Forums | MacLife
You are not logged in.
#51 2005-04-15 10:43 pm
- gradient
- Member
- Registered: 2002-04-24
- Posts: 3101
Re: When you ban a person from a forum...
Og wrote:
gradient wrote:
Jehannum wrote:
You weren't banned, you've simply been relocated to a free speech zone.
For what reason?
Why not just admit that you don't want conservative view points on Minithink?
Isn't it just a *little* odd that the conservatives always seem to end up banned? You do whatever is necessary to get rid of them, either to make a few whining posters happy or because you can't stand to see them yourselves.how about you STFU, take your toys and go home. Talk about whiny posters. You're their god damn poster child.
you aren't going to get the ban lifted. Dry up. Stifle.
No one is forcing you to read this topic. If you'd rather not talk about the staff's dishonesty, that's fine.
They have an opportunity to show that I'm a troll and that they honestly only ban people when they deserve it.
Instead, all they have done is act childishly and make petty arguments against me, without backing up a single action they've made against me.
You'd think that if I were a troll or someone that was bad enough to be banned three times, they'd have something to post against me, to prove how offensive and disrespectful to the rules I am.
Offline
#52 2005-04-15 10:52 pm
- gradient
- Member
- Registered: 2002-04-24
- Posts: 3101
Re: When you ban a person from a forum...
Since a moderator has already come here, then the staff are aware I was going to post the email they sent me regarding my ban:
I asked why I was banned, here is the reason given:
-----------------------------------
On Saturday, November 20, 2004, at 01:01 AM, Kirk Mueller wrote:
good point. here you go:
bedstuy wrote:
gradient wrote:
They are a drain on resources and do not offer increased genetic frequencies in the population.
Obviously they should be gassed.
... or at least run over with automobiles.
-----------------------------------
So, I was banned for threatening homosexuals with violence. We see in fact that I did not threaten anyone with violence. Rather it was bedstuy who said it, albeit sarcastically:
Obviously they should be gassed.
... or at least run over with automobiles.
Then they banned me a second time for 'intolerance towards homosexuals'. Saying that the final straw was because I "suggested that homosexuals should leave the country." For asking a question related to the recent election someone asked immediately after my topic was removed.
Now, they had removed me from minithink, citing these two obviously bogus bannings and a handful of non-offensive posts in a forum where blatant flaming and insulting seems to be okay so long as it is directed towards conservatives.
Anyways, I've posted full proof of what the staff has done. The staff are free to try to counter it, but they won't, simply because they can't. I strongly suggest you let conservative posters know in advance that they aren't welcome on minithink. Thanks.
Last edited by gradient (2005-04-15 10:55 pm)
Offline
#53 2005-04-15 10:57 pm
- brendave
- Rankin and Rockin like Roger

- From: Valparaiso, IN
- Registered: 2005-01-10
- Posts: 1422
Re: When you ban a person from a forum...
Maybe they just don't feel the need to argue their points. I mean we are all here by choice and don't pay. I would say that three bans in the same place would be a wakeup. I haven't read all of your postings, but it's not as if every righty has been put into the big brother house. Hell, look at ol' Campy. He seems to be able to speak his mind without going over the line. Sure he pisses people off, but he does point/ counter point... debate style. I just think that taking this argument into the "public eye" just makes you look worse than we know you are. Humility, patience, and real communication would get you further. Don't get me wrong, I love the drama of all of this. Maybe drama doesn't solve all problems?
Last edited by brendave (2005-04-15 10:59 pm)
Offline
#54 2005-04-15 11:32 pm
- gradient
- Member
- Registered: 2002-04-24
- Posts: 3101
Re: When you ban a person from a forum...
brendave wrote:
Maybe they just don't feel the need to argue their points. I mean we are all here by choice and don't pay.
I'm not suggesting I have a right to be here. The problem is that they claim to be fair., which as I've shown, isn't true at all.
If they want to make it a liberal-moderate forum only, that's their business, although their customers will know that MacAddict has a policy against conservatives.
I would say that three bans in the same place would be a wakeup.
Wake up for whom? I hadn't done anything wrong. What's to wake up from what I'm banned for something someone else said? What's to wake up from what I'm banned for asking a question that someone else asked a few minutes after my topic was deleted? When I'm banned a third time for on the basis of this two past bannings and for some really inoffensive comments, what's to wake up to?
