Forums | MacLife

2005-05-07 5:55 pm

Duke Stratosphere wrote:

If I had the old lady artificially inseminated so we could have a kid and it grew up to be gay I would demand my money back.

Unless it was a girl, in which case I guess I wouldn't really care.

2005-05-08 8:57 am

Duke Stratosphere wrote:

What? lol No, seriously, I'd be bummed out. It's not that I care if other people are gay and stuff, you oughta know that by now, but it's just not something that I would want to deal with personally. If I'd had a kid myself, with my own DNA and everything, who turned out to be gay, I'd be okay with it and say, "Sure. Go ahead. It's your life. Live it how you want. Fly to Ohio and hook up with XYZ. His boyfriend is ugly anyway." lol If, on the other hand, I'd actually paid good money to have a kid, I'd be pissed off if it grew up with any defects and demand my money back. lol

2005-05-08 5:58 pm

Duke Stratosphere wrote:

HEY! What the smurf does the Food and Drug Administration care who donates sperm? Since when is sperm a drug? lol Since when does anyone besides XYZ think that sperm is food? lol

Yesterday 8:21 pm

Duke Stratosphere wrote:

Kind of takes the sport out of them being Lesbians when it's obvious they don't have much of a choice.

Is there a new policy that says hate speech is OK?

Listen, you're going to run across all sorts of people who have all sorts of opinions about things.

You say that being gay is not a defect. Well, swell. Some folks don't see it that way. When those folk start threatening you or saying that everyone gay needs to be round up and sent to concentration camps, I'll worry. In the meantime, recognize that it's merely people trying to get your goat.

Like me and my hebephilia. Don't make a big deal out of it (like this!) unless you want the attention for fun and profit.

Here it comes.

robocop wrote:

We were aware of this situation before you posted it here.  It is being dealt with...

Inasmuch as I often disagree with Duke Stratosphere and he has often castigated me and others on these posts, I personally don't believe his posts as cited above are "hate speech" in any way. One of them is very humerous in a unique way. My opinion for what it is worth.

And fido. You are agreeing with fido.

Are you impressionable enough to be led in a revolution to reinstate postcounts?

jax wrote:

I'll do anything to be accepted as one of the cool kids.

We're in short supply of conservatives herein; would you consider unconditional support of the GOP? http://www.whitehouse.gov/

jax wrote:

Camp David wrote:

jax wrote:

I'll do anything to be accepted as one of the cool kids.

We're in short supply of conservatives herein; would you consider unconditional support of the GOP? http://www.whitehouse.gov/

Would I get a cool jacket? Does it have any Metallica patches on the back of it?

I would hope so. Right next to the Testament and Anthrax patches.

Well, permabans are exactly that: permanent.  Do not pass Go, do not collect $200, do not come back and try again.  If you violate any ban (temp, perma, or BigBrother), you get heavier punishment (well, there's nothing bigger than a permanent ban, so we just keep blocking ways you try to circumvent the system).

Does that mean alternicks get banned too?

wink wink and all that Barney.

KingFred wrote:

jax wrote:

Who got permabanned?

The collective known, in part, as CompUSA, Best Buy and.. well, I've forgotten the other iterations now, but there were many. It's back.

I see. I think that was before my time. I didn't start frequenting the forums until last fall (other than the occaisional trip to balloon help). Is that (CompUSA et al) the same as Barney F?

HeadonaStick wrote:

I think Brad Goodman was the most recent before Barney Frank.

w3rd, and I want dibs on the Brad Goodman avatar.