Forums | MacLife
You are not logged in.
#1 2005-03-23 10:32 am
Better Mac Gaming?
From Cafemacs.com
Tiger to bring improved 3D gaming performance
Caf
Offline
#3 2005-03-23 3:50 pm
- brainiac_7
- % rm -r brainiac_6
- Moderator

- From: CT Shoreline
- Registered: 2000-10-09
- Posts: 7243
- Website
Re: Better Mac Gaming?
Very nice to hear, Cee. I hope it turns out to be true. The best thing about being a Mac gamer, tho, is that when I'm done gaming, I'm still on a Mac. 
Offline
#4 2005-03-23 4:16 pm
- Soulstorm
- Member

- Registered: 2005-03-05
- Posts: 14
Re: Better Mac Gaming?
Sorry to tell you that guys... but I think you should read that...
http://www.macbidouille.com/niouzconten … 3-23#10682
Seems tiger is not as good as we want to think it is... These are the results: "Sans ombres" mean "without shadows" and "avec ombres" mean "with shadows".
In my opinion... Apple is not going to make it as far as more decent performance in gaming is concerned....
macbidouille.com wrote:
- Doom 3 & Tiger (I translated it from french)
Cafemacs made headlines in claiming that DOOM 3 would double the framerate in Tiger (in latest A414 beta tests). Reactions were sceptical. We asked a Tiger beta tester to try the game for us. G5 Dual 2,5 GHz and a Radeon 9800 just like our own machine under 10.3.8:
10.3.8:
- 800x600 sans Aniso sans Ombres : 50.9 FPS
- 800x600 sans Aniso avec Ombres : 38.3 FPS
- 800x600 avec Aniso 4x sans Ombres : 47.7 FPS
- 800x600 avec Aniso 4x avec Ombres : 37.1 FPS
- 1024x768 sans Aniso sans Ombres : 41.7 FPS
- 1024x768 sans Aniso avec Ombres : 29.6 FPS
- 1024x768 avec Aniso 4x sans Ombres : 38.2 FPS
- 1024x768 avec Aniso 4x avec Ombres : 28.1 FPS
Tiger A414 Beta:
- 800x600 sans Aniso sans Ombres : 52.2 FPS
- 800x600 sans Aniso avec Ombres : 40.2 FPS
- 800x600 avec Aniso 4x sans Ombres : 46.4 FPS
- 800x600 avec Aniso 4x avec Ombres : 35.4 FPS
- 1024x768 sans Aniso sans Ombres : 44.2 FPS
- 1024x768 sans Aniso avec Ombres : 31.6 FPS
- 1024x768 avec Aniso 4x sans Ombres : 37.4 FPS
- 1024x768 avec Aniso 4x avec Ombres : 27.9 FPS
The results are almost identical on both systems.
Last edited by Soulstorm (2005-03-23 4:18 pm)
1)--G5 2.5 GHz, 9600XT, 1GByte RAM, a NEC display supporting 1280x1024 resolution OS X 10.3.8.
2)--G4 Dual 1.25 GHz with 2GBytes RAM ATI RADEON 9200
3)--iMac G4 1Ghz with Geforce4 MX 768 RAM os x 10.3.7
4)--iMac DV 400 MHz 384 RAM And an LC475 (Yes, the one with 25MHz and 12 Mbytes RAM!!!!)
Offline
#6 2005-03-24 11:06 am
Re: Better Mac Gaming?
Soulstorm wrote:
Sorry to tell you that guys... but I think you should read that...
http://www.macbidouille.com/niouzconten … 3-23#10682
Seems tiger is not as good as we want to think it is... These are the results: "Sans ombres" mean "without shadows" and "avec ombres" mean "with shadows".
In my opinion... Apple is not going to make it as far as more decent performance in gaming is concerned....macbidouille.com wrote:
- Doom 3 & Tiger (I translated it from french)
Cafemacs made headlines in claiming that DOOM 3 would double the framerate in Tiger (in latest A414 beta tests). Reactions were sceptical. We asked a Tiger beta tester to try the game for us. G5 Dual 2,5 GHz and a Radeon 9800 just like our own machine under 10.3.8:
10.3.8:
- 800x600 sans Aniso sans Ombres : 50.9 FPS
- 800x600 sans Aniso avec Ombres : 38.3 FPS
- 800x600 avec Aniso 4x sans Ombres : 47.7 FPS
- 800x600 avec Aniso 4x avec Ombres : 37.1 FPS
- 1024x768 sans Aniso sans Ombres : 41.7 FPS
- 1024x768 sans Aniso avec Ombres : 29.6 FPS
- 1024x768 avec Aniso 4x sans Ombres : 38.2 FPS
- 1024x768 avec Aniso 4x avec Ombres : 28.1 FPS
Tiger A414 Beta:
- 800x600 sans Aniso sans Ombres : 52.2 FPS
- 800x600 sans Aniso avec Ombres : 40.2 FPS
- 800x600 avec Aniso 4x sans Ombres : 46.4 FPS
- 800x600 avec Aniso 4x avec Ombres : 35.4 FPS
- 1024x768 sans Aniso sans Ombres : 44.2 FPS
- 1024x768 sans Aniso avec Ombres : 31.6 FPS
- 1024x768 avec Aniso 4x sans Ombres : 37.4 FPS
- 1024x768 avec Aniso 4x avec Ombres : 27.9 FPS
The results are almost identical on both systems.
I'll leave my final thoughts after Tigar 10.4.2 comes out 
Offline
#7 2005-03-24 11:17 am
- Soulstorm
- Member