I haven't read all of your postings, but it's not as if every righty has been put into the big brother house. Hell, look at ol' Campy. He seems to be able to speak his mind without going over the line.
Of course, campy has also been banned, as have other conservative posters, some permanently. I can state my opinion without insulting people- but I wasn't banned for insulting people, I was banned for being conservative.
I just think that taking this argument into the "public eye" just makes you look worse than we know you are. Humility, patience, and real communication would get you further. Don't get me wrong, I love the drama of all of this. Maybe drama doesn't solve all problems?
I don't think being put on the ban list, as if I were a troll does any good for me in the public eye as well.
I have no problem bringing this out because I know I have the truth on my side.
Offline
#55 2005-04-15 11:56 pm
Re: When you ban a person from a forum...
I only have one thing to say: we're NOT STAFF. Stop referring to mods and admins as staff. We're unpaid volunteers who are helping out MacAddict by keeping the forums running and freely available to anyone. MacAddict has no "liberal policy against conservatives" and even if they did, we'd hardly be in a position to carry it out. However, keep in mind that this is a privately-owned and operated web site. Anything the owners don't want posted here can be removed at their leisure. Don't like it? Don't post. If that means you're going to beat your "I'm a repressed conservative!" drum until the sun goes down, go right ahead. It's all a matter of perspective.
Look at it this way: you've sold as many paintings as Van Gogh—and you have both your ears.
Thanks, Dad.
• www.joelschou.com • www.bothears.com • www.vault25.com • www.fuzzycoconut.com •
Offline
#56 2005-04-16 12:00 am
- brendave
- Rankin and Rockin like Roger

- From: Valparaiso, IN
- Registered: 2005-01-10
- Posts: 1422
Re: When you ban a person from a forum...
Didn't mean to offend you. Sorry for that. I know that you must be frustrated. Campy might have gotten the two week thing, I'm just saying he ain't in Brother. As I have said before, I have not read all of your threads, so I wouldn't say I am an expert on this particular issue. One would hope that a mod would say "hey.. you are going to far!", and not "it was because of his past actions." It's only mini think man. How many people do you really think you reach with mini? My suggestion is to cool down and remember why you came to this sight. Not to argue politics, but to learn more about Mac/ Apple. I've been trying to avoid mini a little more as of late for these very reasons.
Offline
#57 2005-04-16 12:01 am
- gradient
- Member
- Registered: 2002-04-24
- Posts: 3101
Re: When you ban a person from a forum...
I was referring to forum staff as staff, not magazine staff. Obviously they are not making the day-to-day decisions of the forum.
Offline
#58 2005-04-16 12:13 am
- gradient
- Member
- Registered: 2002-04-24
- Posts: 3101
Re: When you ban a person from a forum...
brendave wrote:
Didn't mean to offend you. Sorry for that.
Oh, no worries, you didn't. I'm must trying to explain my position.
I know that you must be frustrated. Campy might have gotten the two week thing, I'm just saying he ain't in Brother. As I have said before, I have not read all of your threads, so I wouldn't say I am an expert on this particular issue. One would hope that a mod would say "hey.. you are going to far!", and not "it was because of his past actions."
Absolutely, but sadly that never happened. Like with this recent ban from minithink, none of the mods deny the fact they never told me I was on the edge of getting it. They basically saw a handful of recent posts and decided they could get rid of me based on that and my two earlier bannings. I wasn't told, "gradient, you have recently pushed the edge, particularly in this post... etc, if you continue to do this, you will be removed from minithink.
Same thing with my first ban- it wasn't based on anything except the fact they thought I threatened gays. When I tried to correct them, I was completely ignored. I'm not mad they banned me for thinking I made the comment, but when I gave them links and clearly showed I never made the comment, it was someone else, I was just ignored.. that's what bothered me.
With the second, no prior warning was given. It was because of my first banning they considered me 'already warned'.
It's only mini think man. How many people do you really think you reach with mini? My suggestion is to cool down and remember why you came to this sight. Not to argue politics, but to learn more about Mac/ Apple. I've been trying to avoid mini a little more as of late for these very reasons.
Well, I go to mini to get viewpoints and information I can't get anywhere else. I'm not out to change the world, just have a discussion with people with a different set of views.
What I don't like is that after 3 years of being here, all I get is my nick on a ban list as if I were a troll. I'm honestly not out to offend anyone. If ANY of my posts offend someone, even slightly, I'd hope they'd let me know so I could apologize if necessary or remove it.
