Quantcast

Forums | MacLife

You are not logged in.

#1 2009-09-13 7:49 pm

radarman
Member
Registered: 2005-02-28
Posts: 3618

Water, water everywhere - but not a drop you'd want to drink

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/13/us/13water.html?_r=1

Jennifer Hall-Massey knows not to drink the tap water in her home near Charleston, W.Va.

In fact, her entire family tries to avoid any contact with the water. Her youngest son has scabs on his arms, legs and chest where the bathwater — polluted with lead, nickel and other heavy metals — caused painful rashes. Many of his brother’s teeth were capped to replace enamel that was eaten away.

Neighbors apply special lotions after showering because their skin burns. Tests show that their tap water contains arsenic, barium, lead, manganese and other chemicals at concentrations federal regulators say could contribute to cancer and damage the kidneys and nervous system.

“How can we get digital cable and Internet in our homes, but not clean water?” said Mrs. Hall-Massey, a senior accountant at one of the state’s largest banks.

She and her husband, Charles, do not live in some remote corner of Appalachia. Charleston, the state capital, is less than 17 miles from her home.

“How is this still happening today?” she asked.

When Mrs. Hall-Massey and 264 neighbors sued nine nearby coal companies, accusing them of putting dangerous waste into local water supplies, their lawyer did not have to look far for evidence. As required by state law, some of the companies had disclosed in reports to regulators that they were pumping into the ground illegal concentrations of chemicals — the same pollutants that flowed from residents’ taps.

But state regulators never fined or punished those companies for breaking those pollution laws.

This pattern is not limited to West Virginia. Almost four decades ago, Congress passed the Clean Water Act to force polluters to disclose the toxins they dump into waterways and to give regulators the power to fine or jail offenders. States have passed pollution statutes of their own. But in recent years, violations of the Clean Water Act have risen steadily across the nation, an extensive review of water pollution records by The New York Times found.
...
“I met our inspector at the spill site, and we had this really awkward conversation,” Mr. Crum recalled. “I said we should shut down the mine until everything was cleaned up. The inspector agreed, but he said if he issued that order, he was scared of getting demoted or transferred to the middle of nowhere. Everyone was terrified of doing their job.”

Mr. Crum temporarily shut the mine.

In the next two years, he shut many polluting mines until they changed their ways. His tough approach raised his profile around the state.

Mining companies, worried about attracting Mr. Crum’s attention, began improving their waste disposal practices, executives from that period said. But they also began complaining to their friends in the state’s legislature, they recalled in interviews, and started a whisper campaign accusing Mr. Crum of vendettas against particular companies — though those same executives now admit they had no evidence for those claims.

In 2003, a new director, Stephanie Timmermeyer, was nominated to run the Department of Environmental Protection. One of West Virginia’s most powerful state lawmakers, Eustace Frederick, said she would be confirmed, but only if she agreed to fire Mr. Crum, according to several people who said they witnessed the conversation.

She was given the job and soon summoned Mr. Crum to her office. He was dismissed two weeks after his second child’s birth.


Ms. Timmermeyer, who resigned in 2008, did not return calls. Mr. Frederick died last year.

Since then, hundreds of workplaces in West Virginia have violated pollution laws without paying fines. A half-dozen current and former employees, in interviews, said their enforcement efforts had been undermined by bureaucratic disorganization, a departmental preference to let polluters escape punishment if they promise to try harder, and a revolving door of regulators who leave for higher-paying jobs at the companies they once policed.

“We are outmanned and overwhelmed, and that’s exactly how industry wants us,” said one employee who requested anonymity for fear of being fired. “It’s been obvious for decades that we’re not on top of things, and coal companies have earned billions relying on that.”

In June, four environmental groups petitioned the E.P.A. to take over much of West Virginia’s handling of the Clean Water Act, citing a “nearly complete breakdown” in the state. The E.P.A. has asked state officials to respond and said it is investigating the petition.

