad owners? If that is the case, the allure of the device is that much greater for these folks. Just think if your VERY first experience was with this device versus the original.
Steve Paris
March 15, 2011 at 2:10am
I fail to understand the obsession over the low-res camera. It's a tablet. Compared to a camera or a phone, it's huge. And unwieldy. Are you seriously going to tell me that you'll be using this as a camera?
Unlikely. If anything, you'll be using the camera for casual shots like taking a photo of a book cover to remember what to order later, or a funny street sign. But who's going to be the proud geek who'll be holding a 10" camera in public? :)
What annoys me most actually (and this is a little off-topic), is Apple's insistence that iMovie can only work on the iPad 2. I may change my mind when I end up holding an iPad 2 myself, but I personally don't believe that people will be doing much shooting with this device. It's more than likely that they'll be using an iPhone or iPod touch and transferring the footage to the iPad 2 for editing. Therefore, why haven't they made iMovie compatible with the iPad 1? We know it works since some clever people managed to install it (it's an ugly workaround), so the specs can handle it. I think that's a bad move and I hope they'll rectify it soon: after all if the iPod touch is only 256MB of RAM can handle it, why not the iPad 1?
@Roosch
March 15, 2011 at 1:45am
Surprisingly enough - looking at my 'normal' behaviour whenever Apple launches a new product - I'm still not sure if I will buy the iPad2 when it arrives in The Netherlands, March 25th. Since I own an iPad1, I might even skip this version to see what no. 3 will bring.
And is it only me or is it strange mirroring is only possible with a connector? Since Apple is pushing AirPlay so bad, I would expect to be able to mirror wireless with at least 720p.
Bbray6744
March 14, 2011 at 6:30pm
I agree about the cameras. But after I bought one I have to strongly disagree with this. The iPad 2 is much faster than my original iPad. Loading apps is much faster. Want an awesome example? Load infinity blade. Huge difference in time...not 1-1.5 seconds. YouTube a comparison. The screen is brighter, it's much much faster. Maybe evolutionary...but a giant evolutionary step.
maclover1
May 21, 2011 at 7:00pm
Thanks for your comment. I bought the first G iPad also and I tried to give myself every excuse not to buy the iPad 2. Needless to say after reading reviews and seeing the iPad 2 in person. I had to have one and I am glad I bought it. It is something to marvel at. The thinness, speed and the ability to video chat made it worth the upgrade for me. The camera for taking stills could be better. But I am not going to be using it as a point and shoot device. Also at least the video camera captures decent video.
tomdoty
March 14, 2011 at 5:18pm
Enjoyed your article about the iPad2. But I would not be buying the it as a camera, so the low res and the grain would not even enter into my buying decision. If that one of the areas Apple need to cut cost to keep the iPad2 at last years prices, then I'm all for it.
Log in to Mac|Life directly or log in using Facebook
Forgot your username or password?
Click here for help.




















