Forums | MacLife
You are not logged in.
#51 2006-01-05 1:54 am
- KingFred
- is enjoying his status as
- Royal Wombat

- Registered: 2002-05-09
- Posts: 7541
Re: O'Reilly, misinformation, and 'Brokeback Mountain'
Or shepherds.
Exploring the intertubes
Offline
#52 2006-01-05 2:04 am
- Duke Stratosphere
- Winter Rebel

- From: Iowa
- Registered: 2003-12-10
- Posts: 3731
- Website
Re: O'Reilly, misinformation, and 'Brokeback Mountain'
Anyone who really thinks this is the first movie about gay cowboys hasn't seen Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid. They weren't strictly gay, I guess, but I saw it for the 10th time last night on TV and it looked like a bisexual threesome going on there to me.
Last edited by Duke Stratosphere (2006-01-05 2:05 am)
"Make the most of the hemp seed. Sow it everywhere." --George Washington (No party)
Offline
#53 2006-01-05 3:27 am
- AAPL Shareholder
- Hacking my iPod

- From: Bay Area
- Registered: 1999-02-22
- Posts: 2949
- Website
Re: O'Reilly, misinformation, and 'Brokeback Mountain'
Really, there's a whole lot about the "western" culture that's really really ambiguously gay. But it's not necessarily Castro St gay... it's Folsom St gay.
Leather, horses, tight pants, big belts, the occasional mustache, manly men with 5 O'clock shadows, plaid, etc.
I think being reminded of this really freaks out the bible belt homophobes 
"Hi, Tracy." I declared warmly. "It's me. Tek Jansen."
Offline
#54 2006-01-05 3:39 am
- XYZ
- Banned

- Registered: 2000-07-03
- Posts: 10881
Re: O'Reilly, misinformation, and 'Brokeback Mountain'
Stereotypically gay. I'm not into any of those things, nor am I attracted to the Castro street stuff. Mustaches are, very rarely, an improvement for a man's face. Most men, though, look better without much facial hair. Older men who shave sometimes look weird to me, though, like they're young men who have some terrible problem that caused their face to deform. Yes, aging sucks. Facial hair probably looks more natural to me for older men because my father had a beard and mustache. He shaved it once and it made his face look angry and sharp.
there's really no need for all of this
Offline
#55 2006-01-05 8:12 am
- Sternum
- Slathered in barbecue sauce

- From: Ribcage
- Registered: 2002-01-10
- Posts: 3349
Re: O'Reilly, misinformation, and 'Brokeback Mountain'
Considering that you're a huge Marvel comics zombie, Duke, I'm surprised you aren't a regular reader of The Rawhide Kid — the original gay cowboy ("Slap leather!").
Offline
#56 2006-01-05 9:00 am
Re: O'Reilly, misinformation, and 'Brokeback Mountain'
Duke Stratosphere wrote:
Anyone who really thinks this is the first movie about gay cowboys hasn't seen Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid. They weren't strictly gay, I guess, but I saw it for the 10th time last night on TV and it looked like a bisexual threesome going on there to me.
You've already shown that your gadar doesn't work.
It's a paradox of how sharply dull I am.
Offline
#57 2006-01-05 9:08 am
Re: O'Reilly, misinformation, and 'Brokeback Mountain'
AAPL Shareholder wrote:
Eventually the homophobes shut up when then movie dropped out of the limelight.
How courteous of them.
"Live with your head in the lion's mouth. I want you to overcome 'em with yeses, undermine 'em with grins, agree 'em to death and destruction, let 'em swoller you till they vomit or bust wide open." -Ralph Ellison
"Overpower, overcome" -Cro-Mags
Offline
#58 2006-01-05 10:42 am
- bedstuy
- Archimandrite, Eastern Elite

