Quantcast

Forums | MacLife

You are not logged in.

#1 2003-01-29 12:04 am

Shlo
FITE YOU!!11!1
From: Chicago, Illinois, USA
Registered: 2001-08-26
Posts: 1267

i think we need to talk...

http://homepage.mac.com/skama/Images/aubrypost.tiff
mac daddy, i think you have a problem. when was the last time you saw the sun?


Rozzlapeed:I remember hearing that Gen. Horner, CENTCOM commander in Gulf War I, is one of the signatories. I think we can trust his point-of-view to an extent.
Cyberpawz:Yeah, and what has he done since?

Offline

 

#2 2003-01-29 1:02 am

dabeech
Member
From: Seattle, WA, USA
Registered: 2001-07-25
Posts: 371
Website

Re: i think we need to talk...

Give him a break...just a few more posts and he'll have 1,000!!!


"Excuse me while I go do manly things in a sensitive way." --Guybrush Threepwood

Offline

 

#3 2003-01-29 1:19 am

delta wolph
Member
From: SoCal
Registered: 2002-12-30
Posts: 3471

Re: i think we need to talk...

see the PM button? click it!

Offline

 

#4 2003-01-29 1:32 am

Mac Daddy
Member
From: Canada
Registered: 2000-08-28
Posts: 7541
Website

Re: i think we need to talk...

http://homepage.mac.com/skama/Images/aubrypost.tiff
mac daddy, i think you have a problem. when was the last time you saw the sun?

That's a stupid question...

Right here

Just so it's known... I'm actually losing ground on the most number of posts count... at one point (say... a month ago?) I was one below Justine... I just checked now, and well... she's flying way ahead.

I see the sun everyday on my way to work (for 11:30am) and watch it set while working, then get home at night (leave at 10:00pm). I gernally come on here 10min before work, and 30min after, depending if my friends are online I might be on a bit longer before doing something else, and (like now) 10min just before bed.

Any other details you need to know?


"The only thing better than a woman you can control in bed, is one that you can't."

Offline

 

#5 2003-01-29 1:34 am

delta wolph
Member
From: SoCal
Registered: 2002-12-30
Posts: 3471

Re: i think we need to talk...

we need a minute by minute schedule wink

Offline

 

#6 2003-01-29 1:37 am

Mac Daddy
Member
From: Canada
Registered: 2000-08-28
Posts: 7541
Website

Re: i think we need to talk...

I would, but I'm past my 10min already.

Have a night.


"The only thing better than a woman you can control in bed, is one that you can't."

Offline

 

#7 2003-01-29 1:40 am

delta wolph
Member
From: SoCal
Registered: 2002-12-30
Posts: 3471

Re: i think we need to talk...

i dont get it......

wait, thats nothing new

Offline

 

#8 2003-01-29 7:45 am

Shlo
FITE YOU!!11!1
From: Chicago, Illinois, USA
Registered: 2001-08-26
Posts: 1267

Re: i think we need to talk...

more info, hmm, copies of 3 forms of photo ID, a recent utilities statement, social security number, ATM pin number, home adress, security system code where applicable and where the smurf i put my keys.


Rozzlapeed:I remember hearing that Gen. Horner, CENTCOM commander in Gulf War I, is one of the signatories. I think we can trust his point-of-view to an extent.
Cyberpawz:Yeah, and what has he done since?

Offline

 

#9 2003-01-29 7:52 am

Shlo
FITE YOU!!11!1
From: Chicago, Illinois, USA
Registered: 2001-08-26
Posts: 1267

Re: i think we need to talk...

oh, and i was attempting to imply that macdaddy spends too much time here in a jokign type fashion, as aubry had many while md had few. funny, sort of.

...well, no.  sad


Rozzlapeed:I remember hearing that Gen. Horner, CENTCOM commander in Gulf War I, is one of the signatories. I think we can trust his point-of-view to an extent.
Cyberpawz:Yeah, and what has he done since?

Offline

 

#10 2003-01-29 8:28 am

milenko11
Member
From: somewhere
Registered: 2001-08-15
Posts: 1714
Website

Re: i think we need to talk...

aubrey post over 32 times a day! thats way too much. aubrey, you're still in high school i take it?


There are 10  type of people in the world... those you know binary and those that don't.

Offline

 

#11 2003-01-29 8:44 am

registered_user
bulletproof
From: padding: zero-pixels;
Registered: 2000-12-19
Posts: 16026
Website

Re: i think we need to talk...

aubrey post over 32 times a day! thats way too much. aubrey, you're still in high school i take it?

That's because he posts something in every thread, whether or not he actually has something to actually contribute or not.

I stamp him with the mark of shame as well:

SHAME!

Offline

 

#12 2003-01-29 8:51 am

Mac Daddy
Member
From: Canada
Registered: 2000-08-28
Posts: 7541
Website

Re: i think we need to talk...

oh, and i was attempting to imply that macdaddy spends too much time here in a jokign type fashion, as aubry had many while md had few. funny, sort of.

...well, no.  sad

It was a joke? I'm sorry, I had no idea...


"The only thing better than a woman you can control in bed, is one that you can't."

