Forums | MacLife
You are not logged in.
#276 2008-10-16 11:19 pm
- Macskeeball
- Member

- Registered: 2002-02-07
- Posts: 8014
- Website
Re: 2008 Final Debate thread
Kripto wrote:
Maybe JTP can join NKOTB when his moment in the sun is done...
Who is JTP and what is NKOTB? I tried Googling but didn't find anything that seemed to make sense.
tech writer for hire
Offline
#277 2008-10-17 12:29 am
- jerwin
- Sophist
- From: The Garden of Pure Ideology
- Registered: 2003-01-01
- Posts: 7408
Re: 2008 Final Debate thread
Joe The Plumber and, I'm guessing here-- New Kids on the Block?
Some subjects actually enjoy pain, and withhold information they might otherwise have divulged in order to be punished.
Central Intelligence Agency. (1983). Human Resource Exploitation Training Manual
Offline
#278 2008-10-17 1:00 am
- Some1
- The flying moleman.

- From: Montréal
- Registered: 2003-05-17
- Posts: 2788
Re: 2008 Final Debate thread
The picture of McCain making a funny face is a photoshop right?
Offline
#279 2008-10-17 1:21 am
- Macskeeball
- Member

- Registered: 2002-02-07
- Posts: 8014
- Website
Re: 2008 Final Debate thread
Some1 wrote:
The picture of McCain making a funny face is a photoshop right?
Nope. It's a frame from the end of the debate when the candidates stood up. McCain was trying to shake hands with the moderator. McCain went one way but the moderator went the other, so he had to correct it. Also, McCain was actually off to the side of Obama, not right behind him.
You can see it at about 4:25 in with this clip: www.youtube.com/watch?v=r0c6aIlXIfs
tech writer for hire
Offline
#280 2008-10-17 2:19 am
- Warin
- Maple Leaf Wag

- From: Canada
- Registered: 2003-09-21
- Posts: 2441
Re: 2008 Final Debate thread
I actually feel a little sorry for McCain after watching that clip. It's pretty obvious, when in motion, that it was just a silly face he made when he went the wrong way to shake hands... something many of us probably might do. But as a still it just makes him look terrible and goofy.
From what I can tell, either way, you're screwed. Bad people are punished by society's laws, and good people are punished by Murphy's Law.
-- George, Dead Like Me
Offline
#281 2008-10-17 8:22 am
- user
- Your plastic pal who's fun to be with

- From: I'm not getting you down, am I
- Registered: 2001-10-15
- Posts: 16471
Re: 2008 Final Debate thread
Also known as a "Dukakis moment".
Aw, he's no fun, he fell right over.
Unless you become as little children, there's no way you will believe this crap.
Offline
#282 2008-10-17 9:27 am
Re: 2008 Final Debate thread
I'm going to go out on a limb...
Unlike some online commentary that has looked at polls and concluded that Obama has peaked, and that Nov. 4 will be a squeeker (much like, say 1976, which had Ford closing fast late) I think that McCampaign will appear in now 'battleground' states like FLA, NC, VA and OH (coming on this next swing) he will actually LOSE points in those states. Much as if someone had a W voodoo doll at work against him.
Follow tracking over the next week. And watch those states go bluer.
Last edited by daemon (2008-10-17 10:36 am)
Brigid O'Shaughnessy: I haven't lived a good life. I've been bad, worse than you could know.
Sam Spade: You know, that's good, because if you actually were as innocent as you pretend to be, we'd never get anywhere.
http://sitruc.blip.tv/file/2661495/
Offline
#283 2008-10-17 10:34 am
- CG5Addict
- Member

- From: middle of nowhere
- Registered: 2005-08-29
- Posts: 583
Re: 2008 Final Debate thread
Did anybody watch McCain on Letterman last night?
Gears Of War Addict!
Offline
#284 2008-10-17 10:49 am
- Tallgeese
- Homo loquax nonnumquam sapiens
- Registered: 2000-10-17
- Posts: 34895
Re: 2008 Final Debate thread
daemon wrote:
I'm going to go out on a limb...
Unlike some online commentary that has looked at polls and concluded that Obama has peaked, and that Nov. 4 will be a squeeker (much like, say 1976, which had Ford closing fast late) I think that McCampaign will appear in now 'battleground' states like FLA, NC, VA and OH (coming on this next swing) he will actually LOSE points in those states. Much as if someone had a W voodoo doll at work against him.
Follow tracking over the next week. And watch those states go bluer.
You don't worry that the big chunk of "undecided" voters (and some who are polling for Obama) are actually racists who don't want to admit it?
I still believe in liberalism today as much as I ever did, but, oh, there was a happy time when I believed in liberals.
Offline
#285 2008-10-17 10:54 am
- Colonel Panic
- You need to restart

