Forums | MacLife
You are not logged in.
#1 2004-12-04 6:56 pm
The Rules - Discuss
The Rules.
Discuss 'em in here. Don't like one? Let's talk about it. Think we need a new one? Have at it, what'cha got?
The rules posted at the moment are Neut's old ones; they're here as a stopgap set.
Offline
#2 2004-12-04 6:56 pm
Re: The Rules - Discuss
Rules are stupid.
Spirit was crushed; now is fading, But I want to help make things right.
Because I can see and I can feel, and you can see and you can feel
So why don't we both either stand up and fight
Or at least together we'll call it a night.
Offline
#3 2004-12-04 6:58 pm
Re: The Rules - Discuss
Rules are stupid.
Ladies and gentlemen, it didn't even take a whole minute! Let's give him a round of applause!
Offline
#4 2004-12-04 7:01 pm
Re: The Rules - Discuss
Rules are stupid.
Ladies and gentlemen, it didn't even take a whole minute! Let's give him a round of applause!
Gimmie lovin'!
Spirit was crushed; now is fading, But I want to help make things right.
Because I can see and I can feel, and you can see and you can feel
So why don't we both either stand up and fight
Or at least together we'll call it a night.
Offline
#5 2004-12-04 7:05 pm
- KingFred
- is enjoying his status as
- Royal Wombat

- Registered: 2002-05-09
- Posts: 7541
Re: The Rules - Discuss
It's about that soapboxing rule, see....I think it should go. Again.
Exploring the intertubes
Offline
#6 2004-12-04 7:12 pm
Offline
#7 2004-12-04 7:12 pm
- Tria
- Minor Prophetess

- From: Madison, WI
- Registered: 2000-05-13
- Posts: 18087
Re: The Rules - Discuss
I say we go to a narcosyndic commune.
Offline
#8 2004-12-04 7:13 pm
Re: The Rules - Discuss
I say we go to a narcosyndic commune.
Or drop the "No Porn" rule. One way or the other.
Spirit was crushed; now is fading, But I want to help make things right.
Because I can see and I can feel, and you can see and you can feel
So why don't we both either stand up and fight
Or at least together we'll call it a night.
Offline
#9 2004-12-04 7:14 pm
Re: The Rules - Discuss
It's about that soapboxing rule, see....I think it should go. Again.
Oh, gimme a couple of hours. I'll get to it eventually.
They'll be going back as close to the version I had before the crash as I can get.
Offline
#10 2004-12-04 7:18 pm
- KingFred
- is enjoying his status as
- Royal Wombat

- Registered: 2002-05-09
- Posts: 7541
Re: The Rules - Discuss
It's about that soapboxing rule, see....I think it should go. Again.
Oh, gimme a couple of hours. I'll get to it eventually.
They'll be going back as close to the version I had before the crash as I can get.
Lazy ass, you've had three days off!!!
Exploring the intertubes
Offline
#11 2004-12-04 7:19 pm
Re: The Rules - Discuss
It's about that soapboxing rule, see....I think it should go. Again.
Oh, gimme a couple of hours. I'll get to it eventually.
They'll be going back as close to the version I had before the crash as I can get.Lazy ass, you've had three days off!!!
Don't do today what you can put off until tomorrow.
Spirit was crushed; now is fading, But I want to help make things right.
Because I can see and I can feel, and you can see and you can feel
So why don't we both either stand up and fight
Or at least together we'll call it a night.
Offline
#12 2004-12-04 8:08 pm
- ShnickyShnack
- ::: title edited due to Satanic influences :::

- From: Rockin' out
- Registered: 2001-05-25
- Posts: 22237
Re: The Rules - Discuss
I'm lobbying for a "Shnicky is God and MiniThinkers His Abject Servants" rule.
Note: please delete this post.
Offline
#13 2004-12-04 8:25 pm
Re: The Rules - Discuss
I'm lobbying for a "Shnicky is God and MiniThinkers His Abject Servants" rule.
We can probably fit that one in somewhere after this one...

Offline
#14 2004-12-04 8:26 pm
Re: The Rules - Discuss
I'm lobbying for a "Shnicky is God and MiniThinkers His Abject Servants" rule.
We can probably fit that one in somewhere after this one...
Or, more realistically, after we get our iPod Forum up and running.
Spirit was crushed; now is fading, But I want to help make things right.
Because I can see and I can feel, and you can see and you can feel
So why don't we both either stand up and fight
Or at least together we'll call it a night.
Offline
#15 2004-12-04 8:31 pm
- ShnickyShnack
- ::: title edited due to Satanic influences :::

