Forums | MacLife
You are not logged in.
#1 2006-04-05 8:16 am
- kvoll
- Member
- From: Dallas, TX, USA
- Registered: 2001-06-18
- Posts: 108
Windows on a Mac for Real (Boot Camp)
Wow!!!! You can download a patch that allows windows to run on mac hardware right now. And it was released by APPLE, they really seem to be making strides trying to sell more hardware. I don't think I would ever run it, but if it sells more hardware the stock will definitely go up.
http://www.apple.com/macosx/bootcamp/
Kevin
Last edited by kvoll (2006-04-05 8:18 am)
Offline
#2 2006-04-05 8:31 am
Re: Windows on a Mac for Real (Boot Camp)
um, not much to say, but that is legit. Now, which one of you Intel Mac users have a copy of windows lying around?
My Tuna spits in your general direction
Offline
#3 2006-04-05 8:41 am
- Fracai
- Evacipate

- From: St. Elsewhere
- Registered: 2000-05-25
- Posts: 2835
Re: Windows on a Mac for Real (Boot Camp)
There are a few things that are particularly impressive to me.
1) The installer repartitions the hard drive without erasing everything first. Granted this has been around for a while in 3rd party software, but I don't think Apple has ever directly supported it.
2) It'll be part of Leopard.
Offline
#5 2006-04-05 8:44 am
Re: Windows on a Mac for Real (Boot Camp)
he got 13 (more like 14) thuosand dollars for doing something that Apple just did here. At least he finished before Apple released this. How is he pissed exactly?
Last edited by Digital (2006-04-05 8:48 am)
My Tuna spits in your general direction
Offline
#6 2006-04-05 8:46 am
- Zetetic Apparatchik
- Member

- Registered: 2001-01-07
- Posts: 8250
Re: Windows on a Mac for Real (Boot Camp)
smurfing amazing. Also:
Apple wrote:
Word to the Wise
Windows running on a Mac is like Windows running on a PC. That means it’ll be subject to the same attacks that plague the Windows world. So be sure to keep it updated with the latest Microsoft Windows security fixes.
I hope that live partition resizing gets rolled into Disk Utility soonish.
Last edited by Zetetic Apparatchik (2006-04-05 8:47 am)
Join the MAF AudioScrobbler group.
Protest ist, wenn ich sage, das und das paßt mir nicht. Widerstand ist, wenn ich dafür sorge, daß das, was mir nicht paßt, nicht länger geschieht.
Offline
#7 2006-04-05 8:47 am
Re: Windows on a Mac for Real (Boot Camp)
Digital wrote:
he got 13 (more like 14) thuosand dollars for doing something that Apple just did here. At least he finished before Apple released this.
No, not they guy who got paid. The guy who payed the guy to make the "hack." Guy.
Abortions for some, miniature American flags for others.
Don't Steal - The government hates competition
Offline
#8 2006-04-05 8:48 am
- Zetetic Apparatchik
- Member

- Registered: 2001-01-07
- Posts: 8250
Re: Windows on a Mac for Real (Boot Camp)
That was a large number of people. Biggest donations were ~$1000, I think.
In the Setup Guide, Apple wrote:
In order to partition your startup disk and install Windows XP using Boot Camp Assistant, your startup disk must be a single partition, formatted as a Mac OS X Extended (Journaled) volume. If you have already partitioned your startup disk using Disk Utility or some other utility, you cannot use Boot Camp Assistant until you restore your startup disk to a single-partition Mac OS X volume.
I also hope they get live resizing working properly soonish. 
Last edited by Zetetic Apparatchik (2006-04-05 8:50 am)
Join the MAF AudioScrobbler group.
Protest ist, wenn ich sage, das und das paßt mir nicht. Widerstand ist, wenn ich dafür sorge, daß das, was mir nicht paßt, nicht länger geschieht.
Offline
#9 2006-04-05 8:51 am
Re: Windows on a Mac for Real (Boot Camp)
Zander wrote:
Digital wrote:
he got 13 (more like 14) thuosand dollars for doing something that Apple just did here. At least he finished before Apple released this.
No, not they guy who got paid. The guy who payed the guy to make the "hack." Guy.
its nearly 7 am and I had four hours of sleep, no wonder I missed that. Anywho, time for school
My Tuna spits in your general direction
Offline
#10 2006-04-05 8:59 am
- Fracai
- Evacipate

