Quantcast

Forums | MacLife

You are not logged in.

#1 2009-05-11 8:17 pm

ShnickyShnack
::: title edited due to Satanic influences :::
From: Rockin' out
Registered: 2001-05-25
Posts: 22237

Saving GM: law of diminishing returns?

GM may be saved, but all kinds of smurf is on the table ... further union concessions, outsourcing, and now selling the corporate headquarters (and leaving Detroit?).

So at which point does it become not worth the effort to save the company? Considering the immense sums involved, will the "saved" company be too diminished to have been worth the effort? Where is such a point, anyway?

Last edited by ShnickyShnack (2009-05-11 8:18 pm)


Note: please delete this post.

Offline

 

#2 2009-05-11 9:40 pm

robco
Curmudgeon
From: Sodom
Registered: 2004-12-04
Posts: 7942
Website

Re: Saving GM: law of diminishing returns?

It's not worth it in the long-term. GM, like Ford, will send more jobs to Canada and primarily Mexico. It's the only way to keep costs down to a reasonable level.


It is an odd thing, but every one who disappears is said to be seen at San Francisco. It must be a delightful city, and possess all the attractions of the next world.
- Oscar Wilde

Offline

 

#3 2009-05-11 9:44 pm

ShnickyShnack
::: title edited due to Satanic influences :::
From: Rockin' out
Registered: 2001-05-25
Posts: 22237

Re: Saving GM: law of diminishing returns?

They're not going to open up new factories here.


Note: please delete this post.

Offline

 

#4 2009-05-11 10:29 pm

radarman
Member
Registered: 2005-02-28
Posts: 3617

Re: Saving GM: law of diminishing returns?

ShnickyShnack wrote:

GM may be saved, but all kinds of smurf is on the table ... further union concessions, outsourcing, and now selling the corporate headquarters (and leaving Detroit?).

So at which point does it become not worth the effort to save the company? Considering the immense sums involved, will the "saved" company be too diminished to have been worth the effort? Where is such a point, anyway?

As far as I'm concerned, we were there last year. All the crap since has been as depressing as it was predictable.

Offline

 

#5 2009-05-12 6:04 am

avkills
demyelinated brain matter
Registered: 2001-05-09
Posts: 7094

Re: Saving GM: law of diminishing returns?

Well the unions are just going to have to recognize that pensions are a thing of the past; and fall into line with what the industry can bear to pay them -- just like the rest of us. (and to you who have pensions -- you're damn lucky)

-mark

Offline

 

#6 2009-05-12 10:53 am

ShnickyShnack
::: title edited due to Satanic influences :::
From: Rockin' out
Registered: 2001-05-25
Posts: 22237

Re: Saving GM: law of diminishing returns?

I wonder how many pensions could've been funded with the $12 trillion bailout program ...?


Note: please delete this post.

Offline

 

#7 2009-05-12 11:00 am

resedit
Chicken Little
Royal Wombat
From: /dev/null
Registered: 1999-11-01
Posts: 50394
Website

Re: Saving GM: law of diminishing returns?

ShnickyShnack wrote:

I wonder how many pensions could've been funded with the $12 trillion bailout program ...?

I wonder how many jobs could have been saved/created if that $12 trillion (er, whatever it really is ...) had been left in the private sector where it was earned.

Last edited by resedit (2009-05-12 11:00 am)


In her right hand Jenny held the Bible of her mother
Jenny had a pistol in the other
-- Steve Taylor

Offline

 

#8 2009-05-12 11:02 am

avkills
demyelinated brain matter
Registered: 2001-05-09
Posts: 7094

Re: Saving GM: law of diminishing returns?

Both good points.

-mark

Offline

 

#9 2009-05-12 11:05 am

ShnickyShnack
::: title edited due to Satanic influences :::
From: Rockin' out
Registered: 2001-05-25
Posts: 22237

Re: Saving GM: law of diminishing returns?

resedit wrote:

ShnickyShnack wrote:

I wonder how many pensions could've been funded with the $12 trillion bailout program ...?

