<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.maclife.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
 <title>Mac|Life Lawsuit RSS Feed</title>
 <link>http://www.maclife.com/tags/Lawsuit</link>
 <description>used for category lists, takes arguments</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>AT&amp;T Sues Verizon Over &quot;Maps&quot; Commercial</title>
 <link>http://www.maclife.com/article/news/att_sues_verizon_over_maps_commercial</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;object classid=&quot;clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000&quot; codebase=&quot;http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0&quot; width=&quot;380&quot; height=&quot;307&quot;&gt;&lt;param name=&quot;width&quot; value=&quot;380&quot; /&gt;&lt;param name=&quot;height&quot; value=&quot;307&quot; /&gt;&lt;param name=&quot;allowscriptaccess&quot; value=&quot;always&quot; /&gt;&lt;param name=&quot;allowfullscreen&quot; value=&quot;true&quot; /&gt;&lt;param name=&quot;src&quot; value=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/v/37NKnDRPFKU&amp;amp;rel=0&amp;amp;color1=0xb1b1b1&amp;amp;color2=0xcfcfcf&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;feature=player_embedded&amp;amp;fs=1&quot; /&gt;&lt;embed type=&quot;application/x-shockwave-flash&quot; width=&quot;380&quot; height=&quot;307&quot; allowscriptaccess=&quot;always&quot; allowfullscreen=&quot;true&quot; src=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/v/37NKnDRPFKU&amp;amp;rel=0&amp;amp;color1=0xb1b1b1&amp;amp;color2=0xcfcfcf&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;feature=player_embedded&amp;amp;fs=1&quot;&gt;&lt;/embed&gt;&lt;/object&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;AT&amp;amp;T sues Verizon over a commercial designed to play on
Apple&#039;s &amp;quot;There&#039;s an app for that&amp;quot; commercials. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Verizon&#039;s &amp;quot;There&#039;s a map for that&amp;quot; commercial (above) might have stepped on some feet when they bashed AT&amp;amp;T&#039;s 3G service saying that other companies don&#039;t have the service Verizon has and that &amp;quot;There&#039;s a map for that, too.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;According to the suit, which was filed in an Atlanta, Georgia federal court on Tuesday, &amp;quot;&lt;em&gt;The map attributed to AT&amp;amp;T shows large swaths of white or blank
space, as if these are areas in which AT&amp;amp;T has no coverage
whatsoever.&lt;/em&gt;&amp;quot; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The suit goes on to say, &amp;quot;&lt;em&gt;By depicting AT&amp;amp;T&#039;s non-&amp;quot;3G&amp;quot; coverage
as white or blank space in the map used in Verizon&#039;s print
advertisement, consumers are being misled into believing that
AT&amp;amp;T&#039;s customers have no coverage whatsoever and thus cannot use
their wireless devices when they are outside of AT&amp;amp;T&#039;s depicted
coverage area.&lt;/em&gt;&amp;quot; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.reuters.com/article/technology-media-telco-SP/idUSN0351092120091103&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Reuters&lt;/a&gt; got a reply from Verizon saying, &amp;quot;&lt;em&gt;The ads in question clearly state that voice and data services are available outside 3G areas.&lt;/em&gt;&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;AT&amp;amp;T has requested a temporary restraining order that could prevent the television commercial from airing until this dispute is resolved. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Via &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/09/11/03/att_brings_lawsuit_against_verizon_over_map_ad_campaign.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;AppleInsider&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.maclife.com/article/news/att_sues_verizon_over_maps_commercial#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.maclife.com/taxonomy/term/24">News</category>
 <category domain="http://www.maclife.com/taxonomy/term/3168">3g</category>
 <category domain="http://www.maclife.com/taxonomy/term/188">apple</category>
 <category domain="http://www.maclife.com/taxonomy/term/332">AT&amp;amp;T</category>
 <category domain="http://www.maclife.com/taxonomy/term/3326">cell</category>
 <category domain="http://www.maclife.com/taxonomy/term/4007">cellular</category>
 <category domain="http://www.maclife.com/taxonomy/term/255">iPhone</category>
 <category domain="http://www.maclife.com/taxonomy/term/334">Lawsuit</category>
 <category domain="http://www.maclife.com/taxonomy/term/173">phone</category>
 <category domain="http://www.maclife.com/taxonomy/term/3760">Service</category>
