Forums | MacLife
You are not logged in.
#1 2005-03-29 12:25 am
Longhorn v. Tiger
http://www.winsupersite.com/reviews/longhorn_alpha.asp
What is it with Windows?
It seems as if ANY intelligent person can find dozens of flaws with the interface.
Icons should be perfect.
Note things like the Windoze logo is white surrounded by blue just like the new Tiger Apple menu. (click on the Apple menu now and see what I mean.)
Why?!?! I simply cannot understand why Windows can't ever be as good as Macintosh. They have the funds to hire artistic smart people.
goddammit
...;;;---...///---999;;;===
Offline
#2 2005-03-29 12:55 am
- sosumi
- numbery
- Royal Wombat

- From: North Mexico
- Registered: 1999-02-21
- Posts: 17513
Re: Longhorn v. Tiger
Of course, Longhorn is not nearly as far along as Tiger so it's not technically fair to compare something that's 1.5 years+ from release to something coming out in less than a month.
Offline
#4 2005-03-29 1:44 am
- assassin_bill
- International Bitch Maker

- From: (__
- Registered: 2003-08-06
- Posts: 1293
- Website
Re: Longhorn v. Tiger
Isn't longhorn based on a proprietary UNIX version?
Innovation will not be included in the intel switch
Offline
#5 2005-03-29 2:05 am
Re: Longhorn v. Tiger
assassin_bill wrote:
Isn't longhorn based on a proprietary UNIX version?
In my understanding, Windows is based on .Net, something that Microsoft created with some help, but other than that, I don't believe that Windows is at all like Linux or Unix or made from it for that matter.
"If you love what you do; you will never work a day in your life" -- From Connie Cutler
**Sticker on a broken PC****
"My other computer is a G5"
Offline
#6 2005-03-29 2:56 am
Re: Longhorn v. Tiger
.Net is just their technology for creating user applications.
The NT kernel is very similar to VMS, not UNIX.
Offline
#7 2005-03-29 3:06 am
Re: Longhorn v. Tiger
sosumi wrote:
Of course, Longhorn is not nearly as far along as Tiger so it's not technically fair to compare something that's 1.5 years+ from release to something coming out in less than a month.
Of course, Longhorn was promised to us how long ago?...
Offline
#8 2005-03-29 4:34 am
- Blandford Fly
- Member

- From: Malformed People Factory
- Registered: 2003-04-04
- Posts: 2142
Re: Longhorn v. Tiger
'My Recent Documents' sure look they'll take a long time to find...
User Friendly, anyone?
MacBook 2Ghz, 4GB RAM, OS X 10.6.1
12" G4 1Ghz PowerBook, 768mb RAM, OS X 10.4.11
Offline
#9 2005-03-29 6:48 am
#10 2005-03-29 7:45 am
- Short Circuit
- authorized airduct engineer
- From: UESC Marathon
- Registered: 2002-05-17
- Posts: 4739
Re: Longhorn v. Tiger
That smurfy website: wrote:
The Longhorn alpha Welcome screen gets a long-awaited clock.
Wow! ha ha ha!!!
W
Frog7blast the ventcore!
Offline
#11 2005-03-29 7:46 am
- Short Circuit
- authorized airduct engineer
- From: UESC Marathon
- Registered: 2002-05-17
- Posts: 4739
Re: Longhorn v. Tiger
Also, why the bloody hell does he use .gif for large images...
W
Frog7blast the ventcore!
Offline
#12 2005-03-29 8:20 am
- MattElmore
- Member

- From: Tuscaloosa, AL
- Registered: 2003-02-28
- Posts: 1778
- Website
Re: Longhorn v. Tiger
that is one of the ugliest "news" sites I've ever seen.
Offline
#13 2005-03-29 11:42 am
- treehouse
- Member

- Registered: 2004-05-17
- Posts: 822
Re: Longhorn v. Tiger
Kurto2021 wrote:
Longhorn = Jan
Tiger = Marsha
Give me a break.
OS 10.1 = MaryAnn
OS 10.2 = Ginger
OS 10.3 = Holly Hunter
OS 10.4 = Catherine Zeta-Jones, probably
Last edited by treehouse (2005-03-29 11:46 am)
Offline
#14 2005-03-29 11:50 am
- benightedbastard
- Cheap and Juicy!

- From: Western Australia
- Registered: 1999-06-03
- Posts: 28733
- Website
Re: Longhorn v. Tiger
Short Circuit wrote:
Also, why the bloody hell does he use .gif for large images...
W
Unless you're specifically showing some fancy transparency effect, gif is far superior to jpeg for screenshots.
Though I guess he could use png, but that would make them smurfing huge.
Offline
#15 2005-03-29 1:33 pm
- Short Circuit
- authorized airduct engineer
- From: UESC Marathon
- Registered: 2002-05-17
- Posts: 4739
Re: Longhorn v. Tiger
gif results in bigger filesizes 
W
Frog7blast the ventcore!
Offline
#16 2005-03-29 1:49 pm
- benightedbastard
- Cheap and Juicy!

