Forums | MacLife
You are not logged in.
#1 2003-12-22 9:48 pm
- DaBeav
- Member
- From: Stranded at the Drive-In, bran
- Registered: 2000-10-10
- Posts: 5501
News Item: iPod Class Action Lawsuit
Well, apparently the iPod battery issue is going to court. Here is the story on apple.slashdot. Apparently a law firm is investigating a possible lawsuit.
Should Apple, in the interest of either corporate integrity or customer and public relations, offer battery replacement free of charge? Do you feel that if this goes to court that the court will rule in favor of customers or Apple?
Discuss.
Offline
#2 2003-12-22 10:03 pm
Re: News Item: iPod Class Action Lawsuit
I think it's ridiculous that they're getting sued over the concept that batteries die.
They need to find another instance where something like this wasn't questioned, and fast.
Spirit was crushed; now is fading, But I want to help make things right.
Because I can see and I can feel, and you can see and you can feel
So why don't we both either stand up and fight
Or at least together we'll call it a night.
Offline
#3 2003-12-22 10:18 pm
- orbit
- Member
- From: Mars Rover
- Registered: 2003-09-29
- Posts: 1793
Re: News Item: iPod Class Action Lawsuit
My car battery died yesterday. Can I sue Datsun? 
Offline
#4 2003-12-22 10:20 pm
- babastus
- Member

- Registered: 2003-02-17
- Posts: 858
Re: News Item: iPod Class Action Lawsuit
Well, apparently the iPod battery issue is going to court.... Apparently a law firm is investigating a possible lawsuit.
These are not the same thing.
Should Apple, in the interest of either corporate integrity or customer and public relations, offer battery replacement free of charge? Do you feel that if this goes to court that the court will rule in favor of customers or Apple?
Discuss.
Apple, they make no claims that the battery is user replaceable. And they can't be blamed for batteries dying. Unless the iPods are really new.
In Britain in the last century, it was quite acceptable for a young gentleman to lose his virginity to one of London's many "whoredogs". Dickens and Prince Albert both boasted of their experience."
Offline
#5 2003-12-23 12:41 am
- Jack of Clubs
- Member
- From: on the road
- Registered: 2003-12-12
- Posts: 176
- Website
Re: News Item: iPod Class Action Lawsuit
While it would be extremely nice of Apple to give away batteries, it wouldn't make any sense. Also, they should not be held responsible for the batteries that failed because that is the nature of batteries. There really isn't any QC process that can protect against that other than seeing if they can hold an initial charge, and batteries aren't everlasting.
Welcome to our ballroom,
The dead are dancing.
Offline
#6 2003-12-23 1:20 am
- sosumi
- numbery
- Royal Wombat

- From: North Mexico
- Registered: 1999-02-21
- Posts: 17513
Re: News Item: iPod Class Action Lawsuit
Considering none of these batteries died like that within the span of the one year warranty, I really don't know how they have any grounds for such a thing. And the damn thing is replaceable if people would shut their whine holes for just five minutes to Google the subject.
Offline
#7 2003-12-23 2:02 am
Re: News Item: iPod Class Action Lawsuit
This is almost equal to the lawsuit against McDonalds made by fat people claiming it's McDonald's fault that they're fat.
Offline
#8 2003-12-23 3:47 am
- Marc
- On the run from the MPAA

- Registered: 2003-05-10
- Posts: 13129
Re: News Item: iPod Class Action Lawsuit
This is almost equal to the lawsuit against McDonalds made by fat people claiming it's McDonald's fault that they're fat.
hi, welcome to america
You know the hole, the one you put the pie in?
My mean my pie-hole?
Yeah, shut it.
Offline
#9 2003-12-23 7:20 am
- MuckSavage
- The Balls

- From: In a glass case of emotion.
- Registered: 2001-10-02
- Posts: 3402
- Website
Re: News Item: iPod Class Action Lawsuit
And the damn thing is replaceable if people would shut their whine holes for just five minutes to Google the subject.
Come on, sumi. That's not the American
You have an absolutely breath-taking... heiney. I mean, that thing's good. I wanna be friends with it.
Offline
#10 2003-12-23 8:25 am
- Camp David
- Banned