 <category domain="http://www.maclife.com/taxonomy/term/3001">verizon</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 11:24:55 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Cory Bohon</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">5204 at http://www.maclife.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Apple will &#039;Vigorously&#039; Defend Itself in Nokia Lawsuit</title>
 <link>http://www.maclife.com/article/news/apple_will_vigorously_defend_itself_nokia_lawsuit</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;img class=&quot;graphic-right&quot; src=&quot;/files/u124583/apple_logo_silver.jpg&quot; /&gt;In Apple&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://phx.corporate-ir.net/External.File?item=UGFyZW50SUQ9MTg1OTB8Q2hpbGRJRD0tMXxUeXBlPTM=&amp;amp;t=1&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;10-K annual report&lt;/a&gt; filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission that was posted yesterday, it notes that Apple plans to &amp;quot;Vigorously&amp;quot; defend itself from a lawsuit filed last week by Nokia. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Nokia is claiming infringement of different cellular and Wi-Fi patents by Apple&#039;s iPhone. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&amp;quot;&lt;em&gt;The complaint alleges that these patents are essential to one or more of the GSM, UMTS and 802.11 wireless communications standards, and that the Company has the right to license these patents from plaintiff on fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory (&amp;quot;FRAND&amp;quot;) terms and conditions. Plaintiff seeks unspecified FRAND compensation and other relief. The Company&#039;s response to the complaint is not yet due. The Company intends to defend the case vigorously.&amp;quot;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In Nokia&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nokia.com/press/press-releases/showpressrelease?newsid=1349562&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;press release&lt;/a&gt; announcing the lawsuit, they noted that about 40 other companies, including &amp;quot;virtually all the leading mobile device vendors,&amp;quot; had licensed the intellectual property, but Apple had refused to agree to the terms for licensing. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.maclife.com/article/news/apple_will_vigorously_defend_itself_nokia_lawsuit#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.maclife.com/taxonomy/term/24">News</category>
 <category domain="http://www.maclife.com/taxonomy/term/325">Apple Inc.</category>
 <category domain="http://www.maclife.com/taxonomy/term/3952">GSM</category>
 <category domain="http://www.maclife.com/taxonomy/term/3951">intellectual property</category>
 <category domain="http://www.maclife.com/taxonomy/term/255">iPhone</category>
 <category domain="http://www.maclife.com/taxonomy/term/334">Lawsuit</category>
 <category domain="http://www.maclife.com/taxonomy/term/3535">nokia</category>
 <category domain="http://www.maclife.com/taxonomy/term/330">Wi-Fi</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 15:38:48 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Andrew Villa</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">5164 at http://www.maclife.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Psystar Enjoys Being Sued, Releases Software to Install OS X on any PC</title>
 <link>http://www.maclife.com/article/news/psystar_enjoys_being_sued_releases_software_install_os_x_any_pc</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;img class=&quot;graphic-right&quot; height=&quot;75&quot; src=&quot;/files/u32/1022_psystar_75.jpg&quot; width=&quot;162&quot; /&gt;Psystar has begun selling &lt;a href=&quot;http://store.psystar.com/rebel-efi-preview.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Rebel EFI&lt;/a&gt; software on their site. The software allows users to install OS X on any old Intel-based PC for the low price of $50. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Well not any old Intel. You&#039;ll need a Core 2Duo, Core 2 Quad, i7 or Xeon Nehalem to run Snow Leopard. The software reportedly works with Windows 7. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Of course you could just save your money and check out the &lt;a href=&quot;http://wiki.osx86project.org/wiki/index.php/Main_Page&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;OSx86 project&lt;/a&gt; for free information on how to accomplish the same thing without dipping into your wallet. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Via &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.loopinsight.com/2009/10/22/psystar-releases-software-to-install-mac-os-x-on-regular-pcs/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;The Loop&lt;/a&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.maclife.com/article/news/psystar_enjoys_being_sued_releases_software_install_os_x_any_pc#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.maclife.com/taxonomy/term/24">News</category>