- From: St. Elsewhere
- Registered: 2000-05-25
- Posts: 2835
Re: Windows on a Mac for Real (Boot Camp)
http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=303572
These tidbits from the FAQ are interesting:
FAQ wrote:
While booted into Windows XP, I still hear sound coming from the built-in speaker even with headphones plugged in.
The Boot Camp Beta audio driver for Windows XP does not currently support rerouting sound.
I remember seeing some questions about routing sound to the headphones and the speakers a bit back. Seems it's not a hardware switch in the headphone jack that does the switching.
FAQ wrote:
Why do there appear to be more display resolutions available in Windows XP than in Mac OS X?
Mac OS X may limit the number of resolutions it shows to only those that it recommends.
Tsk, tsk Apple. You shouldn't cap our resolutions. I wonder if this just corresponds to actual recommendations and OS X doesn't actually hide resolutions.
The MacBook Pro FAQ is incorrectly linked to the Mac Mini FAQ. The correct address is http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=303575
Finally, the page indicates "For the technically minded, Boot Camp makes a Macintosh look like a BIOS-based PC to Windows." I wonder if this is based on Amit Singhs work on BAMBIOS http://www.osxbook.com/book/bonus/misc/legacyboot/
Offline
#11 2006-04-05 9:06 am
- Zetetic Apparatchik
- Member

- Registered: 2001-01-07
- Posts: 8250
Re: Windows on a Mac for Real (Boot Camp)
BAMBIOS is one possibility or the 'latest firmware updates' might have just added the CSM to the EFI.
One major problem for this to be really useful (i.e. not just for games) still exists ; read-write drivers for NTFS for Mac OS X and/or read-write drivers for HFS+ for Windows.
Heh heh. The BBC really do lap up Apple.
Last edited by Zetetic Apparatchik (2006-04-05 9:12 am)
Join the MAF AudioScrobbler group.
Protest ist, wenn ich sage, das und das paßt mir nicht. Widerstand ist, wenn ich dafür sorge, daß das, was mir nicht paßt, nicht länger geschieht.
Offline
#12 2006-04-05 9:23 am
- SpacemanSpiff
- Stupendous Man

- From: Transmogrifier
- Registered: 2001-07-31
- Posts: 5536
Re: Windows on a Mac for Real (Boot Camp)
But I am still wondering: Why aren't people trying to go the other way? Tiger on a BIOS Box?
"The first time one sees natural beauty which is privately owned; oceans as people's back yards, confounds the senses. I didn't know God had a a toy store for the rich." -- Spanglish
Where forums are fun again: macstack
Offline
#13 2006-04-05 9:27 am
- reece_james
- TheLAD

- From: Wollongong, Australia.
- Registered: 2001-12-01
- Posts: 3790
- Website
Re: Windows on a Mac for Real (Boot Camp)
Yep, X-over driver would be good.
Planing on having a LAN in the dorms this Session, can't wait to see what everyone says when I'm playing CS (and winning) on a Mac!
Reece [/IMHO]
"All posts on the internet are postfixed by an invisible 'IMHO'", tito
Intel iMac CD 1.83Ghz, 2GB RAM, 17" + 20", 1160GB HD, 10.5.2.
MacBook CD 1.83Ghz, 2GB RAM, 60GB HD, 10.5.2.
Offline
#14 2006-04-05 9:31 am
- MacBoy4139
- BHA

- From: Big Hair Anonymous
- Registered: 2000-10-31
- Posts: 10911
Re: Windows on a Mac for Real (Boot Camp)
SpacemanSpiff wrote:
But I am still wondering: Why aren't people trying to go the other way? Tiger on a BIOS Box?
They are, have, and will continue to do so. They've been doing this since before the Intel Macs came around.
Dive in the Pool!
I'm still trying to figure out if you're a girl posing as Macboy4139, or a boy posing as a girl, and a bit confused sexually. <shrug> laughinol
Offline
#15 2006-04-05 9:33 am
- Macskeeball
- Member

- Registered: 2002-02-07
- Posts: 8014
- Website
Re: Windows on a Mac for Real (Boot Camp)
SpacemanSpiff wrote:
But I am still wondering: Why aren't people trying to go the other way? Tiger on a BIOS Box?
They have, and they already succeeded. Old news.
As for Boot Camp, I am genuinely afraid for the survival of the Mac platform now. Apple itself providing a solution for this really adds credence to the argument that 3rd parties might see no reason to make or continue to make a Mac version. I've got a very bad feeling about this, and I didn't agree with those people until now. Time will tell, i guess, but I wish Apple would have continued to take a more neutral position (ie. not stopping it, but not supporting it either).
Last edited by Macskeeball (2006-04-05 9:49 am)
tech writer for hire
Offline
#16 2006-04-05 9:35 am
- reece_james
- TheLAD

