Forums | MacLife
You are not logged in.
#1 2007-11-18 1:36 pm
- lord funk
- Title

- Registered: 2000-12-11
- Posts: 2276
e-Readers e-Books: Why can't they not suck?
Amazon is introducing a REVOLUTIONARY e-Book:
http://www.newsweek.com/id/70983
In other news, Amazon is introducing a HIDEOUS, MONSTER e-Book:
http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/11/amaz … ok-reader/
Okay, come on. Why do we like books? Because they are simple, comfortable, and easy on the eyes. They even smell nice, feel good in the hands, are compact, and sometimes soft.
So why are the e-Readers out there missing this point so much?
I've put together exactly what an e-Reader should be. Here's my sketch:
It should have two facing pages of e-paper (the technology is coming a long way), just like a book. It should close just like a book, for compactness. Although the sketch doesn't show it, it should be as thin as possible. Perhaps the case can be made of leather, suede, or a soft plastic.
The interface should be dead simple. There should be a button for utility things, like loading, settings, etc. There should be a Next Page button and a Previous Page button, so you can 'turn' the pages. There should be a USB port for charging and transferring files.
I think a touch slider would make things like skimming be much better. You could quickly skim through a 500 page book by sliding your finger along the slider.
What is so hard about this? Why does it have to have a keyboard? I want to be able to download books, and have a comfortable READER. It should be focused on READING, in the most COMFORTABLE way possible. Ugh. It's 2007. Where is my e-Reader?!
In and around the lake,
Mountains come out of the sky
And they stand there!
Offline
#2 2007-11-18 1:47 pm
- Tallgeese
- Sternly Advising
- From: Pool Party
- Registered: 2000-10-17
- Posts: 34096
Re: e-Readers e-Books: Why can't they not suck?
My God, that thing [Amazon's] looks like 1983 back from the dead.
I still believe in liberalism today as much as I ever did, but, oh, there was a happy time when I believed in liberals.
Offline
#3 2007-11-18 3:53 pm
- test
- Member
- From: Collingwood, Ont., CANADA
- Registered: 2002-12-13
- Posts: 5300
Re: e-Readers e-Books: Why can't they not suck?
Tallgeese wrote:
My God, that thing [Amazon's] looks like 1983 back from the dead.
++
Patience is a virtue of the weak for it makes them stand still long enough for the strong to crush them with ease.
Offline
#4 2007-11-18 3:59 pm
Re: e-Readers e-Books: Why can't they not suck?
test wrote:
Tallgeese wrote:
My God, that thing [Amazon's] looks like 1983 back from the dead.
++
+= 1000
Offline
#5 2007-11-18 4:23 pm
- Aqua OS X
- Shark Sandwich

- From: Oakland, CA
- Registered: 2000-06-05
- Posts: 12669
Re: e-Readers e-Books: Why can't they not suck?
I like Apple's MacBook and MacBook Pro eBook readers. They look nice and they also run other applications.
Offline
#6 2007-11-18 5:34 pm
Re: e-Readers e-Books: Why can't they not suck?
And we still have the more serious problem of eBook pricing models - the same or more as their real book counterparts???? Give me a break.
I have friends who were excited about the Sony eBook reader, but the pricing for titles just turned them off. And I read an article that said that the publishers are still trying to figure out a pricing model? OMG.
"We are all atheists, some of us just take it one god further" Richard Dawkins
Offline
#7 2007-11-18 5:59 pm
- ephemeron
- Member
- Registered: 2003-06-23
- Posts: 226
Re: e-Readers e-Books: Why can't they not suck?
Sony's version looks like a much better contender (see the Ars Technica review), but it still costs too much, and "E Ink" hasn't quite arrived yet -- the entire screen flashes black every time you "turn" a page.
Offline
#8 2007-11-18 6:38 pm
- mtpalms
- plz stand by

- From: Telstar
- Registered: 2002-09-16
- Posts: 4534
Re: e-Readers e-Books: Why can't they not suck?
They are selling the Kindles for the same price as a 16 GB iPod Touch, which would probably work just as well as a reader, if the screen is held horizontal. My point being is that it is unnecessarily ugly and clunky-looking for the price. It makes a Zune look elegant.
I find that when I read books digitally I scroll the type, as opposed moving my eyes down a page like I would with a book, so one doesn't need height with the screen. The paperback I'm reading right now has the copy set 3.5" wide, but it's cheap printing on cheap paper. Crisp type on a quality, though smaller, screen like the iPod's should be easy enough to read for the average person.
The Sony PRS-505 does look better and it's only $299, and that's still too much just going by looks, but Sony products tend to be pricy anyway.
As far as title pricing goes, printing costs very little, so the price of an ebook will probably never be much less than a print book.
Offline
#9 2007-11-18 7:08 pm
- Boxcutter
- Member
- Registered: 2001-04-21
- Posts: 463
Re: e-Readers e-Books: Why can't they not suck?
It could be that e-paper is a relatively new thing and that these are the first steps for a comercial product and not R&D project. Give it 5 years or more, and then you'll see paper-thin, foldable, maybe even color divices. The Altair 8800 didn't win any beauty contests, but it didn't stop people from seeing it's potential.