That's all I asked of the staff, I'm honestly not a bad guy.
Last edited by gradient (2005-04-16 12:14 am)
Offline
#59 2005-04-16 12:31 am
- brendave
- Rankin and Rockin like Roger

- From: Valparaiso, IN
- Registered: 2005-01-10
- Posts: 1422
Re: When you ban a person from a forum...
Maybe "wake-up call" was a bit rash. But I really don't believe that the mods are politically motivated. I've seen them defend Campy when all the lefties were asking for his head. Not saying that you are wrong, but the law, any law, is what the person with authority says is the law at the time of the infraction. If you live to post on mini, then I would suggest that you try to resolve this in the future with the mods. I really (nothing against you) believe that dragging it out here is not helping. Polarization only makes for bad neighbors.
Offline
#60 2005-04-16 6:51 am
- kamizuno
- Poking you with a stick

- From: Smileytown
- Registered: 1999-07-13
- Posts: 1987
Re: When you ban a person from a forum...
This is just IMO, but I think permaBB"ing is a bit harsh, there should be some sort of parole system set up so that someone on BB can gain reentry into minithink. And I can see Grad's point, some people on mini have routinely called others smurfing nutjobs and smurf and nothing has been done to them, if that was a criteria for BB then there should be dozens of people in BB, not just 5. Anyway, the mods and admins on this board seem like good kinda people, I'm sure something will be worked out eventually 
PS-I think paroling would work because the threat of permaBB"ing is pretty potent, I know I would be crawling the walls if I were permaBB'ed
And yes, I know that means I have no real social life
no need to rub it in.
Last edited by kamizuno (2005-04-16 7:02 am)
Offline
#61 2005-04-16 7:28 am
- gradient
- Member
- Registered: 2002-04-24
- Posts: 3101
Re: When you ban a person from a forum...
brendave wrote:
Maybe "wake-up call" was a bit rash. But I really don't believe that the mods are politically motivated.
Perhaps not deliberately, no. What I do know is that a disproportionate amount of conservatives end up banned, while some of the left-leaning poster routinely attack and insult members and nothing happens.
Sometimes personal bias causes us to give others chances, while completely ignoring others, as was my case in the first ban.
If you live to post on mini, then I would suggest that you try to resolve this in the future with the mods. I really (nothing against you) believe that dragging it out here is not helping. Polarization only makes for bad neighbors.
Well, I'm certainly not trying to polarize anything. This isn't about liberal vs. conservative, so much as it is about getting feedback from moderators before these sorts of issues come up.
If they let me post in minithink in the future again, I can assure you that I would calm down the tone of my post, even if I'm being treated like utter garbage. I didn't think there was a problem with my tone, given what I've seen moderators post and what is allowed there on a regular basis. Had I known they wanted me to, I would have. It is just that only know it seems to be an issue, but not with some of the other posters...
I just wish I had the chance to, as you point out, resolve any issues with the moderators.
Last edited by gradient (2005-04-16 7:31 am)
Offline
#62 2005-04-16 10:05 am
Re: When you ban a person from a forum...
gradient wrote:
What I don't like is that after 3 years of being here, all I get is my nick on a ban list as if I were a troll.
You are one. Any time you come into MiniThink to post, you stir up crap without contributing. You incite trouble then pretend to be surprised when people respond negatively.
Camp David has been mentioned here. He's been banned several times for various reasons - and from all appearances he's learned his lesson and is not getting himself into trouble anymore. Even when he was going over the line it was apparent that he was making posts with content in them. VERY conservative content. Content I can't disagree with more. Content that he continues to post to this day, but without going over the line of threatening anyone or advocating violence.
And he's only the most extreme example, because he tends to hold the most extreme views and because he's reformed his manner of expression of those views. We've got conservatives on the forums who don't get themselves banned because they manage to be civil, and *gasp* they make posts with content 9 times out of 10 instead of the other way around.
But if you want it, you got it.
1) Don't be a jerk (DBAJ)
- The MacAddict forums-wide edition of
Offline
#63 2005-04-16 10:10 am
Offline
#64 2005-04-16 10:13 am
Re: When you ban a person from a forum...
maxintosh wrote:
What's the Big Brother usergroup?
