Quantcast

Forums | MacLife

You are not logged in.

#1 2003-02-12 10:10 am

registered_user
bulletproof
From: padding: zero-pixels;
Registered: 2000-12-19
Posts: 16026
Website

Simple Tax Analogy

I got this over a email a few months ago, and I thought I'd share it with you folks.

How Taxes Work

This is a VERY simple way to understand the tax laws. Read on - it does make you think.

Let's put tax cuts in terms everyone can understand. Suppose that every day, ten men go out for dinner. The bill for all ten Comes to $100. If they paid their bill the way we pay our taxes, it would go something like this:

The first four men -- the poorest -- would pay nothing; the fifth would pay $1, the sixth would pay $3, the seventh $7, the eighth $12, the ninth $18, and the tenth man -- the richest -- would pay $59.  That's what they decided to do. The ten men ate dinner in the restaurant every day and seemed quite happy with the arrangement -- until one day, the owner threw them a curve (in tax language a tax cut). Since you are all such good customers, he said, I'm going to reduce the cost of your daily meal by $20. So now dinner for the ten only cost $80.00. 

The group still wanted to pay their bill the way we pay our taxes. So the first four men were unaffected. They would still eat for free. But what about the other six -- the paying customers? How could They divvy up the $20 windfall so that everyone would get his fair share?  The six men realized that $20 divided by six is $3.33. But if they subtracted that from everybody's share, Then the fifth man and The sixth man would end up being PAID to eat their meal. So the restaurant owner suggested that it would be fair to reduce each man's bill by roughly the same amount, and he proceeded to work out the amounts each should pay.  And so the fifth man paid nothing, the sixth pitched in $2, the seventh paid $5, the eighth paid $9, the ninth paid $12, leaving the tenth man with a bill of $52 instead of his earlier $59. Each of the six was better off than before. And the first four continued to eat for free. 

But once outside the restaurant, the men began to compare their savings. I only got a dollar out of the $20, declared the sixth man, but he, pointing to the tenth. But he got $7! Yeah, that's right, exclaimed the fifth man, I only saved a dollar, too, ........It's unfair that he got seven times more than me!  That's true! shouted the seventh man, why should he get $7 back when I got only $2? The wealthy get all the breaks! Wait a minute, yelled the first four men in unison, We didn't get anything at all. The system exploits the poor!  The nine men surrounded the tenth and beat him up. The next night he didn't show up for dinner, so the nine sat down and ate without him. But when it came time to pay the bill, they discovered, a little late what was very important. They were FIFTY-TWO DOLLARS short of paying the bill!  Imagine that! 

And that, boys and girls, journalists and college instructors, is how the tax system works. The people who pay the highest taxes get the most benefit from a tax reduction. Tax them too much, attack them for being wealthy, and they just may not show up at the table anymore.  Where would that leave the rest? Unfortunately, most taxing authorities anywhere cannot seem to grasp this rather straight-forward logic!

Offline

 

#2 2003-02-12 10:12 am

ShnickyShnack
::: title edited due to Satanic influences :::
From: Rockin' out
Registered: 2001-05-25
Posts: 22237

Re: Simple Tax Analogy

Didn't someone post this here already?


Note: please delete this post.

Offline

 

#3 2003-02-12 10:15 am

The Great Prophet Omega
Member
Registered: 2001-09-18
Posts: 2211

Re: Simple Tax Analogy

Macul posted it.


I am the great and powerfull OZ! Pay no attention to the man behind that curtain!

Offline

 

#4 2003-02-12 10:23 am

Dragula
Member
Registered: 2002-05-17
Posts: 1291

Re: Simple Tax Analogy

Good example of why income taxes are biased and unbalanced.  A federal sales tax would be a lot better, it's just harder to figure out tax returns.  neutral


Dead I am the dog, hound of hell you cry. Devil on your back, I can never die...

Offline

 

#5 2003-02-12 10:40 am

registered_user
bulletproof
From: padding: zero-pixels;
Registered: 2000-12-19
Posts: 16026
Website

Re: Simple Tax Analogy

Macul posted it.

dammit. mad    Oh well, there are some users that could certainly use a redux. big_smile

Offline

 

#6 2003-02-12 10:41 am

macul
Member
From: Jacksonville, Florida, U.S.A.
Registered: 2001-09-19
Posts: 1910

Re: Simple Tax Analogy

Macul posted it.

dammit. mad    Oh well, there are some users that could certainly use a redux. big_smile

hahahahhahahaha!  Get with the times!    tongue


If you think health care is expensive now, wait until you see what it costs when it's free.
--P.J. O'Rourke

A liberal is someone who feels a great debt to his fellow man, which debt he proposes to pay off with your money.
--G. Gordon Liddy

Offline

 

#7 2003-02-12 11:43 am

Sternum
Slathered in barbecue sauce
From: Ribcage
Registered: 2002-01-10
Posts: 3349

Re: Simple Tax Analogy

And that, boys and girls, journalists and college instructors, is how the tax system works. The people who pay the highest taxes get the most benefit from a tax reduction. Tax them too much, attack them for being wealthy, and they just may not show up at the table anymore.  Where would that leave the rest? Unfortunately, most taxing authorities anywhere cannot seem to grasp this rather straight-forward logic!

An amusing story and an apt description of how our tax system works. However, I think it should also mention that man number ten owns 74% percent of the available wealth* in the in the town they live, and that men one through five basically have nothing. Assuming that each man spends a similar amount of money to maintain his lifestyle -- give or take a few dollars -- it makes more sense to charge more money of out man number ten's reserve.

Likewise, in order to keep the town's economy active, the restaurant wants to keep as much money in circulation as possible. Since men five through nine spend the majority of their income on lifestyle expenses, it also makes sense to give them the highest percentage of return. That way, all of the money returned is immediately put back into the system. Man number ten's lifestyle expenses aren't proportionately higher than the other men, despite his massive income, so it is unlikely that his return would fuel the system as effectively as the other four men.

All-in-all, the restaurant didn't establish it's pricing policy with the intent of punishing the rich, but rather to maintain the welfare of the town overall. In the end, if the economy crashes due to an over-polarization of wealth, all ten men are screwed, and their money, regardless of how much they happened to have, becomes worthless.

* - Understanding the U.S. Distribution of Wealth, published by the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis in its Spring 1997 Quarterly Review

Offline

 

Board footer

Powered by PunBB 1.2.6
© Copyright 2002–2005 Rickard Andersson