- From: The bowels of code
- Registered: 2003-10-12
- Posts: 533
Re: 2008 Final Debate thread
Have you tried repairing permissions?
Offline
#286 2008-10-17 10:56 am
Re: 2008 Final Debate thread
I think McCrazee drives 'em away. To the half-white guy.
There is a large dose of robocalls underway also. I fear those more. However, it is a flip of the coin about the success of those vs. the loss of pissed off centrists/(racists.)
Like I said, out on a limb...but the numbers say the view is solid. And that only a major X factor can change the electorate.
Brigid O'Shaughnessy: I haven't lived a good life. I've been bad, worse than you could know.
Sam Spade: You know, that's good, because if you actually were as innocent as you pretend to be, we'd never get anywhere.
http://sitruc.blip.tv/file/2661495/
Offline
#287 2008-10-17 11:00 am
Re: 2008 Final Debate thread
It's a corallary to the 'unconventional cycle theory' and that his 'conventional campaign' will defy 'political analysis' and bounce to his detriment.
The cement is solid; the wave is waxing not waning.
Brigid O'Shaughnessy: I haven't lived a good life. I've been bad, worse than you could know.
Sam Spade: You know, that's good, because if you actually were as innocent as you pretend to be, we'd never get anywhere.
http://sitruc.blip.tv/file/2661495/
Offline
#288 2008-10-17 11:34 am
Re: 2008 Final Debate thread
bratboy wrote:
I don't feel too sorry for him, considering he basically made up the situation that he claimed would cause his taxes to go up under Obama when talking to him in front of the media.
Dude simply asked a what-if question. It wasn't off the wall or ridiculous and is certainly valid for many Americans. Tearing hi s life apart simply for daring to ask a question serves to let warn others what could happen if they don't just shut up and obey. Not quite progressive or open-minded.
Just like back in Saigon! Eh, slick?
Offline
#289 2008-10-17 11:38 am
Re: 2008 Final Debate thread
thwack!
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1008/14652.html
While the arc of Wurzelbacher’s breakneck trip through the news cycle – from private citizen to insta-celebrity to political target – offers a curious insight into the political media culture, it also appears to offer a glimpse into the McCain campaign’s on-the-fly decisionmaking style.
A McCain source said Thursday that the campaign read about Wurzelbacher on the Drudge Report, while another campaign aide confirmed that he was not vetted.
I wonder how Shnicky views this invasion of a citizens' private and personal life?
Simple what-if.
Last edited by daemon (2008-10-17 11:41 am)
Brigid O'Shaughnessy: I haven't lived a good life. I've been bad, worse than you could know.
Sam Spade: You know, that's good, because if you actually were as innocent as you pretend to be, we'd never get anywhere.
http://sitruc.blip.tv/file/2661495/
Offline
#290 2008-10-17 11:45 am
Re: 2008 Final Debate thread
daemon wrote:
thwack!
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1008/14652.htmlWhile the arc of Wurzelbacher’s breakneck trip through the news cycle – from private citizen to insta-celebrity to political target – offers a curious insight into the political media culture, it also appears to offer a glimpse into the McCain campaign’s on-the-fly decisionmaking style.
A McCain source said Thursday that the campaign read about Wurzelbacher on the Drudge Report, while another campaign aide confirmed that he was not vetted.I wonder how Shnicky views this invasion of a citizens' private and personal life?
Simple what-if.
It is a question, it wasnt a trick question or loaded one, just a regular question. and for people who are confident in the plan of action they suppport being the right one it should be pretty simple to answer without focusing almost exclusively on the person who asked it.
Last edited by Steyr AUG (2008-10-17 11:54 am)
Just like back in Saigon! Eh, slick?
Offline
#291 2008-10-17 11:56 am
- bratboy
- keeping the poor down
- Royal Wombat

- From: Austin, Texas
- Registered: 2003-01-19
- Posts: 34225
Re: 2008 Final Debate thread
Steyr AUG wrote:
Dude simply asked a what-if question. It wasn't off the wall or ridiculous and is certainly valid for many Americans.
Actually the percentage of "small businesses" that bring in that amount of profit is quite small. I think the question was more rhetorical than it was hypothetical.
Tearing hi s life apart simply for daring to ask a question serves to let warn others what could happen if they don't just shut up and obey. Not quite progressive or open-minded.

