Forums | MacLife
You are not logged in.
#1 2003-04-03 6:45 pm
- ShnickyShnack
- ::: title edited due to Satanic influences :::

- From: Rockin' out
- Registered: 2001-05-25
- Posts: 22237
Why aren't the Iraqis blowing stuff up?
This is something that's been puzzling me. I would've thought that an army fighting a losing battle would normally try to slow the enemy down by screwing up roads and blowing bridges and such. I wonder why they're not? I mean, think of all those airfields the Americans have captured intact. The Iraqis didn't think to send some guy with a backhoe to tear up the runway?
Instead of sending the Republican Guard to get slaughtered by US Marines, why not just dynamite all the bridges over the Tigris and Euphrates, and maybe destroy water pipes as they retreat, forcing the Americans to care for thirsty and sick refugees?
Are they stupid or what?
Note: please delete this post.
Offline
#2 2003-04-03 7:33 pm
Re: Why aren't the Iraqis blowing stuff up?
ShnickyShnack:
The reason that the Iraqis are not, according to you, "blowing stuff up" was answered this evening on CNN...an interview with a 3rd US Infantry officer confirmed that, for the first time, the Iraqis are not afraid of SADDAM HUSSEIN! For the last two weeks, most of Iraq was more afraid of Saddam than the U.S. military. Now, as Iraq realizes that it is liberated, it is not interested in "blowing stuff up" but instead, "what's for dinner"! That should be common sense! Iraq, for the first time in a long time, is free from a tryant! For our part, we should all go shake hands with a serviceman, Army, Navy, Marines, Coast Guard...and say THANKS!
God Bless President George Bush and the 101st Airborne!
Powerbook G3
Offline
#3 2003-04-03 7:34 pm
- bratboy
- laden with emotion
- Royal Wombat

- From: Austin, Texas
- Registered: 2003-01-19
- Posts: 34106
Re: Why aren't the Iraqis blowing stuff up?
Jesus had a hand in all of this as well, I'd wager.

"One thing we've learned is there's a difference between being disappointed and having madmen in authority."
--Paul Krugman
Offline
#4 2003-04-03 7:39 pm
- Nearest Neighbor
- Member

- From: San Francisco, California USA
- Registered: 2002-12-09
- Posts: 136
Re: Why aren't the Iraqis blowing stuff up?
Now, as Iraq realizes that it is liberated, it is not interested in "blowing stuff up" but instead, "what's for dinner"!
Iraq has yet to be liberated. Right now, it's still a country in chaos and no one can say for sure what lies ahead.
Offline
#5 2003-04-03 7:53 pm
- [MA] Flying_Meat
- Member
- From: Frisco?
- Registered: 2001-03-31
- Posts: 8515
Re: Why aren't the Iraqis blowing stuff up?
I think the question was not about "Now" so much as during this whole battle.
The Iraqi military is what the question is about. Not the "people" who are "Now" considered to be liberated.
It's been reported that the military has come across bridges that were rigged and ready. To say they didn't flip the switch 'cuz we're so freakin' fast is sorta silly. How long does it take to flip a switch?
So, why not?
...and watch out for the flying meat!
Offline
#6 2003-04-03 7:54 pm
- ShnickyShnack
- ::: title edited due to Satanic influences :::

