Forums | MacLife

mo' ron wrote:

Chances are if this woman were otherwise normal, she wouldn't be protesting by herself, so long after-the-fact.

You don't know that - and that's Ad-Hominem - dismissing her because she's "not normal"

Haha... Where were you during the Clinton years? Or when Michael's business was being dug up? For the record, i'm not against digging up people's personal lives if it can shed some light on a serious situation.

Michael's business was directly related to the issue of Terri - he went and got himself a new family etc. but still wanted control over Terri.

That was directly related to the case - that wasn't someone digging up unrelated smurf on someone just because they don't like what they are doing.

resedit wrote:

mo' ron wrote:

Chances are if this woman were otherwise normal, she wouldn't be protesting by herself, so long after-the-fact.

You don't know that - and that's Ad-Hominem - dismissing her because she's "not normal"

That's right, I don't (it's why I said "chances are"). I also don't know that you aren't really George Bush or Osama Bin Laden.

Haha... Where were you during the Clinton years? Or when Michael's business was being dug up? For the record, i'm not against digging up people's personal lives if it can shed some light on a serious situation.

Michael's business was directly related to the issue of Terri - he went and got himself a new family etc. but still wanted control over Terri.

That was directly related to the case - that wasn't someone digging up unrelated smurf on someone just because they don't like what they are doing.

A lot of what they said was extremely exaggerated, false (as the autopsy has shown), or just tunnel vision. I guess that's different though than digging someone's personal life up, but it's in the same vein.

user wrote:

RatFink wrote:

Smothering with a pillow certainly does leave marks.  Cuts an abrasions on the lips an tongue.  They would have certainly noticed these in the ambulance or ER.

Damn! Guy must not be keeping up with his CSI episodes...

Actually that one came from my friend, and doctor, who happens to be is a pathologist.   Hmmm... on second thought might best find me a new doctor.

resedit wrote:

Podesta wrote:

User, those people just won't give up.  A couple weeks ago, I posted an excerpt and a link to an article about the remaining protester at the hospice.  She is a multiple divorcee who was fired from her last job.

So smurfing what?
That's really low, really low.

Not as low as implying that Michael had Teri cremated simply to spite her folks.

resedit wrote:

Podesta wrote:

Stifle, Resedit.  To understand where the woman is coming from, you have to understand where she has been.  I think any intelligent person reading the comment would realize that I am not saying everyone who is divorced or has lost a job is a loser.   I'm saying that the woman is someone who can't cope with losses and that appears to be fueling her misplaced anger.   I also think she has really poor judgment.

Ad hominem - and this kind of smear is all too typical. Sure - I'm generalizing.
Stop smearing - it makes you look like an smurf.

You talk about how liberals are more excepting and triumph civil rights - and even call me a racist - and then you pull superioristic smurf like this.

I'm often accused of judging people - you want to see an example of judging people?
Read Podesta's post there. He's judging that woman.

Like you judge Michael and make unfounded accusations. Get over yourself. smurf.

I find it hypocritical to be outraged at attacking someone's personal life, when this is a standard issue tactice for the right.