Forums | MacLife
You are not logged in.
#26 2009-08-05 7:22 pm
- jkahless
- Member

- From: Right in front of you.
- Registered: 2002-01-05
- Posts: 10020
Re: The stormy opposition to Obama
resedit wrote:
ShnickyShnack wrote:
Ah, sorry ... I assumed the co-op would be receiving government funding.
It probably would in many states.
Just like medicare does now.
The funding would be to subsidize poor states that do not have the tax revenue to carry the burden of unemployed, precondition, and poor.
That's not single payer - that's federal welfare.
Ummm, so government funding = federal government funding. State government funding is ok? And federal government funding is ok if the state is poor. Thats what you're saying, right?
Offline
#27 2009-08-05 7:29 pm
- ShnickyShnack
- ::: title edited due to Satanic influences :::

- From: Rockin' out
- Registered: 2001-05-25
- Posts: 22237
Re: The stormy opposition to Obama
resedit wrote:
ShnickyShnack wrote:
Ah, sorry ... I assumed the co-op would be receiving government funding.
It probably would in many states.
Just like medicare does now.
The funding would be to subsidize poor states that do not have the tax revenue to carry the burden of unemployed, precondition, and poor.
That's not single payer - that's federal welfare.
What if it's single payer, with the "payer" being the states?
That's how it works in Canada.
Note: please delete this post.
Offline
#28 2009-08-05 7:53 pm
- bedstuy
- Archimandrite, Eastern Elite

- From: King Cole Bar, St. Regis Hotel
- Registered: 2003-09-20
- Posts: 13628
Re: The stormy opposition to Obama
resedit wrote:
And regardless of whether or not there is something wrong with single payer, the fact that Obama is using deception to ultimately achieve it is wrong.

Offline
#29 2009-08-05 8:04 pm
Re: The stormy opposition to Obama
It's terribly wrong of Obama and he ought be ashamed. I mean, the next thing you know he'll be spinning "intelligence" to justify a costly, bloody war on foreign soil!
It is an odd thing, but every one who disappears is said to be seen at San Francisco. It must be a delightful city, and possess all the attractions of the next world.
- Oscar Wilde
Offline
#30 2009-08-05 8:11 pm
- ShnickyShnack
- ::: title edited due to Satanic influences :::

- From: Rockin' out
- Registered: 2001-05-25
- Posts: 22237
Re: The stormy opposition to Obama
robco wrote:
It's terribly wrong of Obama and he ought be ashamed. I mean, the next thing you know he'll be spinning "intelligence" to justify a costly, bloody war on foreign soil!






BURN!!!!!
Note: please delete this post.
Offline
#31 2009-08-05 9:00 pm
- Colonel Panic
- You need to restart

- From: The bowels of code
- Registered: 2003-10-12
- Posts: 533
Re: The stormy opposition to Obama
Everyone chill the smurf out. I got this.
Have you tried repairing permissions?
Offline
#32 2009-08-05 9:15 pm
- bratboy
- laden with emotion
- Royal Wombat

- From: Austin, Texas
- Registered: 2003-01-19
- Posts: 34106
Re: The stormy opposition to Obama
resedit wrote:
I just saw a couple of rather damning videos.
First was pre-election Obama specifically stating that he wanted single payer system but that it would have to be done in steps.
Second was the guy largely responsible for the bill stating that they would have to ease into single payer to not upset to many people (aka social engineering ...)
Link?
So - all this talk about nothing changing for those who like their current plans is clearly a bunch of lying bull smurf.
Obama is a liar and I'm not only regretting having voted for him, I'm smurfing embarrassed that I did.
Huh? Is the proposed plan "single payer," or isn't it? It won't magically become anything different later. Or are you claiming that it's inappropriate to pursue any plan other than the one that you ultimately believe SHOULD be enacted?
Perhaps Obama does believe single payer would be best. Others in Congress probably do, as well. Who gives a smurf? They're not lying to you by pursuing a different plan. Single payer isn't politically viable at this point. But passing a bill that's not single payer while still believing that single payer would be best isn't "a bunch of lying bullsmurf."
These are why things like the townhouse protests are not only going to continue, but are going to grow.
Obama is a one term president. He's making statements and promises he has absolutely no intention of keeping.
I hope you kooks keep it up.
"One thing we've learned is there's a difference between being disappointed and having madmen in authority."
--Paul Krugman
Offline
#33 2009-08-05 9:23 pm
- Bat
- Flawless Cowboy
- Royal Wombat

