Quantcast

Special Sponsored Section


The video player requires Flash 8 Player or later. Please download the latest Flash Player.


Maclife Hottest Articles
Thumbnail
FEATURE
100 Snow Leopard Tips, Tricks, and Features
Browser
FEATURE
OS X Browser Speed Wars: May the Fastest App Win
iTunes History
FEATURE
The Complete iTunes History -- SoundJam MP to iTunes 9
iTunes Tips
FEATURE
iTunes 9 Tips and Tricks - Solve the Mysteries of the New iTunes
Reviews
Skyla Memoir FS80
Posted 10/14/2009 at 3:09:54pm | by Leslie Ayers

It’s mystifying to us when gadget makers assume that devices that do one thing well should be re-engineered to multitask. Testing the Memoir FS80, it took us back to when basketball god Michael Jordan tried his hand at Major League Baseball. It’s, like, why?


Skyla took a quality digital photo frame and added the ability to scan snapshots--a neat party trick, but not the most efficient way to digitize all your snapshots.

The FS80 is an 8-inch digital photo frame that incorporates a 300 dpi scanner. As digiframes go, it’s a winner, with 1GB of onboard memory (to hold about 500 high-quality images), a bright 800x600 screen, handy infrared (IR) remote, and built-in slots to read CF, SD, and xD memory cards. The onscreen menus are easy enough for any second-grader--or slightly tech-savvy grandparent--to navigate.

But the scanning process was far from foolproof. We experienced multiple misfeeds because the mechanism on the feeder simply couldn’t grab the photo in the right spot. Scanning 4x6 snapshots was also relatively slow--25 seconds on average for a 300 dpi scan, and up to 35 seconds from start to finish when we encountered misfeeds.

THE BOTTOM LINE
The FS80 is a nifty device that does its job adequately but solves a nonexistent problem. If you really want to "digitize your photo albums" as Skyla claims its customers do, there are more efficient ways to do it.

Memoir FS80
COMPANY: Skyla
CONTACT: www.skyla.com
PRICE: $219.99
REQUIREMENTS: None
Simple enough for any member of the family over 7 to use.
Slow compared to a dedicated scanner.
3/5
COMMENTS