Quantcast

Forums | MacLife

You are not logged in.

#1 2003-06-14 9:44 am

David2371
Member
From: ontario,canada
Registered: 2002-04-27
Posts: 287

Has anyone else noticed Intel has slowed to a halt?

When Intel hit 1 and 2 GHZ it seemed like they were going up 200MHZ every 2 months.But since they hit 3GHZ they seem to have slowed quite a bit. cool


iBook 12",1.2GHZ,256MB,10.3.8
iMac DV 400MHZ,256MB,10.3.8
iPod Shuffle 1GB,AirPort Extreme

Offline

 

#2 2003-06-14 10:08 am

~Coxy
Member
From: Perth, Western Australia
Registered: 2000-04-05
Posts: 8472
Website

Re: Has anyone else noticed Intel has slowed to a halt?

That's because they're waiting for AMD.

Now that AMD is increasing their PR factor (no pun inteded) instead of core frequency, there's no reason for Intel to release faster chips in quick succession.

Offline

 

#3 2003-06-14 10:11 am

chickenlump
Member
From: Toronto, Canada
Registered: 2002-01-07
Posts: 1045

Re: Has anyone else noticed Intel has slowed to a halt?

because any faster, the heatsinks will start melting...  lol

Offline

 

#4 2003-06-14 10:30 am

Madsculptor
Member
From: Marquette, MI, almost Canada..
Registered: 2002-02-05
Posts: 1738

Re: Has anyone else noticed Intel has slowed to a halt?

because any faster, the heatsinks will start melting...  lol

That's probably closer to reality than we think. I've read some articles and heard through the 'grapevine' that when they hit 3.06 GHz it was like hitting a 10 foot thick cement wall.

I figure, they will have to find out a way to liquid cool the chips or make them much lower voltage. Anyone could have guessed this would happen with the P4 chips.

It used to take them 6 mos. to go from 166 to 180MHz. People were pooping their pants "oooohh boy its gonna break 200MHz, can you believe it, oooohhh boy"

After hitting 1 GHz they were racing at almost 100MHz a month.

Course they are waiting for Apple to catch up too....They just stopped to take a breather.


"The PC is a third rate Mac wannabe" Roger Ebert

Offline

 

#5 2003-06-14 10:38 am

test
Member
From: Collingwood, Ont., CANADA
Registered: 2002-12-13
Posts: 5300

Re: Has anyone else noticed Intel has slowed to a halt?

With the imminent release of the PPC970 Intel has finally realised they have met their match and are throwing in the towel. Congrats Apple, y'all win!! cheers

Or it could be that they are sinking a big ol' butt-load of R&D into the Itanium line right now. Why put time and money into a processor they plan to phase out soon? I expect the P3 to be EOLed pretty fast when Itanium goes mainstream and the P4 can't have much life left in it either.


Patience is a virtue of the weak for it makes them stand still long enough for the strong to crush them with ease.

Offline

 

#6 2003-06-14 10:39 am

dj phat 2000
Member
From: New York, USA
Registered: 2001-06-22
Posts: 2667
Website

Re: Has anyone else noticed Intel has slowed to a halt?

I am sure there is money involved as to why they aren't upclocking there chips as much any more.  AMD seems more stuck then anyone else right now.  Neither company is as stuck as Moto was with the G4 500 but, still I think AMD has the burden of the problem right now.  I am sure intel could keep making chips faster and faster but, like someone else posted, there is no real need to spend on R&D when no one else is close in catching them in clock speed right now and they have other chips to develop.  AT Best it would take AMD and IBM a year + to get there chips up to that clock rate it think.  I could be wrong but how much has AMD moved in the pasted year?  400mhz or so?
While Moto has gone up about 50% in 7 or so months. 
There also comes a time when making chips faster without melting becomes a problem too. wink


Apple is the only company that makes you want everything they create...  MacAddict-4-Life

Offline

 

#7 2003-06-14 11:21 am

Czachorski
Member
Registered: 2002-12-20
Posts: 5588

Re: Has anyone else noticed Intel has slowed to a halt?

