Forums | MacLife
You are not logged in.
#101 2008-08-29 7:48 pm
- Chickenhawk
- Snark Snark Snark Snark
- From: Being Snarky
- Registered: 2005-06-01
- Posts: 5821
Re: Somehow the Dems didn't screw it up
So if a tree falls in the woods, and nobody gives a crap, did it fall on anybody?
The recent medical controversy over whether vaccinations cause autism reveals a habit of human cognition—thinking anecdotally comes naturally, whereas thinking scientifically does not. -- Michael Shermer
Offline
#102 2008-08-29 7:52 pm
- bratboy
- laden with emotion
- Royal Wombat

- From: Austin, Texas
- Registered: 2003-01-19
- Posts: 34106
Re: Somehow the Dems didn't screw it up
everlong205 wrote:
What policy was Obama addressing? What 90% of policy were they in agreement on?
Does it concern "policy," or doesn't it? It isn't specific, but it certainly pertains to policy decisions. Just as identifying someone as a "Republican" evokes a general image of policy preferences.
Is obama trying to narrow it down? No, he's making a blanket statement, not about policy but about Bush and mcain. Is it Bush's support of funding for aids in africa? Would that count for or against Mcain that he voted with Bush on that policy? Is that part of the 90%? And is that then good or bad? It doesn't matter because that isn't obama's intenet. Instead obama is engaging in guilt by association.
That could be said about any criticism. If someone is connected to a particular policy or a set of policies and that policy or policies are viewed unfavorably, then they are 'guilty by association.' Criticizing Obama for being "pro-choice" offers an identification of his policy beliefs, and is not a "personal attack." However, saying that Obama is pro-choice "because he hate babies" is an unfounded attack upon his motive.
As to whether mcain was called a republican, by itself I would say no. However, used in a certain context and I would say yes or it could be used as an attack.
Of course you would.
This discussion has gone far enough. I don't foresee anyone stepping in to defend your position here, so I'll just leave it at the fact that, in my view, you would classify any and every criticism as a personal attack. Clearly you're unhappy with McCain being associated with Bush, and for obvious reasons (you know that Bush is terribly unpopular).
"One thing we've learned is there's a difference between being disappointed and having madmen in authority."
--Paul Krugman
Offline
#103 2008-08-29 8:36 pm
- everlong554
- Member
- Registered: 2003-12-24
- Posts: 6865
Re: Somehow the Dems didn't screw it up
Chickenhawk wrote:
So if a tree falls in the woods, and nobody gives a crap, did it fall on anybody?
yes
"YOU DISGUST ME!!!!"
Offline
#104 2008-08-29 8:38 pm
- kamizuno
- Poking you with a stick

- From: Smileytown
- Registered: 1999-07-13
- Posts: 1987
Re: Somehow the Dems didn't screw it up
I read this whole thread and was going to post something pertinent to this discussion, but then I realized my brains feel all hot and mushy, "WHAT THE HELL HAVE YOU PEOPLE DONE TO MY BRAIN
"
Offline
#105 2008-08-29 8:42 pm
- Chickenhawk
- Snark Snark Snark Snark
- From: Being Snarky
- Registered: 2005-06-01
- Posts: 5821
Re: Somehow the Dems didn't screw it up
everlong205 wrote:
Chickenhawk wrote:
So if a tree falls in the woods, and nobody gives a crap, did it fall on anybody?
yes
But if it fell on somebody, wouldn't they give a crap?
The recent medical controversy over whether vaccinations cause autism reveals a habit of human cognition—thinking anecdotally comes naturally, whereas thinking scientifically does not. -- Michael Shermer
Offline
#106 2008-08-29 9:51 pm
Re: Somehow the Dems didn't screw it up
everlong205 wrote:
Oh no? What a hypocritical disingeous, demagoging cur. I don't care that he makes such an attack. I just don't want to hear that he is not making such attacks.
everlong, demagogue is a noun.