- From: Björk, Björk
- Registered: 2001-05-14
- Posts: 28541
Re: The stormy opposition to Obama
I note no links to the disturbing videos. Are they secret?
If all economists were laid end to end, they would not reach a conclusion - George Bernard Shaw
"Fire up a colortini, sit back, relax, and watch the pictures, now, as they fly through the air."
Offline
#34 2009-08-05 9:25 pm
- bratboy
- laden with emotion
- Royal Wombat

- From: Austin, Texas
- Registered: 2003-01-19
- Posts: 34106
Re: The stormy opposition to Obama
There is one (deceptively edited) video from '07 or so that's been making the rounds on the kooky blogs, not sure if that's what he's referring to or not.
"One thing we've learned is there's a difference between being disappointed and having madmen in authority."
--Paul Krugman
Offline
#35 2009-08-05 9:28 pm
Re: The stormy opposition to Obama
ShnickyShnack wrote:
resedit wrote:
ShnickyShnack wrote:
Ah, sorry ... I assumed the co-op would be receiving government funding.
It probably would in many states.
Just like medicare does now.
The funding would be to subsidize poor states that do not have the tax revenue to carry the burden of unemployed, precondition, and poor.
That's not single payer - that's federal welfare.What if it's single payer, with the "payer" being the states?
That's how it works in Canada.
Did you even read my proposal?
The coop is very similar to coop's that currently exist for small businesses - except it is run by the state, so that anyone can join - regardless of employer or pre-condition.
Joining the coop is not mandatory, if states want to do that (or require health insurance like the swiss) that's up to the state.
It's there so that just like insurance companies don't exclude people with pre-existing conditions from IBM or UPS or many other large companies, anyone can buy into it and not be excluded. Being state run coop rather than private makes it easier for unemployed and poor to get get their insurance through the coop.
If you (or your employer) want to deal with the HMO directly, go ahead. It probably would be cheaper through the coop but for large businesses it may be cheaper to continue the deals they have now.
If you make a decent wage but don't have insurance from your employer (IE self employed or small company) - you can deal with the insurance companies directly (just like you can now) or buy into the coop and choose an insurance company that way, choice is yours - but it isn't the state paying your insurance or coop membership, if you choose to go coop it's the state pooling the money to make options available to you but you pay your own quarterly or monthly or whatever coop dues.
In her right hand Jenny held the Bible of her mother
Jenny had a pistol in the other
-- Steve Taylor
Offline
#36 2009-08-05 9:34 pm
- bratboy
- laden with emotion
- Royal Wombat

- From: Austin, Texas
- Registered: 2003-01-19
- Posts: 34106
Re: The stormy opposition to Obama
More crazies:
Rep. Mike Thompson (D-CA) was on the receiving end of some right-wingers disrupting a town hall meeting Monday night, the Napa Valley Register reports.
Speaking in a packed church, Thompson and other speakers were met by shouts of "This is America!" and "What's wrong with profit?" as they also tried to answer questions from supporters and critics in the audience.
The Napa Valley Register -- a conservative paper that endorsed John McCain last year -- now has a new editorial condemning the hecklers:The display was unwelcome -- and unsuccessful if it was meant to move health care reform supporters toward considering the concerns of the critics. Several callers to the Register on Tuesday reported they were repulsed by the aggressive tactics of some members of the crowd.
To the degree the catcalls, chants and shouts were organized -- and it appears from events around the country that they were -- we strongly suggest that the organizers find more constructive ways to get their message out.
"One thing we've learned is there's a difference between being disappointed and having madmen in authority."
--Paul Krugman
Offline
#37 2009-08-05 9:46 pm
- mo' ron
- PS3 4 EVA

- From: NC, USA
- Registered: 2002-10-15
- Posts: 14253
Re: The stormy opposition to Obama
I'm glad their tactics are starting to backfire on them.
What is the difference between Vista and OSX?
- Microsoft employees are excited about OSX.
Online
#38 2009-08-05 9:49 pm
Re: The stormy opposition to Obama
Several callers to the Register on Tuesday reported they were repulsed by the aggressive tactics of some members of the crowd.
Not surprising - Napa Valley has basically two types that settled there. Business (largely wine related but not exclusively) and liberal ex-hippies. The latter group is undoubtedly who called the Register.
In her right hand Jenny held the Bible of her mother
Jenny had a pistol in the other
-- Steve Taylor
Offline
#39 2009-08-05 9:55 pm
- bratboy
- laden with emotion
- Royal Wombat