Finally, an issue that we can legitimately be angry at. Apparently, our water isn't as clean as it used to be, and a lot of the gains we made in the '70's are slowly being rolled back. True, this story is about West Virginia, and mining companies practically are the economy, but still. It makes you wonder.

This a long story, and I don't want to quote it all, but the bottom line is that business is back in charge in a lot of places.

Offline

 

#2 2009-09-13 7:56 pm

ShnickyShnack
::: title edited due to Satanic influences :::
From: Rockin' out
Registered: 2001-05-25
Posts: 22237

Re: Water, water everywhere - but not a drop you'd want to drink

radarman wrote:

the bottom line is that business is back in charge in a lot of places.

Yep.

Of course the only people who have a problem with this are communists.


Note: please delete this post.

Offline

 

#3 2009-09-13 8:02 pm

Tallgeese
Sternly Advising
From: Pool Party
Registered: 2000-10-17
Posts: 34096

Re: Water, water everywhere - but not a drop you'd want to drink

I honestly wonder if some, uh, historic educational issues in places like West Virginia or the Ozarks are due in part to mercury and lead in the water.


I still believe in liberalism today as much as I ever did, but, oh, there was a happy time when I believed in liberals.

Offline

 

#4 2009-09-13 8:55 pm

sturner
Royal High Poobah
Moderator
From: Carrollton, TX USA
Registered: 2000-01-31
Posts: 13800

Re: Water, water everywhere - but not a drop you'd want to drink

From dumping of tailings and such into the water sources? Could be.


I'm not dead yet.
There are 3 types of people, those who can count and those who can't.
"There are few things graven in stone, excepting your date of death."

Offline

 

#5 2009-09-13 9:03 pm

jerwin
Sophist
From: The Garden of Pure Ideology
Registered: 2003-01-01
Posts: 7065

Re: Water, water everywhere - but not a drop you'd want to drink

Enforcement lapses were particularly bad under the administration of President George W. Bush, employees say. “For the last eight years, my hands have been tied,” said one E.P.A. official who requested anonymity for fear of retribution. “We were told to take our clean water and clean air cases, put them in a box, and lock it shut. Everyone knew polluters were getting away with murder. But these polluters are some of the biggest campaign contributors in town, so no one really cared if they were dumping poisons into streams.”

The Obama administration needs to correct course. Unfortunately, they haven't yet done so.

Last edited by jerwin (2009-09-13 9:03 pm)


Some subjects actually enjoy pain, and withhold information they might otherwise have divulged in order to be punished.
Central Intelligence Agency. (1983). Human Resource Exploitation Training Manual

Offline

 

#6 2009-09-13 9:20 pm

Tallgeese
Sternly Advising
From: Pool Party
Registered: 2000-10-17
Posts: 34096

Re: Water, water everywhere - but not a drop you'd want to drink

sturner wrote:

From dumping of tailings and such into the water sources? Could be.

Well, mining and mineral extraction is very water-intensive but also just the opening of the earth into a lot of galena or cinnabar veins encourages the metals to leech into the groundwater.


I still believe in liberalism today as much as I ever did, but, oh, there was a happy time when I believed in liberals.

Offline

 

#7 2009-09-13 11:19 pm

Tallgeese
Sternly Advising
From: Pool Party
Registered: 2000-10-17
Posts: 34096

Re: Water, water everywhere - but not a drop you'd want to drink

jerwin wrote:

Enforcement lapses were particularly bad under the administration of President George W. Bush, employees say. “For the last eight years, my hands have been tied,” said one E.P.A. official who requested anonymity for fear of retribution. “We were told to take our clean water and clean air cases, put them in a box, and lock it shut. Everyone knew polluters were getting away with murder. But these polluters are some of the biggest campaign contributors in town, so no one really cared if they were dumping poisons into streams.”

The Obama administration needs to correct course. Unfortunately, they haven't yet done so.

Major industry is allowed to literally dump poison in the drinking water, making them responsible for maiming and killing citizens and they aren't even fined. If someone steals my TV they'll be hurt worse than CEOs who actually kill people.

