Forums | MacLife
You are not logged in.
#1 2009-07-22 6:36 pm
- Bat
- Flawless Cowboy
- Royal Wombat

- From: Björk, Björk
- Registered: 2001-05-14
- Posts: 28541
Rare win for gun control
Oh, Daniel's going to hate this.
WASHINGTON (AP) - In a rare win for gun control advocates, the Senate on Wednesday rejected a measure allowing a person with a concealed weapon permit in one state to also hide his firearm when visiting another state.
The vote was 58-39 in favor of the provision establishing concealed carry permit reciprocity in the 48 states that have concealed weapons laws. That fell two votes short of the 60 needed to approve the measure, offered as an amendment to a defense spending bill.
Opponents prevailed in their argument that the measure violated states rights by forcing states with stringent requirements for permits to recognize concealed weapons carriers from states that give out permits to almost any gun owner.
"This is no minor shift in policy," said Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., whose state requires people to be fingerprinted, get gun training and to undergo a federal background check before issuing permits. "It in fact would be a sweeping change and I think with some deadly consequences."
The vote reversed recent trends where Republicans and gun rights Democrats from rural states joined to push pro-gun rights issues and block gun control legislation.
Congress this year voted to restore the rights of people to carry loaded weapons into national parks and the Senate moved to effectively eviscerate the tough gun control laws of the District of Columbia.
Congress has also ignored urgings from President Barack Obama and Attorney General Eric Holder to revive a ban on military-style weapons that expired in 2004.
The concealed weapons measure, promoted by the National Rifle Association and Gun Owners of America, would have made a concealed weapon permit from one state valid in the 47 other states with permit laws. Only Wisconsin and Illinois have no carry permit laws.
So no effect on me (or kev) anyway.
Senate rejects concealed weapons measure
If all economists were laid end to end, they would not reach a conclusion - George Bernard Shaw
"Fire up a colortini, sit back, relax, and watch the pictures, now, as they fly through the air."
Offline
#2 2009-07-22 7:04 pm
Re: Rare win for gun control
Missed it by one vote. Worth trying again. If it can get 59 to get introduced as an amendment, with the right amount of lobbying it should be able to be made into a standalone bill with the necessary 67 votes to override the inevitable Obama veto.
Can you imagine how stupid it would be to have your drivers license from, say, Pennsylvania, be invalid in New York? Because that's how it is with gun licensing right now.
Last edited by Daniel (2009-07-22 7:05 pm)
Offline
#3 2009-07-22 7:16 pm
- bratboy
- laden with emotion
- Royal Wombat

- From: Austin, Texas
- Registered: 2003-01-19
- Posts: 34106
Re: Rare win for gun control
If a state wanted to accept such licenses from other states, couldn't it make such a determination on its own?
"One thing we've learned is there's a difference between being disappointed and having madmen in authority."
--Paul Krugman
Offline
#4 2009-07-22 7:26 pm
Re: Rare win for gun control
Daniel wrote:
Can you imagine how stupid it would be to have your drivers license from, say, Pennsylvania, be invalid in New York? Because that's how it is with gun licensing right now.
Poor analogy- a drivers license kind of implies mobility in a way that firearms do not. But did you know that in many states your license to practice business as a qualified professional may also be invalid in other states? Crazy, I know.
"Live with your head in the lion's mouth. I want you to overcome 'em with yeses, undermine 'em with grins, agree 'em to death and destruction, let 'em swoller you till they vomit or bust wide open." -Ralph Ellison
"Overpower, overcome" -Cro-Mags
Offline
#5 2009-07-22 7:36 pm
- Chickenhawk
- Snark Snark Snark Snark
- From: Being Snarky
- Registered: 2005-06-01
- Posts: 5824
Re: Rare win for gun control
I don't think a state like CA would be very happy with people from AZ or NV coming over the border and concealed carrying.
The recent medical controversy over whether vaccinations cause autism reveals a habit of human cognition—thinking anecdotally comes naturally, whereas thinking scientifically does not. -- Michael Shermer
Offline
#6 2009-07-22 7:39 pm
- ShnickyShnack
- ::: title edited due to Satanic influences :::

- From: Rockin' out
- Registered: 2001-05-25
- Posts: 22237
Re: Rare win for gun control
It would also suggest that any attempt by states to outlaw concealed carry would be futile.
Note: please delete this post.
Offline
#7 2009-07-22 7:52 pm
- radarman
- Member