Good I am glad to see them slow down.  Computer processor speed increases has been the biggest marketing scam in years.  I swear that computers have gotten slower in the past 5 years, when I compare the overall speed of AutoCad, Work Perfect, Excel and various other environmental models that I use at work.  The computers just seem slower than they did 5 years ago, although we are still using them for the same type of tasks - civil engineering design functions.  Guess what, 5 years ago, we still managed to get plans and specs out just fine with AutoCad12 and wordperfect 7.  Now, 5 years later, the computers are slower, but the programs have 2-3 times the functionality, and we still get plans and specs out just fine, albeit a little more slowly, since we have to f**k with the computers so much now to get them to work right.


Tracking the Tech

Offline

 

#8 2003-06-14 11:25 am

Tallgeese
Sternly Advising
From: Pool Party
Registered: 2000-10-17
Posts: 34096

Re: Has anyone else noticed Intel has slowed to a halt?

Woo-hoo! And now, with them stalled, it will only take Apple (at current rate of processor speed increase) another four years to catch up!


I still believe in liberalism today as much as I ever did, but, oh, there was a happy time when I believed in liberals.

Offline

 

#9 2003-06-14 12:15 pm

zerocool90
Member
From: N.C.
Registered: 2002-05-02
Posts: 1538
Website

Re: Has anyone else noticed Intel has slowed to a halt?



Or it could be that they are sinking a big ol' butt-load of R&D into the Itanium line right now. Why put time and money into a processor they plan to phase out soon? I expect the P3 to be EOLed pretty fast when Itanium goes mainstream and the P4 can't have much life left in it either.

Theres one problem here. The Itanium will never be a desktop chip. it cant be, as designed, unless they throw in something WAY in the future. It is not designed for, nor is it viable for the consumer desktop. They dont even have full rights to the design of the itanium. or any other 64 bit chip they are working with (or maybe they do the itanium, but nothing else 64 bit...i forget). Those patents are held by another company not interested in selling, leasing, renting, or otherwise letting INTEL use them anymore. Why? Cause Intel tried the "im a huge company youll do what i darn well please" routine and got burned in court. They owe millions upon millions to this other company. That and Intel has publicly stated they plan to stay with the pentium as long as they can, and arent terribly interested in 64 bit desktops.


....Shopping on BuyMusic.com is best described as Soviet.... from the washington post

and goto www.deloreanrocks.com and listen to my music

Offline

 

#10 2003-06-14 1:05 pm

HackerJax
Previous Poster
From: *unknown*
Registered: 2002-07-13
Posts: 4871

Re: Has anyone else noticed Intel has slowed to a halt?

They dont even have full rights to the design of the itanium. or any other 64 bit chip they are working with (or maybe they do the itanium, but nothing else 64 bit...i forget). Those patents are held by another company not interested in selling, leasing, renting, or otherwise letting INTEL use them anymore.

Thats right. What was the name of those guys ? I can't remember now. I read about it. Very interesting.

That and Intel has publicly stated they plan to stay with the pentium as long as they can, and arent terribly interested in 64 bit desktops.

I read that the P4 was originally designed with the idea of scaling to 8 or 9 Ghz before a major new design would be needed.

I'm sure Intel will milk the P4 for all its worth. Its been a major money maker for them and the transition to 64-bit makes them vulnerable.

-=Jax=-


http://i47.photobucket.com/albums/f184/HighDuck420/windows.gif

Offline

 

#11 2003-06-14 1:08 pm

zerocool90
Member
From: N.C.
Registered: 2002-05-02
Posts: 1538
Website

Re: Has anyone else noticed Intel has slowed to a halt?

jax, I think this is the 2nd time i have totally agreed with you.

i think if you look at thier stock at yahoo.com, and look in the old news for "lawsuit" or "court" youll find it...


....Shopping on BuyMusic.com is best described as Soviet.... from the washington post

and goto www.deloreanrocks.com and listen to my music

Offline

 

#12 2003-06-14 1:16 pm

HackerJax
Previous Poster
From: *unknown*
Registered: 2002-07-13
Posts: 4871

Re: Has anyone else noticed Intel has slowed to a halt?

jax, I think this is the 2nd time i have totally agreed with you.

i think if you look at thier stock at yahoo.com, and look in the old news for "lawsuit" or "court" youll find it...