- From: Austin, Texas
- Registered: 2003-01-19
- Posts: 34106
Re: The stormy opposition to Obama
Non-"liberal ex-hippies" couldn't find this sort of behavior appalling, apparently.
"One thing we've learned is there's a difference between being disappointed and having madmen in authority."
--Paul Krugman
Offline
#40 2009-08-05 9:57 pm
- Bat
- Flawless Cowboy
- Royal Wombat

- From: Björk, Björk
- Registered: 2001-05-14
- Posts: 28541
Re: The stormy opposition to Obama
So, res? Vid links?
If all economists were laid end to end, they would not reach a conclusion - George Bernard Shaw
"Fire up a colortini, sit back, relax, and watch the pictures, now, as they fly through the air."
Offline
#41 2009-08-05 10:01 pm
- bratboy
- laden with emotion
- Royal Wombat

- From: Austin, Texas
- Registered: 2003-01-19
- Posts: 34106
Re: The stormy opposition to Obama
I've been under the assumption that Obama would favor a single payer system, but I cannot remember if I've heard him claim such a thing or not.
The simple fact is, however, that his proposed plan is not single payer in any way, shape, or form. There's no secret single payer law hidden in it. Enacting such a plan would require the same legislative processes as the proposed plan has required.
"One thing we've learned is there's a difference between being disappointed and having madmen in authority."
--Paul Krugman
Offline
#42 2009-08-05 10:02 pm
Re: The stormy opposition to Obama
I see we're still at the bargaining stage...
It is an odd thing, but every one who disappears is said to be seen at San Francisco. It must be a delightful city, and possess all the attractions of the next world.
- Oscar Wilde
Offline
#43 2009-08-05 10:09 pm
Re: The stormy opposition to Obama
bratboy wrote:
I've been under the assumption that Obama would favor a single payer system, but I cannot remember if I've heard him claim such a thing or not.
Watch Today's Glenn Beck.
He stated that's what he wants but that it has to be done in stages.
In her right hand Jenny held the Bible of her mother
Jenny had a pistol in the other
-- Steve Taylor
Offline
#44 2009-08-05 10:11 pm
- Tallgeese
- Sternly Advising
- From: Pool Party
- Registered: 2000-10-17
- Posts: 34096
Re: The stormy opposition to Obama
lulz
I still believe in liberalism today as much as I ever did, but, oh, there was a happy time when I believed in liberals.
Offline
#45 2009-08-05 10:12 pm
- Bat
- Flawless Cowboy
- Royal Wombat

- From: Björk, Björk
- Registered: 2001-05-14
- Posts: 28541
Re: The stormy opposition to Obama
If that's the source of the disturbing vids, they're already suspect. I don't volunteer.
Anyone game?
If all economists were laid end to end, they would not reach a conclusion - George Bernard Shaw
"Fire up a colortini, sit back, relax, and watch the pictures, now, as they fly through the air."
Offline
#46 2009-08-05 10:12 pm
- user
- Your plastic pal who's fun to be with

- From: I'm not getting you down, am I
- Registered: 2001-10-15
- Posts: 16035
Re: The stormy opposition to Obama
Who cares what Glenn Beck wants?
Aw, he's no fun, he fell right over.
Unless you become as little children, there's no way you will believe this crap.
Offline
#47 2009-08-05 10:17 pm
- bratboy
- laden with emotion
- Royal Wombat

- From: Austin, Texas
- Registered: 2003-01-19
- Posts: 34106
Re: The stormy opposition to Obama
resedit wrote:
Watch Today's Glenn Beck.
He stated that's what he wants but that it has to be done in stages.
Res, I don't do the shrieking talking heads thing, be them liberals or conservatives. At all. I know you love it. I can't stand that smurf, and I don't trust them to offer honest reporting. You alone have brought enough of Beck's nonsense to the board to convince me that he's a con artist. Sorry.
Do we have a more credible source, perhaps?
Again--I have no problem with Obama or anyone else believing that single payer is the appropriate plan. The fact remains that they're not pursuing anything close to that. They are pursuing a plan that a plan that could work, not one that won't. Seems pragmatic to me.
"One thing we've learned is there's a difference between being disappointed and having madmen in authority."
--Paul Krugman
Offline
#48 2009-08-05 10:23 pm
- mo' ron
- PS3 4 EVA