"Shut up and obey?" How uncharacteristically dramatic of you.
Nobody is "tearing his life apart," and he seems to be quite content with the attention (he's probably given more interviews than Sarah Palin, if you hadn't noticed).
The focus has been more on John McCain's use of the story. In reality, "Joe the Plumber" wasn't preparing to buy such a business, doesn't make that much money himself, and the business likely doesn't make that much money, either.
"One thing we've learned is there's a difference between being disappointed and having madmen in authority."
--Paul Krugman
Offline
#292 2008-10-17 11:56 am
- JakeTheTall
- Cargo Cultist

- From: In Permanent Opposition
- Registered: 2003-03-13
- Posts: 10123
Re: 2008 Final Debate thread
Steyr AUG wrote:
bratboy wrote:
I don't feel too sorry for him, considering he basically made up the situation that he claimed would cause his taxes to go up under Obama when talking to him in front of the media.
Dude simply asked a what-if question. It wasn't off the wall or ridiculous and is certainly valid for many Americans. Tearing hi s life apart simply for daring to ask a question serves to let warn others what could happen if they don't just shut up and obey. Not quite progressive or open-minded.
Is the Obama campaign "tearing his life apart," or is it the media that's simply asking questions about him ?
If the right can disavow nutters yelling at McCain / Palin rallies, who are being few lies and distortions by the McCain campaign, I think you should realize the Obama campaign =/= media outlets.
Jesus said to the servants, "Fill the jars with water"; so they filled them to the brim. Then he told them, "Now draw some out and take it to the master of the banquet." They did so, and the master of the banquet tasted the water that had been turned into wine. He did not realize where it had come from, though the servants who had drawn the water knew.
Offline
#293 2008-10-17 12:04 pm
Re: 2008 Final Debate thread
The truth has a well known liberal bias. (sic)
Brigid O'Shaughnessy: I haven't lived a good life. I've been bad, worse than you could know.
Sam Spade: You know, that's good, because if you actually were as innocent as you pretend to be, we'd never get anywhere.
http://sitruc.blip.tv/file/2661495/
Offline
#294 2008-10-17 12:06 pm
Re: 2008 Final Debate thread
bratboy wrote:
Steyr AUG wrote:
Dude simply asked a what-if question. It wasn't off the wall or ridiculous and is certainly valid for many Americans.
Actually the percentage of "small businesses" that bring in that amount of profit is quite small. I think the question was more rhetorical than it was hypothetical.
I worked for one, and it was by no means an anomaly.
Nobody is "tearing his life apart," and he seems to be quite content with the attention (he's probably given more interviews than Sarah Palin, if you hadn't noticed).
What was being discussed is the impression to others, ask an inconvenient question and get your life sifted through by dailykos bloggers everywhere. Its laughable for you to even assert that nobody is tearing his life apart.
Just like back in Saigon! Eh, slick?
Offline
#295 2008-10-17 12:07 pm
Re: 2008 Final Debate thread
Steyr AUG wrote:
bratboy wrote:
Steyr AUG wrote:
Dude simply asked a what-if question. It wasn't off the wall or ridiculous and is certainly valid for many Americans.
Actually the percentage of "small businesses" that bring in that amount of profit is quite small. I think the question was more rhetorical than it was hypothetical.
I worked for one, and it was by no means an anomaly.
Nobody is "tearing his life apart," and he seems to be quite content with the attention (he's probably given more interviews than Sarah Palin, if you hadn't noticed).
What was being discussed is the impression to others, ask an inconvenient question and get your life sifted through by dailykos bloggers everywhere. Its laughable for you to even assert that nobody is tearing his life apart.
It's laughable that he is what he was presented as.
Another lie.
If he did nothing wrong, what has he to fear, anymore? "Also!"
Brigid O'Shaughnessy: I haven't lived a good life. I've been bad, worse than you could know.
Sam Spade: You know, that's good, because if you actually were as innocent as you pretend to be, we'd never get anywhere.
http://sitruc.blip.tv/file/2661495/
Offline
#296 2008-10-17 12:13 pm
- Colonel Panic
- You need to restart

- From: The bowels of code
- Registered: 2003-10-12
- Posts: 533
Re: 2008 Final Debate thread
Steyr AUG wrote:
bratboy wrote:
Steyr AUG wrote:
Dude simply asked a what-if question. It wasn't off the wall or ridiculous and is certainly valid for many Americans.
Actually the percentage of "small businesses" that bring in that amount of profit is quite small. I think the question was more rhetorical than it was hypothetical.
I worked for one, and it was by no means an anomaly.
Nobody is "tearing his life apart," and he seems to be quite content with the attention (he's probably given more interviews than Sarah Palin, if you hadn't noticed).
What was being discussed is the impression to others, ask an inconvenient question and get your life sifted through by dailykos bloggers everywhere. Its laughable for you to even assert that nobody is tearing his life apart.
I love how the regressives trot out a parade of retards then blames the likes of daily kos (???!!!) for shining the light on them that they're begging for.
Have you tried repairing permissions?
Offline
#297 2008-10-17 12:16 pm
- bratboy
- keeping the poor down
- Royal Wombat