- From: Rockin' out
- Registered: 2001-05-25
- Posts: 22237
Re: Why aren't the Iraqis blowing stuff up?
ShnickyShnack:
The reason that the Iraqis are not, according to you, "blowing stuff up" was answered this evening on CNN...an interview with a 3rd US Infantry officer confirmed that, for the first time, the Iraqis are not afraid of SADDAM HUSSEIN! For the last two weeks, most of Iraq was more afraid of Saddam than the U.S. military. Now, as Iraq realizes that it is liberated, it is not interested in "blowing stuff up" but instead, "what's for dinner"! That should be common sense! Iraq, for the first time in a long time, is free from a tryant! For our part, we should all go shake hands with a serviceman, Army, Navy, Marines, Coast Guard...and say THANKS!
God Bless President George Bush and the 101st Airborne!
Er ... they're afraid of Saddam, so presumably they'd follow his orders until they were certain there was no risk to disobey him, yes? So presumably those orders have not been issued. Why haven't they? That's what I'm wondering.
Jeez laweez, not everything has to be an excuse for political soapboxing! Why am I even bothering to respond? God bless Jacques Rousseau and the Declarations of the Rights of Man!
Note: please delete this post.
Offline
#7 2003-04-03 8:16 pm
- Mustapha Mond
- Up your alley

- Registered: 2001-03-24
- Posts: 7024
- Website
Re: Why aren't the Iraqis blowing stuff up?
WARNING: Read at your own risk
In the interest in spreading rumors: I've heard two things on the news recently, which I'm not sure I even remember correctly, but here goes.
First, I've heard that Saddam (or whoever is in charge) is believed to have ordered that many things, like oil wells and bridges, be sabotaged/destroyed, in order to frustrate US forces. However, the people who were ordered to do the sabotaging seem to have sabotaged their own sabotages -- in other words, they intentionally set themselves up for failure. Specifically, many of the oil wells had the appearance of being set-up for burning, but they were never ignited, and the few that were ignited seemed to have been set-off accidentally. Somebody more determined than me might be able to find a link on this. I was only half paying attention to the news when the "analyst" was talking about it.
Second, the news was saying something about runways being incredibly difficult to destroy. Apparently some serious munitions are needed and they didn't seem to think Iraq had the resources to spare (which, if it's true, should make us all raise our eyebrows a bit). To put the amount of damage needed in perspective: army engineers have been talking about building a runway somewhere north (I think) of Baghdad, and once they solve the problem of how to deal with the water table being so close to the surface (it's like, only 5 feet down or something), they suspect it will only take a few days to build it. So, to really make an existing runway useless, you've got to do more than bust up some concrete, you've got to ruin all the ground underneath it. (I think this is how "anti-runway" bombs work -- they pierce the concrete and then destroy stuff from the bottom on outward.) Otherwise you just pave right over the broken stuff.
Maybe someone who knows more about all this can chime in. Otherwise remember that I'm carelessly reporting on stuff I was only half paying attention to in the first place -- and it was stuff I heard on the news, which as a general rule is not to be trusted.
Offline
#8 2003-04-03 8:50 pm
- Ribtorus
- Member

- Registered: 2002-07-11
- Posts: 13734
Re: Why aren't the Iraqis blowing stuff up?
A runway suitable for high performance aircraft (fighters etc) must be very clean and clear of debris. Even the aprons and taxiways must be clean to ensure nothing is ingested by the engines. Even small craters can render a runway useless for such aircraft. Cratering a runway to prevent high performance aircraft use is relatively easy. This is not the case for many transport aircraft types. STOL craft can use runways and strips that other aircraft wouldn't attempt to use. Cratering a runway to prevent their use can be more involved.
Cratering is not too hard, and is a basic part of military engineering. First create a row of small bore-holes with a 15 lb or a 40 lb shaped charges across the runway, then pack the holes with about 40 to 80 lbs (depending on depth of bore hole) with high explosive, like C4 or DM12. Space these charges with about 5 feet between them, and after detonation you will get a crater about 8 feet deep and 25 feet wide across the runway.
A section of 10 men can do this in very short order.
...just in case anyone wanted to know.
when surrounded and left on Afghanistan's plains,
and the women come out to cut up what remains,
just roll to your rifle and blow out your brains,
and go to your god like a soldier...
Offline
#9 2003-04-03 9:01 pm
- Ribtorus
- Member

