Forums | MacLife

Wow that entire statemend is nothing but drivel, pure Drivel.

So we will attack Iran, an a nation that has seen a swweeping cultural change over the last decade, with semi-pro west atitudes in the population, not necicarilly an attitude liked by the government, which of itself poses no threat what-so-ever.

How bout Korea? A starving nation that would not hesitate to Nuke Tokyo, one of the Densest, most modern cites in the world?  What possible reason could we have for basing planes there?  Maybe because we have always done that? Don't forget the Large amount of people who live Very close to the DMZ on both sides...

And those 5 carrier groups?  Has nothing to do with the Defence of Kuwait? Or the fact that we need to cover ALL of Iraq? No...

it's BestBuy/CompUSA

This routine is getting old. I make a thoughful post, or perhaps start an interesting new thread, and king fred quickly follows up with a post warning the forum goers not to read my theories or browse through my assorted literature on this forum. Experts agree that the forum goers deserve the right to read my prose free from harassment by king fred, thus allowing the readers the opportunity to decide for themselves the merit of my doctrine.

king fred, you're always following me. You're remind me of a bad act following a virtuoso performance, and you're simply hurting yourself. My view is that you might want to start following a lesser forum goer, perhaps brat boy. That way you'll come across as an intelligent person.

Oddly, I must side with Best Buy here. Don't be jerks guys, there's nothing trollish about this post.

Oddly, I must side with Best Buy here. Don't be jerks guys, there's nothing trollish about this post.

Note I did say: "...I doubt there's been more than a small handfull that actually were worth thinking about" which means I acknowledge he's managed to grovel above his typical trollish level on a FEW RARE occasions. So I wasn't being 100% nasty.

nothing trollish, just too much glue-sniffing

well, he's entitled to his opinion, regardless of the chemical inbalance that causes it.

Oddly, I must side with Best Buy here. Don't be jerks guys, there's nothing trollish about this post.

Thanks, NB, for the support. I know that in recent days you've supported the fundamental merits of several of my threads, and have taken lots of heat as a result.

Back to the topic:
My thought is that the DMZ has actually weakened greatly on the North Korean side over the last two years. Moral is low, and concentrated bombing in the region would result in disorientation on the part of the North Korean army. If done correctly, I predict a 15% loss in US aircraft.

Bestbuy wrote:

If done correctly, I predict a 15% loss in US aircraft.

How do you estimate this? Do you have specs on the NK SAM defences? Their  stategy? And why would we want to bomb the DMZ anyway? So we can blow up all the mines?

You leave many holes Bestbuy.

My theory is based on the fact that most of NK's forces are concentrated above the DMZ. Fast and overwhelming strikes in this vicinity would incapacitate the majority of NK forces. The key is to remove NK's heavy artillery quickly so that Seol is unthreatened.

I think if any nation created a ICBM named Long-Dong we'd have to surrender to them, simply out of their superior coolness.

The thought of a two front war, Iraq and NK, has indeed crossed my mind.  If done properly it might avoid later problems dealing with NK's nukes.  If not I shudder to think of the implications.

Oddly, I must side with Best Buy here. Don't be jerks guys, there's nothing trollish about this post.

An example of NeutronBomb's wicked sense of humour.

Best Buy wrote

I've developed a new theory based on recent positioning of US forces: I now believe that the USA is going to simultaneously strike Iraq, Iran, and North Korea.

We are not attacking France this time around?

just watch out for the dog poo all over the streets