Forums | MacLife
You are not logged in.
#51 2005-01-31 12:57 pm
Re: Wait! Now There's Too Much Filtering!
stoned wrote:
so abu, you are saying that yes we need to use a real email address in our profile info?????
Yup. If you don't, and we can't get through to you, it's as good as sassing us in your reply.
Offline
#53 2005-01-31 1:19 pm
Re: Wait! Now There's Too Much Filtering!
technically the email i signed up with is still active, i just forgot the password about 3 years ago.
i can probably find the email password, but then i would actually have to check it, which isn't going to happen.
ummm..... i'll think of something.... the mods can snail mail me a warning if they want.
"the bible is cooler than i thought.... most of the main characters get stoned!!!"
"let's get back to the good ol' days when the "opiate of the masses" was still actually opium." -me
"kids don't beat me. i beat kids." -HJS
the above post is proudly antihammer
Offline
#54 2005-01-31 1:34 pm
Re: Wait! Now There's Too Much Filtering!
stoned wrote:
technically the email i signed up with is still active, i just forgot the password about 3 years ago.
i can probably find the email password, but then i would actually have to check it, which isn't going to happen.
ummm..... i'll think of something.... the mods can snail mail me a warning if they want.
If we send you an email warning about something and you don't fix it or stop the behavior, it's likely going to lead to being banned. At that point, you can complain all you want about never having recieved the email 'cause you don't check the account or 'cause the account is inactive; we made the reasonable attempt to contact you and you didn't keep your end of the deal. The ban will stand.
Offline
#55 2005-01-31 1:37 pm
Re: Wait! Now There's Too Much Filtering!
i can live with that 
in my years of posting i may have said stupid or offensive things, but i've never gotten a warning before, so i think i'll be ok.
Last edited by stoned (2005-01-31 1:46 pm)
"the bible is cooler than i thought.... most of the main characters get stoned!!!"
"let's get back to the good ol' days when the "opiate of the masses" was still actually opium." -me
"kids don't beat me. i beat kids." -HJS
the above post is proudly antihammer
Offline
#56 2005-01-31 5:32 pm
- WindowsBreakerG4
- Banned
- From: Jo mamas smurfn smurfity smurf
- Registered: 2004-01-10
- Posts: 136
- Website
Re: Wait! Now There's Too Much Filtering!
benightedbastard wrote:
Maybe we'll need to delete your avatar if you do.
Then maybe i'll make one that says bb is a nazi 
Halbie's Law:
As an online discussion involving underage girls grows longer, the probability of invoking Fido's name approaches one.
Offline
#57 2005-01-31 9:56 pm
Re: Wait! Now There's Too Much Filtering!
stoned wrote:
i can live with that
in my years of posting i may have said stupid or offensive things, but i've never gotten a warning before, so i think i'll be ok.
Yup, that's the key. Just don't do anything dumb and the email issue won't be an issue 
Look at it this way: you've sold as many paintings as Van Gogh—and you have both your ears.
Thanks, Dad.
• www.joelschou.com • www.bothears.com • www.vault25.com • www.fuzzycoconut.com •
Offline
#58 2005-02-01 12:18 am
- TheConfuzed1
- Faking Sanity
- Registered: 2000-04-19
- Posts: 20194
Re: Wait! Now There's Too Much Filtering!
stoned wrote:
i can live with that
in my years of posting i may have said stupid or offensive things, but i've never gotten a warning before, so i think i'll be ok.
How do you know?
The storm starts when the drops start dropping. When the drops stop dropping, the storm starts stopping.
Last Fm
Offline
#59 2005-02-02 4:51 pm
- jerwin
- Sophist
- From: The Garden of Pure Ideology
- Registered: 2003-01-01
- Posts: 7093
Re: Wait! Now There's Too Much Filtering!
So, any word on when the anglo-saxon words will return?
Suppose someone wants to speak of smurfs smurfing, a la Donnie Darko? The option to turn the filter off might well improve the intelligibility of such discussion...
Some subjects actually enjoy pain, and withhold information they might otherwise have divulged in order to be punished.
Central Intelligence Agency. (1983). Human Resource Exploitation Training Manual
Offline
#60 2005-02-03 11:37 am
Re: Wait! Now There's Too Much Filtering!
jerwin wrote:
I'm new to this whole 7331 speak thing...
1337
Offline
#61 2005-02-03 11:43 am
- dinerfan
- a natural, zesty enterprise
- From: the sunny side
- Registered: 2000-12-31
- Posts: 11093
Re: Wait! Now There's Too Much Filtering!
Offline
#62 2005-02-03 12:56 pm
- Zetetic Apparatchik
- Member
- Registered: 2001-01-07
- Posts: 8250
Re: Wait! Now There's Too Much Filtering!
Schonheit in Szene!
Last edited by Mac OS XI (2005-02-04 7:55 am)
Join the MAF AudioScrobbler group.