Found it. Its Intergraph Corporation.

If I dig up anything really juicy I'll post the links for you. smile

-=Jax=-


http://i47.photobucket.com/albums/f184/HighDuck420/windows.gif

Offline

 

#13 2003-06-14 1:41 pm

HackerJax
Previous Poster
From: *unknown*
Registered: 2002-07-13
Posts: 4871

Re: Has anyone else noticed Intel has slowed to a halt?

Here is some info on the Intergraph / Intel lawsuit

http://www.intergraph.com/press02/intel10-10.asp

-=Jax=-


http://i47.photobucket.com/albums/f184/HighDuck420/windows.gif

Offline

 

#14 2003-06-14 1:56 pm

Mazer Rackham
Member
From: St. Pete, Florida, United Stat
Registered: 2002-05-03
Posts: 1882
Website

Re: Has anyone else noticed Intel has slowed to a halt?

You're right, they're just kind of sitting pretty on 3 Ghz. I remember some article about them hitting 220 Ghz in 4 years or something like that.

Anyone remember that? There was a slew of articles a couple months ago about how incredible they were going to be in a couple of years. Apparently there's nothing in the mean time.


"Early to bed, early to rise makes a man stupid and blind in the eyes." -Mazer Rackham

Offline

 

#15 2003-06-14 2:11 pm

AutoJC
Banned
From: Defending Evil, Greedy Capital
Registered: 2002-05-15
Posts: 3555
Website

Re: Has anyone else noticed Intel has slowed to a halt?

When Intel hit 1 and 2 GHZ it seemed like they were going up 200MHZ every 2 months.But since they hit 3GHZ they seem to have slowed quite a bit. cool

Intel doesn't care.  They think they are miles ahead of Moto/IBM in the processing speed department.

Until Motos come out that hit 3 ghz. Intel's not going to sweat it.

Also, the 3 ghz Intel-based computer prices are plummeting.


AutoJC

"

Offline

 

#16 2003-06-14 2:41 pm

rampant
Member
From: Oregon
Registered: 2001-10-06
Posts: 2314

Re: Has anyone else noticed Intel has slowed to a halt?

Woo-hoo! And now, with them stalled, it will only take Apple (at current rate of processor speed increase) another four years to catch up!

\o/


http://uploader.stonedonkey.com/uploads/sigs/marathonsiganim3.gif

Offline

 

#17 2003-06-14 4:40 pm

ukimalefu
4 8 15 16 23 42
Moderator
From: time loop
Registered: 2002-09-09
Posts: 9356
Website

Re: Has anyone else noticed Intel has slowed to a halt?

http://inetreviews.safeshopper.com/images/b70zcirh.jpghttp://www.hardware.no/mach/images/ppc_970_ingress.jpg
big_smile

Offline

 

#18 2003-06-14 5:44 pm

titok16
Sssssss
From: 1-314-237-0485
Registered: 2001-05-08
Posts: 10925
Website

Re: Has anyone else noticed Intel has slowed to a halt?

that was my idea!!!
tito


shut up tito.
PICES
indeed.

Offline

 

#19 2003-06-14 6:30 pm

iHate You
Banned
From: Butt
Registered: 2001-08-12
Posts: 8034
Website

Re: Has anyone else noticed Intel has slowed to a halt?

and we still get plans and specs out just fine, albeit a little more slowly, since we have to f**k with the computers so much now to get them to work right.

I was thinking about how maybe it does make sense to break different jobs into different categories, with different equipment. I'd like it if one computer could handle everything but it just seems like the computers are becoming more convoluted and buggy and stupid from trying to do everything. Buh.


I'm going to slap your ass so hard, your bell-bottoms will be ringing.

Offline

 

#20 2003-06-14 6:39 pm

Gary Patterson
    
Registered: 2000-09-19
Posts: 4732

Re: Has anyone else noticed Intel has slowed to a halt?