Offline
#10 2007-11-18 7:40 pm
Re: e-Readers e-Books: Why can't they not suck?
For those who mention the macbook or iPhone as reader, e-ink tryly is a more calm experience on the eye.. I have a cheap Motorola F3 that has e-ink, and it has a very concrete / real / calm presence.
product design portfolio / brothers art
Hackintosh C2Q 2.4Ghz - 4GB - GF9800GT - Mac Pro case
PowerBook G4 1,33Ghz - dead ram slot Apple won't acknowledge
Offline
#11 2007-11-18 8:47 pm
Re: e-Readers e-Books: Why can't they not suck?
In art there is often a point where more brush strokes begin to destroy the art rather than create it. I think technology is sometimes the same way. A book is a great technology that cannot really be improved upon.
"Live with your head in the lion's mouth. I want you to overcome 'em with yeses, undermine 'em with grins, agree 'em to death and destruction, let 'em swoller you till they vomit or bust wide open." -Ralph Ellison
"Overpower, overcome" -Cro-Mags
Offline
#12 2007-11-18 9:08 pm
- Aqua OS X
- Shark Sandwich

- From: Oakland, CA
- Registered: 2000-06-05
- Posts: 12669
Re: e-Readers e-Books: Why can't they not suck?
StaticAge wrote:
In art there is often a point where more brush strokes begin to destroy the art rather than create it. I think technology is sometimes the same way. A book is a great technology that cannot really be improved upon.
I don't know about that. Most man made things can be improved upon with a little time and thoughtful design.
Offline
#13 2007-11-18 9:37 pm
- Ribtorus
- Member

- Registered: 2002-07-11
- Posts: 13749
Re: e-Readers e-Books: Why can't they not suck?
There's just no end to the drive to sell yet more content to yet more plastic rectangles.
Is there a glut of lithium batteries somewhere in China that's just begging for more places to stick them; to accomplish a task that hitherto doesn't even need said batteries?
when surrounded and left on Afghanistan's plains,
and the women come out to cut up what remains,
just roll to your rifle and blow out your brains,
and go to your god like a soldier...
Offline
#14 2007-11-18 9:44 pm
- mo' ron
- PS3 4 EVA

- From: NC, USA
- Registered: 2002-10-15
- Posts: 14253
Re: e-Readers e-Books: Why can't they not suck?
Ebooks have the potential to be really cool, but they need to make one with 2 flexible pages, with writing on the back and front that, so you can flip back instantly to the page you just read if you need to re-read something. They also need to make them fast (none of this flashing nonsense), and they also need a good interface to be able to search for text/phrases.
The primary limitation to this goal is technology. Right now, we simply don't have the technology to do this, at least not at a reasonable cost.
What is the difference between Vista and OSX?
- Microsoft employees are excited about OSX.
Offline
#15 2007-11-18 10:41 pm
- frankly
- Greetings Citizens!

- Registered: 2000-09-16
- Posts: 5103
Re: e-Readers e-Books: Why can't they not suck?
akb825 wrote:
test wrote:
Tallgeese wrote:
My God, that thing [Amazon's] looks like 1983 back from the dead.
++
+= 1000
*= 10^9
xkcd: Listen to Yourself
There are only 10 types of people in the world: those who understand binary and those who don't.
Offline
#16 2007-11-18 10:42 pm
- frankly
- Greetings Citizens!

- Registered: 2000-09-16
- Posts: 5103
Re: e-Readers e-Books: Why can't they not suck?
Aqua OS X wrote:
I like Apple's MacBook and MacBook Pro eBook readers. They look nice and they also run other applications.
Me too, except for when I'm laying in bed which is where I do a good bit of my reading.
Frank
xkcd: Listen to Yourself
There are only 10 types of people in the world: those who understand binary and those who don't.
Offline
#17 2007-11-19 2:38 am
Re: e-Readers e-Books: Why can't they not suck?
frankly wrote:
akb825 wrote:
test wrote:
+++= 1000
*= 10^9
*= 9.975^3 * c
Offline
#18 2007-11-19 5:24 am
- reece_james
- TheLAD

- From: Wollongong, Australia.
- Registered: 2001-12-01
- Posts: 3790
- Website
Re: e-Readers e-Books: Why can't they not suck?
Aqua OS X wrote:
StaticAge wrote:
In art there is often a point where more brush strokes begin to destroy the art rather than create it. I think technology is sometimes the same way. A book is a great technology that cannot really be improved upon.
I don't know about that. Most man made things can be improved upon with a little time and thoughtful design.
Like the door handle? "When you've got a good design, it tends to stick."
ePaper etc I think is a nasty idea. The iPod works well, but the line length is too small for me to scan. The iPod Touch is about the closest on the market atm.
Reece [/IMHO]
"All posts on the internet are postfixed by an invisible 'IMHO'", tito
Intel iMac CD 1.83Ghz, 2GB RAM, 17" + 20", 1160GB HD, 10.5.2.
MacBook CD 1.83Ghz, 2GB RAM, 60GB HD, 10.5.2.
Offline
#19 2007-11-19 6:33 am
- thume
- Only in Lapland