 <category domain="http://www.maclife.com/taxonomy/term/334">Lawsuit</category>
 <category domain="http://www.maclife.com/taxonomy/term/3920">OSx86</category>
 <category domain="http://www.maclife.com/taxonomy/term/441">psystar</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 16:18:05 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Roberto Baldwin</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">5136 at http://www.maclife.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Nokia vs. Apple - Sour Grapes Lawsuit?</title>
 <link>http://www.maclife.com/article/news/nokia_vs_apple_sour_grapes_lawsuit</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;img height=&quot;141&quot; src=&quot;/files/u32/1022_nokia_380.jpg&quot; width=&quot;380&quot; /&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The worlds largest mobile phone maker is taking on Apple and its magical iPhone. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Nokia filed a lawsuit against Apple claiming that the company infringed upon Nokia patents. Ten patents named in the suit include wireless data, speech coding, security and encryption. Nokia contends that Apple was given the opportunity to license the technology but Apple, “refused to compensate Nokia.”&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Nokia is seeking royalties on sales of all three iPhone models. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.maclife.com/article/news/nokia_vs_apple_sour_grapes_lawsuit#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.maclife.com/taxonomy/term/24">News</category>
 <category domain="http://www.maclife.com/taxonomy/term/188">apple</category>
 <category domain="http://www.maclife.com/taxonomy/term/255">iPhone</category>
 <category domain="http://www.maclife.com/taxonomy/term/334">Lawsuit</category>
 <category domain="http://www.maclife.com/taxonomy/term/3535">nokia</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 11:43:43 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Roberto Baldwin</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">5131 at http://www.maclife.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Patent Holder That Won Against Microsoft Now Targets Apple</title>
 <link>http://www.maclife.com/article/news/patent_holder_won_against_microsoft_now_targets_apple</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;img class=&quot;graphic-right&quot; height=&quot;75&quot; src=&quot;/files/u175020/eolas_logo_body.gif&quot; width=&quot;117&quot; /&gt;Apple and 22 other companies are now the target of a new patent infringement suit over the use of browser-embedded interactive Web content. Previous patent suits on behalf of Eolas have gone favorably for the company. In 2004, Eolas was granted $565 million from litigation against Microsoft over a patent. The latest suit alleges that Apple and other companies are in violation of patents 5,838,906 and 7,599, 985. Both involve embedded Web applications. The suit was filed Wednesday in a U.S. District Court in the Eastern District of Texas.&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;The suit states that Apple&#039;s official website uses QuickTime and Safari to enable the viewing of interactive content. It also alleges that Apple&#039;s hardware that runs the previously stated software is in violation of the patents as well. &amp;quot;Intellectual property is the lifeblood of the U.S. economy,&amp;quot; said Dr. Michael D. Doyle, chairman of Eolas. &amp;quot;The primary reason for this has been the success of the U.S. patent system in allowing the innovative company in a field to develop and market its new inventions without having competitors unfairly profit from the innovator&#039;s hard work.”&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;The company stated that its patents relate to interactive, browser-embedded applications. The patent that ends in 906 was granted in 1998 and the other was issued this month. It covers the use of embedded applications through the use of browser plug-ins and AJAX.&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The list of defendants, in its entirety, is as follows: Adobe, Amazon, Apple, Argosy Publishing, Blockbuster, CDW Corporation, Citigroup, Ebay, Frito-Lay, GoDaddy, Google, J.C. Penney, JP Morgan Chase &amp;amp; Co., New Frontier Media, Office Depot, Perot Systems Corp., Playboy, Rent-A-Center, Staples, Sun Microsystems, Texas Instruments, Yahoo and YouTube.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.maclife.com/article/news/patent_holder_won_against_microsoft_now_targets_apple#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.maclife.com/taxonomy/term/24">News</category>
 <category domain="http://www.maclife.com/taxonomy/term/188">apple</category>
 <category domain="http://www.maclife.com/taxonomy/term/82">Apple Software</category>