---------------------------------------__ o
____________________ \ <.
================= (_)/ (_)
Offline
#107 2008-08-29 9:55 pm
- sturner
- Royal High Poobah
- Moderator

- From: Carrollton, TX USA
- Registered: 2000-01-31
- Posts: 13816
Re: Somehow the Dems didn't screw it up
isaly wrote:
everlong205 wrote:
Oh no? What a hypocritical disingeous, demagoging cur. I don't care that he makes such an attack. I just don't want to hear that he is not making such attacks.
everlong, demagogue is a noun.
So it should be "What a hypocritical curish demagogue."
But by your definition everthing McCain has said is a personal attack to. So we only have personal attacks.
I'm not dead yet.
There are 3 types of people, those who can count and those who can't.
"There are few things graven in stone, excepting your date of death."
Online
#108 2008-08-29 10:57 pm
#109 2008-08-29 11:00 pm
- mo' ron
- PS3 4 EVA

- From: NC, USA
- Registered: 2002-10-15
- Posts: 14253
Re: Somehow the Dems didn't screw it up
Metacell wrote:
You would never have heard Bush/Rove calling Al Gore "Bill Clinton's third term!"
This may have been your joke, but people would have (and technically did) welcomed that 
What is the difference between Vista and OSX?
- Microsoft employees are excited about OSX.
Offline
#110 2008-08-30 12:01 am
#111 2008-08-30 12:02 am
- radarman
- Member

- Registered: 2005-02-28
- Posts: 3618
Re: Somehow the Dems didn't screw it up
Metacell wrote:
You would never have heard Bush/Rove calling Al Gore "Bill Clinton's third term!"
I figured that was because everyone, dems and repubs alike, recognized that Al just didn't have the mojo to carry on Bill's legacy. I mean, seriously - can you imagine Gore wallowing around on the Oval Office rug with an intern?
Al was close, but no cigar.
Offline
#112 2008-08-30 12:30 am
Re: Somehow the Dems didn't screw it up
Actually according to the newsmen covering the convention Obama was echoing Bush's sentiments from 8 years ago (8 years is enough and no third term).
Offline
#113 2008-08-30 12:47 am
- everlong554
- Member
- Registered: 2003-12-24
- Posts: 6865
Re: Somehow the Dems didn't screw it up
Chickenhawk wrote:
everlong205 wrote:
Chickenhawk wrote:
So if a tree falls in the woods, and nobody gives a crap, did it fall on anybody?
yes
But if it fell on somebody, wouldn't they give a crap?
Maybe maybe not. they might be crushed and die right off the bat, dying before they had a chance to give a crap.
"YOU DISGUST ME!!!!"
Offline
#114 2008-08-30 12:49 am
- everlong554
- Member
- Registered: 2003-12-24
- Posts: 6865
Re: Somehow the Dems didn't screw it up
isaly wrote:
everlong205 wrote:
Oh no? What a hypocritical disingeous, demagoging cur. I don't care that he makes such an attack. I just don't want to hear that he is not making such attacks.
everlong, demagogue is a noun.
and a verb.
"YOU DISGUST ME!!!!"
Offline
#115 2008-08-30 12:53 am
Re: Somehow the Dems didn't screw it up
everlong205 wrote:
Chickenhawk wrote:
everlong205 wrote:
yes
But if it fell on somebody, wouldn't they give a crap?
Maybe maybe not. they might be crushed and die right off the bat, dying before they had a chance to give a crap.
You fail at logic.
We're talking epic fail too.
Offline
#116 2008-08-30 12:56 am
- everlong554
- Member
- Registered: 2003-12-24
- Posts: 6865
Re: Somehow the Dems didn't screw it up
radarman wrote:
Al was close, but no cigar.
Good one.
"YOU DISGUST ME!!!!"
Offline
#117 2008-08-30 12:57 am
Re: Somehow the Dems didn't screw it up
everlong205 wrote:
isaly wrote:
everlong205 wrote:
Oh no? What a hypocritical disingeous, demagoging cur. I don't care that he makes such an attack. I just don't want to hear that he is not making such attacks.
everlong, demagogue is a noun.
and a verb.
