Forums | MacLife

You are not logged in.

#101 2003-01-22 7:11 pm

registered_user
bulletproof
From: padding: zero-pixels;
Registered: 2000-12-19
Posts: 16020
Website

Re: Bush plan pays big for SUVs

If you two are looking for credible information on auto safety, The Insurance Institute of Highway Safety is your best bet.

Offline

 

#102 2003-01-22 7:12 pm

bratboy
attorney-at-law
Royal Wombat
From: Austin, Texas
Registered: 2003-01-19
Posts: 30572

Re: Bush plan pays big for SUVs

Check out these ratings:

http://www.safecarguide.com/exp/rollover/idx.htm

Here's something from the http://www.hwysafety.org/safety%5Ffacts … assveh.htm site, listed above:

Single-vehicle crashes involving rollover accounted for 41 occupant deaths per million registered passenger vehicles in 2000 compared with 9 deaths per million in multiple-vehicle crashes.

and

Single-vehicle rollover crashes accounted for 51 percent of occupant deaths in utility vehicles in 2000 compared with 34 percent of deaths in pickups and 19 percent of deaths in cars.

This is not to say that there aren't some SUV's that are much safer than others...crash rating vary greatly.


"One thing we've learned is there's a difference between being disappointed and having madmen in authority."

                                                                   --Paul Krugman

Offline

 

#103 2003-01-22 7:19 pm

Cyberpawz
Member
Registered: 2001-11-14
Posts: 10172

Re: Bush plan pays big for SUVs

That website is biased...hence the name, find another site.

It's called www.suvrollovernews.com 

That's what it's about.  All the numbers I've posted come from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, or NHTSA.

Do you think the NHTSA is biased? 

If this site is 'biased' against anything, it's rollover accidents (hence the name).

One of the links I gave you, was from the NHTSA.

And because the site is biased against one type of thing, it can't be trusted, unbiased info is the only way I try to find things... if it can't be found that means it is for radicals.

Cyberpawz


Governing sense, mind and intellect, intent of liberation, free from desire, fear and anger, the sage is forever free.

Bhagavad Gita (c.B.C. 400)

Offline

 

#104 2003-01-22 7:23 pm

bratboy
attorney-at-law
Royal Wombat
From: Austin, Texas
Registered: 2003-01-19
Posts: 30572

Re: Bush plan pays big for SUVs

One of the links I gave you, was from the NHTSA.

And because the site is biased against one type of thing, it can't be trusted, unbiased info is the only way I try to find things... if it can't be found that means it is for radicals.

I said their numbers were taken from the NHTSA report.  As were the ones from my second post.  Then I posted more info above.  Have you really never heard of this whole "SUV rollover thing" before?

And what was that sentence above...about 'radicals?'  What?


"One thing we've learned is there's a difference between being disappointed and having madmen in authority."

                                                                   --Paul Krugman

Offline

 

#105 2003-01-22 7:40 pm

Cyberpawz
Member
Registered: 2001-11-14
Posts: 10172

Re: Bush plan pays big for SUVs

One of the links I gave you, was from the NHTSA.

And because the site is biased against one type of thing, it can't be trusted, unbiased info is the only way I try to find things... if it can't be found that means it is for radicals.

I said their numbers were taken from the NHTSA report.  As were the ones from my second post.  Then I posted more info above.  Have you really never heard of this whole "SUV rollover thing" before?

And what was that sentence above...about 'radicals?'  What?

look at the site, and look for Rollover Occurrence, again...you will see that trucks don't have the highest percentage...in deaths...small cars do.(if I am reading this correctly)

this is to describe the def of each vehicle.
http://www-fars.nhtsa.dot.gov/manual_gr … ;groupid=B

And this is to show what it means by yes or no.

http://www-fars.nhtsa.dot.gov/manual_gr … ;groupid=A

And as for what I meant by radicals, I think I was explanatory enough.

Cyberpawz


Governing sense, mind and intellect, intent of liberation, free from desire, fear and anger, the sage is forever free.

Bhagavad Gita (c.B.C. 400)

Offline

 

#106 2003-01-22 7:47 pm

Freezer mac
iPod scroll wheel
From: next to a big cold lake.
Registered: 2001-01-06
Posts: 7367

Re: Bush plan pays big for SUVs

Freezer please read it again. It ssays 87000 in deductions, not savings. It says 33500 in tax savings.
102581-33500=69081
Not the 15500 hummer your math comes up with.
Deductions are not 1 for 1 off the tax, they are off taxable income.

you didnt read my post, did you?

