Forums | MacLife

You are not logged in.

#1 2008-02-16 7:25 pm

Scott
Zombie Gorilla
From: Oregon
Registered: 2002-12-07
Posts: 3446
Website

Thoughts on JS frameworks...

I am looking for thoughts and opinions on the various JS frameworks.  That may sound pretty open-ended, but I am hoping to find more info beyond the what the sites claim.  I have googled some of them but they tend to be n00b devs discussing which is easier and such.  Nothing substansive.

I have used Prototype/Scriptaculous extensively and am very familiar with Mootools.  I am somewhat farmiliar with extJS.  I want to move away from Prototype/Scriptaculous (well mostly scriptaculous) because of the bulk it carries with it. 

But I am looking for a fast efficient base frame work that is extensible.  The goal is use it as more of a scaffolding than a direct framework.  Performance and memory usage a are big issues.  Not really interested in the admittadly cool features for class declarations and such that Moo/Proto have.  They are slick, but then you are tied to those frameworks. 

Again no specific question here, just thoughts. All thing like this have walls you hit when you venture past the basic functionality that 99% of people use.  We have hit several bugs and limitations with prototype that you really don't find discussed often because they are used mostly in a cookie cutter fashion.

TIA.


http://www.greatgamesexperiment.com/images/logo_kit/468x60-Blue.gif

Offline

 

#2 2008-02-16 8:20 pm

Gipetto
Yankee Doodle's noodle
Royal Wombat
From: People! Ahg!!
Registered: 2000-09-24
Posts: 9937
Website

Re: Thoughts on JS frameworks...

I haven't stepped out of the prototype/scriptaculous bubble for fear of having to rewrite too much to make a clean conversion in a timely manner.


So, just when did this place get Private Messages? YIKES!

Gippy Pages  |  Fuzzy Coconut XHTML Widget | PuppyCam

Offline

 

#3 2008-02-18 8:08 am

Scott
Zombie Gorilla
From: Oregon
Registered: 2002-12-07
Posts: 3446
Website

Re: Thoughts on JS frameworks...

Gipetto wrote:

I haven't stepped out of the prototype/scriptaculous bubble for fear of having to rewrite too much to make a clean conversion in a timely manner.

Same thoughts here.  By the same token, I am now finding the need to be flexible.  Our current setup doesn't rely on the structural elements that proto uses, but it reliant enough on things to be a little problematic.  Ideally, we want to replace everything with our own code, but that does take time. 

One nice thing I have found is that many of them rely on the same conventions, like $('id') and things.

Also of interest, recently we upgraded Prototype and ran in to problems.  They handed form differently and it broke many things on our site.  That raised red flags about becoming dependent on third party code.


http://www.greatgamesexperiment.com/images/logo_kit/468x60-Blue.gif

Offline

 

#4 2008-02-18 12:30 pm

Gipetto
Yankee Doodle's noodle
Royal Wombat
From: People! Ahg!!
Registered: 2000-09-24
Posts: 9937
Website

Re: Thoughts on JS frameworks...

Yeah, the 1.6 upgrade deprecated a lot.
This comes in handy: http://prototypejs.org/2008/2/12/deprec … transition


So, just when did this place get Private Messages? YIKES!

Gippy Pages  |  Fuzzy Coconut XHTML Widget | PuppyCam

Offline

 

Board footer

Powered by PunBB
© Copyright 2002–2005 Rickard Andersson