- Registered: 2002-07-11
- Posts: 13734
Re: Why aren't the Iraqis blowing stuff up?
With that in mind, I'd have to say that the decision by the Iraqis not to destroy the runways, bridges etc was deliberate. It's not conceivable that they would abandon their demolition plans in a rear guard action unless they made that decision in anticipation of capitulating.
when surrounded and left on Afghanistan's plains,
and the women come out to cut up what remains,
just roll to your rifle and blow out your brains,
and go to your god like a soldier...
Offline
#10 2003-04-03 9:32 pm
- damage
- Member

- From: Safe European Home
- Registered: 2002-11-05
- Posts: 3184
Re: Why aren't the Iraqis blowing stuff up?
A runway suitable for high performance aircraft (fighters etc) must be very clean and clear of debris. Even the aprons and taxiways must be clean to ensure nothing is ingested by the engines. Even small craters can render a runway useless for such aircraft. Cratering a runway to prevent high performance aircraft use is relatively easy. This is not the case for many transport aircraft types. STOL craft can use runways and strips that other aircraft wouldn't attempt to use. Cratering a runway to prevent their use can be more involved.
Cratering is not too hard, and is a basic part of military engineering. First create a row of small bore-holes with a 15 lb or a 40 lb shaped charges across the runway, then pack the holes with about 40 to 80 lbs (depending on depth of bore hole) with high explosive, like C4 or DM12. Space these charges with about 5 feet between them, and after detonation you will get a crater about 8 feet deep and 25 feet wide across the runway.
A section of 10 men can do this in very short order.
...just in case anyone wanted to know.
Interesting...although now you have me wondering why you know about stuff like this 
Offline
#11 2003-04-03 9:39 pm
- Blueboy626
- Member
- From: Chicago, IL USA
- Registered: 1999-10-30
- Posts: 3300
Re: Why aren't the Iraqis blowing stuff up?
snip...the people who were ordered to do the sabotaging seem to have sabotaged their own sabotages.
You're not nuts I saw this too. When you properly set a charge on an oil well "head" you set it at the base so the pipe coming from the ground is damaged as well. These schmo's in Irag set their charges higher up where only the valves would be damaged, and this was reported as being deliberately done. Also should remember that the US rather frequently told the Iraq leadership to not do such things or they would be tried for war crimes, possible they may have heeded that warning.
the news was saying something about runways being incredibly difficult to destroy.
Naw, couple of backhoes can ruin one in a day...er night.
Meigs Field
Offline
#12 2003-04-03 9:44 pm
- damage
- Member

- From: Safe European Home
- Registered: 2002-11-05
- Posts: 3184
Re: Why aren't the Iraqis blowing stuff up?
snip...the people who were ordered to do the sabotaging seem to have sabotaged their own sabotages.
You're not nuts I saw this too. When you properly set a charge on an oil well "head" you set it at the base so the pipe coming from the ground is damaged as well. These schmo's in Irag set their charges higher up where only the valves would be damaged, and this was reported as being deliberately done. Also should remember that the US rather frequently told the Iraq leadership to not do such things or they would be tried for war crimes, possible they may have heeded that warning.
the news was saying something about runways being incredibly difficult to destroy.
Naw, couple of backhoes can ruin one in a day...er night.
![]()
Meigs Field
Offtopic: Now that was a ridiculous thing for the mayor to do - rip down the airport to protect against terrorism?!
Funny, last time I looked Boston-Logan was still there.
It astounds me that people are still playing on 9/11 paranoia to try to get votes
Offline
#13 2003-04-03 10:01 pm
- Blueboy626
- Member
- From: Chicago, IL USA
- Registered: 1999-10-30
- Posts: 3300
Re: Why aren't the Iraqis blowing stuff up?
Offtopic: Now that was a ridiculous thing for the mayor to do - rip down the airport to protect against terrorism?!
![]()
Funny, last time I looked Boston-Logan was still there.![]()
It astounds me that people are still playing on 9/11 paranoia to try to get votes
It's not votes he wants-he's got all the votes he needs, it's the LAND--90+ acres of prime Lake Michigan shoreline property! He's been trying since the late 1990's to rip it up and make it all parkland...Daley Park sounds nice. It's been a wonderful and versatile bargaining chip of his for years, he traded it's demolition away many times for all kinds of stuff but he always seems to get it back to use again. 
Offline
#14 2003-04-03 10:03 pm
- Farmerkev
- Official Dementor
- Moderator
- Registered: 2003-01-03
- Posts: 18603
Re: Why aren't the Iraqis blowing stuff up?
To be fair now, you can't expect him to understand or even believe Chicago politics 
Do your part to combat global warming.
Eat a cow.
Online
#15 2003-04-03 10:07 pm
- damage
- Member