- Registered: 2003-04-11
- Posts: 6065
Re: News Item: iPod Class Action Lawsuit
There is another post on the iPod issue... it is not as clear cut as some of you are making it; i.e., about batteries failing! It is more about people buying iPods and them not lasting as long as they should.
I think the iPod is badly designed in one respect.... it should have had a battery compartment such that consumers could replace battery. Instead it is sealed system so to speak, and if battery fails to recharge owners must return unit to Apple for additional charge. Consumers are use to replacing batteries in most every other electronic item and the iPod is unique in that area. It would not be difficult for Apple to head off this lawsuit by offering free replacements as I gather percentage of iPod's falling into this category are rather small. Other thoughts?
Camp David
Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger/Benedict XVI: "a simple, humble worker in God's vineyard." Habemus Papem!
Offline
#11 2003-12-23 8:51 am
- SwisSlesS
- Member

- From: Home of the Massholes
- Registered: 2002-06-19
- Posts: 8307
Re: News Item: iPod Class Action Lawsuit
As other people have said, it would be nice of Apple to offer free battery replacements. However, they neither will or will have to do this. The lawsuit doesn't have enough basis and will not hold up in court. Sounds like a big waste of time and money for the people filing the suit.
I'm a dog, spelled backwards.
Offline
#12 2003-12-23 9:17 am
- radams
- Member

- Registered: 2002-01-16
- Posts: 839
Re: News Item: iPod Class Action Lawsuit
Edit: Nevermind, said right before me and I missed it.
Tiger Server, not so bad now. Automator, however, still sucks.
Offline
#13 2003-12-23 9:41 am
- avkills
- demyelinated brain matter

- Registered: 2001-05-09
- Posts: 6420
Re: News Item: iPod Class Action Lawsuit
I'm pretty sure somewhere in the iPod hoohah it said there were no user serviceable parts. Knowing that and still buying an iPod, not using it and letting the battery drain beyond repair, and then bitching about it, just screams user fault IMO. However, it would be nice if Apple replaced the batteries for less than $100 considering the cost of the iPod. Anyway, I'll probably run mine until it quits (1st gen 5GB) and then sell it to someone who wants to fix the battery and buy a new one that is better.
-mark
Offline
#14 2003-12-24 7:58 am
Re: News Item: iPod Class Action Lawsuit
Custom, manufacturer-specific batteries for consumer electronics devices are nothing new. I don't really understand the brouhaha, where's the outcry when a $100, 700 mAh NiMH battery for a DV camcorder dies?
Offline
#15 2003-12-24 9:05 am
Re: News Item: iPod Class Action Lawsuit
I am ambivalent about the lawsuit issue but was made curious by the claims of several on these boards that long recharge cycles will lower the life span of a lithium-ion polymer battery.
I just got dome spending about 20 minutes perusing several battery care web sites and manufactures guidelines, including Apple's and found not one single mention of this phenomenon.
If letting a battery totally discharge is so injurious to its life span I would think I would find this information prominently displayed on pages related to proper battery care. I did not.
I therefor conclude that this "discharged battery" issue is just another attempt by Apple Fan boi's to excuse Apple from any responsibility.
Prove me wrong, provide linkage that fully discharging a lithium-ion polymer battery will shorten its life.
I’m not ready to make nice-I’m not ready to back down-I’m still mad as hell and
I don’t have time to go round and round and round-It’s too late to make it right
I probably wouldn’t if I could-‘Cause I’m mad as hell-Can’t bring myself to do what it is you think I should
Offline
#16 2003-12-24 9:44 am
- avkills
- demyelinated brain matter

- Registered: 2001-05-09
- Posts: 6420
Re: News Item: iPod Class Action Lawsuit
I am ambivalent about the lawsuit issue but was made curious by the claims of several on these boards that long recharge cycles will lower the life span of a lithium-ion polymer battery.
I just got dome spending about 20 minutes perusing several battery care web sites and manufactures guidelines, including Apple's and found not one single mention of this phenomenon.
If letting a battery totally discharge is so injurious to its life span I would think I would find this information prominently displayed on pages related to proper battery care. I did not.
I therefor conclude that this "discharged battery" issue is just another attempt by Apple Fan boi's to excuse Apple from any responsibility.
Prove me wrong, provide linkage that fully discharging a lithium-ion polymer battery will shorten its life.
I don't think that long re-charge cycles are bad, so long as you actually charge the thing when it tells you to. I think the problem is if you let it sit around forever w/o a charge. Good of you to do some research on it. I'll go look as well.
-mark
Offline
#17 2003-12-24 9:51 am
Re: News Item: iPod Class Action Lawsuit
One reason I tend to disbelieve that storing a rechargible in a discharged state will shorten its life is because that is the way they are originally made, shipped and stored.
Rechargibles are allways fully discharged when you buy them.
I’m not ready to make nice-I’m not ready to back down-I’m still mad as hell and
I don’t have time to go round and round and round-It’s too late to make it right
I probably wouldn’t if I could-‘Cause I’m mad as hell-Can’t bring myself to do what it is you think I should
Offline
#18 2003-12-24 12:20 pm
- avkills
- demyelinated brain matter