 <category domain="http://www.maclife.com/taxonomy/term/3829">Eolas</category>
 <category domain="http://www.maclife.com/taxonomy/term/334">Lawsuit</category>
 <category domain="http://www.maclife.com/taxonomy/term/383">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.maclife.com/taxonomy/term/359">Patent</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 15:52:42 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Liam Widman</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">5052 at http://www.maclife.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Apple, Eminem To Settle Out of Court</title>
 <link>http://www.maclife.com/article/news/apple_eminem_settle_out_court</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;img align=&quot;right&quot; height=&quot;145&quot; src=&quot;/files/u12635/iTunes9_0_1_large.jpg&quot; width=&quot;150&quot; /&gt;Eminem&#039;s record label, Eight Mile Style, decided to sue Apple over a royalty dispute, but now
both parties will settle outside the courtroom, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/09/10/02/eminem_music_publisher_apple_settle_out_of_court.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;AppleInsider&lt;/a&gt; reports. Last week an agreement was reached between the two. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;During the first day of the trial, however, Apple gave out an interesting bit of information: Aftermath records (the company that controls Eminems songs) gets $0.70 per download and Eight Mile Style gets 9.1-cents. Assuming no other royalties, Apple would get 19.9 cents on a 99-cent download. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In Eight Mile Style&#039;s filing, they claimed they were owed $2.5 million by Apple, of which nearly half was for the single &amp;quot;Lose Yourself.&amp;quot; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.maclife.com/article/news/apple_eminem_settle_out_court#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.maclife.com/taxonomy/term/24">News</category>
 <category domain="http://www.maclife.com/taxonomy/term/3822">Aftermath Records</category>
 <category domain="http://www.maclife.com/taxonomy/term/325">Apple Inc.</category>
 <category domain="http://www.maclife.com/taxonomy/term/3821">Court</category>
 <category domain="http://www.maclife.com/taxonomy/term/3820">Eminem</category>
 <category domain="http://www.maclife.com/taxonomy/term/334">Lawsuit</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 17:38:56 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Cory Bohon</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">5044 at http://www.maclife.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Apple v. Psystar Gets Ugly, Apple Asks For Key Evidence</title>
 <link>http://www.maclife.com/article/news/apple_v_psystar_gets_ugly_apple_asks_key_evidence</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;img align=&quot;right&quot; alt=&quot;Psystar v Apple Battle over Bootloader&quot; height=&quot;234&quot; src=&quot;/files/u12635/Psystar_v_Apple_Bootloader_Battle.jpg&quot; width=&quot;200&quot; /&gt;New court documents tell us that Apple is looking to get key evidence
from the clone rival &lt;a href=&quot;http://psystar.com/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Psystar&lt;/a&gt;, but the bootloader is no where to be
found. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.macnn.com/articles/09/08/17/psystar.destroying.proof/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;MacNN&lt;/a&gt; reports that Psystar has removed the infringing portions of the bootloader software that was distributed to the clone customers. Psystar was legally required to preserve the original bootloader. (Oops!)  &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Apple started the lawsuit last year alleging that Psystar infringed upon the &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DMCA&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;DMCA&lt;/a&gt; (Digital Millennium Copyright Act) by changing code to allow Mac OS X Leopard to run on Psystar PCs. While it remains to be seen, the Psystar could be in hot water over the destruction of evidence. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Psystar is claiming that Apple infringed copyright law and blocked competition by not allowing Mac OS X to be installed on other computers like Linux and Windows can.  &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.maclife.com/article/news/apple_v_psystar_gets_ugly_apple_asks_key_evidence#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.maclife.com/taxonomy/term/24">News</category>
 <category domain="http://www.maclife.com/taxonomy/term/188">apple</category>
 <category domain="http://www.maclife.com/taxonomy/term/3565">Bootloader</category>
 <category domain="http://www.maclife.com/taxonomy/term/334">Lawsuit</category>
 <category domain="http://www.maclife.com/taxonomy/term/441">psystar</category>