- From: Safe European Home
- Registered: 2002-11-05
- Posts: 3184
Re: Why aren't the Iraqis blowing stuff up?
Offtopic: Now that was a ridiculous thing for the mayor to do - rip down the airport to protect against terrorism?!
![]()
Funny, last time I looked Boston-Logan was still there.![]()
It astounds me that people are still playing on 9/11 paranoia to try to get votesIt's not votes he wants-he's got all the votes he needs, it's the LAND--90+ acres of prime Lake Michigan shoreline property! He's been trying since the late 1990's to rip it up and make it all parkland...Daley Park sounds nice. It's been a wonderful and versatile bargaining chip of his for years, he traded it's demolition away many times for all kinds of stuff but he always seems to get it back to use again.
Well ok then. Eitherway, people are using 9/11 to try and push their own (often totally non-related) agendas.
Offline
#16 2003-04-03 11:33 pm
- AdamB
- Member
- From: Austin, Texas
- Registered: 2003-02-17
- Posts: 682
Re: Why aren't the Iraqis blowing stuff up?
Are they stupid or what?
No, they aren't Saddam Hussein. It's really that simple.
Keep on believing they all hate us and want us dead.
Those brown people will get us yet! 
Offline
#17 2003-04-04 9:07 am
Re: Why aren't the Iraqis blowing stuff up?
WARNING: Read at your own risk
In the interest in spreading rumors: I've heard two things on the news recently, which I'm not sure I even remember correctly, but here goes.
First, I've heard that Saddam (or whoever is in charge) is believed to have ordered that many things, like oil wells and bridges, be sabotaged/destroyed, in order to frustrate US forces. However, the people who were ordered to do the sabotaging seem to have sabotaged their own sabotages -- in other words, they intentionally set themselves up for failure. Specifically, many of the oil wells had the appearance of being set-up for burning, but they were never ignited, and the few that were ignited seemed to have been set-off accidentally. Somebody more determined than me might be able to find a link on this. I was only half paying attention to the news when the "analyst" was talking about it.
Second, the news was saying something about runways being incredibly difficult to destroy. Apparently some serious munitions are needed and they didn't seem to think Iraq had the resources to spare (which, if it's true, should make us all raise our eyebrows a bit). To put the amount of damage needed in perspective: army engineers have been talking about building a runway somewhere north (I think) of Baghdad, and once they solve the problem of how to deal with the water table being so close to the surface (it's like, only 5 feet down or something), they suspect it will only take a few days to build it. So, to really make an existing runway useless, you've got to do more than bust up some concrete, you've got to ruin all the ground underneath it. (I think this is how "anti-runway" bombs work -- they pierce the concrete and then destroy stuff from the bottom on outward.) Otherwise you just pave right over the broken stuff.
Maybe someone who knows more about all this can chime in. Otherwise remember that I'm carelessly reporting on stuff I was only half paying attention to in the first place -- and it was stuff I heard on the news, which as a general rule is not to be trusted.
Pretty much what I heard, Mustapha!
Also, I heard that one of the bridges that we captured was discovered to be wired to be blown up. I think your assessment is reasonable.
AutoJC
"
Offline
#18 2003-04-04 10:31 am
Re: Why aren't the Iraqis blowing stuff up?
ShnickyShnack:
The reason that the Iraqis are not, according to you, "blowing stuff up" was answered this evening on CNN...an interview with a 3rd US Infantry officer confirmed that, for the first time, the Iraqis are not afraid of SADDAM HUSSEIN! For the last two weeks, most of Iraq was more afraid of Saddam than the U.S. military. Now, as Iraq realizes that it is liberated, it is not interested in "blowing stuff up" but instead, "what's for dinner"! That should be common sense! Iraq, for the first time in a long time, is free from a tryant! For our part, we should all go shake hands with a serviceman, Army, Navy, Marines, Coast Guard...and say THANKS!
God Bless President George Bush and the 101st Airborne!
So why are they still fighting? Why aren't they surrendering? Why are they packing themselves into buses and trucks for idiotic, ill conceived suicide attacks?
If they're not afraid of Saddam, and they want to keep the infrastructure in place for the people's use post-war, why are they still shooting at our troops?
And for our part, we should also go and shake hands with a journalist and say thanks for keeping our government honest. It's a fine line between the free exchange of ideas and government bozo's like the Iraqi information minister delivering the party line. It is the journalist, not the soldier, who holds our leaders accountable for their actions.
God bless Michael Moore and the American Civil Liberties Union.
"I don't like country music, but I don't mean to denigrate those who do. And for the people who like country music, denigrate means 'put down.'"
-- Bob Newhart
Offline
#19 2003-04-04 10:55 am
Re: Why aren't the Iraqis blowing stuff up?
So why are they still fighting? Why aren't they surrendering? Why are they packing themselves into buses and trucks for idiotic, ill conceived suicide attacks?
They want to make sure they don't miss out on their fast track to Allah. 
AutoJC
"
Offline
#20 2003-04-04 11:08 am
- Mustapha Mond
- Up your alley