I wonder how many jobs could have been saved/created if that $12 trillion (er, whatever it really is ...) had been left in the private sector where it was earned.

Where it was earned? I thought it was imaginary money?


Note: please delete this post.

Offline

 

#10 2009-05-12 3:05 pm

robco
Curmudgeon
From: Sodom
Registered: 2004-12-04
Posts: 7942
Website

Re: Saving GM: law of diminishing returns?

Yeah, I'm beginning to think we'd have been much better off if they'd just given everyone in the US a couple grand and called it a day...


It is an odd thing, but every one who disappears is said to be seen at San Francisco. It must be a delightful city, and possess all the attractions of the next world.
- Oscar Wilde

Offline

 

#11 2009-05-12 4:15 pm

JakeTheTall
Cargo Cultist
From: In Permanent Opposition
Registered: 2003-03-13
Posts: 9611

Re: Saving GM: law of diminishing returns?

robco wrote:

Yeah, I'm beginning to think we'd have been much better off if they'd just given everyone in the US a couple grand and called it a day...

Which would have let the market decide, too.  But spending government money to try to save jobs is the socialist way !11!!1


Jesus said to the servants, "Fill the jars with water"; so they filled them to the brim.  Then he told them, "Now draw some out and take it to the master of the banquet."  They did so, and the master of the banquet tasted the water that had been turned into wine. He did not realize where it had come from, though the servants who had drawn the water knew.

Offline

 

#12 2009-05-12 4:28 pm

ShnickyShnack
::: title edited due to Satanic influences :::
From: Rockin' out
Registered: 2001-05-25
Posts: 22237

Re: Saving GM: law of diminishing returns?

robco wrote:

Yeah, I'm beginning to think we'd have been much better off if they'd just given everyone in the US a couple grand and called it a day...

It certainly would've been a hell of a lot cheaper ...

I believe the current loans, bailouts etc. total something like forty grand per American.


Note: please delete this post.

Offline

 

#13 2009-05-12 6:17 pm

mrreet2001
Member
From: NW Ohio
Registered: 2005-05-25
Posts: 4334
Website

Re: Saving GM: law of diminishing returns?

I bet if every citizen got 20 grand, the Automotive industry would be doing a lot better.  ... and it still would have only cost half as much.


2.66Ghz QuadCore-Nehalem w/24"LED CD ---2.2Ghz BlackMB---15" 2.4Ghz MBP(work)
Dual 2.3Ghz G5 (4G Ram, 2x 250G HD)(10.5 server)--- 400Mhz G4 PM (10.4 Server)
1.5GHz Powerbook---1.6Ghz G5 iMac
"So he fels down in a poisoning gas."

Offline

 

#14 2009-05-12 7:38 pm

radarman
Member
Registered: 2005-02-28
Posts: 3617

Re: Saving GM: law of diminishing returns?

$40 large would have probably paid most people's credit cards off, possibly their cars, or put a dent in their mortgage. With less debt, folks would have gone out and spent more (because Americans are hopelessly retarded when it comes to spending)

This would have probably lifted not only OUR economy out of the crapper, but probably a few other nation's economies as well.

Instead, we (as a nation) own a significant, and worthless, percentage of a couple of car companies.

Offline

 

#15 2009-05-26 5:49 pm

DevoDoc
Vardøger
From: The East Wing
Registered: 2003-05-27
Posts: 2711

Re: Saving GM: law of diminishing returns?


We also know how cruel the truth often is, and we wonder whether delusion is not more consoling. - Henri Poincaré
http://www.cdc.gov/images/campaigns/SwineFlu/stayhome_130x73.jpg

Offline

 

#16 2009-05-31 8:51 am

Bat
Flawless Cowboy
Royal Wombat
From: Björk, Björk
Registered: 2001-05-14
Posts: 28541

Re: Saving GM: law of diminishing returns?

DETROIT (NYT) - General Motors’ bondholders finished voting Saturday on the company’s plan to exchange their debt for an ownership stake as high as 25 percent in G.M., the final obstacle to an orderly bankruptcy for the ailing carmaker.

