Forums | MacLife
You are not logged in.
#1 2009-09-17 6:23 pm
- Bat
- Flawless Cowboy
- Royal Wombat

- From: Björk, Björk
- Registered: 2001-05-14
- Posts: 28541
Quad-core reaches new low
A rare hardware thread, still worth mentioning. The price of quad-cores has reached double digits. Article/review by Anand Himself.
AMD Athlon II X4 620 & 630: The First $99 Quad Core CPU
How does AMD respond to Lynnfield? Is it by drastically cutting prices on Phenom II? Nope. By introducing the world’s first quad-core processor to debut at $99. Now that’s cool.
It’s called the Athlon II X4 and its existence shouldn’t be any surprise. AMD quietly announced it along with the Athlon II X2 line.
Today we get two models: the Athlon II X4 630 and the Athlon II X4 620, priced at $122 and $99 respectively. The only difference between the two is clock speed; the 630 runs at 2.8GHz while the 620 runs at 2.6GHz. These are both AM3 chips meaning they'll work in AM3 motherboards with DDR3 memory or AM2+ boards with DDR2 memory.
^Word to NC.^
The price is unbeatable. If we ignore the 630 for a moment, the Athlon II X4 620 is by far the cheapest route to four cores on the market. Intel’s most affordable quad-core is the Core 2 Quad Q8200 at $163, while AMD would previously charge you $163 for a Phenom X4 9600B. This is where the AM3/AM2+ compatibility play really helps out. Motherboard/memory costs are as cheap as possible thanks to AMD's incredible socket flexibility.
And just in case you’re wondering, yes, the Athlon II X4 620 actually delivers performance competitive with the Q8200 but for 60% of the cost. It’s not all that clear cut, there are some cases where the 620 is faster but others where the Q8200 is much faster. On average it ends up being a wash but you’ll want to pay attention to the coming pages to see how the cookie crumbles as it does vary from test to test.
..
Final Words
Regardless of what it may seem like, this is not a repeat of AMD during the late K8 or during the Phenom days. AMD is relegated to competing in the sub-$200 space, it is actually very competitive in that space. These days, I'm sure that's not a bad position to be in. While I'm sure AMD would love to be able to demand more money for its processors, being able to demand any at all isn't a bad position to be in.
AMD effectively knocked 40% off the value of Intel's low end quad-core CPUs. The Athlon II X4 620 manages to, at $99, perform close enough to the Core 2 Quad Q8200 that the latter simply doesn't make any sense. Add another hundred dollars and you'll get a Core i5 750 (or less will get you into a Phenom II X4 945/955), but if you're on a strict budget you can't beat the 620.
No L3, light on L2 at 512k/core... but the stock 2.6GHz OCed easily to 3.25 at stock voltage w_stock cooler. Wish I had a suitable mobo. {sniff}
Pocket rocket. http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/sh … spx?i=3638
Last edited by Bat (2009-09-17 6:23 pm)
If all economists were laid end to end, they would not reach a conclusion - George Bernard Shaw
"Fire up a colortini, sit back, relax, and watch the pictures, now, as they fly through the air."
Offline
#2 2009-09-17 6:40 pm
Re: Quad-core reaches new low
Now if we only had software that would really make good use of quad core chips...
It is an odd thing, but every one who disappears is said to be seen at San Francisco. It must be a delightful city, and possess all the attractions of the next world.
- Oscar Wilde
Offline
#3 2009-09-17 8:48 pm
- dv
- Negusa Negest
- Moderator

- From: Minneapolis, MN
- Registered: 1999-08-30
- Posts: 18103
Re: Quad-core reaches new low
robco wrote:
Now if we only had software that would really make good use of quad core chips...
We do.
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/res … 09-11.html
CPU Core scaling - second graph. Note the jumps between 1, 2 and 3 cores.
Add in a 2AM scheduled virus scan for core #4, and you're doing alright.
"Now commences the process of cutting off the head, which generally takes from an hour to an hour and a half by an expert workman with a sharp blade." -Reuben Delano, Wanderings and Adventures
Offline
#4 2009-09-17 9:03 pm
- Bat
- Flawless Cowboy
- Royal Wombat

- From: Björk, Björk
- Registered: 2001-05-14
- Posts: 28541
Re: Quad-core reaches new low
Multitasking always benefits, and background processes that can otherwise make a machine sluggish if single core, won't if multicore.
Individual apps are getting there faster than expected, too. Resident Evil 5 for PC reportedly has eight threads, and 8-core perf is 350% of single-core. Diminishing turns (not exactly 8x), and exceptional, but such are arriving.
I'd be all over this if I could. Eventually I will... I'll give up some clockspeed for cores now anytime.
If all economists were laid end to end, they would not reach a conclusion - George Bernard Shaw
"Fire up a colortini, sit back, relax, and watch the pictures, now, as they fly through the air."
Offline
#6 2009-09-18 1:39 pm
- NightCougar_37
- For Gallia!!

- From: The back of my Twilight Drake
- Registered: 2001-07-22
- Posts: 9143
Re: Quad-core reaches new low
On the initial reviews of those chips. They don't really do super till you clock them past 3.5Ghz. A lot were getting 3.7Ghz on air while one I saw was 3.9Ghz on air. So they do clock pretty well. But most I saw were saying, if you don't plan to clock, the Phenom X3 was the better deal.
Knowing how well it would be on my crap cooler, i'd be better off going X3. I can't even get this 5000+ BE past 2.8Ghz even if it can boot past 3.2.
Offline
#7 2009-09-18 10:06 pm
- Bat
- Flawless Cowboy
- Royal Wombat

- From: Björk, Björk
- Registered: 2001-05-14
- Posts: 28541
Re: Quad-core reaches new low
Echoed in
The 630 I'm less excited about simply because it commands a 22% price premium. What the 620 has going for it is its sub-$100 entry price; start going much above that then you might as well be looking at a Phenom II X3.
...but
I could hit 260MHz x 13.0 for 3.38GHz by upping the voltage, but the gain wasn't worth the additional power usage. Anything higher wasn't possible without more exotic cooling or much more voltage. The performance improved handily at 3.25GHz:
I have a couple of suitable coolers; it always was a specialty of mine.
Left 4 Dead
Zombies? Check. Zombie killing performance: [..]
If this thing only had Lynnfield's turbo modes it would be at the top of these charts. We get respectable performance out of the Athlon II X4s, just nothing earth shattering.
Mm... dead zumbies (darned AI Director and lack of Turbo)... still, good on wattage. But a bundle with the MSI board with the latest AMD chipset for ~$170-180... speed's a matter of money. What's your budget?
If all economists were laid end to end, they would not reach a conclusion - George Bernard Shaw
"Fire up a colortini, sit back, relax, and watch the pictures, now, as they fly through the air."
Offline