- From: Rockin' out
- Registered: 2001-05-25
- Posts: 22237
Re: The Rules - Discuss
I'm lobbying for a "Shnicky is God and MiniThinkers His Abject Servants" rule.
We can probably fit that one in somewhere after this one...
Gee, what a wacky forum that is.
Note: please delete this post.
Offline
#16 2004-12-04 8:33 pm
Re: The Rules - Discuss
I'm lobbying for a "Shnicky is God and MiniThinkers His Abject Servants" rule.
We can probably fit that one in somewhere after this one...
Gee, what a wacky forum that is.
No, that's for here!
Gotta start somewhere. 
Offline
#17 2004-12-04 8:39 pm
- ShnickyShnack
- ::: title edited due to Satanic influences :::

- From: Rockin' out
- Registered: 2001-05-25
- Posts: 22237
Re: The Rules - Discuss
I'm lobbying for a "Shnicky is God and MiniThinkers His Abject Servants" rule.
We can probably fit that one in somewhere after this one...
Gee, what a wacky forum that is.
No, that's for here!
Gotta start somewhere.
But I like vowels!
Note: please delete this post.
Offline
#18 2004-12-04 9:18 pm
- Clareaux
- Banned

- Registered: 2004-04-23
- Posts: 205
Re: The Rules - Discuss
Rules are stupid.
Like you pay attention anyway. 
"Have you heard the theme she sings for the 'Spongebob Squarepants Movie'? It's punk. But she says she's not punk. So it's nice that she came out of punk retirement long enough to sing a song about a smurfing sponge that lives under the sea."
Offline
#19 2004-12-04 9:59 pm
Re: The Rules - Discuss
Deaux-- this is getting creepy. XYZ has got many screen names, yet doesn't hold conversations with himself.
WTF?
Offline
#20 2004-12-05 12:00 am
- Freezer mac
- iPod scroll wheel

- From: next to a big cold lake.
- Registered: 2001-01-06
- Posts: 7370
Re: The Rules - Discuss
Deaux-- this is getting creepy. XYZ has got many screen names, yet doesn't hold conversations with himself.
WTF?
he's bored... i would post some topics from about 6 months ago where he was the only person talking to himself, but they are missing...
Offline
#21 2004-12-05 12:15 am
Re: The Rules - Discuss
Deaux-- this is getting creepy. XYZ has got many screen names, yet doesn't hold conversations with himself.
WTF?he's bored... i would post some topics from about 6 months ago where he was the only person talking to himself, but they are missing...
KICK
ASS.
And if we could never speak of the UBB days, that'd make me MIGHTY happy.
Spirit was crushed; now is fading, But I want to help make things right.
Because I can see and I can feel, and you can see and you can feel
So why don't we both either stand up and fight
Or at least together we'll call it a night.
Offline
#22 2004-12-05 10:17 am
Re: The Rules - Discuss
Offline
#23 2004-12-06 9:05 am
- Camp David
- Banned

- Registered: 2003-04-11
- Posts: 6065
Re: The Rules - Discuss
Ok, the new rules are up and ready for anyone who would like to see them. [/url]
A Personal Observation: Rule #10, "10) You don't have free speech here..." seems to be one created purely for the self-aggrandizement of the rule-maker(s)... Why post a "rule" which specifically cites a real and/or perceived limitation on written expression? Although I understand the motivation behind Rule #10 and I respect the facts that posts are at the discretion of the Mods(as thsi is a private board), the deliberate reference to lack of free speech sets up a dangerous precedent to limited or controlled speech, which, I am sure, is not what MiniThink or This Board advances... if Rule #10 is allowe to stand, this Discussion Board should be renamed a "refereed discussion board" as no free thought seems to apply..
Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger/Benedict XVI: "a simple, humble worker in God's vineyard." Habemus Papem!
Offline
#24 2004-12-06 9:08 am
- ShnickyShnack
- ::: title edited due to Satanic influences :::

- From: Rockin' out
- Registered: 2001-05-25
- Posts: 22237
Re: The Rules - Discuss
Ok, the new rules are up and ready for anyone who would like to see them. [/url]
A Personal Observation: Rule #10, "10) You don't have free speech here..." seems to be one created purely for the self-aggrandizement of the rule-maker(s)... Why post a "rule" which specifically cites a real and/or perceived limitation on written expression? Although I understand the motivation behind Rule #10 and I respect the facts that posts are at the discretion of the Mods(as thsi is a private board), the deliberate reference to lack of free speech sets up a dangerous precedent to limited or controlled speech, which, I am sure, is not what MiniThink or This Board advances... if Rule #10 is allowe to stand, this Discussion Board should be renamed a "refereed discussion board" as no free thought seems to apply..
Time to shut up now.
Note: please delete this post.
Offline
#25 2004-12-06 9:18 am
- Camp David
- Banned

- Registered: 2003-04-11
- Posts: 6065
Re: The Rules - Discuss
Time to shut up now.
Shnicky: That comment seems to be against Rule 4) Stay on topic, Subrule 2: "No personal attacks. If you disagree with something, refute the post, don
Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger/Benedict XVI: "a simple, humble worker in God's vineyard." Habemus Papem!
Offline
