Forums | MacLife
You are not logged in.
#26 2008-06-08 7:18 am
Re: USB 3.0 forking
reece_james wrote:
Gipetto wrote:
My sister's Dell has firewire. My sister is not tech savvy and bought a computer with price first, features 2nd mentality. That tells me its probably more common than we think.
I doubt that it's 6 pin. Then again, saw a Dell display with composite in the other day, that was a pleasant surprise.
6 versus 4 pins don't change anything except that 4 pin isn't powered, but in the end, there really aren't many FW devices that are powered by the bus. Camcorders and hard-drives for instance, are just as glad with 4 pins.
Anyway, just a side note.
product design portfolio / brothers art
Hackintosh C2Q 2.4Ghz - 4GB - GF9800GT - Mac Pro case
PowerBook G4 1,33Ghz - dead ram slot Apple won't acknowledge
Offline
#27 2008-06-08 6:26 pm
Re: USB 3.0 forking
Isn't it likely that both standards will fall back to USB 2.0 speeds if communicating at USB 3.0 speeds are unavailable?
Offline
#28 2008-06-08 6:27 pm
Re: USB 3.0 forking
pirloui wrote:
reece_james wrote:
Gipetto wrote:
My sister's Dell has firewire. My sister is not tech savvy and bought a computer with price first, features 2nd mentality. That tells me its probably more common than we think.
I doubt that it's 6 pin. Then again, saw a Dell display with composite in the other day, that was a pleasant surprise.
6 versus 4 pins don't change anything except that 4 pin isn't powered, but in the end, there really aren't many FW devices that are powered by the bus. Camcorders and hard-drives for instance, are just as glad with 4 pins.
Anyway, just a side note.
Older iPods are not.
Offline
#29 2008-06-08 9:29 pm
- Bat
- Flawless Cowboy
- Royal Wombat

- From: Björk, Björk
- Registered: 2001-05-14
- Posts: 28541
Re: USB 3.0 forking
matt wrote:
Isn't it likely that both standards will fall back to USB 2.0 speeds if communicating at USB 3.0 speeds are unavailable?
Perhaps, but if the hardware specs are different, perhaps not. The host comp might not even see the attached peripheral.
I'll be watching for informed opinion as this gets closer.
If all economists were laid end to end, they would not reach a conclusion - George Bernard Shaw
"Fire up a colortini, sit back, relax, and watch the pictures, now, as they fly through the air."
Offline
#30 2008-06-09 1:45 am
- Macskeeball
- Member

- Registered: 2002-02-07
- Posts: 8014
- Website
Re: USB 3.0 forking
Jasoco wrote:
God, you mean like the whole High Definition movie fiasco? And we all see how well that turned out.
Based on Bat's posts, this sounds even worse. With Blu-Ray vs HD-DVD, the two formats at least had different names. With this, they're both called the same name yet are incompatible.
tech writer for hire
Offline
#31 2008-06-09 3:46 am
- Bat
- Flawless Cowboy
- Royal Wombat

- From: Björk, Björk
- Registered: 2001-05-14
- Posts: 28541
Re: USB 3.0 forking
Macskeeball wrote:
Jasoco wrote:
God, you mean like the whole High Definition movie fiasco? And we all see how well that turned out.
Based on Bat's posts, this sounds even worse. With Blu-Ray vs HD-DVD, the two formats at least had different names. With this, they're both called the same name yet are incompatible.
Also it may be that neither is fully adopted, but 3.1 will be a new hybrid spec, totally compatible with neither of the 3.0s. We'll just have to see.
With luck, 3.1 might be engineered to be as compatible as possible with both 3.0s, but full backwards compat might be unobtainable.
If all economists were laid end to end, they would not reach a conclusion - George Bernard Shaw
"Fire up a colortini, sit back, relax, and watch the pictures, now, as they fly through the air."
Offline
#32 2008-06-09 8:28 pm
- Bat
- Flawless Cowboy
- Royal Wombat