- From: King Cole Bar, St. Regis Hotel
- Registered: 2003-09-20
- Posts: 13623
Re: O'Reilly, misinformation, and 'Brokeback Mountain'
Need I remind all of you that the "leather man" look is merely a form of drag? Conceptually speaking of course. They'd deny it though thoroughly but it's still a form of drag.
Also, in today's urban black world there's a new form of drag that manifests itself in a "thug/gangsta" look for some. They look like your average corner drug dealer until they open their mouths.
Offline
#59 2006-01-05 10:48 am
- bratboy
- laden with emotion
- Royal Wombat

- From: Austin, Texas
- Registered: 2003-01-19
- Posts: 34106
Re: O'Reilly, misinformation, and 'Brokeback Mountain'
bedstuy wrote:
Need I remind all of you that the "leather man" look is merely a form of drag? Conceptually speaking of course. They'd deny it though thoroughly but it's still a form of drag.
Also, in today's urban black world there's a new form of drag that manifests itself in a "thug/gangsta" look for some. They look like your average corner drug dealer until they open their mouths.

"One thing we've learned is there's a difference between being disappointed and having madmen in authority."
--Paul Krugman
Offline
#60 2006-01-05 11:17 am
- bedstuy
- Archimandrite, Eastern Elite

- From: King Cole Bar, St. Regis Hotel
- Registered: 2003-09-20
- Posts: 13623
Re: O'Reilly, misinformation, and 'Brokeback Mountain'
bratboy wrote:
bedstuy wrote:
Need I remind all of you that the "leather man" look is merely a form of drag? Conceptually speaking of course. They'd deny it though thoroughly but it's still a form of drag.
Also, in today's urban black world there's a new form of drag that manifests itself in a "thug/gangsta" look for some. They look like your average corner drug dealer until they open their mouths.
what?
Offline
#61 2006-01-05 11:19 am
- bratboy
- laden with emotion
- Royal Wombat

- From: Austin, Texas
- Registered: 2003-01-19
- Posts: 34106
Re: O'Reilly, misinformation, and 'Brokeback Mountain'
bedstuy wrote:
bratboy wrote:
bedstuy wrote:
Need I remind all of you that the "leather man" look is merely a form of drag? Conceptually speaking of course. They'd deny it though thoroughly but it's still a form of drag.
Also, in today's urban black world there's a new form of drag that manifests itself in a "thug/gangsta" look for some. They look like your average corner drug dealer until they open their mouths.
what?
I realized that I had misread your post after I responded, but then I forgot about that and went and did something else.
I initially thought your post was talking about the gay "urban black world."
"One thing we've learned is there's a difference between being disappointed and having madmen in authority."
--Paul Krugman
Offline
#62 2006-01-05 11:21 am
- bedstuy
- Archimandrite, Eastern Elite

- From: King Cole Bar, St. Regis Hotel
- Registered: 2003-09-20
- Posts: 13623
Re: O'Reilly, misinformation, and 'Brokeback Mountain'
bratboy wrote:
bedstuy wrote:
bratboy wrote:
what?
I realized that I had misread your post after I responded, but then I forgot about that and went and did something else.
I initially thought your post was talking about the gay "urban black world."
oh... sorry. I *was* referencing the gay urban black world.
Offline
#63 2006-01-05 11:27 am
- KingFred
- is enjoying his status as
- Royal Wombat

- Registered: 2002-05-09
- Posts: 7541
Re: O'Reilly, misinformation, and 'Brokeback Mountain'
bedstuy wrote:
Need I remind all of you that the "leather man" look is merely a form of drag? Conceptually speaking of course. They'd deny it though thoroughly but it's still a form of drag.
Also, in today's urban black world there's a new form of drag that manifests itself in a "thug/gangsta" look for some. They look like your average corner drug dealer until they open their mouths.
Depends on your definition of "drag" though, doesn't it? If you mean "clothing typical of one sex worn by a person of the opposite sex -- often used in the phrase in drag" [www.m-w.com] then no since no gender crossing is intended. If you mean a more relaxed definition as in putting on a "costume" to exhibit a character you do not actually possess, then that may be equally applied to leather, gansta, business suits, grunge, church lady, "jeans and a t-shirt" and much more. Clothing as an affectation, in other words, regardless of gender.
At some point then ALL clothing is "drag".
Exploring the intertubes
Offline
#64 2006-01-05 11:31 am
Re: O'Reilly, misinformation, and 'Brokeback Mountain'
bedstuy wrote:
bratboy wrote:
bedstuy wrote:
what?I realized that I had misread your post after I responded, but then I forgot about that and went and did something else.
I initially thought your post was talking about the gay "urban black world."oh... sorry. I *was* referencing the gay urban black world.
I think its now fair to say that you live in a completely different world from me.
It's a paradox of how sharply dull I am.
Offline
#65 2006-01-05 11:32 am
- bedstuy
- Archimandrite, Eastern Elite

