Forums | MacLife
You are not logged in.
#1 2004-01-15 11:35 am
- damage
- Member

- From: Safe European Home
- Registered: 2002-11-05
- Posts: 3184
Pot
...In the spirit of the recent trend for threads checking how the MAF compares to Meat Life...
Offline
#2 2004-01-15 12:23 pm
Re: Pot
You want a complete history, or do you just want to know what some people are smoking when they post?
Personally, I'd like to know the latter sometimes. 
Spirit was crushed; now is fading, But I want to help make things right.
Because I can see and I can feel, and you can see and you can feel
So why don't we both either stand up and fight
Or at least together we'll call it a night.
Offline
#3 2004-01-15 12:26 pm
- pottymouth
- Uncreative
- Moderator

- From: JP, MA
- Registered: 2002-02-06
- Posts: 17458
- Website
Re: Pot
I don't smoke any more...of course, I don't smoke any less either.
Ba-dum-dum
Offline
#4 2004-01-15 12:28 pm
- Dan
- Used Member
- Registered: 2002-06-18
- Posts: 3027
Re: Pot
I don't smoke, but i don't think the government should regulate what I do to my body either.
Talk like a pirate day September 19th.
Offline
#5 2004-01-15 12:38 pm
- Blueboy626
- Member
- From: Chicago, IL USA
- Registered: 1999-10-30
- Posts: 3300
Re: Pot
Since I was 16 years old (30+years). And almost daily when it's available. 
Offline
#6 2004-01-15 12:40 pm
- why8not9
- Member
- From: Austin, TX
- Registered: 2000-05-04
- Posts: 3008
Re: Pot
never have but willing to try
And how is education supposed to make me feel smarter? Besides, every time I learn something new, it pushes some old stuff out of my brain. Remember when I took that home winemaking course, and I forgot how to drive? --Homer Simpson
Offline
#7 2004-01-15 1:15 pm
- Marc
- On the run from the MPAA

- Registered: 2003-05-10
- Posts: 13129
Re: Pot
never. wont.
You know the hole, the one you put the pie in?
My mean my pie-hole?
Yeah, shut it.
Offline
#10 2004-01-15 1:58 pm
- jkahless
- Member

- From: Right in front of you.
- Registered: 2002-01-05
- Posts: 10147
Re: Pot
Since I was 16 years old (30+years). And almost daily when it's available.
Doesnt that kinda mess you up if you want a job that does drug testing?
Not unless he doesn't stop a bit over a month before he takes the test.
Offline
#11 2004-01-15 2:05 pm
Re: Pot
Drugs are bad for you, but then again, so is alcohol and loud music and women (they are the worst for you), so I do all of them. For drugs though, only pot, nothing else, never will. Also, it has to be rolled or in a glass pipe, I'm picky. Nothing that contains aluminium, like a pop can. I also turn it down more than I do it, like today, I turned it town. I don't need it, it's only the afternoon, and I treat it more like drinking. Special occations only.
"The only thing better than a woman you can control in bed, is one that you can't."
Offline
#12 2004-01-15 2:08 pm
- Short Circuit
- authorized airduct engineer
- From: UESC Marathon
- Registered: 2002-05-17
- Posts: 4739
Re: Pot
iSmokeAlot
W
Frog7blast the ventcore!
Offline
#13 2004-01-15 2:08 pm
Re: Pot
Since I was 16 years old (30+years). And almost daily when it's available.
Doesnt that kinda mess you up if you want a job that does drug testing?
No job anywhere near here does that... they'd probably have to fire 80% of their employee's.
Personally, I think it's stupid to test. What hard does it do if one smokes a joint on the weekend to your company? Just tell them you have an addiction to poppy seed bagles.
"The only thing better than a woman you can control in bed, is one that you can't."
Offline
#14 2004-01-15 2:08 pm
Re: Pot
Since I was 16 years old (30+years). And almost daily when it's available.
Doesnt that kinda mess you up if you want a job that does drug testing?
Not unless he doesn't stop a bit over a month before he takes the test.
Well he better hope he doesnt get a random test or the hair test then.
Just like back in Saigon! Eh, slick?
Offline
#15 2004-01-15 2:12 pm
Re: Pot
kids shouldn't do drugs. they should give their drugs to me.
"the bible is cooler than i thought.... most of the main characters get stoned!!!"
"let's get back to the good ol' days when the "opiate of the masses" was still actually opium." -me
"kids don't beat me. i beat kids." -HJS
the above post is proudly antihammer
Offline
#16 2004-01-15 2:16 pm
- Stop the Robots
- I'm Jesus

- From: Michigan
- Registered: 2002-12-01
- Posts: 6727
Re: Pot
I don't, but I usually tell people I do so that my mellowness can be explained that way.