 <category domain="http://www.maclife.com/taxonomy/term/3564">Suit</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 18:38:59 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Cory Bohon</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">4736 at http://www.maclife.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Podcast #99: iPhone on Verizon and App Store Wackiness</title>
 <link>http://www.maclife.com/article/podcast_99_iphone_verizon_and_app_store_wackiness</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt=&quot;podcast&quot; class=&quot;graphic-right&quot; height=&quot;219&quot; src=&quot;/sites/future.p2technology.com/files/imce-images2/podcast_220.jpg&quot; width=&quot;220&quot; /&gt;The staff discuss the ongoing rumors about ongoing discussions between Apple and Verizon. Who wants a CDMA iPhone and who&#039;ll stick with AT&amp;amp;T for better or worse? &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Apple, once again, irks developers with its App Store shenanigans and the best lawsuit ever. Turns out your iPod is in cahoots with the Italian Mafia and has a very low opinion of you. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Got a question, but you&#039;re afraid to leave a voice message because of
Witness Relocation Dept. rules? Drop us a question via Twitter &lt;a href=&quot;http://twitter.com/maclife&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;twitter.com/maclife&lt;/a&gt;.   &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This week&#039;s &lt;strong&gt;Battlestar Applactica&lt;/strong&gt; picks:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewSoftware?id=307727765&amp;amp;mt=8&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Doodle Jump - $.99&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewSoftware?id=306220440&amp;amp;mt=8&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewSoftware?id=295646461&amp;amp;mt=8&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The Weather Channel - Free&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Don&#039;t forget, the &lt;em&gt;Mac&lt;/em&gt;|&lt;em&gt;Life&lt;/em&gt; staff would love to hear your thoughts, comments and ideas for the new podcast. Just leave a message on the &lt;em&gt;Mac&lt;/em&gt;|&lt;em&gt;Live&lt;/em&gt;
question/comment line: (877) 404-1337, extension 622. Please limit the
length of your messages to 1 minute max. We&#039;ll review these calls each
week and feature our favorites, along with responses, on that week&#039;s
podcast.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;To subscribe to the &lt;em&gt;Mac&lt;/em&gt;|&lt;em&gt;Live&lt;/em&gt; podcast series through an RSS feed, click &lt;a href=&quot;http://feeds2.feedburner.com/maclife/audio/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;; if you want to subscribe through the iTunes Store, click &lt;a href=&quot;http://phobos.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewPodcast?id=252335711&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.maclife.com/article/podcast_99_iphone_verizon_and_app_store_wackiness#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.maclife.com/taxonomy/term/247">App Store</category>
 <category domain="http://www.maclife.com/taxonomy/term/332">AT&amp;amp;T</category>
 <category domain="http://www.maclife.com/taxonomy/term/255">iPhone</category>
 <category domain="http://www.maclife.com/taxonomy/term/334">Lawsuit</category>
 <category domain="http://www.maclife.com/taxonomy/term/20">Mac|Live Podcast</category>
 <category domain="http://www.maclife.com/taxonomy/term/3001">verizon</category>
 <enclosure url="http://dl.maclife.com/MacLive_Podcast_No.99.mp3" length="27793246" type="audio/mpeg" />
 <atom:link type="audio/mpeg" href="http://dl.maclife.com/MacLive_Podcast_No.99.mp3" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" />
 <itunes:author>Mac|Life Staff</itunes:author>
 <itunes:subtitle>iPhone on Verizon and App Store Wackiness</itunes:subtitle>
 <itunes:summary>The staff discuss the ongoing rumors about ongoing discussions between
Apple and Verizon. Who wants a CDMA iPhone and who&#039;ll stick with
AT&amp;amp;T for better or worse? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Apple, once again, irks developers with its App Store shenanigans and
the best lawsuit ever. Turns out your iPod is in cahoots with the
Italian Mafia and has a very low opinion of you.</itunes:summary>
 <itunes:keywords>Verizon, AT&amp;amp;T, iphone, app store, maclife, mac|Life, </itunes:keywords>
 <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
 <itunes:duration>00:28:55</itunes:duration>
 <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 18:18:25 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Mac|Life Staff</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">4575 at http://www.maclife.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
