Quantcast

Forums | MacLife

You are not logged in.

#1 2009-01-21 1:50 pm

Daniel
[dp] design#
From: Melbourne, FL
Registered: 2000-11-21
Posts: 9708
Website

Obama and Guns

As promised, this thread:

Crime and Law Enforcement
Address Gun Violence in Cities: Obama and Biden would repeal the Tiahrt Amendment, which restricts the ability of local law enforcement to access important gun trace information, and give police officers across the nation the tools they need to solve gun crimes and fight the illegal arms trade. Obama and Biden also favor commonsense measures that respect the Second Amendment rights of gun owners, while keeping guns away from children and from criminals. They support closing the gun show loophole and making guns in this country childproof. They also support making the expired federal Assault Weapons Ban permanent.

No, no, no, no.  People get all up in arms about warrantless wiretapping and domestic spying conducted by the Bush administration, and now Obama wants to do the same to gun owners by removing the protections provided by the Tiahrt Amendment.  The "gun show loophole" is Brady Campaign fearmongering about a nonexistent issue.  What it's actually talking about is allowing private sellers to sell their guns at a gun show without being an FFL.  Do we make private sellers of cars start a dealership just to sell their used car?  No.  Why should we do that to gun owners?  Finally, the expired Federal Assault Weapons Ban was a joke that banned guns based on cosmetic features, not functionality.  Banning things because they seem "scary" is what leads to the burning of books like Harry Potter.  Again, this is not a reasonable proposition.  Making scary-looking black guns illegal just keeps legitimate citizens from owning them, it doesn't stop criminals from getting them.  And besides, the fully-automatic guns that people think of when they hear "Assault Weapon" are, in fact, already de facto banned through an asinine law from 1986.  You can still get them if you fill out a lot of paperwork and pay a lot of fees and have a friend in your county Sheriff department who approves it.  All stupid gun laws like this do are inflate prices and treat honest, law-abiding citizens as if they were already criminals.

Say no to the FAWB.  If ever there was a reason to prevent the Democrats from getting a filibuster-proof supermajority, this is it.


Airman Dan
Private Pilot, Instrument Airplane Single-Engine Land
http://homepage.mac.com/dp.design/.Pictures/atat/AtAT-Banner.jpg

Offline

 

#2 2009-01-21 2:03 pm

DevoDoc
Vardøger
From: The East Wing
Registered: 2003-05-27
Posts: 2711

Re: Obama and Guns

Daniel wrote:

Do we make private sellers of cars start a dealership just to sell their used car?  No.  Why should we do that to gun owners?

I don't recall any recent incidents of someone buying a car from a private seller and using it in a college campus killing spree.  Apples and oranges.

Last edited by DevoDoc (2009-01-21 2:04 pm)


We also know how cruel the truth often is, and we wonder whether delusion is not more consoling. - Henri Poincaré
http://www.cdc.gov/images/campaigns/SwineFlu/stayhome_130x73.jpg

Offline

 

#3 2009-01-21 2:13 pm

ScifiterX
婚約中
Moderator
From: NW Palm Bay, Florida
Registered: 2000-02-10
Posts: 18096
Website

Re: Obama and Guns

Honestly, people who choose to go on killing sprees with guns or cars tend to prefer stolen ones. Cars, at least, you can typically trace easier when that happens.

Offline

 

#4 2009-01-21 2:17 pm

bedstuy
Archimandrite, Eastern Elite
From: King Cole Bar, St. Regis Hotel
Registered: 2003-09-20
Posts: 13629

Re: Obama and Guns

I hope King Barry rams an Uzi up your ass.

Offline

 

#5 2009-01-21 2:19 pm

Tallgeese
Sternly Advising
From: Pool Party
Registered: 2000-10-17
Posts: 34102

Re: Obama and Guns

Maybe you should start a violent armed revolution just like all the gun nuts have been promising.


I still believe in liberalism today as much as I ever did, but, oh, there was a happy time when I believed in liberals.

Offline

 

#6 2009-01-21 3:48 pm

Gurlugon
I'm feeling lucky
From: PBR Street Gang
Registered: 2003-07-07
Posts: 1220

Re: Obama and Guns

Assault Weapon Ban? More like Scary Guns Regardless Of Their Capabilities Ban

I don't want any more restrictions on gun ownership than there already are.

Offline

 

#7 2009-01-21 5:21 pm

avkills
demyelinated brain matter
Registered: 2001-05-09
Posts: 7107

Re: Obama and Guns

There should be a 30-day waiting period on all guns purchased whether at a gun show, store, private seller, along with a background check.