Protest ist, wenn ich sage, das und das paßt mir nicht. Widerstand ist, wenn ich dafür sorge, daß das, was mir nicht paßt, nicht länger geschieht.
Offline
#63 2005-02-03 7:29 pm
- TheConfuzed1
- Faking Sanity
- Registered: 2000-04-19
- Posts: 20194
Re: Wait! Now There's Too Much Filtering!
Mac OS XI wrote:
Goddamn ads!
Oops. Coupla weeks early. I'll repost then.
I was hoping no one would mention that.
The storm starts when the drops start dropping. When the drops stop dropping, the storm starts stopping.
Last Fm
Offline
#64 2005-02-04 6:11 pm
- Pithecanthropus
- Roast Master
- From: St. Cloud, MN
- Registered: 2002-12-30
- Posts: 4457
- Website
Re: Wait! Now There's Too Much Filtering!
Oh, come on...smurfette? You can say bitch on TV and the radio. You can print it in newspapers. We're talking about a female dog here, not some little blue chick who lives in a mushroom.
Grandfatherly advice: You can drink 'em pretty, but you can't drink 'em smart.
Offline
#65 2005-02-04 10:44 pm
- thegreenestday56
- Member
- From: next door.
- Registered: 2002-12-27
- Posts: 182
Re: Wait! Now There's Too Much Filtering!
It's not filtering pussy!
Offline
#66 2005-02-04 10:46 pm
Re: Wait! Now There's Too Much Filtering!
Hehe...
Offline
#67 2005-02-05 8:47 am
Re: Wait! Now There's Too Much Filtering!
thegreenestday56 wrote:
It's not filtering pussy!
Yes it is. It's changing it from the inappropriate "pussy" to the more appropriate one that means "cat."
Offline
#68 2005-02-05 9:38 am
- dinerfan
- a natural, zesty enterprise
- From: the sunny side
- Registered: 2000-12-31
- Posts: 11093
Re: Wait! Now There's Too Much Filtering!
Call me old-fashioned, but I prefer unfiltered pussy.
Offline
#69 2005-02-05 9:46 am
- Pithecanthropus
- Roast Master
- From: St. Cloud, MN
- Registered: 2002-12-30
- Posts: 4457
- Website
Re: Wait! Now There's Too Much Filtering!
Grandfatherly advice: You can drink 'em pretty, but you can't drink 'em smart.
Offline
#70 2005-02-05 11:00 am
- Macskeeball
- Member
- Registered: 2002-02-07
- Posts: 8014
- Website
Re: Wait! Now There's Too Much Filtering!
oatmeal wrote:
thegreenestday56 wrote:
It's not filtering pussy!
Yes it is. It's changing it from the inappropriate "pussy" to the more appropriate one that means "cat."
He was referring to when an exclamation point, etc. follows it.
Edit: And, as evidenced by your reply, it isn't caught if you put it within quotes. Apparently wildcards are needed.
Last edited by macskeeball (2005-02-05 11:02 am)
tech writer for hire
Offline
#71 2005-02-05 11:55 am
- dinerfan
- a natural, zesty enterprise
- From: the sunny side
- Registered: 2000-12-31
- Posts: 11093
Re: Wait! Now There's Too Much Filtering!
macskeeball wrote:
oatmeal wrote:
thegreenestday56 wrote:
It's not filtering pussy!
Yes it is. It's changing it from the inappropriate "pussy" to the more appropriate one that means "cat."
He was referring to when an exclamation point, etc. follows it.
Edit: And, as evidenced by your reply, it isn't caught if you put it within quotes. Apparently wildcards are needed.
Offline
#72 2005-02-05 12:02 pm
- Farmerkev
- Official Dementor
- Moderator
- Registered: 2003-01-03
- Posts: 18626
Re: Wait! Now There's Too Much Filtering!
dinerfan wrote:
Call me old-fashioned, but I prefer unfiltered pussy.
There are so many ways to take that statement and run with it, all guaranteed to get me banned.
Do your part to combat global warming.
Eat a cow.
Offline
#73 2005-02-05 2:46 pm
Offline
#74 2005-02-05 2:47 pm
Re: Wait! Now There's Too Much Filtering!
No, it's just that that isn't filtered. I don't think it should be; I'm not entering it.
Offline
#75 2005-02-05 4:17 pm
- Macskeeball
- Member
- Registered: 2002-02-07
- Posts: 8014
- Website
Re: Wait! Now There's Too Much Filtering!
Oh, I thought it was supposed to be filtered. I saw in another thread a quote with smittenedkitten in it and assumed the filters were causing it, then I saw this thread.
Edit: it was Oatmeal's post in this thread: http://www.macaddict.com/forums/topic/51635 However I just noticed that smittenedkitten was an IM handle when I actually looked at the article. I apparently glanced over the first time they mentioned it, so when I came across the second time they used it ("...not the smittenedkitten they were looking for...") it didn't make much sense so I thought it was the filters at work. Never mind.
Last edited by macskeeball (2005-02-05 4:22 pm)
tech writer for hire
Offline