Vocabulary as well.
demagogue |ˈdeməˌgäg|
noun
a political leader who seeks support by appealing to popular desires and prejudices rather than by using rational argument.
• (in ancient Greece and Rome) a leader or orator who espoused the cause of the common people.
DERIVATIVES
demagogic |ˌdeməˈgäjik; -ˈgägik; -ˈgōjik| |ˈˈdɛməˈˈgɑdʒɪk| |ˈˈdɛməˈˈgɑgɪk| |-ˈgɒgɪk| adjective
demagoguery |ˈdeməˌgägərē| |ˈdɛməˈgɑg(ə)ri| |ˈˈdɛməˈgɑg(ə)ri| |-ˈgɒg(ə)ri| noun
demagogy |ˈdeməˌgäjē; -ˌgōjē| |ˈdɛməˈgɑdʒi| |ˈdɛməˈgɑgi| noun
ORIGIN mid 17th cent.: from Greek dēmagōgos, from dēmos ‘the people’ + agōgos ‘leading’ (from agein ‘to lead’ ).
Offline
#118 2008-08-30 12:59 am
- everlong554
- Member
- Registered: 2003-12-24
- Posts: 6865
Re: Somehow the Dems didn't screw it up
ScifiterX wrote:
everlong205 wrote:
Chickenhawk wrote:
But if it fell on somebody, wouldn't they give a crap?
Maybe maybe not. they might be crushed and die right off the bat, dying before they had a chance to give a crap.
You fail at logic.
We're talking epic fail too.
actually in truth, I misread the initial question to be "If a tree fell on somebody in the woods, but nobody gives a crap, did it fall on anybody?"
But in the case of a tree falling on someone and whether or not they gave a crap, that would depend on a lot of factors and there could be a lot of answers of which the answer I gave is one possibility. So I'm sticking to my answer anyway.
Last edited by everlong205 (2008-08-30 1:02 am)
"YOU DISGUST ME!!!!"
Offline
#119 2008-08-30 1:01 am
#120 2008-08-30 1:01 am
- bratboy
- laden with emotion
- Royal Wombat

- From: Austin, Texas
- Registered: 2003-01-19
- Posts: 34106
Re: Somehow the Dems didn't screw it up
You killed my thread!
"One thing we've learned is there's a difference between being disappointed and having madmen in authority."
--Paul Krugman
Offline
#121 2008-08-30 1:01 am
- everlong554
- Member
- Registered: 2003-12-24
- Posts: 6865
Re: Somehow the Dems didn't screw it up
ScifiterX wrote:
everlong205 wrote:
isaly wrote:
everlong, demagogue is a noun.and a verb.
Vocabulary as well.
demagogue |ˈdeməˌgäg|
noun
a political leader who seeks support by appealing to popular desires and prejudices rather than by using rational argument.
• (in ancient Greece and Rome) a leader or orator who espoused the cause of the common people.
DERIVATIVES
demagogic |ˌdeməˈgäjik; -ˈgägik; -ˈgōjik| |ˈˈdɛməˈˈgɑdʒɪk| |ˈˈdɛməˈˈgɑgɪk| |-ˈgɒgɪk| adjective
demagoguery |ˈdeməˌgägərē| |ˈdɛməˈgɑg(ə)ri| |ˈˈdɛməˈgɑg(ə)ri| |-ˈgɒg(ə)ri| noun
demagogy |ˈdeməˌgäjē; -ˌgōjē| |ˈdɛməˈgɑdʒi| |ˈdɛməˈgɑgi| noun
ORIGIN mid 17th cent.: from Greek dēmagōgos, from dēmos ‘the people’ + agōgos ‘leading’ (from agein ‘to lead’ ).
dem·a·gogue \ [dem-uh-gog, -gawg] noun, verb, -gogued, -gogu·ing.
–noun
1. a person, esp. an orator or political leader, who gains power and popularity by arousing the emotions, passions, and prejudices of the people.