- Registered: 2001-05-09
- Posts: 6420
Re: News Item: iPod Class Action Lawsuit
One reason I tend to disbelieve that storing a rechargible in a discharged state will shorten its life is because that is the way they are originally made, shipped and stored.
Rechargibles are allways fully discharged when you buy them.
True but charging them makes a chemical reaction occur, so maybe after that initial charge, storing them uncharged is not a good idea.
It is a bad situation any way it happens with an iPod.
-mark
Offline
#19 2003-12-24 12:31 pm
Re: News Item: iPod Class Action Lawsuit
The Neistat Brothers of http://www.ipodsdirtysecret.com/ (remember these guys?) have weighed in on the lawsuit.
December 23, 2003 - The Neistat Brothers are in no way affiliated with the pending class action against Apple Computer, Inc. or the law firm of Girard Gibbs & De Bartolomeo LLP. The Neistat Brothers are not partaking in the potential suit nor are they supporting it.
-Source
MacCentral Article via Yahoo
[url=http://macaddict.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=43408]
BTW: There's already a thread running on this.[/url]
Offline
#20 2003-12-24 3:57 pm
- pwt65
- Member
- From: KC
- Registered: 2003-11-15
- Posts: 5
Re: News Item: iPod Class Action Lawsuit
Doesn't matter whether it is just or not. All the plaintiff's lawyer needs to do is keep it going long enough to get Apple to settle. Then the lawyer can take his millions while all the people who were "wronged" will get their pittance. This reminds me of when PC manufacturers were sued over the stated size of computer monitors. It's a shame.
Offline
#21 2003-12-24 11:50 pm
- radams
- Member

- Registered: 2002-01-16
- Posts: 839
Re: News Item: iPod Class Action Lawsuit
I therefor conclude that this "discharged battery" issue is just another attempt by Apple Fan boi's to excuse Apple from any responsibility.
Prove me wrong, provide linkage that fully discharging a lithium-ion polymer battery will shorten its life.
http://www.batteryuniversity.com/partone-5.htm
Specifically:
Subject to aging, even if not in use - storing the battery in a cool place and at 40% charge reduces the aging effect.
In other words, letting your iPod battery discharge completely and leaving it discharged increases the aging effect which in turns leads to lessening battery life.
Here's another and another and another and another
So leaving your iPod uncharged for extended periods of time=bad.
Tiger Server, not so bad now. Automator, however, still sucks.
Offline
#22 2003-12-24 11:51 pm
- radams
- Member

- Registered: 2002-01-16
- Posts: 839
Re: News Item: iPod Class Action Lawsuit
Rechargibles are allways fully discharged when you buy them.
Always? My laptop battery wasn't fully discharged. Neither were the rechargeables that came with my mouse. Or either of my cell phones. I would be careful with words like always.
Tiger Server, not so bad now. Automator, however, still sucks.
Offline
#23 2003-12-25 6:59 am
Re: News Item: iPod Class Action Lawsuit
Rechargibles are allways fully discharged when you buy them.Always? My laptop battery wasn't fully discharged. Neither were the rechargeables that came with my mouse. Or either of my cell phones. I would be careful with words like always.
Just about every device I've ever bought has come with a nominal charge on the batteries.
And for what it's worth, Lithium-Ion batteries are typically rated for 1000 discharge/recharge cycles.
Offline
#24 2003-12-26 1:25 am
- delta wolph
- Member

- From: SoCal
- Registered: 2002-12-30
- Posts: 3471
Re: News Item: iPod Class Action Lawsuit
Rechargibles are allways fully discharged when you buy them.Always? My laptop battery wasn't fully discharged. Neither were the rechargeables that came with my mouse. Or either of my cell phones. I would be careful with words like always.
Just about every device I've ever bought has come with a nominal charge on the batteries.
Same. Cell phones, laptops, and yes, my iPod all had charges around 10% when the box was opened. Often this is because they do tests in the factory to see if they work. Well, that's what the salesbot told me.
Offline
#25 2003-12-26 2:36 am
Re: News Item: iPod Class Action Lawsuit
I chose Undecided. I believe a good solution would be for Apple to sell disassembly kits and replacement batteries. Perhaps $40 for the kit and $25 for the battery.
Offline