- From: Wollongong, Australia.
- Registered: 2001-12-01
- Posts: 3790
- Website
Re: Windows on a Mac for Real (Boot Camp)
SpacemanSpiff wrote:
But I am still wondering: Why aren't people trying to go the other way? Tiger on a BIOS Box?
Cause, that really is ILLEGAL!
(Starts phoning mates for a SP 2 CD...)
Reece [/IMHO]
"All posts on the internet are postfixed by an invisible 'IMHO'", tito
Intel iMac CD 1.83Ghz, 2GB RAM, 17" + 20", 1160GB HD, 10.5.2.
MacBook CD 1.83Ghz, 2GB RAM, 60GB HD, 10.5.2.
Offline
#17 2006-04-05 9:38 am
- MacBoy4139
- BHA

- From: Big Hair Anonymous
- Registered: 2000-10-31
- Posts: 10911
Re: Windows on a Mac for Real (Boot Camp)
Macskeeball wrote:
SpacemanSpiff wrote:
But I am still wondering: Why aren't people trying to go the other way? Tiger on a BIOS Box?
They have, and they already succeeded. Old news.
As for Boot Camp, I am genuinely afraid for the survival of the Mac platform now. Apple themself providing a solution for this really adds credence to the argument that 3rd parties might see no reason to make or continue to make a Mac version. I've got a very bad feeling about this, and I didn't agree with those people until now. Time will tell, i guess, but I wishh Apple would have continued to take a more neutral position (ie. not stopping it, but not supporting it either).
It will be a feature of the next version of the Mac OS. So in order to gain this functionality, you have to buy OS X.
Nice move, Apple!
Dive in the Pool!
I'm still trying to figure out if you're a girl posing as Macboy4139, or a boy posing as a girl, and a bit confused sexually. <shrug> laughinol
Offline
#18 2006-04-05 9:42 am
- Zetetic Apparatchik
- Member

- Registered: 2001-01-07
- Posts: 8250
Re: Windows on a Mac for Real (Boot Camp)
I suspect what MSB meant is that over time, fewer and fewer large developers will see the point of developing for Mac OS X when they can just develop for Windows on Macs. I disagree, personally. I do, however, think that the Mac game porting industry is nearly completely smurfed.
Last edited by Zetetic Apparatchik (2006-04-05 9:43 am)
Join the MAF AudioScrobbler group.
Protest ist, wenn ich sage, das und das paßt mir nicht. Widerstand ist, wenn ich dafür sorge, daß das, was mir nicht paßt, nicht länger geschieht.
Offline
#19 2006-04-05 9:43 am
- reece_james
- TheLAD

- From: Wollongong, Australia.
- Registered: 2001-12-01
- Posts: 3790
- Website
Re: Windows on a Mac for Real (Boot Camp)
Macskeeball wrote:
SpacemanSpiff wrote:
But I am still wondering: Why aren't people trying to go the other way? Tiger on a BIOS Box?
They have, and they already succeeded. Old news.
As for Boot Camp, I am genuinely afraid for the survival of the Mac platform now. Apple themself providing a solution for this really adds credence to the argument that 3rd parties might see no reason to make or continue to make a Mac version. I've got a very bad feeling about this, and I didn't agree with those people until now. Time will tell, i guess, but I wishh Apple would have continued to take a more neutral position (ie. not stopping it, but not supporting it either).
Well not with any version since the developer ones...
Also I know that feeling. It could be a very bad decision, up there with the Cube and Pippin! However, I think (and hope) developers will see this as a sign such that Apple is just supporting a Legacy OS not that they are breaking into the Windows market. (It certainly is worded that way on the BootCamp site.)
Either way, any good developer knows OS X is where the party's as. Vista is dead, Linux is making great strides but isn't there yet, Solaris, well, who knows. (I realise it is a very good enterprise OS, just not one for the average personal computer.)
Reece [/IMHO]
"All posts on the internet are postfixed by an invisible 'IMHO'", tito
Intel iMac CD 1.83Ghz, 2GB RAM, 17" + 20", 1160GB HD, 10.5.2.
MacBook CD 1.83Ghz, 2GB RAM, 60GB HD, 10.5.2.
Offline
#20 2006-04-05 9:43 am
- test
- Member
- From: Collingwood, Ont., CANADA
- Registered: 2002-12-13
- Posts: 5300
Re: Windows on a Mac for Real (Boot Camp)
Too bad the partitioning dingus almost certainly will never work on PPC Macs; I assume it requires the new partition system introduced with the Intel Macs. I hope I'm wrong but I'm not holding my breath.
Patience is a virtue of the weak for it makes them stand still long enough for the strong to crush them with ease.
Offline
#21 2006-04-05 9:45 am
- MacBoy4139
- BHA

