Nolobe Iris

The Help dialog sums up our thoughts on this turkey. Click image to embiggen.
Nolobe Software’s Iris is billed as the “ultimate image editor for Mac OS X,” which, depending on your point of view, is about as true as the statement, “Martians live among us.” This app is an all-out dud, offering very little reason for anyone to enlist it as a creative tool.
Iris is easy to download and install—and the app takes up very little disk space (7.5MB), which is great, but keep in mind that there are no demo files, no brush libraries, and no help files. That’s right, the version we tested included no documentation or help of any sort, which is surprising, given that Iris seems targeted to users who are just getting started with image editing.
Once you start working with Iris, the frustration comes up like acid reflux. Consider the simple operation of selecting a region from an image and duplicating it on the same layer. Virtually every bitmap editor since MacPaint has implemented the option-drag selection to “lift” the pixels of the selection and let you drag out a duplicate. Not Iris, though—you’ll need to copy your selection and paste it back, resulting in a new layer. OK, that works, now we’ll change the opacity of the new layer, except—oops!—there’s no opacity control for layers. You’re stuck with 100% opaque or nothing. This is completely unacceptable. Indeed, we have a hard time understanding how an app billed as having “advanced compositing” features could miss this essential feature. And don’t even think about asking where the layer masks, layer blend modes, and layer grouping come into the picture, because they’re not here either.
So what if you don’t care about layers? One of the most basic aspects of working with photographs is color correction—making skin tones look nice and healthy or removing overall cyan color casts from outdoor photos, for example. Iris has some of the expected color-correction tools, but they just don’t work. Levels, which is the most powerful tool in Iris, is totally broken—it makes some of the most bizarre and totally incorrect color shifts we’ve ever seen. It’s utterly useless, and that’s really bad news when you consider that it’s the most capable color-correction tool the app has to offer.
There’s such a long list of other hiccups and hair balls in Iris, it boggles the mind. We opened a 10-megapixel image and found that the app slowed to a crawl. And when we clicked the icon to toggle a single layer (of a two-layer image) on and off, there was a 6-second lag on a 2.16GHz Core 2 Duo MacBook Pro with 3GB of RAM. We had several problems with layers—the ability to move a layer, for example, frequently vanished. After applying a filter to a layer, the filter effect would disappear the instant we tried to move the layer. Paintbrushes stopped painting after a few minutes, and screen redraw nightmares were common. We just had to wonder, did anyone actually test this thing before it was released?
COMPANY: Nolobe
CONTACT: www.nolobe.com
PRICE: $79
REQUIREMENTS: OS 10.5
the_saltminer
September 09, 2008 at 8:01am
Your first comment talks about and only about the developer's Web site. As you said, "They have a total of 164 words describing an application they would like you to pay $79 for." My point is that you can try the app _before_ paying the $79. You weren't talking about documentation (which I agree is important) in your first comment.
frankly
September 08, 2008 at 10:41pm
I'm sorry but a demo download does NOT make up for the lack of content on the website and this part that was pointed out in the review:
"but keep in mind that there are no demo files, no brush libraries, and no help files. That’s right, the version we tested included no documentation or help of any sort, which is surprising, given that Iris seems targeted to users who are just getting started with image editing."
If we don't start demanding more from software developers then we will only see more products like this, where they give it to you and basically tell you to fend for yourself. We don't accept this from other products. Why should we accept it from a piece of software? Keep in mind that most applications have more features than the typical hardware product (cell phone, DVD player, etc.) and yet those items come with user manuals.
If they want to keep a sparse website and not include a manual then at a minimum they have to include help files. Mac|Life doesn't give out AWFUL ratings very easily so they need to go back to the drawing board with this app.
the_saltminer
September 08, 2008 at 3:43pm
Nolobe allows you to download a fully-functional demo before you can buy it. Which is more important to me than >164 words describing the product. Just try the demo before you buy. That's how you can figure out if this application is for you.
frankly
September 08, 2008 at 11:46am
The website for this application gives you a big hint as to the quality of the application. Unfortunately it is just one example of a growing number of applications where the author thinks they only need one page with a few bullet points to describe a complex application to their potential customers. I can't understand for the life of me how someone is supposed to figure out whether this application is for them or not by looking at 7 brief items and 3 lousy screenshots. They have a total of 164 words describing an application they would like you to pay $79 for.
Log in to Mac|Life directly or log in using Facebook
Forgot your username or password?
Click here for help.

