- From: King Cole Bar, St. Regis Hotel
- Registered: 2003-09-20
- Posts: 13623
Re: O'Reilly, misinformation, and 'Brokeback Mountain'
KingFred wrote:
bedstuy wrote:
Need I remind all of you that the "leather man" look is merely a form of drag? Conceptually speaking of course. They'd deny it though thoroughly but it's still a form of drag.
Also, in today's urban black world there's a new form of drag that manifests itself in a "thug/gangsta" look for some. They look like your average corner drug dealer until they open their mouths.Depends on your definition of "drag" though, doesn't it? If you mean "clothing typical of one sex worn by a person of the opposite sex -- often used in the phrase in drag" [www.m-w.com] then no since no gender crossing is intended. If you mean a more relaxed definition as in putting on a "costume" to exhibit a character you do not actually possess, then that may be equally applied to leather, gansta, business suits, grunge, church lady, "jeans and a t-shirt" and much more. Clothing as an affectation, in other words, regardless of gender.
At some point then ALL clothing is "drag".
It's a matter of degrees and intent. But yeah, I think "drag" can encompass more than than the usual "cross dressing." Think of Paris Is Burning and the Butch Queen category as merely one example.
Offline
#66 2006-01-05 11:33 am
- bedstuy
- Archimandrite, Eastern Elite

- From: King Cole Bar, St. Regis Hotel
- Registered: 2003-09-20
- Posts: 13623
Re: O'Reilly, misinformation, and 'Brokeback Mountain'
kb5zhh wrote:
bedstuy wrote:
bratboy wrote:
I realized that I had misread your post after I responded, but then I forgot about that and went and did something else.
I initially thought your post was talking about the gay "urban black world."oh... sorry. I *was* referencing the gay urban black world.
I think its now fair to say that you live in a completely different world from me.
Assuredly.
Offline
#67 2006-01-05 11:34 am
- bratboy
- laden with emotion
- Royal Wombat

- From: Austin, Texas
- Registered: 2003-01-19
- Posts: 34106
Re: O'Reilly, misinformation, and 'Brokeback Mountain'
bedstuy wrote:
bratboy wrote:
bedstuy wrote:
what?I realized that I had misread your post after I responded, but then I forgot about that and went and did something else.
I initially thought your post was talking about the gay "urban black world."oh... sorry. I *was* referencing the gay urban black world.
Then I stand by my
!
"One thing we've learned is there's a difference between being disappointed and having madmen in authority."
--Paul Krugman
Offline
#68 2006-01-05 11:38 am
- bedstuy
- Archimandrite, Eastern Elite

- From: King Cole Bar, St. Regis Hotel
- Registered: 2003-09-20
- Posts: 13623
Re: O'Reilly, misinformation, and 'Brokeback Mountain'
bratboy wrote:
bedstuy wrote:
bratboy wrote:
I realized that I had misread your post after I responded, but then I forgot about that and went and did something else.
I initially thought your post was talking about the gay "urban black world."oh... sorry. I *was* referencing the gay urban black world.
Then I stand by my
!
What's so shocking? Do you not have this in Illinois?
If you really want some fun I know a bathhouse in Harlem that's been there for almost a century (right across from Rev. Sharpton's offices!) that's completely gay. And no, I've not gone.
Offline
#69 2006-01-05 11:40 am
- bratboy
- laden with emotion
- Royal Wombat