- Registered: 2005-02-28
- Posts: 3631
Re: Rare win for gun control
bratboy wrote:
If a state wanted to accept such licenses from other states, couldn't it make such a determination on its own?
One could argue that the 2nd amendment implies that a federal ccw would be constitutional. That would take the issue out of state hands, since it would be Federal law.
I am not a big fan, because I am a big proponent of states rights, but I could see such a law.
Offline
#8 2009-07-22 7:57 pm
- Tallgeese
- Sternly Advising
- From: Pool Party
- Registered: 2000-10-17
- Posts: 34104
Re: Rare win for gun control
Then it would be applied to federal properties not entire states.
I still believe in liberalism today as much as I ever did, but, oh, there was a happy time when I believed in liberals.
Online
#9 2009-07-22 8:33 pm
Re: Rare win for gun control
ShnickyShnack wrote:
It would also suggest that any attempt by states to outlaw concealed carry would be futile.
As it should be.
Offline
#10 2009-07-22 8:34 pm
Re: Rare win for gun control
StaticAge wrote:
Daniel wrote:
Can you imagine how stupid it would be to have your drivers license from, say, Pennsylvania, be invalid in New York? Because that's how it is with gun licensing right now.
Poor analogy- a drivers license kind of implies mobility in a way that firearms do not. But did you know that in many states your license to practice business as a qualified professional may also be invalid in other states? Crazy, I know.
"Implied mobility" is really pretty irrelevant and not a good justification. Driver's Licenses are a state-issued license that follow federal guidelines to allow relative uniformity and uniform reciprocity between the several states.
Offline
#11 2009-07-22 8:35 pm
- Tallgeese
- Sternly Advising
- From: Pool Party
- Registered: 2000-10-17
- Posts: 34104
Re: Rare win for gun control
Daniel wrote:
ShnickyShnack wrote:
It would also suggest that any attempt by states to outlaw concealed carry would be futile.
As it should be.
Until the Supreme Court says different, the matter is up to the states.
I still believe in liberalism today as much as I ever did, but, oh, there was a happy time when I believed in liberals.
Online
#12 2009-07-22 8:37 pm
Re: Rare win for gun control
bratboy wrote:
If a state wanted to accept such licenses from other states, couldn't it make such a determination on its own?
That's how it works now, and it results in needing to have one of these, and it's a mess overall.
Offline
#13 2009-07-22 8:47 pm
Re: Rare win for gun control
Daniel wrote:
"Implied mobility" is really pretty irrelevant and not a good justification. Driver's Licenses are a state-issued license that follow federal guidelines to allow relative uniformity and uniform reciprocity between the several states.
That bit of info still doesnt help your analogy.
"Live with your head in the lion's mouth. I want you to overcome 'em with yeses, undermine 'em with grins, agree 'em to death and destruction, let 'em swoller you till they vomit or bust wide open." -Ralph Ellison
"Overpower, overcome" -Cro-Mags
Offline
#14 2009-07-22 8:50 pm
- KHannon
- Member
- Registered: 2000-05-14
- Posts: 3097
Re: Rare win for gun control
Daniel wrote:
Can you imagine how stupid it would be to have your drivers license from, say, Pennsylvania, be invalid in New York? Because that's how it is with gun licensing right now.
State refusal to recognize other state's driver's licenses would constitute a violation of the dormant commerce clause as it would constitute either a) a discriminatory ban on out of state commerce (with commerce being defined in federal courts as "intercourse" between the states) or b) an undue burden on interstate commerce.
There would be no similar constitutional bar to state regulation of concealed weapon permits.
Offline
#15 2009-07-22 8:59 pm
- Tallgeese
- Sternly Advising
- From: Pool Party
- Registered: 2000-10-17
- Posts: 34104
Re: Rare win for gun control
Daniel wrote:
"Implied mobility" is really pretty irrelevant and not a good justification. Driver's Licenses are a state-issued license that follow federal guidelines to allow relative uniformity and uniform reciprocity between the several states.
Is this true for CCW, or would this be more like one state with a written and a practical driver test having to recognize licenses from a state that requires holders to point to the picture of the car?
I still believe in liberalism today as much as I ever did, but, oh, there was a happy time when I believed in liberals.
Online
#16 2009-07-22 9:04 pm
Re: Rare win for gun control
Whether or not the 2nd Amendment allows for ccw is up to SCOTUS. It isn't explicit, nor was it really an issue when the Constitution was written. Then again, small semi-automatic weapons that are easily concealed and can take out several people in a matter of seconds wasn't exactly in the minds of the authors either. If that were the case, they may have made the provision a bit more explicit.
Short of an outright ban, the feds need to stay the hell out of the issue. I'm glad CA is a may carry state and permits are difficult to obtain. It's more of an issue in urban areas, but the last thing Oakland and East LA need are more guns. The flyover states can do whatever they want, just leave the guns at home when you visit.
It is an odd thing, but every one who disappears is said to be seen at San Francisco. It must be a delightful city, and possess all the attractions of the next world.
- Oscar Wilde
Offline
#17 2009-07-22 9:06 pm
- wellfleation
- High on Life

- From: Metheun, Mass.
- Registered: 2001-11-13
- Posts: 8684
Re: Rare win for gun control
Well, so they left it a state's issues. Want liberal gun laws? Move to Texas or numerous other states with slack gun laws. Or change your state's gun laws.
FIGHT
POWEROffline
#18 2009-07-22 10:49 pm
- sturner
- Royal High Poobah
- Moderator