2. (in ancient times) a leader of the people.
–verb (used with object)
3. to treat or manipulate (a political issue) in the manner of a demagogue; obscure or distort with emotionalism, prejudice, etc.
–verb (used without object)
4. to speak or act like a demagogue.
"YOU DISGUST ME!!!!"
Offline
#122 2008-08-30 1:09 am
Re: Somehow the Dems didn't screw it up
everlong205 wrote:
ScifiterX wrote:
everlong205 wrote:
Maybe maybe not. they might be crushed and die right off the bat, dying before they had a chance to give a crap.
You fail at logic.
We're talking epic fail too.actually in truth, I misread the initial question to be "If a tree fell on somebody in the woods, but nobody gives a crap, did it fall on anybody?"
But in the case of a tree falling on someone and whether or not they gave a crap, that would depend on a lot of factors and there could be a lot of answers of which the answer I gave is a possibility. So I'm sticking to my answer anyway.
Oh if it fell on someone, someone would give a crap. Maybe the victim, maybe the victim's surviving friends, enemies, and/or family, maybe the person who finds the body. And if someone witnessed it they'd almost certainly care. If someone caused it, they'd care as well. Someone's gonna care one way or another if a tree falls on somebody.
Offline
#123 2008-08-30 1:19 am
Re: Somehow the Dems didn't screw it up
everlong205 wrote:
ScifiterX wrote:
everlong205 wrote:
and a verb.
Vocabulary as well.
demagogue |ˈdeməˌgäg|
noun
a political leader who seeks support by appealing to popular desires and prejudices rather than by using rational argument.
• (in ancient Greece and Rome) a leader or orator who espoused the cause of the common people.
DERIVATIVES
demagogic |ˌdeməˈgäjik; -ˈgägik; -ˈgōjik| |ˈˈdɛməˈˈgɑdʒɪk| |ˈˈdɛməˈˈgɑgɪk| |-ˈgɒgɪk| adjective
demagoguery |ˈdeməˌgägərē| |ˈdɛməˈgɑg(ə)ri| |ˈˈdɛməˈgɑg(ə)ri| |-ˈgɒg(ə)ri| noun
demagogy |ˈdeməˌgäjē; -ˌgōjē| |ˈdɛməˈgɑdʒi| |ˈdɛməˈgɑgi| noun
ORIGIN mid 17th cent.: from Greek dēmagōgos, from dēmos ‘the people’ + agōgos ‘leading’ (from agein ‘to lead’ ).dem·a·gogue \ [dem-uh-gog, -gawg] noun, verb, -gogued, -gogu·ing.
–noun
1. a person, esp. an orator or political leader, who gains power and popularity by arousing the emotions, passions, and prejudices of the people.
2. (in ancient times) a leader of the people.
–verb (used with object)
3. to treat or manipulate (a political issue) in the manner of a demagogue; obscure or distort with emotionalism, prejudice, etc.
–verb (used without object)
4. to speak or act like a demagogue.
Fair enough, however, you forgot this footnote...
Usage Note: Among the nouns that the Usage Panel is loath to see used as a verb is demagogue, meaning "to speak about something in the manner of a demagogue." Ninety-four percent reject it in the sentence The President will demagogue Medicare, unwilling to acknowledge that fundamental reforms need to be made. Resistance to the use of traditional nouns as verbs is sometimes strong, especially when the novel usages are associated with business or bureaucratic jargon.
Offline
#124 2008-08-30 7:28 am
Re: Somehow the Dems didn't screw it up
I knew that disgusting corporate habit of turning nouns into verbs had to start somewhere.
---------------------------------------__ o
____________________ \ <.
================= (_)/ (_)
Offline
#125 2008-08-30 7:30 am
Re: Somehow the Dems didn't screw it up
And to call Obama a demagogue is kind of disingenuous, given that all mr everlong does is quote the talking points of demagogues himself.
---------------------------------------__ o
____________________ \ <.
================= (_)/ (_)
Offline