- From: Austin, Texas
- Registered: 2003-01-19
- Posts: 34106
Re: O'Reilly, misinformation, and 'Brokeback Mountain'
bedstuy wrote:
What's so shocking? Do you not have this in Illinois?
If you really want some fun I know a bathhouse in Harlem that's been there for almost a century (right across from Rev. Sharpton's offices!) that's completely gay. And no, I've not gone.
Well, I live in Indiana.
But now that I think of it, I suppose I have seen something of the sort at some of the bars in Kentucky (I don't go often because I don't like them, but my bf does).
"One thing we've learned is there's a difference between being disappointed and having madmen in authority."
--Paul Krugman
Offline
#70 2006-01-05 12:47 pm
- Sternum
- Slathered in barbecue sauce

- From: Ribcage
- Registered: 2002-01-10
- Posts: 3349
Re: O'Reilly, misinformation, and 'Brokeback Mountain'
Are we talking about the "down low"?
Offline
#71 2006-01-05 1:27 pm
- Duke Stratosphere
- Winter Rebel

- From: Iowa
- Registered: 2003-12-10
- Posts: 3731
- Website
Re: O'Reilly, misinformation, and 'Brokeback Mountain'
Sternum wrote:
Considering that you're a huge Marvel comics zombie, Duke, I'm surprised you aren't a regular reader of The Rawhide Kid — the original gay cowboy ("Slap leather!").
I had no idea. I just subscribe to the Avengers these days and don't even go to comic book shops any more. I guess this kills the idea that Daredevil is one of the Rawhide Kid's descendants.
"Make the most of the hemp seed. Sow it everywhere." --George Washington (No party)
Offline
#72 2006-01-05 2:08 pm
- bedstuy
- Archimandrite, Eastern Elite

- From: King Cole Bar, St. Regis Hotel
- Registered: 2003-09-20
- Posts: 13623
Re: O'Reilly, misinformation, and 'Brokeback Mountain'
Sternum wrote:
Are we talking about the "down low"?
Somewhat. But "down low" isn't always about "banjee realness" though often they go together. I can generally clock them tough.
Oh... you breeders probably don't know what "clocking" is!
Offline
#74 2006-01-05 3:01 pm
- Farmerkev
- Official Dementor
- Moderator
- Registered: 2003-01-03
- Posts: 18617
Re: O'Reilly, misinformation, and 'Brokeback Mountain'
kb5zhh wrote:
bedstuy wrote:
snip
:Covers my innocent ears and stares going lalalalalalalala:
Are you sure you're coving the right areas?
Do your part to combat global warming.
Eat a cow.
Offline
#75 2006-01-05 4:03 pm
- iBubba
- Displaced

- From: central Iowa
- Registered: 2000-10-06
- Posts: 7109
Re: O'Reilly, misinformation, and 'Brokeback Mountain'
KingFred wrote:
bedstuy wrote:
Need I remind all of you that the "leather man" look is merely a form of drag? Conceptually speaking of course. They'd deny it though thoroughly but it's still a form of drag.
Also, in today's urban black world there's a new form of drag that manifests itself in a "thug/gangsta" look for some. They look like your average corner drug dealer until they open their mouths.Depends on your definition of "drag" though, doesn't it? If you mean "clothing typical of one sex worn by a person of the opposite sex -- often used in the phrase in drag" [www.m-w.com] then no since no gender crossing is intended. If you mean a more relaxed definition as in putting on a "costume" to exhibit a character you do not actually possess, then that may be equally applied to leather, gansta, business suits, grunge, church lady, "jeans and a t-shirt" and much more. Clothing as an affectation, in other words, regardless of gender.
At some point then ALL clothing is "drag".
Did you say "grunge?"
:digs out "stompers" and flannel:
"Hell, I'm sure Og had some cool way of banging two rocks together, until he took himself too seriously."
- Pithecanthropus
Offline