Offline
#18 2004-01-15 2:29 pm
- Short Circuit
- authorized airduct engineer
- From: UESC Marathon
- Registered: 2002-05-17
- Posts: 4739
Re: Pot
Drugs drugs drugs.
Which are good, which are bad?
Drugs drugs drugs.
Ask your mom, get'em from your dad.
it doesent rythme well, it isent the truth, and its NOT fun, were you stoned when you typed this ?
W
Frog7blast the ventcore!
Offline
#19 2004-01-15 2:30 pm
- why8not9
- Member
- From: Austin, TX
- Registered: 2000-05-04
- Posts: 3008
Re: Pot
Drugs drugs drugs.
Which are good, which are bad?
Drugs drugs drugs.
Ask your mom, get'em from your dad.
Thats just as bad as this one: (Ripped off from a Downy commercial, long ago)
Hello mother, hello father
Greeting from Ken, Marijuana
Coke is good here
Crack is better
I'm so smurfed up I can barely write this letter
And how is education supposed to make me feel smarter? Besides, every time I learn something new, it pushes some old stuff out of my brain. Remember when I took that home winemaking course, and I forgot how to drive? --Homer Simpson
Offline
#20 2004-01-15 2:30 pm
- Blueboy626
- Member
- From: Chicago, IL USA
- Registered: 1999-10-30
- Posts: 3300
Re: Pot
Since I was 16 years old (30+years). And almost daily when it's available.
Doesnt that kinda mess you up if you want a job that does drug testing?
My current employer does not test-nor has any company that I've ever worked for, or will. I personally consider 'drug testing' to be a clear violation of my constitutional right against being subjected to illegal search and seizure as defined by the 4th amendment.
That's not to say I don't think it's valid as an employment requirement for people who are responsible for the safety of others (transportation, law enforcement, medical workers, etc.) as long as it's presented before employment begins.
The real injustice in 'drug testing' is that someone could be a functional alcoholic and pass a drug test with ease yet still be an even greater danger to others.
Offline
#21 2004-01-15 2:45 pm
Re: Pot
Since I was 16 years old (30+years). And almost daily when it's available.
Doesnt that kinda mess you up if you want a job that does drug testing?
My current employer does not test-nor has any company that I've ever worked for, or will. I personally consider 'drug testing' to be a clear violation of my constitutional right against being subjected to illegal search and seizure as defined by the 4th amendment.
That's not to say I don't think it's valid as an employment requirement for people who are responsible for the safety of others (transportation, law enforcement, medical workers, etc.) as long as it's presented before employment begins.
The real injustice in 'drug testing' is that someone could be a functional alcoholic and pass a drug test with ease yet still be an even greater danger to others.
I think companies have the right to make sure they have drug free workers.
Just like back in Saigon! Eh, slick?
Offline
#22 2004-01-15 2:55 pm
Re: Pot
I've smoked it since I was 16 (I turn 32 on the 24th of this month) but have pretty much given it up now. The last time I smoked it was a single joint on Christmas Eve with my brother. Contrary to popular belief, pot is very easy to give up, as long as you want to.
Offline
#23 2004-01-15 3:01 pm
- scudincII
- Member
- From: The Clubhouse
- Registered: 2003-11-13
- Posts: 2710
Re: Pot
Since I was 16 years old (30+years). And almost daily when it's available.
Doesnt that kinda mess you up if you want a job that does drug testing?
My current employer does not test-nor has any company that I've ever worked for, or will. I personally consider 'drug testing' to be a clear violation of my constitutional right against being subjected to illegal search and seizure as defined by the 4th amendment.
That's not to say I don't think it's valid as an employment requirement for people who are responsible for the safety of others (transportation, law enforcement, medical workers, etc.) as long as it's presented before employment begins.
The real injustice in 'drug testing' is that someone could be a functional alcoholic and pass a drug test with ease yet still be an even greater danger to others.I think companies have the right to make sure they have drug free workers.
Agreed.
Offline
#24 2004-01-15 3:37 pm
Re: Pot
Since I was 16 years old (30+years). And almost daily when it's available.
Doesnt that kinda mess you up if you want a job that does drug testing?
My current employer does not test-nor has any company that I've ever worked for, or will. I personally consider 'drug testing' to be a clear violation of my constitutional right against being subjected to illegal search and seizure as defined by the 4th amendment.
That's not to say I don't think it's valid as an employment requirement for people who are responsible for the safety of others (transportation, law enforcement, medical workers, etc.) as long as it's presented before employment begins.
The real injustice in 'drug testing' is that someone could be a functional alcoholic and pass a drug test with ease yet still be an even greater danger to others.I think companies have the right to make sure they have drug free workers.
Agreed.
I think it depends on the field in question.
Spirit was crushed; now is fading, But I want to help make things right.
Because I can see and I can feel, and you can see and you can feel
So why don't we both either stand up and fight
Or at least together we'll call it a night.
Offline
#25 2004-01-15 5:05 pm
- DevoDoc
- Vardøger

- From: The East Wing
- Registered: 2003-05-27
- Posts: 2747
Re: Pot
Most companies are actually worried most about employees who are high hurting themselves, especially factory workers who work around dangerous equipment. They don't want the liability. When I worked in the ER and someone came in with an on-the-job injury, the first tests they got were blood alcohol and a drug screen.
Do you have medical insurance through your work? If you do, you probably signed something saying you don't use illegal substances. If you come up positive or refuse the test, your chances of getting workman's comp or winning a settlement against the company are in serious jeopardy, and you may even get stuck with the medical bills.
Offline