- From: Carrollton, TX USA
- Registered: 2000-01-31
- Posts: 13831
Re: Rare win for gun control
Slack gun laws?
In Texas you must attend a 16 hour class just to carry concealed. Do you know what kind of pain in the ass that is?
I needs to carry my PPKS everywheres! There are lots of despicable people out there that I must defend against!
I'm not dead yet.
There are 3 types of people, those who can count and those who can't.
"There are few things graven in stone, excepting your date of death."
Offline
#19 2009-07-22 11:24 pm
Re: Rare win for gun control
PPK? Son, in this country we carry Colts or Smith and Wessons!
It is an odd thing, but every one who disappears is said to be seen at San Francisco. It must be a delightful city, and possess all the attractions of the next world.
- Oscar Wilde
Offline
#20 2009-07-23 4:20 am
- avkills
- demyelinated brain matter

- Registered: 2001-05-09
- Posts: 7107
Re: Rare win for gun control
I thought that most of the states already had a reciprocal policy with conceal carry?
Does this new legislation mean none do now?
-mark
Offline
#21 2009-07-23 4:35 am
- Bat
- Flawless Cowboy
- Royal Wombat

- From: Björk, Björk
- Registered: 2001-05-14
- Posts: 28541
Re: Rare win for gun control
robco wrote:
PPK? Son, in this country we carry Colts or Smith and Wessons!
PPK/S, assumedly in .380ACP/9mm Kurz (can't imagine sturner carrying even more of a mousegun like a .32ACP/7.65mm). The original is about 1/8" too short to satisfy GCA '68. Gee, Rob, I thought you were more tech knowledgeable. So respect my authoritah, and don't espect sturner or I to ask you for your favorite .380 recipes, or what to carry carry to meet one's particular requirements. 
Anyhoo, there being no convenient other gun thread, this can go here unless a Mod wants to split it off...
Va. Tech gunman’s mental health records found
Former director of university clinic had them in his home
RICHMOND, Va. (AP) - The Virginia Tech gunman's missing mental-health records have been found at the home of a former university counseling official more than two years after the bloodbath — a discovery that angered victims' families struggling to understand how the killer fell through the cracks so disastrously.
The belated emergence of Seung-Hui Cho's file, a development disclosed in a memo obtained Wednesday by The Associated Press, represents another embarrassing lapse in the case and raises questions about how such potentially explosive evidence could be lost for so long.
"Deception comes to my mind in my first response," said Suzanne Grimes, whose son Kevin Sterne was wounded. "It gives me the impression, 'What else are they hiding?'"
If all economists were laid end to end, they would not reach a conclusion - George Bernard Shaw
"Fire up a colortini, sit back, relax, and watch the pictures, now, as they fly through the air."
Offline
#22 2009-07-23 9:16 am
- Tallgeese
- Sternly Advising
- From: Pool Party
- Registered: 2000-10-17
- Posts: 34104
Re: Rare win for gun control
avkills wrote:
I thought that most of the states already had a reciprocal policy with conceal carry?
Does this new legislation mean none do now?
-mark
What new legislation?
I still believe in liberalism today as much as I ever did, but, oh, there was a happy time when I believed in liberals.
Online
#23 2009-07-23 9:59 am
- jerwin
- Sophist
- From: The Garden of Pure Ideology
- Registered: 2003-01-01
- Posts: 7089
Re: Rare win for gun control
wellfleation wrote:
Well, so they left it a state's issues. Want liberal gun laws? Move to Texas or numerous other states with slack gun laws. Or change your state's gun laws.
Not that I endorse the concept, but you can get reciprocity maps here. Those who wish to avoid Dan, for instance, should move to Hawaii. California, Nevada, Oregon, Washington, Nebraska, Iowa, Wisconsin, Illinois, Maine, New York, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Rhode Island and Providence Plantations, New Jersey, Maryland, DC, Puerto Rico, or the Virgin Islands.
Conversely, an out of state gunman will have to file paperwork before entering the state of Florida.
Some subjects actually enjoy pain, and withhold information they might otherwise have divulged in order to be punished.
Central Intelligence Agency. (1983). Human Resource Exploitation Training Manual
Offline
#24 2009-07-23 11:33 am
- Mustapha Mond
- Up your alley

- Registered: 2001-03-24
- Posts: 7033
- Website
Re: Rare win for gun control
Actually, I wouldn't mind if states could stop accepting each other's drivers licenses. People from certain states, almost as a rule, cannot smurfing drive, and I hate when they're clogging up the Long Island Expressway. Similarly, I can imagine many states not wanting NYers driving around. We are not fit to be on the road in states where people do weird smurf like obey speed limits and follow the right of way.
Anyway, licenses to teach, practice law, practice accounting, and a bunch of other mundane things, are not universally accepted state to state. I don't see why carrying a gun is more worthy of special legislation than any of those things.
Online
#25 2009-07-23 1:02 pm
Re: Rare win for gun control
If you think NY is bad, try driving in Jerusalem...
It is an odd thing, but every one who disappears is said to be seen at San Francisco. It must be a delightful city, and possess all the attractions of the next world.
- Oscar Wilde
Offline