- Registered: 2005-03-05
- Posts: 14
Re: Better Mac Gaming?
That's what I have said, some lines above!
1)--G5 2.5 GHz, 9600XT, 1GByte RAM, a NEC display supporting 1280x1024 resolution OS X 10.3.8.
2)--G4 Dual 1.25 GHz with 2GBytes RAM ATI RADEON 9200
3)--iMac G4 1Ghz with Geforce4 MX 768 RAM os x 10.3.7
4)--iMac DV 400 MHz 384 RAM And an LC475 (Yes, the one with 25MHz and 12 Mbytes RAM!!!!)
Offline
#8 2005-03-24 11:48 am
- brainiac_7
- % rm -r brainiac_6
- Moderator

- From: CT Shoreline
- Registered: 2000-10-09
- Posts: 7243
- Website
Re: Better Mac Gaming?
I won't get my hopes up for Tiger; it seems like a lot is expected of the new Core graphic/video functions in their first incarnation. Being able to run DIII at peak isn't a deal maker or breaker for Tiger for me. I'll get Tiger out of curiosity about the first iteration of a 64 bit OS X, knowing I'll still be using 32 apps for quite some time, not unlike SGI/IRIX and the many 32 bit apps for that platform.
I've hit a great balance and comfortability with my G5 and Panther. I look forward to using my Mac in a way that I haven't since the pre-10.0, OS 9 days. I can finally work as quickly as I did in 9. Anything on top of that is gravy for me.
Offline
#9 2005-03-25 1:00 pm
- thunderqube
- Member

- From: Ban me you idiots.
- Registered: 2004-01-03
- Posts: 1038
Re: Better Mac Gaming?
Remember, this is Doom3 we're talking about, a game that can choke any computer if the GPU isn't up to speed. I'm sure that games foucused more on gameplay than graphics (such as UT2004) will see a notable improvement from Tiger.
-Qube
Most moderators here are little more than insensitive pricks who ban people that disagree with their opinions. In fact, this message will most likely be deleted shortly, and I will be banned by a moderator who can't stand being argued with by a mere forum member.
Offline
#10 2005-03-25 1:04 pm
- [SiK][Nards]
- Member
- From: Somewhere between the West to
- Registered: 2002-10-22
- Posts: 934
- Website
Re: Better Mac Gaming?
I wish VALVe would port HL2 and CS:S to the Mac, that would rock. That might be enough to get me back into Mac again.
My new laptop:
1.8 GHz Athlon 64 Processor
512 MBs of RAM
64 MB nVidia Geforce4 440 chipset (not shared with system ram) (hauls @$$ though
)
40 Gig HD
15.4" Widescreen Display
Wireless 802.11g card (builtin)
24x CD-RW/8x DVD-ROM drive
Offline
#11 2005-03-30 12:41 pm
- Bat
- Adult's Play
- Royal Wombat