A special usergroup that bans people from posting in the Ministry of Free Thought, but not from posting in the rest of the forums.
Introduced here.
(We're thinking of changing the name of it to "The Free Speech Zone," because poor BenightedBastard dies a little inside each time someone gets 'bb'ed.')
Offline
#65 2005-04-16 11:44 am
- gradient
- Member
- Registered: 2002-04-24
- Posts: 3101
Re: When you ban a person from a forum...
Oatmeal, I see nothing offensive in what I'm saying, certainly nothing in comparion to what the staff here have posted and what you allow.
Pointing out one of my posts and how it is unrelated to the original post, I guess you would like it to appear as if I derail topics? Try reading over them for once.
I incite flamewars only for having my opinions, while you promote and further the agenda of the handful of posters who bait and attack posters. Those flamewars are your own doing, not mine.
6) No direct personal threats.
- No threats of death, bodily harm, theft, harm of family or friends, etc.
- No threats against elected officials.
This is one that's had you banned before. Previous offenses make current penalties stiffer.
I can't believe you brought this up after I just went over this. Read post #52
I never threatened anyone.
The original post went like this:
bedstuy wrote:
gradient wrote:
They are a drain on resources and do not offer increased genetic frequencies in the population.Obviously they should be gassed.
... or at least run over with automobiles.
But thank you for admitting that you are making current penalties for me stiffer for what bedstuy said.
Last edited by gradient (2005-04-16 11:46 am)
Offline
#66 2005-04-16 11:56 am
- gradient
- Member
- Registered: 2002-04-24
- Posts: 3101
Re: When you ban a person from a forum...
maxintosh wrote:
What's the Big Brother usergroup?
A group they made it make it perfectly clear they don't want some people to express their politicals views.
Minithink is the politics forum and just happens to have its own blacklist.
Last edited by gradient (2005-04-16 11:58 am)
Offline
#67 2005-04-16 12:02 pm
- Og
- Member

- From: Ha!
- Registered: 2002-01-18
- Posts: 5133
Re: When you ban a person from a forum...
gradient wrote:
No one is forcing you to read this topic.
Of course not. That's pretty stupid of you. See, the beauty of this is that we get to read any damn thing we want and respond to it.
So happens, I'm enjoying watching you make a complete monkey's ass out of yourself.
From what I can see, you've been provided with plenty of evidence. Remember, we're in the "kinder, gentler" MAF now (what I might refer to as MAF Lite. Half the calories, none of the flavor of the old MAF
.) Something you as a conservative should appreciate. Or are you not a "compassionate conservative"? Clearly you're not, based on the evidence presented to support your bannage. Not that I ever believed there was such a thing. And here you are proving that for all of us.
Whatever you are, it's clear that your greatest trait is that of being a 'tard.
I also doubt your claim of being a mod on some mega-huge/important/whatever BB. Your behavior here doesn't support that assertion.
please don't come back to 54
tito
Offline
#68 2005-04-16 12:05 pm
- Og
- Member

- From: Ha!
- Registered: 2002-01-18
- Posts: 5133
Re: When you ban a person from a forum...
gradient wrote:
The original post went like this:
bedstuy wrote:
gradient wrote:
They are a drain on resources and do not offer increased genetic frequencies in the population.Obviously they should be gassed.
... or at least run over with automobiles.But thank you for admitting that you are making current penalties for me stiffer for what bedstuy said.
So, not up on satire, are you? Not much for sarcasm and irony?
please don't come back to 54
tito
Offline
#69 2005-04-16 12:09 pm
- gradient
- Member
- Registered: 2002-04-24
- Posts: 3101
Re: When you ban a person from a forum...
Og wrote:
gradient wrote:
No one is forcing you to read this topic.
Of course not. That's pretty stupid of you. See, the beauty of this is that we get to read any damn thing we want and respond to it.
So happens, I'm enjoying watching you make a complete monkey's ass out of yourself.
I've certainly enjoyed watching you do the same by contributing nothing.
All they had done was shown how out of the loop they are, when oatmeal tried to use something they did wrong against me, against me again.
From what I can see, you've been provided with plenty of evidence. Remember, we're in the "kinder, gentler" MAF now (what I might refer to as MAF Lite. Half the calories, none of the flavor of the old MAF
.) Something you as a conservative should appreciate. Or are you not a "compassionate conservative"? Clearly you're not, based on the evidence presented to support your bannage. Not that I ever believed there was such a thing. And here you are proving that for all of us.
