Forums | MacLife
You are not logged in.
#1 2008-04-04 9:17 pm
- thelegendofjohn
- I know.
- From: A Basement On The Hill.
- Registered: 2006-08-20
- Posts: 1385
OS 9
This is pretty random, but I miss Mac OS 9 and earlier, things just seemed simpler.
I was using my original iBook the other day (I actually think it had some version of OS 8 on it) and it was amazing how fast AppleWorks loaded, much quicker than Pages does on my MBP.
Offline
#2 2008-04-06 8:35 am
- loafer
- Member
- Registered: 2000-11-10
- Posts: 271
Re: OS 9
The OS X eye candy slows things down ridiculously. As far as applications go - Photoshop 7 runs the same speed in 9 and X (on my older hardware) if that is any consolation.
Offline
#3 2008-04-07 8:31 pm
- zoees
- Member
- From: Maryland
- Registered: 2001-08-14
- Posts: 2570
Re: OS 9
Photoshop 7 and 9.2.1. Fantastic! I loved that. Wacom tablet dialed in an everything.
Now I'm running 10.5.2 and CS3. Wacom drivers- no more.
Next purchase- Wacom tablet. A nice one.
One of the saddest lessons of history is this: If we've been bamboozled long enough, we tend to reject any evidence of the bamboozle. It is simply too painful to acknowledge even to ourselves that we've been so credulous. -Carl Sagan
Offline
#4 2008-05-13 7:06 am
- ColourClassic
- Now in Colour
- From: OZ
- Registered: 2004-05-19
- Posts: 743
- Website
Re: OS 9
OS 10 > 9. Mind you, I never really had a computer that ran it so my opinion is probably biased.
Offline
#5 2008-05-13 11:28 am
- Mr. T
- Uses STOS implicitly
- From: omnipresent
- Registered: 2002-04-02
- Posts: 3658
Re: OS 9
OS 9 was like a luxury sedan -- a lot of attention to detail, even though the underlying technology is not really all that impressive. OS X is more like a muscle car. The technology is much better, but the detail has largely been ignored.
while (1) {fork();}
Offline
#6 2008-05-13 1:33 pm
- thelegendofjohn
- I know.
- From: A Basement On The Hill.
- Registered: 2006-08-20
- Posts: 1385
Re: OS 9
I like that analogy.
Offline
#7 2008-05-13 2:57 pm
Re: OS 9
I still use OS 9 on a day to day basis, mainly because Jag runs horribly on my wallstreet. there are somethings i still like about OS 9 mainly the speed factor but im sure if i was running a G4 500 in my wallstreet i'd be using that over OS 9 since lets face it.. Web Browsing sucks in 9
tiBook 1ghz.
1gb ram // 100gb HDD
10.4.11
Offline
#8 2008-05-14 4:41 am
Re: OS 9
Panther beats Jaguar by a large margin, especially on older hardware.
.tsooJ
Offline
#10 2008-05-14 8:55 am
- dv
- Negusa Negest
- Moderator
- From: Minneapolis, MN
- Registered: 1999-08-30
- Posts: 16975
Re: OS 9
dhack21 wrote:
yeah, but wouldnt i have to use xpostfacto for a panther installation?
On a Wallstreet? I don't think so - I know you need XPF for a Tiger Install on a WS though.
"Now commences the process of cutting off the head, which generally takes from an hour to an hour and a half by an expert workman with a sharp blade." -Reuben Delano, Wanderings and Adventures
Online
#11 2008-05-14 8:55 am
Offline
#12 2008-05-14 9:22 am
Re: OS 9
dvpierce wrote:
dhack21 wrote:
yeah, but wouldnt i have to use xpostfacto for a panther installation?
On a Wallstreet? I don't think so - I know you need XPF for a Tiger Install on a WS though.
The wallstreet only will take up to 10.2.8 as maximum OS without xpf
tiBook 1ghz.
1gb ram // 100gb HDD
10.4.11
Offline
#13 2008-05-14 10:32 pm
- agedgruel
- insert clever phrase here
- From: Great Plains, U.S.A.
- Registered: 2004-06-05
- Posts: 775
Re: OS 9
If you don't have the RAM maxed on your wallstreet, it is well worth it to do so. Jaguar became much more usable on my wallstreet when I did so.
Offline
#15 2008-05-26 12:51 am
- Temetka
- High Priest
- From: Behind the altar...
- Registered: 2002-07-02
- Posts: 2149
Re: OS 9
No cache?!?
I have a PB5300 with a 100MHz 603 that has no cache. It's performance is middling. I couldn't imagine the non-speed of a cacheless G3.
Brother, I feel your pain.
Puddlemonkey said: My High Priest Rules!
Jdude wrote: Anything in the name of Temetka, I suppose.
Metallica wrote: Obey your Master!
Offline
#16 2008-05-27 5:22 am
Re: OS 9
Temetka wrote:
I have a PB5300 with a 100MHz 603 that has no cache. It's performance is middling. I couldn't imagine the non-speed of a cacheless G3.
You can't make that comparison. The 5300 is a NuBus machine with an anaemic bus. The CPU is hampered by more than the lack of cache in that machine.
.tsooJ
Offline
#17 2008-05-27 2:30 pm
- dv
- Negusa Negest
- Moderator
- From: Minneapolis, MN
- Registered: 1999-08-30
- Posts: 16975
Re: OS 9
The cacheless G3 was "only" as "slow" as the 3400c/240.
"Now commences the process of cutting off the head, which generally takes from an hour to an hour and a half by an expert workman with a sharp blade." -Reuben Delano, Wanderings and Adventures
Online
#18 2008-05-27 2:37 pm
- Antonio
- Now with more cowbell!
- From: San Francisco, CA
- Registered: 2007-01-16
- Posts: 520
Re: OS 9
zoees wrote:
Photoshop 7 and 9.2.1. Fantastic! I loved that. Wacom tablet dialed in an everything.
Now I'm running 10.5.2 and CS3. Wacom drivers- no more.
Next purchase- Wacom tablet. A nice one.
I just bought a used 15 inch Cintiq LCD tablet. It apparently has drivers for both 9 and X, though I only use it with my MacBook.
I do wish the screen had a higher contrast ratio (200:1 sucks really hard), but it's still one of the most impressive and fun legacy devices I've ever used (legacy, as in you can still connect via serial if you want without an adapter).
It's just a digitizer with an lcd screen and protective layer on top, so I may swap the screen with a newer one.
“The most merciful thing in the world, I think, is the inability of the human mind to correlate all its contents.”
--HP Lovecraft, The Call Of Cthulhu
Offline