Offline

 

#13 2003-01-29 10:16 am

~Coxy
Member
From: Perth, Western Australia
Registered: 2000-04-05
Posts: 8472
Website

Re: i think we need to talk...


That's because he posts something in every thread, whether or not he actually has something to actually contribute or not.

I notice that you've been posting some white noise recently. too.
Or maybe it's just the part of me that doesn't want to loose ground.  blush

Offline

 

#14 2003-01-29 10:21 am

FXWizard
Member
From: Port Moody, BC, Canada
Registered: 2000-01-19
Posts: 2773
Website

Re: i think we need to talk...

ATM pin number

You have a Personal Identification Number number?


We can only give you what we think you said you thought you wanted...

Offline

 

#15 2003-01-29 11:01 am

registered_user
bulletproof
From: padding: zero-pixels;
Registered: 2000-12-19
Posts: 16026
Website

Re: i think we need to talk...


That's because he posts something in every thread, whether or not he actually has something to actually contribute or not.

I notice that you've been posting some white noise recently. too.
Or maybe it's just the part of me that doesn't want to loose ground.  blush

Yeah, I admit it, I'm guilty.  I have been posting more than my fair share of white noise recently.  And in fairness, I think that everyone does to a certain degree.  Though I also feel that I post more substantive things as well.  I just hope that my signal to noise ratio isn't too much on the noisy side, and I don't think it is.  And I'm certain that I'm not even coming close to aubrey's noise level.  I mean, you'll never see a pic like the one shlo posted with my name on it.  I might get 4 in a row or something (typically in the mornings here), but that pic is just ridiculous.

You know what I think would be really great?  A user court.  Put a member on trial as a spammer, or as a troll, and allow other users to testify, and the user in question to present a defense.  Punishment would put it over the top and make it dumb, but just for fun I think it might be neat.  I'd even volunteer to go first -- under the stipulation that it doesn't get locked right away, and that anyone who contributes accepts that they may be next on trial.  Perhaps the accused would get the privelege of selecting the next person to put on trial.

That way, there'd be a concensus of what the user posts, more often than not.  It would be really cool if we could get a forum for it, and if the Admins would create a few new titles for it, like "spammer," "informed," or "nonsensical" that the tried user could be marked with after the verdict is reached.

I'm pretty sure that the Admins wouldn't go for it, but it would be neat if they would.  Especially because it would be totally voluntary.

Offline

 

#16 2003-01-29 11:46 am

Slarty
Member
From: MAF. Duh.
Registered: 2002-08-25
Posts: 1938

Re: i think we need to talk...

High post counts=no life.

Trust me. I speak from experience.


Git off my lawn, ya durn kids!

Offline

 

#17 2003-01-29 11:56 am

registered_user
bulletproof
From: padding: zero-pixels;
Registered: 2000-12-19
Posts: 16026
Website

Re: i think we need to talk...

High post counts=no life.

*bows head in shame*

Well, on the bright side, I've been here a few years, so it's not like....

ugh.

*slumps over in shame*

Offline

 

#18 2003-01-30 12:40 am

dabeech
Member
From: Seattle, WA, USA
Registered: 2001-07-25
Posts: 371
Website

Re: i think we need to talk...


That's because he posts something in every thread, whether or not he actually has something to actually contribute or not.

I notice that you've been posting some white noise recently. too.
Or maybe it's just the part of me that doesn't want to loose ground.  blush

Yeah, I admit it, I'm guilty.  I have been posting more than my fair share of white noise recently.  And in fairness, I think that everyone does to a certain degree.  Though I also feel that I post more substantive things as well.  I just hope that my signal to noise ratio isn't too much on the noisy side, and I don't think it is.  And I'm certain that I'm not even coming close to aubrey's noise level.  I mean, you'll never see a pic like the one shlo posted with my name on it.  I might get 4 in a row or something (typically in the mornings here), but that pic is just ridiculous.

You know what I think would be really great?  A user court.  Put a member on trial as a spammer, or as a troll, and allow other users to testify, and the user in question to present a defense.  Punishment would put it over the top and make it dumb, but just for fun I think it might be neat.  I'd even volunteer to go first -- under the stipulation that it doesn't get locked right away, and that anyone who contributes accepts that they may be next on trial.  Perhaps the accused would get the privelege of selecting the next person to put on trial.

That way, there'd be a concensus of what the user posts, more often than not.  It would be really cool if we could get a forum for it, and if the Admins would create a few new titles for it, like "spammer," "informed," or "nonsensical" that the tried user could be marked with after the verdict is reached.

I'm pretty sure that the Admins wouldn't go for it, but it would be neat if they would.  Especially because it would be totally voluntary.

At first I thought that this would make the MAF somewhat like Survivor... you'd have to be cool, otherwise you would get voted off. People would form alliances and stuff, and it would suck.

But making it all volunary and without punishment might be kinda fun... Maybe you can start a test run at Unplugged or something and see how it goes.


"Excuse me while I go do manly things in a sensitive way." --Guybrush Threepwood

Offline

 

Board footer

Powered by PunBB 1.2.6
© Copyright 2002–2005 Rickard Andersson