Try actually going to minithink.
I also doubt your claim of being a mod on some mega-huge/important/whatever BB. Your behavior here doesn't support that assertion.
I didn't say important, just one of the largest ones. But that doesn't really matter- the point of bringing it up was that most places give reasons for bannings. They don't, because they have none.
They didn't give me a reason. They put my on the list of "people whose politics we don't welcome here".
Offline
#70 2005-04-16 12:11 pm
- gradient
- Member
- Registered: 2002-04-24
- Posts: 3101
Re: When you ban a person from a forum...
Og wrote:
gradient wrote:
The original post went like this:
bedstuy wrote:
Obviously they should be gassed.
... or at least run over with automobiles.But thank you for admitting that you are making current penalties for me stiffer for what bedstuy said.
So, not up on satire, are you? Not much for sarcasm and irony?
Honestly Og, I don't think he was being sarcastic.
Offline
#71 2005-04-16 12:12 pm
- jax
- Teh God Of Awesomeness

- From: Lego Death Star
- Registered: 2003-10-03
- Posts: 2307
Re: When you ban a person from a forum...
gradient wrote:
maxintosh wrote:
What's the Big Brother usergroup?
A group they made it make it perfectly clear they don't want some people to express their politicals views.
Minithink is the politics forum and just happens to have its own blacklist.
The irony of that last part is just too rich.
Here's more linkage;
http://www.macaddict.com/forums/topic/57334
Let everybody read through this gem and decide for themselves. It may be better than just painting one's self into a corner so to speak.
In the end, we will remember not the words of our enemies, but the silence of our friends.
-Martin Luther King, Jr.
Offline
#72 2005-04-16 12:15 pm
- gradient
- Member
- Registered: 2002-04-24
- Posts: 3101
Re: When you ban a person from a forum...
Thanks jax for pointing out business as usual in minithink.
Here what I posted, follow SS's typical anti-American rant about how we are all idiots in a corrupt culture (go see, it's there):
Because your healthcare system sucks and doesn't look appealing either.
We can have our crappy system or your system and it seems Americans prefer ours.
How totally awful that guy is actually making money. How dare he!
Everyone should get paid the same and have zero ambition as a result. Isn't that what you liberals are all about?
But, here is what I got:
Would you please shut the f*ck up with your anti-liberal bullsh*it. God damn, you're like a broken record.
There is a problem with the health care in this country. Either attempt to be a part of figuring out the solution, or sit on the sidelines and keep to your mypoic self. I don't care which one you choose.
Just choose.
Offline
#73 2005-04-16 12:18 pm
- gradient
- Member
- Registered: 2002-04-24
- Posts: 3101
Re: When you ban a person from a forum...
Thus, a rant about how Americans are idiots- okay
"Would you please shut the f*ck up with your anti-liberal bullsh*it. God damn, you're like a broken record. "- okay
Someone disagreeing- not okay
Offline
#74 2005-04-16 12:22 pm
- jax
- Teh God Of Awesomeness

- From: Lego Death Star
- Registered: 2003-10-03
- Posts: 2307
Re: When you ban a person from a forum...
Dude, I posted a link to the whole thread. If anyone cares they can read the whole thing. You're not really helping yourself at this point. You also were taking shots at others on another thread at about the same time, but that's already been posted. Anyway, doesn't really matter to me either way. I don't have a problem with the new 'kinder gentler' minithink. Most others don't either, the bottom line is it's okay if you don't agree with someone, but you don't need to throw insults and accuse people of being communists or nazi sympathizers (which I believe you did in fact do in so many words in that very thread). Like I said, not my problem, not my job. I just thought I'd contribute to this thread with one of my 'personal favorites' with the above mentioned link.
In the end, we will remember not the words of our enemies, but the silence of our friends.
-Martin Luther King, Jr.
Offline
#75 2005-04-16 12:29 pm
- gradient
- Member
- Registered: 2002-04-24
- Posts: 3101
Re: When you ban a person from a forum...
jax, this was at the same time I was told how much of a neo-con I was and loved Bush, which isn't true. Context- I was giving what I had been given by THOSE posters.
Most importantly, I hadn't received any prior warnings about it.
I didn't call anyone a Nazi, socialist sure (in response to what I was being called, but not Nazi).
Offline