There is no reason anyone needs a M-16 or an AK-47; if firing those gets you a hard-on, well join the military and get your gun off.

-mark

Offline

 

#8 2009-01-21 5:31 pm

Jdude
Surfing on waterboarders
From: Home is where the war is
Registered: 2003-02-03
Posts: 2702

Re: Obama and Guns

avkills wrote:

There should be a 30-day waiting period on all guns purchased whether at a gun show, store, private seller, along with a background check.

There is no reason anyone needs a M-16 or an AK-47; if firing those gets you a hard-on, well join the military and get your gun off.

-mark

Nobody really needs a car. Nobody really needs a cell phone. Nobody really needs to be free from random searches, or to not have a cop live in your home to keep you out of trouble either.

Freedom is about want. Freedom is about desire.

I want a gun. I want many guns. I have many guns. I have a gun I built by my own hand with tools in the garage. I made gunpowder by my own hands.

You think a several hundred year old technology should require a background check?

How about a 5 gallon can of gas and a box of matches? The worst mass murder in US history was conducted with that.

You can keep your 30 day waiting period and background checks. You have been seriously misled if you thought those worked anyways.


Sometimes before replying to a topic, I think to myself: I am just so original!

Offline

 

#9 2009-01-21 5:31 pm

DevoDoc
Vardøger
From: The East Wing
Registered: 2003-05-27
Posts: 2711

Re: Obama and Guns

avkills wrote:

There is no reason anyone needs a M-16 or an AK-47; if firing those gets you a hard-on, well join the military and get your gun off.

You say that now, but we'll see who's laughing when the post-armageddon mutants are after your brains.


We also know how cruel the truth often is, and we wonder whether delusion is not more consoling. - Henri Poincaré
http://www.cdc.gov/images/campaigns/SwineFlu/stayhome_130x73.jpg

Offline

 

#10 2009-01-21 5:32 pm

Farmerkev
Official Dementor
Moderator
Registered: 2003-01-03
Posts: 18624

Re: Obama and Guns

Moderator note-
Please keep the posts on a civil debate level.


Do your part to combat global warming.
Eat a cow.

Online

 

#11 2009-01-21 5:35 pm

DevoDoc
Vardøger
From: The East Wing
Registered: 2003-05-27
Posts: 2711

Re: Obama and Guns

Jdude wrote:

You think a several hundred year old technology should require a background check?

If that technology's primary purpose is to kill people, yes.

And don't tell me that it's primary purpose is to be a deterrent.  The only reason it's a deterrent is because it will kill you.

Last edited by DevoDoc (2009-01-21 5:37 pm)


We also know how cruel the truth often is, and we wonder whether delusion is not more consoling. - Henri Poincaré
http://www.cdc.gov/images/campaigns/SwineFlu/stayhome_130x73.jpg

Offline

 

#12 2009-01-21 5:36 pm

avkills
demyelinated brain matter
Registered: 2001-05-09
Posts: 7107

Re: Obama and Guns

Jdude wrote:

Freedom is about want. Freedom is about desire.

I want a gun. I want many guns. I have many guns. I have a gun I built by my own hand with tools in the garage. I made gunpowder by my own hands.

If you can't wait 30 days for something you want, then chances are you intend to use it for something other than recreational use.

I laugh real hard about how they like to have gun shops next to bars and liquor stores.  Good combo.

-mark

Last edited by avkills (2009-01-21 5:36 pm)

Offline

 

#13 2009-01-21 5:37 pm

avkills
demyelinated brain matter
Registered: 2001-05-09
Posts: 7107

Re: Obama and Guns

DevoDoc wrote:

avkills wrote:

There is no reason anyone needs a M-16 or an AK-47; if firing those gets you a hard-on, well join the military and get your gun off.

You say that now, but we'll see who's laughing when the post-armageddon mutants are after your brains.

I prefer RPGs in that situation. big_smile

-mark

Offline

 

#14 2009-01-21 5:43 pm

Jdude
Surfing on waterboarders
From: Home is where the war is
Registered: 2003-02-03
Posts: 2702

Re: Obama and Guns

avkills wrote:

Jdude wrote:

Freedom is about want. Freedom is about desire.

I want a gun. I want many guns. I have many guns. I have a gun I built by my own hand with tools in the garage. I made gunpowder by my own hands.

If you can't wait 30 days for something you want, then chances are you intend to use it for something other than recreational use.

