Forums | MacLife

I asked for people to post statements from me made in this forum that support ResEdit and Mo'ron's character assassination attempts. I did not ask anything related to "gays disowning me".

I have a dinner to go to now. Do not post that I've abandoned the topic because I'm a bad person. I will return to it when I get back.

Great.  And now we'll be locked.

Last edited by Tria (2006-03-16 4:43 pm)

Tut tut, kev. You're gonna get a PM from the mods. As much as one may think such things, it's not OK to say it out loud. Even if it's true.

See, XYZ, that's why the link to CH54 was posted. That isn't allowed here, but it is in CH54 and that's where people, gay and straight, will profess their utter dislike for your arrogant style. Can't do it here. At least not as freely and openly.

You asked for proof, it was given. That isn't "spamming".

And nobody said you ever posted there. To claim that they did would be idiotic. And a lie. And stupid. And beyond ridiculous.

Tria wrote:

ad hominems abound.

You dismiss posters as heterophobic without addressing the contents of their posts.  Hell, you've dismissed gays as heterophobic, which I think should be considered both ludicrous and a personal attack.

You're gay but you think hetero sex is superior!

*laughs*

Heterophobic?? He's called me homophobic.

Farmerkev wrote:

KingFred wrote:

Tut tut, kev. You're gonna get a PM from the mods. As much as one may think such things, it's not OK to say it out loud. Even if it's true.

See, XYZ, that's why the link to CH54 was posted. That isn't allowed here, but it is in CH54 and that's where people, gay and straight, will profess their utter dislike for your arrogant style. Can't do it here. At least not as freely and openly.

You asked for proof, it was given. That isn't "spamming".

And nobody said you ever posted there. To claim that they did would be idiotic. And a lie. And stupid. And beyond ridiculous.

It would be my first.
Oh my, to lose my virginity after all these years.

Just ask the mod to be gentle and all will be well...  But remember, after your first time, you might decide you like it, and keep coming back for more. 

Evelyn, A Modified Dog

Last edited by Tallgeese (2006-03-16 5:12 pm)

Freakout Jackson wrote:

Dear XYZ,
As much as I tend to agree with you on most breeders treatment of homosexuals and your views on politics in general,
I find it impossible to ever post in your defence because you're just such an arrogant ass.
Get the smurf over yourself. It's really too late for you to salvage any kind of respect from the members of this forum, the damage is done.
If you really need to post here anymore I suggest:
A- medication: You're seriously unbalanced with a major persecution complex along with a good bit of paranoia. Do this under the supervision of a therapist of course.
B- A new alternick: once your head's on straight, try getting a fresh start. Get a new IP, email address and identity.
If you're not willing to do these things just go away, it's not working out for anyone and I really worry about what it's doing to you.
Good Luck
Freakout Jackson

I too am a breeder who is pro gay rights, and I cannot stand your posting style.


Tone it down, plz.
thx.

XYZ wrote:

I asked for people to post statements from me made in this forum that support ResEdit and Mo'ron's character assassination attempts. I did not ask anything related to "gays disowning me".

Tallgeese wrote:

XYZ wrote:

mo' ron wrote:

haha, you're using XYZ as an example? Some of the gays here on this board have even disowned XYZ in certain situations. He's the worst possible person to hold up as a "general" example of a gay rights activist.

Proof please.

For what it's worth, "here on this board" is a prepositional phrase (adjectival) modifies "gays" not "have disowned XYZ" which is modified by the prepositional phrase (adverbial) "in certain situations."

I almost forgot to throw in the best part!

bedstuy wrote:

XYZ wrote:

I did not ask anything related to "gays disowning me".

But we have, Blanche, we have.  Ellen was asking me just the other day to have your toaster taken back.  She's very, very upset with you.

We use a toaster often at work to dry glassware.  My boss is too cheap to buy a laboratory quality one.

XYZ wrote:

At the heart of this is the fact that posters shouldn't be allowed to post personal attacks about me, particularly false assessments of my character, refuse to back them up with quoted statements from me from this forum, and get topics locked with such spam.

The Forum Rules should apply to posters to target me and my topics.

Sorry, just saw this gem.

It is NOT a false assessment that even other gays find your style as shriekishly ridiculous as the claptrap from fundy groups like the FRC. It is NOT a false assessment that gays on this board (who also post on CH54) don't like you. It is NOT a false assessment that you are NOT to be taken as a "general example of gay activists".

It is incredibly stupid to demand that such evidence, when you request proof (see the QUOTED text of this request by you above),  be limited to quotes from "THIS" thread and "THIS" forum. You have posted in other threads, in case you don't recall , and over a LOOONG period of time. You've pissed MANY people off, people who would otherwise be quite supportive of some of your views. But your style and attitude are irritating as all hell TO THOSE WHO WOULD OTHERWISE BE ON YOUR SIDE. And that goes equally for gay and straight people. Your penchant for calling almost anyone who you don't agree with "homophobe" is well known, to the point you've even called other gays "homophobic".

It is absurd to then claim, several times over, that the provided proof somehow transmorgrified into a claim that you posted in CH54. Pure fantasy. And pretty dumb to boot, since anyone who frequents CH54 knows you do not post there. To everyone's relief, I'd imagine. But the REPEATED accusation that this was the case is ludicrous in the extreme. Are you unaware that people can read and see for themselves this was not the case?? Gaddam, what a dumb move.

It is also stupid beyond belief to repeatedly claim this is "spam". It is neither spam in the general internet sense of UBE nor is it spam in the specific definition on this forum. And it isn't Spam, the Hormel brand of spice ham product. Your insistence on calling it such shows a clear disregard for plain ol' english usage.

It is also outrageously egotistical to think that people do this to "your" topics to get them closed.

Last edited by KingFred (2006-03-16 5:37 pm)

isn't it against the rules to make a thread about any members, including mods/admin?