Forums | MacLife
You are not logged in.
#51 2008-08-04 10:59 pm
- JF
- Member
- Registered: 2000-07-27
- Posts: 1183
Re: CDC: "AIDS numbers? Oh, we miscounted, sorry!"
Chickenhawk wrote:
uhh, your numbers are off there by an order of magnitude.
http://www.avert.org/worldstats.htm
The WHO estimated 2 million deaths from AIDS in 2007, with 2.7 million new cases.
I'm actually very glad you said this. You're talking about estimates, which have never been given any justification by the WHO. In fact, their last president said their estimation methods were capable of producing "total bulls---". The actual numbers they report are dramatically lower than their estimates. But, since this is supposed to be based on science, I always prefer to go with measurement over speculation. And, since AIDS cases, at least in the tropics, are over-reported, even that 200,000 figure should be treated circumspectly.
J
Offline
#52 2008-08-04 11:26 pm
- Chickenhawk
- Snark Snark Snark Snark
- From: Being Snarky
- Registered: 2005-06-01
- Posts: 5821
Re: CDC: "AIDS numbers? Oh, we miscounted, sorry!"
Meanwhile, UNAIDS echoes the same figures.
But I'm sure that there's only 200,000 new cases a year globally. 
The recent medical controversy over whether vaccinations cause autism reveals a habit of human cognition—thinking anecdotally comes naturally, whereas thinking scientifically does not. -- Michael Shermer
Offline