Bondholders with slightly more than 50 percent of G.M.’s $27.2 billion in bond debt agreed to support the plan by the deadline of 5 p.m., according to people briefed on the matter. Among the backers was a committee of large investors holding about 20 percent of G.M.’s outstanding bonds.

G.M. offered the bondholders the opportunity to take a larger stake in the company after they had overwhelmingly rejected a previous exchange offer.

GM bankruptcy plan clears bondholder hurdle


If all economists were laid end to end, they would not reach a conclusion - George Bernard Shaw

"Fire up a colortini, sit back, relax, and watch the pictures, now, as they fly through the air."

Offline

 

#17 2009-05-31 6:30 pm

resedit
Chicken Little
Royal Wombat
From: /dev/null
Registered: 1999-11-01
Posts: 50394
Website

Re: Saving GM: law of diminishing returns?

DevoDoc wrote:

Bankruptcy all but a done deal...

http://money.cnn.com/2009/05/26/news/co … 2009052618

That's what should have happened in the beginning.
I distinctly remember people here (IE schnicky) arguing against it - with absurd statements like no one would want to buy from them if they were bankrupt.

What a waste of money that was dumped into them trying to prevent the right thing from happening.


In her right hand Jenny held the Bible of her mother
Jenny had a pistol in the other
-- Steve Taylor

Offline

 

#18 2009-05-31 7:47 pm

Tallgeese
Sternly Advising
From: Pool Party
Registered: 2000-10-17
Posts: 34086

Re: Saving GM: law of diminishing returns?

I think it's put them in a better position to emerge from bankruptcy as a viable company.


I still believe in liberalism today as much as I ever did, but, oh, there was a happy time when I believed in liberals.

Offline

 

#19 2009-05-31 8:26 pm

ShnickyShnack
::: title edited due to Satanic influences :::
From: Rockin' out
Registered: 2001-05-25
Posts: 22237

Re: Saving GM: law of diminishing returns?

resedit wrote:

DevoDoc wrote:

Bankruptcy all but a done deal...

http://money.cnn.com/2009/05/26/news/co … 2009052618

That's what should have happened in the beginning.
I distinctly remember people here (IE schnicky) arguing against it - with absurd statements like no one would want to buy from them if they were bankrupt.

What a waste of money that was dumped into them trying to prevent the right thing from happening.

It's only possible because GM is being supported by Uncle Sugar.


Note: please delete this post.

Offline

 

#20 2009-06-01 1:24 am

Hank Rearden
Watch your step
From: Republic of Western Canada
Registered: 2001-04-18
Posts: 7044
Website

Re: Saving GM: law of diminishing returns?

ShnickyShnack wrote:

resedit wrote:

ShnickyShnack wrote:

I wonder how many pensions could've been funded with the $12 trillion bailout program ...?

I wonder how many jobs could have been saved/created if that $12 trillion (er, whatever it really is ...) had been left in the private sector where it was earned.

Where it was earned? I thought it was imaginary money?

It's imaginary money that will have to be paid back with real money, earned by producing real things.


The gross heathenism of civilization has generally destroyed nature, and poetry, and all that is spiritual. -John Muir-

Offline

 

#21 2009-06-01 1:35 am

ShnickyShnack
::: title edited due to Satanic influences :::
From: Rockin' out
Registered: 2001-05-25
Posts: 22237

Re: Saving GM: law of diminishing returns?

Hank Rearden wrote:

ShnickyShnack wrote:

resedit wrote:


I wonder how many jobs could have been saved/created if that $12 trillion (er, whatever it really is ...) had been left in the private sector where it was earned.

Where it was earned? I thought it was imaginary money?

It's imaginary money that will have to be paid back with real money, earned by producing real things.

I was teasing res just a little bit.

However the indebtedness of Uncle Sam has become insane. It's gonna get really ugly. Normally I'd say "if nothing's done," but it might be time to drop the caveat.


Note: please delete this post.

Offline

 

Board footer

Powered by PunBB 1.2.6
© Copyright 2002–2005 Rickard Andersson