Well with your logic, I'll be happy to restrict all of your purchase for 30 days excluding basic food items.
Kitchen knives? You don't need them right now.
New car? Congrats, come pick it up in a month.
Shoes? THose are fine for a bit longer.
Pizza delivery? Great, guaranteed 30 days and 30 minutes or less (but not less than 30 days.)

I laugh real hard about how they like to have gun shops next to bars and liquor stores.  Good combo.

-mark

Who is they? More importantly, can you cite where this is actually a problem? You act like people have no self control. Would you be bothered with an alcohol shop near an auto dealership? How about near a laundry mat?


Sometimes before replying to a topic, I think to myself: I am just so original!

Offline

 

#15 2009-01-21 5:48 pm

Pariah
James Carville Fan..
From: Belly Of The Beast, Oklahoma!
Registered: 2001-05-24
Posts: 18425

Re: Obama and Guns

While I really do think people should be able to own guns if they want and banning guns on aesthetic issues really is stupid, I also think people who are really in love with their guns (OP) are kinda scary.
But then I love my Pit Bull shrug

As a practical matter, truly restricting guns is simply impossible. There are more than 275 million firearms in private hands in the USA. Trying to restrict gins is as futile as the war on drugs.
Why fight a battle that has already been lost?


"and it's not surprising that they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren't like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations."
Barack Obama

Offline

 

#16 2009-01-21 5:52 pm

matt
a very bad matt
Registered: 1999-09-16
Posts: 16688
Website

Re: Obama and Guns

I think it's interesting that political proposals sometimes talk about making legislation permanent, as if any governing body has the ability to do that.

A law may be made indefinite, but not permanent. If any future governing body decides to overrule such legislation, then said legislation would be overturned without regard for previous governing bodies.

"Assault weapons" bans will never be permanent. And there are many Democrats who wouldn't support such thing.


Being loud: The next best thing to being right.

Do not click here.

Offline

 

#17 2009-01-21 5:54 pm

avkills
demyelinated brain matter
Registered: 2001-05-09
Posts: 7107

Re: Obama and Guns

Jdude wrote:

avkills wrote:

Jdude wrote:

Freedom is about want. Freedom is about desire.

I want a gun. I want many guns. I have many guns. I have a gun I built by my own hand with tools in the garage. I made gunpowder by my own hands.

If you can't wait 30 days for something you want, then chances are you intend to use it for something other than recreational use.

Well with your logic, I'll be happy to restrict all of your purchase for 30 days excluding basic food items.
Kitchen knives? You don't need them right now.
New car? Congrats, come pick it up in a month.
Shoes? THose are fine for a bit longer.
Pizza delivery? Great, guaranteed 30 days and 30 minutes or less (but not less than 30 days.)

I laugh real hard about how they like to have gun shops next to bars and liquor stores.  Good combo.

-mark

Who is they? More importantly, can you cite where this is actually a problem? You act like people have no self control. Would you be bothered with an alcohol shop near an auto dealership? How about near a laundry mat?

You can't be serious can you?  Yes alcohol does nothing to loosens ones inhibitions and self control.  I think I could wait 30 days for a car.

All of those items you listed can't be used to mow down hundreds of people in a matter a seconds -- except for the car.

If you're comparing buying shoes and ordering pizzas for delivery as the same thing as purchasing lethal firearms then you have some major thought issues going on.

-mark

Offline

 

#18 2009-01-21 5:55 pm

Bat
Flawless Cowboy
Royal Wombat
From: Björk, Björk
Registered: 2001-05-14
Posts: 28541

Re: Obama and Guns

avkills wrote:

DevoDoc wrote:

avkills wrote:

There is no reason anyone needs a M-16 or an AK-47; if firing those gets you a hard-on, well join the military and get your gun off.

You say that now, but we'll see who's laughing when the post-armageddon mutants are after your brains.

I prefer RPGs in that situation. big_smile

-mark

So how many Armageddons you been thru in your 38 years, young'un?

Oh, here; nearly forgot- but it's a non-issue. 'Fact, it can't've happened.

BRADENTON, Fla. - An 81-year-old actor is recovering after being accidentally shot during a dress rehearsal with a gun that was supposed to be empty.

The incident happened Sunday on the final practice run by a seniors theater group for their production of John Steinbeck's "Of Mice and Men."

One actor picked up a pistol he had borrowed from another cast member and fired it at the head of fellow actor Fred Kellerman, who was playing the character Lenny. At the end of the play, Lenny takes a fatal gunshot to the head.
..

The gun was supplied by a member of the Sarasota Senior Theater group, Bradenton police said. The group had used the gun in the past as a prop, but the member told police she did not check to see if the gun was loaded when she brought it for the show Sunday.

