Forums | MacLife
You are not logged in.
#126 2003-01-27 11:57 pm
- benightedbastard
- Cheap and Juicy!
- From: Western Australia
- Registered: 1999-06-03
- Posts: 28731
- Website
Re: Bush's "abstinence only" policy is unsafe
I was just covering moderator ass in case someone did get offended and tried to haul it into the fire. It's also been my experience that when you're debating a topic, posting an article for humorous purposes can often backfire when someone else doesn't find it quite so funny.
Offline
#127 2003-01-28 12:11 am
- bratboy
- attorney-at-law
- Royal Wombat
- From: Austin, Texas
- Registered: 2003-01-19
- Posts: 30529
Re: Bush's "abstinence only" policy is unsafe
I was just covering moderator ass in case someone did get offended and tried to haul it into the fire. It's also been my experience that when you're debating a topic, posting an article for humorous purposes can often backfire when someone else doesn't find it quite so funny.
I was hoping the person who I was poking fun at would take it as just that...'fun,' which is what I believe happened.
I understand your point though, and the full text of the article probably wasn't needed, anyway.
"One thing we've learned is there's a difference between being disappointed and having madmen in authority."
--Paul Krugman
Offline