- From: NC, USA
- Registered: 2002-10-15
- Posts: 14253
Re: The stormy opposition to Obama
bratboy wrote:
I've been under the assumption that Obama would favor a single payer system, but I cannot remember if I've heard him claim such a thing or not.
The simple fact is, however, that his proposed plan is not single payer in any way, shape, or form. There's no secret single payer law hidden in it. Enacting such a plan would require the same legislative processes as the proposed plan has required.
The Daily Show had a clip of him in 2002 or 2003 I think saying he'd favor a single payer system. And I vaguely recall him talking up Canada and the UK's system during his campaign.
But Obama has said on several occasions that he's a pragmatist who recognizes the need for "compromise," and i'm not really convinced he would be die-hard about pushing through a system that wouldn't work politically. Considering how weak he's been regarding wiretapping, torture, and DADT, I have full faith that he'd also accept a weaker healthcare reform than he may want.
I can't remember his exact phrase, but I think referring to energy policy, he said "we can't have the best solution, but we can at least have something better."
What is the difference between Vista and OSX?
- Microsoft employees are excited about OSX.
Online
#49 2009-08-05 10:36 pm
- bratboy
- laden with emotion
- Royal Wombat

- From: Austin, Texas
- Registered: 2003-01-19
- Posts: 34106
Re: The stormy opposition to Obama
mo' ron wrote:
The Daily Show had a clip of him in 2002 or 2003 I think saying he'd favor a single payer system. And I vaguely recall him talking up Canada and the UK's system during his campaign.
But Obama has said on several occasions that he's a pragmatist who recognizes the need for "compromise," and i'm not really convinced he would be die-hard about pushing through a system that wouldn't work politically. Considering how weak he's been regarding wiretapping, torture, and DADT, I have full faith that he'd also accept a weaker healthcare reform than he may want.
I can't remember his exact phrase, but I think referring to energy policy, he said "we can't have the best solution, but we can at least have something better."
Exactly. To suggest that he's a "liar" for pursuing a more politically-viable solution is ridiculous.
"One thing we've learned is there's a difference between being disappointed and having madmen in authority."
--Paul Krugman
Offline
#50 2009-08-05 10:41 pm
- bratboy
- laden with emotion
- Royal Wombat

- From: Austin, Texas
- Registered: 2003-01-19
- Posts: 34106
Re: The stormy opposition to Obama
Last night, Rep. Gene Green (D-TX) hosted a rowdy town hall meeting to discuss health care reform. Fox’s local Houston affiliate reporter, Duarte Geraldino, reported that he talked to the participants and found that “some attendees admit they don’t live in the district.” How did they get there? Geraldino noted “an internet campaign” by far right activists urging their allies to attend and heckle Democratic Representatives. Geraldino then aired a clip showing one participant acting disrespectfully towards Rep. Green. “Pay close attention to the man behind the congressman,” Geraldino says in this clip, “he seems to have forgotten the part about respect.”
The crowd was so disrespectful that one frustrated attendee said he had come to the town hall with the intention of giving Rep. Green “a really hard time,” but changed his mind because he was fed up with another man who was “screaming behind my head for the last hour.” The attendee continued, “This is a free country, but I think there’s a certain degree of respect” required. “I won’t be quiet! I won’t sit down! And I won’t let this happen on my watch,” responded the angry conservative activist.
During the town hall, one conservative activist turns to his fellow attendees and asks them to raise their hands if they “oppose any form of socialized or government-run health care.” Almost all the hands shot up. Rep Green quickly turned the question on the audience and asked, “How many of you have Medicare?” Nearly half the attendees raised their hands, failing to note the irony.
At another point, a small business owner who supported health reform asks the audience how many people in this room “do not have health insurance of some kind.” Only one hand seemed to be raised. “I think the people who are objecting,” she noted, “are the people who have insurance.”
"One thing we've learned is there's a difference between being disappointed and having madmen in authority."
--Paul Krugman
Offline