The actor who pulled the trigger, who is also the president of the group and the play's director, told police "it was stupid" not to check to make sure the gun was empty.

It was even more stupid to use a real gun. Prop guns have plugged bores to prevent projectiles of any real size, let 'lone bullets from live ammo, thru, even propelled by blanks. This is why.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/28775677/

Last edited by Bat (2009-01-21 5:58 pm)


If all economists were laid end to end, they would not reach a conclusion - George Bernard Shaw

"Fire up a colortini, sit back, relax, and watch the pictures, now, as they fly through the air."

Offline

 

#19 2009-01-21 6:03 pm

Jdude
Surfing on waterboarders
From: Home is where the war is
Registered: 2003-02-03
Posts: 2702

Re: Obama and Guns

Pariah wrote:

But then I love my Pit Bull shrug

I don't know if one can love a gun the same way one can love a pet. Yet if you own multiple dogs - even the scary ones like pits (ar 15s) and rotts (ak 47s) - a regulation demanding a 30 day wait, no kennels near alcohol shops (curse the infamous they!) and a background check would be a bit onerous. That is how I feel about my guns. I don't love them, but I'll be damned if someone is going to tell me that an AR-15 should only be used by those in the military and restrict me to a ruger mini - 14 for hunting.

On the same note, I don't think people should restrict you from a pit bull and say you can only own one of those floofy yappers.


Sometimes before replying to a topic, I think to myself: I am just so original!

Offline

 

#20 2009-01-21 6:14 pm

Jdude
Surfing on waterboarders
From: Home is where the war is
Registered: 2003-02-03
Posts: 2702

Re: Obama and Guns

avkills wrote:

You can't be serious can you?  Yes alcohol does nothing to loosens ones inhibitions and self control.  I think I could wait 30 days for a car.

All of those items you listed can't be used to mow down hundreds of people in a matter a seconds -- except for the car.

If you're comparing buying shoes and ordering pizzas for delivery as the same thing as purchasing lethal firearms then you have some major thought issues going on.

-mark

You would be willing to wait 30 days to receive a car after you have paid for it and had a background check? Huh. I wouldn't put up with that. Security for liberty, and all that.

Shoes, eh? Funny you should say that. According to the FBI, people used hands and feet twice as often (854 times) to kill someone last year as they did those scary assault rifles (450 times) you mentioned earlier.

So if the alcohol shop was 10 miles away from the gun store, instead of across the street, would that change anything? Can you prove it either way?


Sometimes before replying to a topic, I think to myself: I am just so original!

Offline

 

#21 2009-01-21 6:18 pm

Daniel
[dp] design#
From: Melbourne, FL
Registered: 2000-11-21
Posts: 9708
Website

Re: Obama and Guns

DevoDoc wrote:

Daniel wrote:

Do we make private sellers of cars start a dealership just to sell their used car?  No.  Why should we do that to gun owners?

I don't recall any recent incidents of someone buying a car from a private seller and using it in a college campus killing spree.  Apples and oranges.

No.  You're the one with the faulty analogy.  What college campus killing spree do you think stemmed from a private sale?


Airman Dan
Private Pilot, Instrument Airplane Single-Engine Land
http://homepage.mac.com/dp.design/.Pictures/atat/AtAT-Banner.jpg

Offline

 

#22 2009-01-21 8:24 pm

avkills
demyelinated brain matter
Registered: 2001-05-09
Posts: 7107

Re: Obama and Guns

Jdude wrote:

Pariah wrote:

But then I love my Pit Bull shrug

I don't know if one can love a gun the same way one can love a pet. Yet if you own multiple dogs - even the scary ones like pits (ar 15s) and rotts (ak 47s) - a regulation demanding a 30 day wait, no kennels near alcohol shops (curse the infamous they!) and a background check would be a bit onerous. That is how I feel about my guns. I don't love them, but I'll be damned if someone is going to tell me that an AR-15 should only be used by those in the military and restrict me to a ruger mini - 14 for hunting.

On the same note, I don't think people should restrict you from a pit bull and say you can only own one of those floofy yappers.

Don't you think it is a bit silly to be hunting with an AR15?  I mean yeah, if the smurf is hitting the fan and that is all you have...

Don't most people use bolt action rifles for hunting?

-mark

Offline

 

#23 2009-01-21 8:34 pm

avkills
demyelinated brain matter
Registered: 2001-05-09
Posts: 7107

Re: Obama and Guns

Daniel wrote:

DevoDoc wrote:

Daniel wrote:

Do we make private sellers of cars start a dealership just to sell their used car?  No.  Why should we do that to gun owners?