- From: Björk, Björk
- Registered: 2001-05-14
- Posts: 24109
Re: Better Mac Gaming?
Peter Cohen, whose MacWorld D3 benchmarking article sparked so much, doesn't think Tiger will increase game framerates much.
Specifically, about the cafemacs.com reference and writing at the IMG Forums:
flargh wrote:
<cafemacs etc>
I don't trust this anecdotal -- dare I say apocryphal -- evidence as far as I can throw it.
When asked if he had Tiger from his MacWorld connection, he replied
I could tell you that, but I'd have to kill you.
http://www.insidemacgames.com/forum/ind … &st=24 and following
If all economists were laid end to end, they would not reach a conclusion - George Bernard Shaw
"Fire up a colortini, sit back, relax, and watch the pictures, now, as they fly through the air."
Offline
#12 2005-04-21 11:36 am
Re: Better Mac Gaming?
Bat wrote:
Peter Cohen, whose MacWorld D3 benchmarking article sparked so much, doesn't think Tiger will increase game framerates much.
Specifically, about the cafemacs.com reference and writing at the IMG Forums:flargh wrote:
<cafemacs etc>
I don't trust this anecdotal -- dare I say apocryphal -- evidence as far as I can throw it.
When asked if he had Tiger from his MacWorld connection, he replied
I could tell you that, but I'd have to kill you.
http://www.insidemacgames.com/forum/ind … &st=24 and following
and the words are "doesn't think" meaning his own opinon. which you know are like @$$ holes,.. everybody has one. 
Offline
#13 2005-04-21 8:42 pm
- Bat
- Adult's Play
- Royal Wombat

- From: Björk, Björk
- Registered: 2001-05-14
- Posts: 24109
Re: Better Mac Gaming?
Ceemkm wrote:
Bat wrote:
Peter Cohen, whose MacWorld D3 benchmarking article sparked so much, doesn't think Tiger will increase game framerates much.
Specifically, about the cafemacs.com reference and writing at the IMG Forums:flargh wrote:
I don't trust this anecdotal -- dare I say apocryphal -- evidence as far as I can throw it.When asked if he had Tiger from his MacWorld connection, he replied
I could tell you that, but I'd have to kill you.
http://www.insidemacgames.com/forum/ind … &st=24 and following
and the words are "doesn't think" meaning his own opinon. which you know are like @$$ holes,.. everybody has one.
Not everyone is the Games Room guy at MacWorld/MacCentral and has been running Tiger betas for some time. He is distinctly better informed than most, and again, it's his D3 benchmark article that started all this. No one including Glenda Adams, who posts at IMG, has called bunk on any of it.
Your opinion seems contrary. We'll see if Apple has pulled a rabbit out of a hat in about a week, who's right and whose opinion is full of... holes. 
If all economists were laid end to end, they would not reach a conclusion - George Bernard Shaw
"Fire up a colortini, sit back, relax, and watch the pictures, now, as they fly through the air."
Offline
#14 2005-04-22 2:19 pm
Re: Better Mac Gaming?
I not here to put anything that Apple does on a pedestal, just saying I would wait to see the final product.
Offline
#15 2005-04-22 11:00 pm
- Bat
- Adult's Play
- Royal Wombat

- From: Björk, Björk
- Registered: 2001-05-14
- Posts: 24109
Re: Better Mac Gaming?
We're all waiting with great interest. I advocate nothing but objectivity.
If all economists were laid end to end, they would not reach a conclusion - George Bernard Shaw
"Fire up a colortini, sit back, relax, and watch the pictures, now, as they fly through the air."
Offline
#17 2005-04-27 10:08 pm
- Bat
- Adult's Play
- Royal Wombat

- From: Björk, Björk
- Registered: 2001-05-14
- Posts: 24109
Re: Better Mac Gaming?
For those who don't frequent Games, Santaduck at Macologist recently posted a wide-ranging interview with Glenda Adams that touched on that and many other things.
http://www.macologist.org/portal.php?topic_id=1224
If all economists were laid end to end, they would not reach a conclusion - George Bernard Shaw
"Fire up a colortini, sit back, relax, and watch the pictures, now, as they fly through the air."
Offline
#18 2005-04-29 5:19 pm
- Bat
- Adult's Play
- Royal Wombat

- From: Björk, Björk
- Registered: 2001-05-14
- Posts: 24109
Re: Better Mac Gaming?
Barefeats has up some prelim benchmarks- big gains on the DP 2.5 on D3, much less on other apps (down to a few % on Halo). Looks like the OGL framework may have gotten some D3-specific reworking.
If all economists were laid end to end, they would not reach a conclusion - George Bernard Shaw
"Fire up a colortini, sit back, relax, and watch the pictures, now, as they fly through the air."
Offline



