Quantcast

Forums | MacLife

You are not logged in.

#26 2008-05-16 9:31 pm

[MA] Flying_Meat
Member
From: Frisco?
Registered: 2001-03-31
Posts: 8542

Re: This is ridiculous

atf exists for those times you need to accidentally set a building full of unwilling evacuees on fire, or when someone writes legal and weed in the same sentence.


...


oh crap!


...and watch out for the flying meat!

Offline

 

#27 2008-05-17 8:02 am

nayrk
User Error
From: Outland
Registered: 2004-05-01
Posts: 769

Re: This is ridiculous

I thought you could have legally less than an ounce of weed in CA... or something like that.

But in other personal news I was sent home from school multiple times for wearing a shirt from Winter Park, CO. I guess a mountain named "Mary Jane" was to big of a drug reference.

Offline

 

#28 2008-05-17 8:50 am

resedit
Chicken Little
Royal Wombat
From: /dev/null
Registered: 1999-11-01
Posts: 50437
Website

Re: This is ridiculous

nayrk wrote:

I thought you could have legally less than an ounce of weed in CA... or something like that.

But in other personal news I was sent home from school multiple times for wearing a shirt from Winter Park, CO. I guess a mountain named "Mary Jane" was to big of a drug reference.

Less than an ounce and most cops will leave you alone. They may confiscate it.
If you have a doctors prescription, you only have to worry about the feds busting you - which is highly unlikely.


In her right hand Jenny held the Bible of her mother
Jenny had a pistol in the other
-- Steve Taylor

Offline

 

#29 2008-05-17 8:52 am

nayrk
User Error
From: Outland
Registered: 2004-05-01
Posts: 769

Re: This is ridiculous

resedit wrote:

nayrk wrote:

I thought you could have legally less than an ounce of weed in CA... or something like that.

But in other personal news I was sent home from school multiple times for wearing a shirt from Winter Park, CO. I guess a mountain named "Mary Jane" was to big of a drug reference.

Less than an ounce and most cops will leave you alone. They may confiscate it.
If you have a doctors prescription, you only have to worry about the feds busting you - which is highly unlikely.

Thats about what I was thinking.

Offline

 

#30 2008-05-17 8:54 am

resedit
Chicken Little
Royal Wombat
From: /dev/null
Registered: 1999-11-01
Posts: 50437
Website

Re: This is ridiculous

Technically possession of less than an ounce w/o doctors prescription is still a misdemeanor.
It might be a felony within a certain distance of a school - not sure.

Last edited by resedit (2008-05-17 8:56 am)


In her right hand Jenny held the Bible of her mother
Jenny had a pistol in the other
-- Steve Taylor

Offline

 

#31 2008-05-17 9:36 am

jerwin
Sophist
From: The Garden of Pure Ideology
Registered: 2003-01-01
Posts: 7094

Re: This is ridiculous

resedit wrote:

Technically possession of less than an ounce w/o doctors prescription is still a misdemeanor.
It might be a felony within a certain distance of a school - not sure.

does that include home schools?


Some subjects actually enjoy pain, and withhold information they might otherwise have divulged in order to be punished.
Central Intelligence Agency. (1983). Human Resource Exploitation Training Manual

Offline

 

#32 2008-05-17 5:21 pm

resedit
Chicken Little
Royal Wombat
From: /dev/null
Registered: 1999-11-01
Posts: 50437
Website

Re: This is ridiculous

jerwin wrote:

resedit wrote:

Technically possession of less than an ounce w/o doctors prescription is still a misdemeanor.
It might be a felony within a certain distance of a school - not sure.

does that include home schools?

I don't know that the law actually differs near a school - I think it does.
I highly doubt a home school counts.


In her right hand Jenny held the Bible of her mother
Jenny had a pistol in the other
-- Steve Taylor

Offline

 

#33 2008-05-18 10:29 pm

Daniel
[dp] design#
From: Melbourne, FL
Registered: 2000-11-21
Posts: 9708
Website

Re: This is ridiculous

Pithecanthropus wrote:

What happened to free speech?  I mean this is on his bottle caps, right?  It's not in his Federally Required list of ingredients?

Alcoholic beverage distributors, unlike every other business that sells an edible or meant-for-consumers (ie, shampoo) product, are not required to list ingredients, or even nutritional values.  Some light beers list nutritional values in order to promote themselves as less carby than other beers, but on the whole, good luck finding either bit of information for any booze.


Airman Dan
Private Pilot, Instrument Airplane Single-Engine Land
http://homepage.mac.com/dp.design/.Pictures/atat/AtAT-Banner.jpg

Offline

 

#34 2008-05-18 10:31 pm

Daniel
[dp] design#
From: Melbourne, FL
Registered: 2000-11-21
Posts: 9708
Website

Re: This is ridiculous

Tallgeese wrote:

I bet the aluminum his beer caps are made of came from another state. Whoops, interstate commerce! Feds can get their hands in it!

While I agree that's what the Feds have been claiming of late, that's a huge abuse of the interstate commerce clause in the constitution.  In much the same manner that using that clause to justify the National Minimum Drinking Age Act of 1984 is a huge abuse of that clause.


Airman Dan
Private Pilot, Instrument Airplane Single-Engine Land
http://homepage.mac.com/dp.design/.Pictures/atat/AtAT-Banner.jpg

Offline

 

Board footer

Powered by PunBB 1.2.6
© Copyright 2002–2005 Rickard Andersson