I don't recall any recent incidents of someone buying a car from a private seller and using it in a college campus killing spree.  Apples and oranges.

No.  You're the one with the faulty analogy.  What college campus killing spree do you think stemmed from a private sale?

Ummm, Columbine Highschool ... Virginia Tech.  I know for a fact that the shooters at Columbine bought their weapons from private sellers directly and indirectly (a friend purchased guns from the Tanner Gun Show).

Don't misunderstand, I believe we have the right to bear arms -- but some of what you guys own and want is a smurfing joke.  There is no "real" proof that you need any of these weapons other than maybe for bragging rights and perhaps to look cool.

Besides, real men use compound bows.  wink

-mark

Offline

 

#24 2009-01-21 9:26 pm

jkahless
Member
From: Right in front of you.
Registered: 2002-01-05
Posts: 10023

Re: Obama and Guns

Jdude wrote:

avkills wrote:

Jdude wrote:

Freedom is about want. Freedom is about desire.

I want a gun. I want many guns. I have many guns. I have a gun I built by my own hand with tools in the garage. I made gunpowder by my own hands.

If you can't wait 30 days for something you want, then chances are you intend to use it for something other than recreational use.

Well with your logic, I'll be happy to restrict all of your purchase for 30 days excluding basic food items.
Kitchen knives? You don't need them right now.
New car? Congrats, come pick it up in a month.
Shoes? THose are fine for a bit longer.
Pizza delivery? Great, guaranteed 30 days and 30 minutes or less (but not less than 30 days.)

Indeed, cause those were all specifically designed and refined over centuries specifically to kill things. 

I have no problems with guns, but I think the gun nuts who don't think that there should be any safeguards or restrictions are smurfing stupid.  Way I see it, anyone should be able to own a gun, after taking an in depth gun use and safety course including gun would specific first aid and the necessary background checks.  They're a piece of dangerous machinery, and I know full well how important good training is.


http://folding.extremeoverclocking.com/sigs/sigimage.php?u=37350

Offline

 

#25 2009-01-21 9:38 pm

Jdude
Surfing on waterboarders
From: Home is where the war is
Registered: 2003-02-03
Posts: 2702

Re: Obama and Guns

avkills wrote:

Jdude wrote:

Pariah wrote:

But then I love my Pit Bull shrug

I don't know if one can love a gun the same way one can love a pet. Yet if you own multiple dogs - even the scary ones like pits (ar 15s) and rotts (ak 47s) - a regulation demanding a 30 day wait, no kennels near alcohol shops (curse the infamous they!) and a background check would be a bit onerous. That is how I feel about my guns. I don't love them, but I'll be damned if someone is going to tell me that an AR-15 should only be used by those in the military and restrict me to a ruger mini - 14 for hunting.

On the same note, I don't think people should restrict you from a pit bull and say you can only own one of those floofy yappers.

Don't you think it is a bit silly to be hunting with an AR15?  I mean yeah, if the smurf is hitting the fan and that is all you have...

Don't most people use bolt action rifles for hunting?

-mark

The ar 15 is an excellent rifle for hunting certain animals, sized between groundhogs and deer. I don't know the ratio between bolt action hunters and AR-15 hunters (can't find my source atm) but AR-15 hunting is on the rise and isn't particularly uncommon anymore. 10 years ago that would not have been true.

The AR-15 as a hunting rifle is an excellent platform. It has low recoil thanks to a spring buffer, is reasonably accurate, and is fairly light. For a hunter these are all wonderful things. The recoil is so low that I use them to teach new shooters too.

For hunting, I prefer to use a M44 mosin nagant shoulder bruising rifle. It has a much more powerful round (1) compared to the ar-15's bullet.(2) The rifle itself goes for about $70 (shipped to your gun dealer, who gives them to you after a background check) compared to 10x that for an AR-15.

The Ruger mini 14 I mentioned in my post fires the same exact bullet (2) a the AR-15. The ruger mini 14 is another ideal hunting rifle. The only difference between it and the AR-15 is the stigma that comes along with the cosmetics of the black rifle (ar-15) look.



(1) 7.62 mm 148 grain about 2600 fps
(2) 5.56 mm 62 grain 3100fps


Sometimes before replying to a topic, I think to myself: I am just so original!

Offline

 

Board footer

Powered by PunBB 1.2.6
© Copyright 2002–2005 Rickard Andersson