Forums | MacLife
You are not logged in.
#26 2008-05-16 9:31 pm
- [MA] Flying_Meat
- Member
- From: Frisco?
- Registered: 2001-03-31
- Posts: 8542
Re: This is ridiculous
atf exists for those times you need to accidentally set a building full of unwilling evacuees on fire, or when someone writes legal and weed in the same sentence.
...
oh crap!
...and watch out for the flying meat!
Offline
#27 2008-05-17 8:02 am
- nayrk
- User Error

- From: Outland
- Registered: 2004-05-01
- Posts: 769
Re: This is ridiculous
I thought you could have legally less than an ounce of weed in CA... or something like that.
But in other personal news I was sent home from school multiple times for wearing a shirt from Winter Park, CO. I guess a mountain named "Mary Jane" was to big of a drug reference.
Offline
#28 2008-05-17 8:50 am
Re: This is ridiculous
nayrk wrote:
I thought you could have legally less than an ounce of weed in CA... or something like that.
But in other personal news I was sent home from school multiple times for wearing a shirt from Winter Park, CO. I guess a mountain named "Mary Jane" was to big of a drug reference.
Less than an ounce and most cops will leave you alone. They may confiscate it.
If you have a doctors prescription, you only have to worry about the feds busting you - which is highly unlikely.
In her right hand Jenny held the Bible of her mother
Jenny had a pistol in the other
-- Steve Taylor
Offline
#29 2008-05-17 8:52 am
- nayrk
- User Error

- From: Outland
- Registered: 2004-05-01
- Posts: 769
Re: This is ridiculous
resedit wrote:
nayrk wrote:
I thought you could have legally less than an ounce of weed in CA... or something like that.
But in other personal news I was sent home from school multiple times for wearing a shirt from Winter Park, CO. I guess a mountain named "Mary Jane" was to big of a drug reference.Less than an ounce and most cops will leave you alone. They may confiscate it.
If you have a doctors prescription, you only have to worry about the feds busting you - which is highly unlikely.
Thats about what I was thinking.
Offline
#30 2008-05-17 8:54 am
Re: This is ridiculous
Technically possession of less than an ounce w/o doctors prescription is still a misdemeanor.
It might be a felony within a certain distance of a school - not sure.
Last edited by resedit (2008-05-17 8:56 am)
In her right hand Jenny held the Bible of her mother
Jenny had a pistol in the other
-- Steve Taylor
Offline
#31 2008-05-17 9:36 am
- jerwin
- Sophist
- From: The Garden of Pure Ideology
- Registered: 2003-01-01
- Posts: 7094
Re: This is ridiculous
resedit wrote:
Technically possession of less than an ounce w/o doctors prescription is still a misdemeanor.
It might be a felony within a certain distance of a school - not sure.
does that include home schools?
Some subjects actually enjoy pain, and withhold information they might otherwise have divulged in order to be punished.
Central Intelligence Agency. (1983). Human Resource Exploitation Training Manual
Offline
#32 2008-05-17 5:21 pm
Re: This is ridiculous
jerwin wrote:
resedit wrote:
Technically possession of less than an ounce w/o doctors prescription is still a misdemeanor.
It might be a felony within a certain distance of a school - not sure.does that include home schools?
I don't know that the law actually differs near a school - I think it does.
I highly doubt a home school counts.
In her right hand Jenny held the Bible of her mother
Jenny had a pistol in the other
-- Steve Taylor
Offline
#33 2008-05-18 10:29 pm
Re: This is ridiculous
Pithecanthropus wrote:
What happened to free speech? I mean this is on his bottle caps, right? It's not in his Federally Required list of ingredients?
Alcoholic beverage distributors, unlike every other business that sells an edible or meant-for-consumers (ie, shampoo) product, are not required to list ingredients, or even nutritional values. Some light beers list nutritional values in order to promote themselves as less carby than other beers, but on the whole, good luck finding either bit of information for any booze.
Offline
#34 2008-05-18 10:31 pm
Re: This is ridiculous
Tallgeese wrote:
I bet the aluminum his beer caps are made of came from another state. Whoops, interstate commerce! Feds can get their hands in it!
While I agree that's what the Feds have been claiming of late, that's a huge abuse of the interstate commerce clause in the constitution. In much the same manner that using that clause to justify the National Minimum Drinking Age Act of 1984 is a huge abuse of that clause.
Offline