- From: Björk, Björk
- Registered: 2001-05-14
- Posts: 28541
Re: USB 3.0 forking
That didn't take long.
AMD and NVIDIA say Intel won't share its USB 3.0 open host controller specs
The USB 3.0 specification is expected to be out in 2009 and will significantly upgrade the bandwidth of the current USB 2.0 ports and products that all computer users are familiar with. The body responsible for the support and promotion of the USB specifications going back to USB 1.1 is the USB Implementers Forum (USB-IF).
The USB-IF was founded by Intel in 1995 along with other industry players including Microsoft, HP, Texas Instruments, NEC and NXP Semiconductors. Currently, the USB-IF and its members are working to bring the USB 3.0 specification to market. USB 3.0 is also being called “PCI Express over cable” because the USB 3.0 specification uses intellectual property that was sourced from the PCI SIG. USB 3.0 will increase the bandwidth offered by USB 2.0 by 10 times with a data throughput of about 5 gigabits per second.
Despite the fact that much of the intellectual property behind the USB 3.0 specification wasn’t developed by Intel, AMD and NVIDIA both assert that Intel is keeping crucial information concerning the open host controller to itself. According to NVIDIA and AMD, Intel has working silicon, meaning the open host controller portion is mature and working, yet Intel is refusing to give the specifications to other processor and chipset makers.
AMD and NVIDIA say that by withholding the open host controller specifications that Intel is basically giving itself a market advantage of six to nine months because of the time lag between receiving the host controller specifications by other CPU and chipset makers and getting product to the marketplace.
We'll share if you don't compete with us. (Not like that's misuse of monopoly power or anything...)
AMD, NVIDIA to Create Second Open Host Controller For USB 3.0
ed spacing
Last edited by Bat (2008-06-09 8:29 pm)
If all economists were laid end to end, they would not reach a conclusion - George Bernard Shaw
"Fire up a colortini, sit back, relax, and watch the pictures, now, as they fly through the air."
Offline
#33 2008-06-10 8:13 am
- user
- Your plastic pal who's fun to be with

- From: I'm not getting you down, am I
- Registered: 2001-10-15
- Posts: 16030
Re: USB 3.0 forking
One thing that like about my VAIO is that it has a FW port. Of course, they don't call it that. It is a 4-pin, but I can use the cable I have to hook up my camcorder to my Mac. I couldn't (and wouldn't) use it for my camcorder, though.
Maybe use it with my FW only CD-burner or my iPod dock....come to think of it, I probably won't actually use it for anything.....
Aw, he's no fun, he fell right over.
Unless you become as little children, there's no way you will believe this crap.
Offline
#34 2008-08-14 3:35 am
- Bat
- Flawless Cowboy
- Royal Wombat

- From: Björk, Björk
- Registered: 2001-05-14
- Posts: 28541
Re: USB 3.0 forking
Good news.
USB3.0 xHCI spec released
Unforked
IT LOOKS LIKE the USB3.0 forking has been defused today with AMD, Dell, Microsoft and NEC all signed up for the new spec. Intel is releasing the Extensible Host Controller Interface (xHCI) today as well.
If you recall, there was going to be a fork on USB3.0, but it appears that several of the forkers are on board now. We wonder what late night negotiations were done to prompt that. In any case, it looks like all the major players are on board at last, so the forked spec will likely die at the current v.5.
http://www.theinquirer.net/gb/inquirer/ … c-released
Then again, the unified spec seems to increase the likelihood of USB3.0 hoopla drowning out any buzz around next-gen FW. Omelettes and eggs.
Edit: Forker NVidia seems conspicuously missing so far.
Last edited by Bat (2008-08-14 3:39 am)
If all economists were laid end to end, they would not reach a conclusion - George Bernard Shaw
"Fire up a colortini, sit back, relax, and watch the pictures, now, as they fly through the air."
Offline
#35 2008-08-14 9:14 am
- sturner
- Royal High Poobah
- Moderator

- From: Carrollton, TX USA
- Registered: 2000-01-31
- Posts: 13779
Re: USB 3.0 forking
Youse been forked!
I'm not dead yet.
There are 3 types of people, those who can count and those who can't.
"There are few things graven in stone, excepting your date of death."
Offline
