Forums | MacLife

blank kludge wrote:

resedit wrote:

I would not be surprised if it was brought down by USAF - I don't think it was brought down by USAF though.

But if it was - I can understand why it was; though if that was the case, then as horrible as it sounds, we should have been told.

Jeebus

Ya don't need a weatherman to tell which way the wind blows.
Don't follow leaders
Watch yer parking meters
The pumps don't work cuz the vandals took the handles.

??

Oh. Then I must be misinformed:

http://www.flight93crash.com/
----
http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=42112
"The official story has been that passengers on the United Airlines flight rushed the hijackers in an effort to prevent them from crashing the plane into a strategic target – possibly the U.S. Capitol.

During his surprise Christmas Eve trip to Iraq, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld referred to the flight being shot down – long a suspicion because of the danger the flight posed to Washington landmarks and population centers. "
--------
Leak? More like a magic fountain ya can't see. But you can hear the splashing water.

Next stop: Pentagon and plane debris. Double or Nothin'.
-------------
PS --> I do believe none of four sets of black boxes has been admitted recovered. U/93 included. Pentagon. Highly rare and unusual, imho.

Last edited by blank kludge (2006-05-07 8:24 pm)

resedit wrote:

blank kludge wrote:

resedit wrote:

I would not be surprised if it was brought down by USAF - I don't think it was brought down by USAF though.

But if it was - I can understand why it was; though if that was the case, then as horrible as it sounds, we should have been told.

Jeebus

Ya don't need a weatherman to tell which way the wind blows.
Don't follow leaders
Watch yer parking meters
The pumps don't work cuz the vandals took the handles.

??

Bob Dylan lyrics.

I simply have no desire to see that movie.

blank kludge wrote:

Made by that major defense contractor GE. That makes me go hhhmmmm.

No, it was distributed by Universal, a movie company.

. . . which has a parent company. . . . which is. . .


General Electric.

There's something about one of the nation's largest defense contractors, which benefits from the whole "war on terrrrrrr" thing making a film about 9/11. . . that would be called propaganda.

The REAL genius is the number of people who will pay to be subject to it. We learned that one from Goebbels and co.

. . . any other bits of obvious recent history you want to conveniently ignore?

Cyberpawz wrote:

Tallgeese wrote:

Why, what are you talking about?

Sorry, I have this thing where I'm unable to remember the past.

Any credibility you had with me is now long gone... thank you for playing and thank you for proving my point, you are a pompous ass who is more willing to take pot shots at people, and make fun of them in general than to actually maintain a topic.

If there was a way to ignore people on this forum, you'd be the first on a very short list of one.

How come my smurfing post against NokXious gets mod-edited,
but this bullsmurf is allowed to fly? If I have to wear the nicey nice
gloves, then - gahdammit - everyone should have to, as well.
  \

From your link:

"With Greengrass available, U execs began trying to get the next "Bourne" entry up and running. Greengrass, however, had another idea: "United 93.""

So how on earth do you get from greengrass wanting to make this film, to it being a giant GE conspiracy to do something sinister?

A butterflies wings flapped, a tsunami was created.

I bet they had a big special-effects budget for the shot when the missle hits the plane.

hee hee

Believing its possible that flight 93 was shot down is a totally different story from beleiving the Pentagon was hit by a misslie or that the WTC attack was a cover to steal gold.

There, another baseless rumor spread.