And then conservatards shriek and whine and rend their garments, calling a progressive tax plan "class warfare".

smurf Republicans. smurf them sideways.


I still believe in liberalism today as much as I ever did, but, oh, there was a happy time when I believed in liberals.

Offline

 

#8 2009-09-13 11:38 pm

robco
Curmudgeon
From: Sodom
Registered: 2004-12-04
Posts: 7944
Website

Re: Water, water everywhere - but not a drop you'd want to drink

If dumping toxic chemicals into the environment is good for business, shouldn't we allow it? Why do these people expect the government to help them?


It is an odd thing, but every one who disappears is said to be seen at San Francisco. It must be a delightful city, and possess all the attractions of the next world.
- Oscar Wilde

Offline

 

#9 2009-09-14 8:06 am

bratboy
laden with emotion
Royal Wombat
From: Austin, Texas
Registered: 2003-01-19
Posts: 34106

Re: Water, water everywhere - but not a drop you'd want to drink

There shouldn't be a public option for drinking water, anyway.


"One thing we've learned is there's a difference between being disappointed and having madmen in authority."

                                                                   --Paul Krugman

Offline

 

#10 2009-09-14 8:54 am

Proost
Member
From: chair
Registered: 2002-12-08
Posts: 1733

Re: Water, water everywhere - but not a drop you'd want to drink

Over here we call people often silly when buying bottled water since the quality from tap water in your home is just as good, if not better.

Another reason to quit this war..

Last edited by Proost (2009-09-14 8:59 am)

Offline

 

#11 2009-09-14 9:01 am

macnuke
just a plano guy
Moderator
From: North Dallas 40
Registered: 2004-05-16
Posts: 7134

Re: Water, water everywhere - but not a drop you'd want to drink

W. virginny eh?

i'll just get me a good chaw o' tobacky and some 'shine and think about these dealings.
my check IS in the mail isn't it?


.....

big holes in the earth really should be monitored tho.
and plugged up when things are not natural.

Offline

 

#12 2009-09-14 9:24 am

Chickenhawk
Snark Snark Snark Snark
From: Being Snarky
Registered: 2005-06-01
Posts: 5821

Re: Water, water everywhere - but not a drop you'd want to drink

Our colloquium 2 weeks ago was regarding EIS for a new phosphorus mine nearby. It was quite clear that the st. gov't here has been pretty strict on the disposal of spoils for at least the past 20 years. Its pretty shocking, but not surprising that the west virginian coal mines get away with this. WV is the only state I've ever been in that you can be driving on the interstate and see mountains with the tops cut off them.


The recent medical controversy over whether vaccinations cause autism reveals a habit of human cognition—thinking anecdotally comes naturally, whereas thinking scientifically does not. -- Michael Shermer

Offline

 

#13 2009-09-14 11:33 am

resedit
Chicken Little
Royal Wombat
From: /dev/null
Registered: 1999-11-01
Posts: 50394
Website

Re: Water, water everywhere - but not a drop you'd want to drink

robco wrote:

If dumping toxic chemicals into the environment is good for business, shouldn't we allow it? Why do these people expect the government to help them?

It's not good for business.


In her right hand Jenny held the Bible of her mother
Jenny had a pistol in the other
-- Steve Taylor

Offline

 

#14 2009-09-14 12:29 pm

sturner
Royal High Poobah
Moderator
From: Carrollton, TX USA
Registered: 2000-01-31
Posts: 13800

Re: Water, water everywhere - but not a drop you'd want to drink

resedit wrote:

robco wrote:

If dumping toxic chemicals into the environment is good for business, shouldn't we allow it? Why do these people expect the government to help them?

It's not good for business.

Neither is killing your workers and consumers.


I'm not dead yet.
There are 3 types of people, those who can count and those who can't.
"There are few things graven in stone, excepting your date of death."

Offline

 

Board footer

Powered by PunBB 1.2.6
© Copyright 2002–2005 Rickard Andersson