- Registered: 2001-03-24
- Posts: 7024
- Website
Re: Why aren't the Iraqis blowing stuff up?
A runway suitable for high performance aircraft (fighters etc) must be very clean and clear of debris. Even the aprons and taxiways must be clean to ensure nothing is ingested by the engines. Even small craters can render a runway useless for such aircraft. Cratering a runway to prevent high performance aircraft use is relatively easy. This is not the case for many transport aircraft types. STOL craft can use runways and strips that other aircraft wouldn't attempt to use. Cratering a runway to prevent their use can be more involved.
Cratering is not too hard, and is a basic part of military engineering. First create a row of small bore-holes with a 15 lb or a 40 lb shaped charges across the runway, then pack the holes with about 40 to 80 lbs (depending on depth of bore hole) with high explosive, like C4 or DM12. Space these charges with about 5 feet between them, and after detonation you will get a crater about 8 feet deep and 25 feet wide across the runway.
A section of 10 men can do this in very short order.
...just in case anyone wanted to know.
Thanks for the insight.
My question, regarding cratering, would be, how easy is it to fix?
The ease of fixing runways is what I was trying to get at with the thing about the army engineers needing only a few days to build a runway in the north.
Hypothetically, let's say Saddam blows some holes in the runway of Saddam National Airport. Granted, it will be too damaged for planes to land on right away, but the army engineers might be able repair the runway in a matter of days (if not hours). Therefore, the only real way to make that runway useless is to destroy it to the point where the army engineers can't easily fix it -- to the point where maybe it just makes more sense to build a whole new runway. Thus, Saddam might not bother with the runway at all. Spend the resources somewhere else.
Granted, I don't know if what I'm proposing is at all factual or plausible -- I'm just trying to make sense out of what I remember hearing on the news.
Offline
#21 2003-04-04 11:21 am
- Blueboy626
- Member
- From: Chicago, IL USA
- Registered: 1999-10-30
- Posts: 3300
Re: Why aren't the Iraqis blowing stuff up?
So why are they still fighting? Why aren't they surrendering? Why are they packing themselves into buses and trucks for idiotic, ill conceived suicide attacks?
If they're not afraid of Saddam, and they want to keep the infrastructure in place for the people's use post-war, why are they still shooting at our troops?
Probably because of those Baath Party guns aimed at their backs. Shoot or be shot?
Offline
#23 2003-04-04 11:25 am
Re: Why aren't the Iraqis blowing stuff up?
Are they stupid or what?
No, they aren't Saddam Hussein. It's really that simple.
Keep on believing they all hate us and want us dead.
Those brown people will get us yet!
Saddam Hussein is not stupid.
Underestimating your enemy is one of the worst things you can do...
Offline
#24 2003-04-04 11:26 am
- Ribtorus
- Member