- From: Big Hair Anonymous
- Registered: 2000-10-31
- Posts: 10911
Re: Windows on a Mac for Real (Boot Camp)
I share the same concern. It is a very valid concern. I just also see that if people want to do this, they have to buy OS X, so more copies of OS X go out, so the user base technically increases.
On top of it all, I can't see everyone doing this. I personally don't have a real need, and I wouldn't want to sacrifice the HD space. Other users I'm sure don't want to switch from Windows to have the same problems (viruses, spyware, etc.) - why else would they be switching?
Then there are others who don't handle using 2 different UIs very well. It happens more than most would think.
Plus you also have to reboot to take advantage of Windows, so it can be seen as a "hassle" to a lot of people - look at the number of people who don't want to ruin their "uptime."
I don't see it as the end, I just see it as another reason to buy a Mac and a helpful tool for switchers who complain "I have to buy all new software."
Dive in the Pool!
I'm still trying to figure out if you're a girl posing as Macboy4139, or a boy posing as a girl, and a bit confused sexually. <shrug> laughinol
Offline
#22 2006-04-05 9:47 am
- Tommy_700
- Member
- From: Antwerp
- Registered: 2000-11-23
- Posts: 578
Re: Windows on a Mac for Real (Boot Camp)
I agree; I'm worried too! I love OS X and I don't want it to go! please...!!!
JAMA*... only this one is from Belgium.
*aka JAMA = 'Just Another MacAddict'
Offline
#23 2006-04-05 9:49 am
- SpacemanSpiff
- Stupendous Man

- From: Transmogrifier
- Registered: 2001-07-31
- Posts: 5536
Re: Windows on a Mac for Real (Boot Camp)
Blinding Flash of the Obvious: Apple is a hardware company. Yes, yes they have some software titles but for the most part they make their money when they sell a machine.
Looks like they will sell a few more machines now.
"The first time one sees natural beauty which is privately owned; oceans as people's back yards, confounds the senses. I didn't know God had a a toy store for the rich." -- Spanglish
Where forums are fun again: macstack
Offline
#24 2006-04-05 9:49 am
- Fracai
- Evacipate

- From: St. Elsewhere
- Registered: 2000-05-25
- Posts: 2835
Re: Windows on a Mac for Real (Boot Camp)
MacBoy4139 wrote:
Macskeeball wrote:
As for Boot Camp, I am genuinely afraid for the survival of the Mac platform now. Apple themself providing a solution for this really adds credence to the argument that 3rd parties might see no reason to make or continue to make a Mac version. I've got a very bad feeling about this, and I didn't agree with those people until now. Time will tell, i guess, but I wishh Apple would have continued to take a more neutral position (ie. not stopping it, but not supporting it either).
It will be a feature of the next version of the Mac OS. So in order to gain this functionality, you have to buy OS X.
Nice move, Apple!
Enh, that's not the issue. Apple is a hardware company so they'd have to get much larger market share to stop caring about OS X. And ironically, a Mac is not the hardware, it's the software. Hence, Apple cares about tieing the OS to the hardware.
This isn't a blow to OS X because the Mac experience isn't about the flashy Apple on the case, it's about the OS X experience. If anything this is insanely great for the Mac. The Mac Mini was all about switching the curious Windows user over to the Mac platform. Boot Camp continues this. It's like saying why buy a dedicated Windows machine when you can get both in one system. And who's going to spend most of their time in Windows on a Boot Camped machine anyway?
Some developers might think they don't need Mac native apps because you can always boot into Windows, but no one will want to reboot for one critical app.
I see this driving more users to the Mac.
It's funny though, I first saw the link to BC on digg. One of the more interesting comments was someone that wanted to use BC to install Windows and then uninstall OS X. The logic there is confounding.
Offline
#25 2006-04-05 9:51 am
- Zetetic Apparatchik
- Member

- Registered: 2001-01-07
- Posts: 8250
Re: Windows on a Mac for Real (Boot Camp)
test wrote:
Too bad the partitioning dingus almost certainly will never work on PPC Macs.
There's always 3rd party solutions.
Sure, they'll definitely be a temporary increase in sales. What happens after that is less clear. Certain industries in Mac software will suffer very badly ; I don't see a reason for buying another game port, ever again. I'd love to run games under Mac OS X. However the majority of ports aren't Mac applications beyond the fact that they run in OS X (Cmd-Q = Quit. Cmd-S = Save. Cmd-W/H = Disappear!) and don't work 'as properly' as the PC version (I'm currently trying to make a Mac distrobution of Cold War Crisis mod for Generals:Zero Hour and the mod support for ZH is smurf).
If Apple becomes purely a hardware company – that's a great OS we just lost decent development for. Hell, even if OS X was open-sourced, that's any UI cohesiveness (yeah, it's not always perfect now) or design intelligence gone down the drain.
Last edited by Zetetic Apparatchik (2006-04-05 9:55 am)
Join the MAF AudioScrobbler group.
Protest ist, wenn ich sage, das und das paßt mir nicht. Widerstand ist, wenn ich dafür sorge, daß das, was mir nicht paßt, nicht länger geschieht.
Offline

