Forums | MacLife
You are not logged in.
#76 2006-01-13 11:28 pm
- fustercluck
- Member
- Registered: 2005-07-13
- Posts: 5
Re: Robertson says Charon's stroke due to God's wrath
ShnickyShnack wrote:
If he can't stand to be scrutinized, he shouldn't be on TV.
If he can't watch is fool mouth, he shouldn't be on TV.
If he can't help coming off like a lunatic, he shouldn't be on TV.
If his views are so far in the fringe so as to barely be Christian (if at all), that word should be taken off the network's name.
So you're saying that Pat Robertson isn't entitled to his First Amendment rights under the U.S. Constitution?
Do you feel the same way about Howard Stern, or Michael Moore?
You know me -- you just wish you didn't.
Offline
#77 2006-01-13 11:50 pm
- ShnickyShnack
- ::: title edited due to Satanic influences :::
- From: Rockin' out
- Registered: 2001-05-25
- Posts: 22237
Re: Robertson says Charon's stroke due to God's wrath
fustercluck wrote:
ShnickyShnack wrote:
If he can't stand to be scrutinized, he shouldn't be on TV.
If he can't watch is fool mouth, he shouldn't be on TV.
If he can't help coming off like a lunatic, he shouldn't be on TV.
If his views are so far in the fringe so as to barely be Christian (if at all), that word should be taken off the network's name.So you're saying that Pat Robertson isn't entitled to his First Amendment rights under the U.S. Constitution?
Do you feel the same way about Howard Stern, or Michael Moore?
I'm curious as to what the hell you're talking about.
Note: please delete this post.
Offline
#78 2006-01-14 1:00 am
- charon
- doesn't make change
- From: DC
- Registered: 2003-05-06
- Posts: 5328
Re: Robertson says Charon's stroke due to God's wrath
fustercluck wrote:
ShnickyShnack wrote:
If he can't stand to be scrutinized, he shouldn't be on TV.
If he can't watch is fool mouth, he shouldn't be on TV.
If he can't help coming off like a lunatic, he shouldn't be on TV.
If his views are so far in the fringe so as to barely be Christian (if at all), that word should be taken off the network's name.So you're saying that Pat Robertson isn't entitled to his First Amendment rights under the U.S. Constitution?
Do you feel the same way about Howard Stern, or Michael Moore?
I didn't see Shnicky say anything about censoring Robertson by law.
Offline
#79 2006-01-17 10:06 am
- XYZ
- Banned
- Registered: 2000-07-03
- Posts: 10881
Re: Robertson says Charon's stroke due to God's wrath
It's interesting that there's libel/slander, but apparently no law against calling for someone's assassination? Isn't it a crime to tell someone to kill someone, or is it only a crime when money is involved?
there's really no need for all of this
Offline