Total cost: $15,446 Total Deductions:$87,135

(emphasis mine.)

Offline

 

#107 2003-01-22 7:50 pm

bratboy
attorney-at-law
Royal Wombat
From: Austin, Texas
Registered: 2003-01-19
Posts: 30572

Re: Bush plan pays big for SUVs

look at the site, and look for Rollover Occurrence, again...you will see that trucks don't have the highest percentage...in deaths...small cars do.(if I am reading this correctly)

You're not reading it correctly.  While more smaller cars might be involved in fatal accidents (they would have to be, there are more of them on the road) any statistics showing rollover accidents and deaths would definitely show that SUVs and trucks rollover more than cars...I've posted several stats above that show that.


Single-vehicle crashes involving rollover accounted for 41 occupant deaths per million registered passenger vehicles in 2000 compared with 9 deaths per million in multiple-vehicle crashes.
 
and
 
Single-vehicle rollover crashes accounted for 51 percent of occupant deaths in utility vehicles in 2000 compared with 34 percent of deaths in pickups and 19 percent of deaths in cars.

That's from the Insurance Institute of Highway Safety.


"One thing we've learned is there's a difference between being disappointed and having madmen in authority."

                                                                   --Paul Krugman

Offline

 

#108 2003-01-22 9:22 pm

Farmerkev
Official Dementor
Moderator
Registered: 2003-01-03
Posts: 16671

Re: Bush plan pays big for SUVs

Freezer you said
you know that you could get a hummer H1 for less than $15,500 with this new law.....
And I have tried to show you that you are doing the math incorrectly. The cost of the hummer would be what I said in my last post.
You cannot buy a 100k car for 15 grand. It's nearly 70k cost.
The acticle does not say that you can either. It seems you confuse the meanings of the terms in the article.
Deductions from taxable income are not the same as deductions from your tax liability. The deduction comes off your gross income. This leaves you with what's called taxable income. Your taxable income is then taxed at a percentage. That will be the total tax due.
You do not take total gross income times your tax bracket to come up with a tax bill and then deduct depreciation and standard deductions and get 1 to 1 tax savings.
Just exactly what part of this do you not understand? Go to the IRS website and download the forms yourself if you refuse to believe me.


Minithink isn't a "to the death" cage match.

Offline

 

#109 2003-01-22 10:02 pm

Gr@sshopper
Redtailed mountain goat
From: Claremont CA
Registered: 2001-05-01
Posts: 1584

Re: Bush plan pays big for SUVs

Nevermind.

Offline

 

#110 2003-01-27 1:46 pm

Ronald Reagan
Banned
Registered: 2000-03-11
Posts: 2238

Re: Bush plan pays big for SUVs


Efficient coroutine generation of constrained Gray sequences

Offline

 

#111 2003-01-27 2:16 pm

jacksquat
Member
From: temporarily inside your head
Registered: 2001-12-07
Posts: 1947

Re: Bush plan pays big for SUVs

Offline

 

#112 2003-01-29 2:42 pm

so
Member
Registered: 2002-12-10
Posts: 906

Re: Bush plan pays big for SUVs


buy or die

Offline

 

#113 2003-01-29 6:19 pm

damage
Member
From: Safe European Home
Registered: 2002-11-05
Posts: 3184

Re: Bush plan pays big for SUVs



Haven't you seen that commercial where the soccer mom parks that whale of a GMC between the two rows of Harleys?

The category of SUV includes everything from that Paul Hogan Subaru wagon to these monster sized trucks. It's stupid.

And i'd like to see a soccer mom with athat much control over a moster of a truck...

i had a roomate which wouldn't handle anything larger than a S10, for anything larger than that and she was terrified of parking in it...

Actually if it's a wagon, or a station wagon, it is still a large station wagon, people call it an SUV because they don't know better.

Remeber this, any SUV that is over a ton, is concidered a SUV, anything under it (kind of truck), is concidered a toy...

Cyberpawz

Well, you can make up your own idea of how to classify things all you want, but r_u was talking about the legal categories, and so was I.

Also, the commercial I was talking about isn't for, literally, a "Monster Truck," but for this really really big GMC truck with a new type of stearing (probably 4-wheel steering) designed specifically to make soccer moms comfortable driving and parking such gigantic automobiles.

heh yup, it only took US auto makers a decade (probably more actually, i know the mitubishi 3000gt had it in the early 90s) to pick up on the 4 wheel steering thing

Offline

 

Board footer

Powered by PunBB
© Copyright 2002–2005 Rickard Andersson