Am I alone in thinking that Intel are not competing against Motorola and IBM in the processor market? I can't see any desktops where they compete, only servers.

Their only competition is in AMD, who are being whipped soundly by Intel in every respect.

A stretch of months at 3.06GHz isn't too much to be concerned with. I expect that they're working on the 3.4GHz chips at the moment.

Offline

 

#21 2003-06-14 6:53 pm

Echoboom
Member
From: Ottawa, Ontario
Registered: 2001-11-01
Posts: 1939
Website

Re: Has anyone else noticed Intel has slowed to a halt?

Madsculptor wrote:


It used to take them 6 mos. to go from 166 to 180MHz. People were pooping their pants "oooohh boy its gonna break 200MHz, can you believe it, oooohhh boy"

That's because at that point Intel realized that all people were doing was pooping their pants over the clock speed.

So they decided that through marketing they could increase the clock speed massively without actually increasing the processor's power or efficiency much. Remember, back then a 200 MHz Motorola was about as powerful as 200MHz Intel; now we have the huge gap in speed. But motorola's processors (or the 970 at least) are almost equal in power.

Offline

 

#22 2003-06-14 7:04 pm

Gary Patterson
    
Registered: 2000-09-19
Posts: 4732

Re: Has anyone else noticed Intel has slowed to a halt?

So they decided that through marketing they could increase the clock speed massively without actually increasing the processor's power or efficiency much. Remember, back then a 200 MHz Motorola was about as powerful as 200MHz Intel; now we have the huge gap in speed. But motorola's processors (or the 970 at least) are almost equal in power.

You might not want to get too hung up about the performance of the PPC970 just yet. I expect it will be a big leap forward, but whether it's comparable is yet to be seen (rumour sites may or may not be believed).

Offline

 

#23 2003-06-14 9:57 pm

petikas
Member
From: Cyprus
Registered: 2000-11-12
Posts: 3601

Re: Has anyone else noticed Intel has slowed to a halt?

I read somewhere that 3.2GHz were imminent. I think they are now trying to eliminate other bottlenecks because processors are already too fast for the rest of the system (memory, bus, HD) to keep up.
As a side note IBM is doing remarkable progress in MRAM. Magnetic RAM is non-volatile and thus requires power only when you need to change its contents and even then less than what DRAM requires. Plus it keeps its data after power down therefore it can be used to store the OS which will lead to instant boot up.


The methods of science are manifestly effective, having made massive humanitarian contributions to society. It is this very effectiveness which the purveyors of mystical philosophies attack, because they recognise in it the chief threat to the belief-based source of their power and financial reward. -Harry Kroto,  Nobel Laureate

Offline

 

#24 2003-06-14 10:12 pm

Turgon
Member
From: Las Vegas, NV
Registered: 2002-07-20
Posts: 172
Website

Re: Has anyone else noticed Intel has slowed to a halt?

Intel is slowing down because the computer market at large is slowing down. Only Mac users are screaming for more power. PC users have all the power they need for now. A 3GHz machine with plenty of RAM and a high end graphics card will meet or exceed the needs of 99% of the PC users. IF there were customer demand and a market I bet Intel would keep pumping out higher speed bumps. But the market isn't demanding them (like the Apple market is) so there not releasing them.

Offline

 

#25 2003-06-15 12:26 am

Mac007
Member
From: Union,MO,USA
Registered: 1999-03-01
Posts: 162

Re: Has anyone else noticed Intel has slowed to a halt?

Right now even speeds in the Mhz range are still quite adequate for most folks. The majority of computer users only use their systems for internet browsing, email, and conducting financial business. As a result the demand just isn't there in significant enough numbers to justify the enormous expenditures necessary in R&D neccessary to develope those chips. In fact I doubt very much anyone now reading this post will live to see speeds in the petabyte, exabyte, zettabyte, or yottabyte level.


It's better to light one candle than to curse the darkness.

Offline

 

Board footer

Powered by PunBB 1.2.6
© Copyright 2002–2005 Rickard Andersson