- From: Budapest, Hungary
- Registered: 2004-11-05
- Posts: 1352
Re: e-Readers e-Books: Why can't they not suck?
A book that needs batteries, no thanks.
Offline
#20 2007-11-19 9:32 am
- Zall
- Member
- Registered: 2004-08-26
- Posts: 177
Re: e-Readers e-Books: Why can't they not suck?
Actually, I think the Kindle gets a lot right. Sure, it's kinda ugly, but.
You can buy books from anywhere with the cell linkup. Great for road warriors. It also has a fantastic library and the hardcore prices are about $10-15 off street price.
Offline
#21 2007-11-19 10:50 am
- lord funk
- Title

- Registered: 2000-12-11
- Posts: 2276
Re: e-Readers e-Books: Why can't they not suck?
Aqua OS X wrote:
Most man made things can be improved upon with a little time and thoughtful design.
That's exactly right. This was not thoughtful design. This was trying to pack as many features into a product as possible so it has 'widespread' appeal. But, to me, it has the opposite effect.
Zall wrote:
You can buy books from anywhere with the cell linkup. Great for road warriors. It also has a fantastic library and the hardcore prices are about $10-15 off street price.
1. Who doesn't have access to the internet everywhere nowadays? Do you need to buy things on the bus instead of waiting until you get to the coffee shop?
2. That fantastic library can already go on your laptop / iPod / whatever. Nothing new there.
thume wrote:
A book that needs batteries, no thanks.
Sure it's a hassle, but so is carrying 25 lbs. of textbooks if you're a student. Put a rechargeable battery in there and it's no harder than an iPod.
In and around the lake,
Mountains come out of the sky
And they stand there!
Offline
#22 2007-11-19 10:51 am
- frankly
- Greetings Citizens!

- Registered: 2000-09-16
- Posts: 5103
Re: e-Readers e-Books: Why can't they not suck?
Nice things about it:
1) Carry a lot of books with you
2) Free Wikipedia access
3) Pretty light
4) Can download all past purchases if you lose your kindle or lose the files, etc. This is a great feature. I've been saying for years that this should be the default behavior of the iTunes store.
5) Major newspaper subscriptions. It would be nice to have the paper downloaded to the device while you sleep.
6) Weekly magazines as low as $1.99 a month!
7) Survives 30" drop tests.
Problems with it:
1) Uses Sprint EVDO. I am a Sprint customer and they still don't have EVDO in my area.
2) That flashing when it changes screens. In the video it was bothering me. Maybe it wouldn't be as bad in person.
3) Horribly ugly
4) Often when I read a book I like to hold it by the side I'm not reading. Kindle only has one side.
5) What about paperback books? Are you even saving any money with them?
6) Priced way too high. They should be selling it at a huge discount since you have to purchase from them in order to use it.
7) Did I mention that it is ugly?
xkcd: Listen to Yourself
There are only 10 types of people in the world: those who understand binary and those who don't.
Offline
#23 2007-11-19 10:52 am
- frankly
- Greetings Citizens!

- Registered: 2000-09-16
- Posts: 5103
Re: e-Readers e-Books: Why can't they not suck?
Zall wrote:
Actually, I think the Kindle gets a lot right. Sure, it's kinda ugly, but.
You can buy books from anywhere with the cell linkup. Great for road warriors. It also has a fantastic library and the hardcore prices are about $10-15 off street price.
Yes, but at $400 for the device you have to buy 30+ books before you start saving any money. And that is if you always buy hardcover. If you usually buy paperback then are you even saving any money?
I'm sorry but $400 seems like a lot of money for this device.
Frank
xkcd: Listen to Yourself
There are only 10 types of people in the world: those who understand binary and those who don't.
Offline
#24 2007-11-19 10:55 am
- frankly
- Greetings Citizens!

- Registered: 2000-09-16
- Posts: 5103
Re: e-Readers e-Books: Why can't they not suck?
lord funk wrote:
2. That fantastic library can already go on your laptop / iPod / whatever. Nothing new there.
Where can I buy electronic printed versions of books to take with me on my laptop? Aside from O'Reilly Safari which is a lame concept.
Frank
xkcd: Listen to Yourself
There are only 10 types of people in the world: those who understand binary and those who don't.
Offline
#25 2007-11-19 10:59 am
- lord funk
- Title

- Registered: 2000-12-11
- Posts: 2276
Re: e-Readers e-Books: Why can't they not suck?
frankly wrote:
lord funk wrote:
2. That fantastic library can already go on your laptop / iPod / whatever. Nothing new there.
Where can I buy electronic printed versions of books to take with me on my laptop? Aside from O'Reilly Safari which is a lame concept.
Frank
Forgive me if I'm misunderstanding, but isn't that what http://www.ebooks.com/ is for?
In and around the lake,
Mountains come out of the sky
And they stand there!
Offline