- Registered: 2002-07-11
- Posts: 13734
Re: Why aren't the Iraqis blowing stuff up?
There are portable runways of interlocking mats that can be laid down very quickly that are suitable for some transports. Engineers can patch and pave pretty quickly, as long as they are in a secure area. To patch a properly cratered and sabotaged runway requires combat engineers to de-mine and remove all booby traps that should have been placed in and around the craters. Then it requires earth moving equipment to fill the craters. It's a big job, but if you watch a motivated civilian paving crew in action, you get the idea of how fast it can go. One of the difficulties is finding suitable back-fill for the craters. Unlike civilians, there are no streams of dump trucks bringing in back-fill and aggregate. It all has to be found locally. The importance of air-droppable heavy equipment is very apparent.
All in all a properly cratered runway is a big fat pain for anyone to deal with. Cratering and other properly executed rear-guard demolitions can seriously hamper an invading force. Had the Iraqis carried out these sorts of operations, the pace of the war would be much slower and would have allowed them time to re-group in better order.
I have the feeling Combat Engineering was not high on the Iraqi militarys priority list.
when surrounded and left on Afghanistan's plains,
and the women come out to cut up what remains,
just roll to your rifle and blow out your brains,
and go to your god like a soldier...
Offline
#25 2003-04-04 11:45 am
- The New Guy
- Member

- From: Left of left
- Registered: 2000-10-18
- Posts: 3422
Re: Why aren't the Iraqis blowing stuff up?
A runway suitable for high performance aircraft (fighters etc) must be very clean and clear of debris. Even the aprons and taxiways must be clean to ensure nothing is ingested by the engines. Even small craters can render a runway useless for such aircraft. Cratering a runway to prevent high performance aircraft use is relatively easy. This is not the case for many transport aircraft types. STOL craft can use runways and strips that other aircraft wouldn't attempt to use. Cratering a runway to prevent their use can be more involved.
Cratering is not too hard, and is a basic part of military engineering. First create a row of small bore-holes with a 15 lb or a 40 lb shaped charges across the runway, then pack the holes with about 40 to 80 lbs (depending on depth of bore hole) with high explosive, like C4 or DM12. Space these charges with about 5 feet between them, and after detonation you will get a crater about 8 feet deep and 25 feet wide across the runway.
A section of 10 men can do this in very short order.
...just in case anyone wanted to know.
Actually, this is only true of US planes. Soviet-era MiGs were able to take off and land from fields and back roads. Like th AK-47, they are incredibly durable pieces of equipment, well suited for inexperienced armies.
But during Gulf War I, the US used Durandals (not sure of designation) to take out runways. It parachutes to about 50-100 feet above a target, then lights a rocket that sends it through the pavement of the runway and the warhead explodes beneath it, making a HUGE crater, and blowing chunks of runway everywhere.
...just in case anyone wanted to know.
Der, forgot my point. I think that the Iraqis are going to lure the Americans and British into Baghdad, then blow the roads and bridges, trapping them inside with a well-armed militia. At least that's what I'd do if I were Saddam.
The car of the future is a train with a bike waiting at the other end.
Offline