- From: Western Australia
- Registered: 1999-06-03
- Posts: 28733
- Website
Re: Longhorn v. Tiger
The only way jpeg files are smaller on computer screen caps is when the compression is overly noticeable.
Offline
#17 2005-03-29 2:23 pm
- petikas
- Member
- From: Cyprus
- Registered: 2000-11-12
- Posts: 3601
Re: Longhorn v. Tiger
Short Circuit wrote:
Also, why the bloody hell does he use .gif for large images...
W
Because .gif is lossless and .jpg is lossy.
The methods of science are manifestly effective, having made massive humanitarian contributions to society. It is this very effectiveness which the purveyors of mystical philosophies attack, because they recognise in it the chief threat to the belief-based source of their power and financial reward. -Harry Kroto, Nobel Laureate
Offline
#18 2005-03-29 3:52 pm
Re: Longhorn v. Tiger
A few things I noticed: the sidebar is huge, and so I'd want to hide it a lot. However, the toggle button is on the COMPLETELY OPPOSITE corner of the screen! And "Plex" looks like it was designed by a two year old on crack who they sat in front of a computer (which he'd never seen before) with Paint running and said "Make us a style, dammit!"
Offline
#19 2005-03-29 5:09 pm
Re: Longhorn v. Tiger
My My My My My My My My My My My My My My My My My My...
What the hell is with that? Like you're going to have someone else's pictures or documents on your computer?
Offline
#20 2005-03-29 6:15 pm
Re: Longhorn v. Tiger
I don't care if Longhorn (i'll hold back male anatomy jokes) is not done yet, WinXP looks like crap, and although it has more color then OS 9, it's still not at a point where every pixel is in the right spot.
A global menu bar at the top is so much faster to use then menus on windows. (infinite velocity upwards yields faster results blah blah)
I tried talking to some PC users at my school about Longhorny, and they didn't even know anything about it. EVERY Mac user knows about the next release. Why? because the next release makes the OS better! DUH
...;;;---...///---999;;;===
Offline
#21 2005-03-29 6:17 pm
#22 2005-03-29 6:22 pm
- skymt
- Lycanthropic Cowboy
- From: Limbo until Q2 2006
- Registered: 2004-09-02
- Posts: 775
Re: Longhorn v. Tiger
I have a different theory about why PC users don't know about Longhorn and Mac users know Tiger. PC users want as little to do with their computer as possible. They don't follow the latest OS news because they don't care about what OS they're using. They really don't care as long as they can get a memo written and log back off as fast as possible.
Offline
#23 2005-03-29 7:05 pm
- Egress
- Connoisseur of Eyebrows

- From: Rockville, Maryland, USA
- Registered: 2000-02-05
- Posts: 5049
Re: Longhorn v. Tiger
The motto at DistroWatch is "Put the fun back in computing."
Using Windows does indeed take all the fun out of computing. It's the perfect OS for cubicle drones.
Hey!!! Was that Pithy? Got a twenty?
Offline
#24 2005-03-29 7:23 pm
- Aurik
- Member

- From: MB, Canada
- Registered: 2001-02-20
- Posts: 655
Re: Longhorn v. Tiger
skymt wrote:
I have a different theory about why PC users don't know about Longhorn and Mac users know Tiger. PC users want as little to do with their computer as possible. They don't follow the latest OS news because they don't care about what OS they're using. They really don't care as long as they can get a memo written and log back off as fast as possible.
I kind of disagree. Most of the Windows users that I talked with while working at a support help desk simply just didn't know or were totally inept. Most of their responses were stuff like "Windows 97" or "Windows Office 97", etc.
But then again, most of the same people that I spoke with, didn't even know their national anthem....why should I expect them to know what operating system they are using???

From my own experience with LongHorn.....it's really junky right now. Very slow, and the Avalon graphics feature crashes after 10 minutes of running, WinFS DOES make the system grind to a halt, and yes GUI is just a nightmare to look at. But that's how it is with betas. Anyone remember the OS X Public Beta??? That was impressively slow and not very workable at the time. Kinda of like how Longhorn is now. Putting aside my dislike for Microsoft, maybe this time they'll actually make a nice OS? (with a downloaded, customized Skin of course
)
Last edited by Aurik (2005-03-29 7:27 pm)
Offline
#25 2005-03-29 7:35 pm
Re: Longhorn v. Tiger
I think those are old images of longhorn. That article is from 2003.
The newer ones are here: http://www.winsupersite.com/showcase/lo … w_2005.asp
There are some more out there as well. I just saw some this morning. They look better than the 2003 ones, but the GUI is still all over the place. In fact one looked very much like OSX. Dropshadows, translucent bits, but crappy buttons.
Offline


Get it
Stack it!