- From: Austin, Texas
- Registered: 2003-01-19
- Posts: 34225
Re: 2008 Final Debate thread
Steyr AUG wrote:
I worked for one, and it was by no means an anomaly.
Taxable income? Great! Your anecdotal evidence notwithstanding....
What was being discussed is the impression to others, ask an inconvenient question and get your life sifted through by dailykos bloggers everywhere. Its laughable for you to even assert that nobody is tearing his life apart.
Obama really hasn't made any secret of his tax proposal, so the question doesn't quite qualify as "inconvenient."
Further, it was quite obviously John McCain that brought all of this attention upon the guy. I'm not asserting that it's "OK" to violate someone's privacy because they approach a candidate in front of the media and ask them a question, which is then used by the opposing candidate in a nationally televised debate--but if this guy were truly interested in avoiding the spotlight, he's going about it in a funny way. He obviously welcomes the attention.
"One thing we've learned is there's a difference between being disappointed and having madmen in authority."
--Paul Krugman
Offline
#298 2008-10-17 12:22 pm
Re: 2008 Final Debate thread
bratboy wrote:
Steyr AUG wrote:
I worked for one, and it was by no means an anomaly.
Taxable income? Great! Your anecdotal evidence notwithstanding....
Just matching the quality of your random guess.
Obama really hasn't made any secret of his tax proposal, so the question doesn't quite qualify as "inconvenient."
Further, it was quite obviously John McCain that brought all of this attention upon the guy. I'm not asserting that it's "OK" to violate someone's privacy because they approach a candidate in front of the media and ask them a question, which is then used by the opposing candidate in a nationally televised debate--but if this guy were truly interested in avoiding the spotlight, he's going about it in a funny way. He obviously welcomes the attention.
The prying started much earlier then when McCain talked about Joey in the debate. As soon as the video of the question started getting play, so did the blogging about the life of the questioner. They were also before he got interviewed.
Last edited by Steyr AUG (2008-10-17 12:23 pm)
Just like back in Saigon! Eh, slick?
Offline
#299 2008-10-17 12:24 pm
- Tallgeese
- Homo loquax nonnumquam sapiens
- Registered: 2000-10-17
- Posts: 34895
Re: 2008 Final Debate thread
bratboy wrote:
Steyr AUG wrote:
Dude simply asked a what-if question. It wasn't off the wall or ridiculous and is certainly valid for many Americans.
Actually the percentage of "small businesses" that bring in that amount of profit is quite small. I think the question was more rhetorical than it was hypothetical.
Tearing hi s life apart simply for daring to ask a question serves to let warn others what could happen if they don't just shut up and obey. Not quite progressive or open-minded.
"Shut up and obey?" How uncharacteristically dramatic of you.
Nobody is "tearing his life apart," and he seems to be quite content with the attention (he's probably given more interviews than Sarah Palin, if you hadn't noticed).
The focus has been more on John McCain's use of the story. In reality, "Joe the Plumber" wasn't preparing to buy such a business, doesn't make that much money himself, and the business likely doesn't make that much money, either.
...and if his income does get pushed to 250-280,000 the tax increase will be about $900 a year.
I still believe in liberalism today as much as I ever did, but, oh, there was a happy time when I believed in liberals.
Offline
#300 2008-10-17 12:27 pm
Re: 2008 Final Debate thread
Steyr AUG wrote:
bratboy wrote:
Steyr AUG wrote:
I worked for one, and it was by no means an anomaly.
Taxable income? Great! Your anecdotal evidence notwithstanding....
Just matching the quality of your random guess.
Obama really hasn't made any secret of his tax proposal, so the question doesn't quite qualify as "inconvenient."
Further, it was quite obviously John McCain that brought all of this attention upon the guy. I'm not asserting that it's "OK" to violate someone's privacy because they approach a candidate in front of the media and ask them a question, which is then used by the opposing candidate in a nationally televised debate--but if this guy were truly interested in avoiding the spotlight, he's going about it in a funny way. He obviously welcomes the attention.The prying started much earlier then when McCain talked about Joey in the debate. As soon as the video of the question started getting play, so did the blogging about the life of the questioner. They were also before he got interviewed.
Come now. It started much earlier than that. How did he get on Drudge for McMonger's staff?
Brigid O'Shaughnessy: I haven't lived a good life. I've been bad, worse than you could know.
Sam Spade: You know, that's good, because if you actually were as innocent as you pretend to be, we'd never get anywhere.
http://sitruc.blip.tv/file/2661495/
Offline


