Forums | MacLife

KingFred wrote:

XYZ wrote:

KingFred wrote:

Dude, the topic derailed on page one. Gah.

It wasn't locked on page one. It was locked on page 20 or so.

So why didn't you complain about that on page one?

I was rebutting your point. By your logic, the topic should have been locked on page 1. It wasn't.

XYZ wrote:

The topic was doing just fine.

XYZ wrote:

The topic was spammed.

_Nik

Chickenhawk wrote:

XYZ wrote:

Farmerkev wrote:

You asked for a link that the other gays here don't like you.
Moron provided it.
No lie.

I will not apologize to you for anything with the way you constantly misread and twist everything said.

Mo'ron posted a link to another forum, pretending that I've been there, and you continued the charade for many posts after I asked you not to. You chose to continue the lie and spam the topic.

http://clubhouse54.com/forums/profile.p … &u=424

If someone is impersonating me on other forums, it's not my problem. End of story.

What is a problem is when good topics are locked because of spam like that link.

XYZ wrote:

Chickenhawk wrote:

XYZ wrote:

Mo'ron posted a link to another forum, pretending that I've been there, and you continued the charade for many posts after I asked you not to. You chose to continue the lie and spam the topic.

http://clubhouse54.com/forums/profile.p … &u=424

If someone is impersonating me on other forums, it's not my problem. End of story.

What is a problem is when good topics are locked because of spam like that link.

Jesus H smurfing Christ On a Stick.
Nobody is impersonating you.
Nobody would want to.

XYZ wrote:

Chickenhawk wrote:

XYZ wrote:

Mo'ron posted a link to another forum, pretending that I've been there, and you continued the charade for many posts after I asked you not to. You chose to continue the lie and spam the topic.

http://clubhouse54.com/forums/profile.p … &u=424

If someone is impersonating me on other forums, it's not my problem. End of story.

What is a problem is when good topics are locked because of spam like that link.

I saw the startings of a flame war; not a spammed link.

_Nik

KingFred wrote:

GreenAlge wrote:

XYZ wrote:

The topic was doing just fine. Why don't you read it?

Of the last 21 posts or so; only 6 related to the topic.

_Nik

No. The actual topic was about how a health web page was deleted due to pressure from a certain group. The rest was about defining hate speech and why a particular poster, who admitted not knowing anything about the religious group, supported their viewpoints. Nothing to do with the original topic.

There was quite a lot discussed that was relevant to the original topic, including debate directly about the Family Research Council.

GreenAlge wrote:

XYZ wrote:

Chickenhawk wrote:

http://clubhouse54.com/forums/profile.p … &u=424

If someone is impersonating me on other forums, it's not my problem. End of story.

What is a problem is when good topics are locked because of spam like that link.

I saw the startings of a flame war; not a spammed link.

_Nik

In fact. . . that link was only posted once.

_Nik

At the heart of this is the fact that posters shouldn't be allowed to post personal attacks about me, particularly false assessments of my character, refuse to back them up with quoted statements from me from this forum, and get topics locked with such spam.

The Forum Rules should apply to posters to target me and my topics.

Farmerkev wrote:

XYZ wrote:

Farmerkev wrote:

No you stupid ignorant excuse for a human being.
You asked for proof and he provided it.
NOBODY SAID YOU POST THERE.

I asked for statements from me that justify the attacks on my character that Resedit and Mo'ron made.

No you lying little turd, you asked for proof that other gays here have disowned you.
It was provided.

I did not ask for "proof that other gays have disowned me". As for your name-calling, it doesn't help.

XYZ wrote:

At the heart of this is the fact that posters shouldn't be allowed to post personal attacks about me, particularly false assessments of my character, refuse to back them up with quoted statements from me from this forum, and get topics locked with such spam.

The Forum Rules should apply to posters to target me and my topics.

Posters should be allowed to treat you in the exact same manner you treat them.
You want respect, show it.

Tell ya what, XYZ. . . I will freely admit that there is a forum-wide conspiracy involving mods and members (even myself) to constantly attack your character and lock your posts. . . if you can give me a good reason why it just happens to be you who is at the center of said conspiracy.

_Nik

Farmerkev wrote:

XYZ wrote:

At the heart of this is the fact that posters shouldn't be allowed to post personal attacks about me, particularly false assessments of my character, refuse to back them up with quoted statements from me from this forum, and get topics locked with such spam.

The Forum Rules should apply to posters to target me and my topics.

Posters should be allowed to treat you in the exact same manner you treat them.
You want respect, show it.

Post an example of my behavior in that topic that wasn't acceptable.

ad hominems abound.

You dismiss posters as heterophobic without addressing the contents of their posts.  Hell, you've dismissed gays as heterophobic, which I think should be considered both ludicrous and a personal attack.

You're gay but you think hetero sex is superior!

*laughs*